Some of the headlines from conservative news outlets today were concerning. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said she would not bring a court-packing bill to the House floor, at which point we saw strange headlines from right-leaning sites. One said she “…Breaks with Nadler…” by not pushing forward. Another claimed she “…Nukes Nadler’s Court-Packing Bill.” One of my least favorites claimed she “…Puts Kibosh On Democrat Court Packing Plan.” The worst so far said “Americans Breathe Sigh of Relief…” following her statement.
All of these headlines comes from sites that I like a lot. But on this issue, all of them are wrong.
The misunderstanding came from her quick response to the question of bringing the court-packing bill to the House floor. Her answer was simply, “No.” She later noted, “I have no plans to bring it to the floor.”
This is not a time to breathe a sigh of relief given what we know about Pelosi. Lest we forget, she was adamant against impeachment until she wasn’t. She has built her career on taking the “tough” path with her leadership by supposedly going against the wishes of many in her caucus, but invariably she pushes forward with the plans. This is her standard operating procedure. It’s a clever political move that allows her to explain to the American people why she supposedly changed her mind.
If she were to support this or any move up front, it declaws her future plea to the American people. By saying she’s opposed to it now, she will get much more attention when she “reverses” her position later, and people will want to know why. The answer has been and always will be the same. She will claim reluctance to such a big move, whether it’s impeachment or court-packing or whatever unpopular stance is on the table. Then, she “reverses” and makes a big spectacle about new information or changing circumstances that prompted her change of heart.
She telegraphed this move during the press conference today. Here are some of her quotes as reported by the NY Post:
“I support the president’s commission to study a such a proposal,” she continued, going on to say that she and her members were focused on President Biden’s infrastructure package and not the federal judiciary.
“I don’t know that that’s a good idea or bad idea. I think it’s an idea that to be considered. And I think the president’s taking the right approach to, to have a commission to study such a thing,” the top-ranking House Democrat said, calling Biden’s move itself “a big step.”
“It’s not out of the question, it has been done before,” she went on to say, noting that “the history of our country a long time ago, and the growth of our country, the size of our country, the growth of our challenges in terms of the economy, etc. might necessitate such a thing.”
These are not the words of a person who is against a particular bill. They’re the words of someone who has spent a lifetime manipulating Congress, mainstream media, and the people. She knows the easiest way to sell something to the widest range of people is by supposedly reversing her decision and being given a platform to explain why she’s doing it.
The timing isn’t right. Democrats need the filibuster out of the way before they can engage in truly significant radical legislation. Right now, they’re plotting to bring forth some form of legislation that’s popular enough to convince the people—not to mention Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema—that they need to bust the filibuster in order to save the nation. That could be gun control if they can get enough mass shootings in the news at the same time. It could be the infrastructure bill if they choose not to push it through reconciliation. It could be something we’re not seeing yet.
Once they remove the filibuster, they’ll push the voter-fraud bill known as H.R. 1. They’ll push other major pieces of legislation that couldn’t get around the filibuster. And then, they’ll push the court-packing bill.
Pelosi is not truly opposed to court-packing. She’s simply biding her time for the proper moment to “reverse” her decision and get it passed. She is conniving, but she’s running off her old playbook. We see exactly what she’s doing.
‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us
Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.
For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip.
It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth.
The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled.
There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies.
During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology.
We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.