Connect with us

Democrats

Open borders in America requires two steps. AOC just called for the first.

Published

on

Open borders in America requires two steps AOC just called for the first

Democrats have a tendency to say things that insinuate what they mean instead of coming right out and saying it. Okay, so politicians on both sides of the aisle do this regularly, but Democrats are worse. And who’s the worst of the Democrats? The New Democrats, also known as “The Crew,” also known as the Radical Progressives, also known as the pawns of the Justice Democrats. They’re the worst of the bunch because they do not come out and proclaim their end goals. Not yet, at least.

I can demonstrate this with the Green New Deal, Medicare-for-All, and the socialistic policy proposals they’re pushing, but all of those are geared towards the financial collapse of America. There’s another category that I’ll focus on today, a category that is closer to being fulfilled than full-blown socialism and their economic endgame of Modern Monetary Theory. That’s something they don’t expect to achieve in an election or two, but the other goal CAN be achieved more quickly if they continue the trends they’ve commandeered.

The other category is the cultural destruction of America, and it’s happening before our eyes. The New Democrats’ short-term goal to achieve complete cultural destruction is an open borders society. Before I demonstrate how this is clearly the case, it’s important to note that I am not a xenophobe or a hyper-nationalist. I love America and I believe America is made stronger through properly vetted legal immigrants. It’s easy for me to acknowledge this because I am a legal immigrant who has fully assimilated to American life. I speak English, have read and understand both the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, and I can name off the top of my head at least 35 presidents without cheating.

I believe in legal immigration, which is why I am so adamantly opposed to illegal immigration.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the Justice Democrats puppet who is the figurehead of the New Democrats. She and her cronies – Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley – have been attacking the conditions at migrant detention facilities while simultaneously voting against funding them to improve conditions. It seems like a contradiction until we understand what they’ve really been saying with their actions. It’s not about conditions needing to be improved. It’s about migrant detention centers being removed altogether. They want migrants to be able to enter freely and to roam the interior uninhibited by risks of detention or deportation.

For the first time, AOC readily acknowledged this today:

I feel bad about going low on my retort to her statement, but the point was made. By saying she does not believe people who have harmed anyone should be detained, what she’s saying is anyone who comes over illegally who has not committed a crime (other than crossing the border illegally, of course) should be free to do whatever they want. No detention. No questions. No requirement for them to be vetted, checked for communicable diseases, or anything else that would hamper them from being labeled simply as “immigrants.”

It’s part of the shifting language the Democrats in general and the New Democrats in particular have been pushing. They do not want a separation between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants. This is why they refer to illegal aliens simply as “immigrants.” They are jamming the media platforms the American people ingest news from with talking points that say anyone entering the country is an “immigrant” regardless of how they get here. On the same platforms, they are calling anyone who opposes them a racist.

And we’re letting them. Perhaps I’m not. Perhaps you’re not. But in general conservatives have been remiss in defending the language used in regards to immigration properly. We should be getting absolutely and unambiguously offended any time a progressive politician or leftist media figure says it’s racist to demand illegal immigrants must be screened and detained. We should be crying foul any time deportations are categorized as anything other than enforcement of a just and necessary set of laws. Despite campaign rhetoric from 2016, President Trump is not calling for the deportation of all illegal immigrants. He’s instructing ICE to enforce removal orders. That’s their job. The people they would be removing have been adjudicated and found to have overstayed the generosity bestowed on them by our nation for whatever reason. Maybe they committed crimes. Maybe they didn’t appear at their asylum hearing.

When American citizens break the law and are caught, we can’t simply not go to our court hearing and pretend like nothing happened. But that’s exactly what AOC and “The Crew” want law enforcement to do in regards to illegal immigrants. That’s why they want ICE and CBP abolished. This is an attack on America’s culture, and millions of Democrats who otherwise wouldn’t support such notions are screaming side-by-side with the New Democrats because they don’t fully understand the implications of their actions.

Erasing the separation between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants is one part of the Justice Democrats’ open borders plan. The other part is also happening at the state level and will soon be introduced more openly at the national level. Once they can get the word “immigrant” to mean anyone who enters the country regardless of whether or not they broke the law doing so, their next step is to blur the lines between “immigrants” and “citizens.” They want equal rights for everyone. “Immigrants” should be allowed to drive legally, they’ll say. “Immigrants” should qualify for all benefits as everyone else, they’ll say.

“Immigrants” should be allowed to vote, they’ll say.

Remember, their view of “immigrants” is the combination of legal immigrants and illegal aliens. Once they achieve their goal of getting anyone entering the country to be classified the same way, they’ll start referring to everyone as “Americans.” They’ll say, “Immigrants are Americans, too,” regardless of the circumstances in which they entered the country. Legal immigrants like me are Americans. Illegal aliens who stole our sovereignty and bypassed our legal immigration system are not Americans. We must hold the line on this talking point or all is lost.

The New Democrats will not rest until there’s nothing illegal about being an illegal immigrant and there’s nothing that separates American citizens from all of the so-called “immigrants.”

The writing is on the wall, folks. Some of you have seen it. The New Democrats aren’t hiding their agenda. They’re just delivering it piecemeal. It’s time to wake up and see their endgames for what they are: The destruction of America.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Advertisement

0

Conservatism

5 reasons Trump’s conservative detractors need to rethink their stance

Published

on

5 reasons Trumps conservative detractors need to rethink their stance

President Trump makes mistakes. All presidents do. All humans do. He also has many policies that have done what he said would happen. They’re making America great again. I wasn’t one who bought into the slogan before, but I’ve come around. I’ve seen what has happened over the last three years. More importantly, I have a clear vision of what would happen if he is not reelected.

There are a few things that must be established before I get into the meat and potatoes of this article. The first is understanding the difference between “critics” and “detractors.” Many, perhaps most, who support President Trump do so without question. It doesn’t matter what he says or does. They love it. I am a “critic” of the President’s. When he does well, I praise. When he does poorly, I criticize. I spoke out profusely about the administration’s bump stock ban. I pleaded for months against replacing free trade with fair trade with several articles before acknowledging after the tariffs were in place that if we’re going to have a trade war, we need to go all the way. No half-measures. The fastest path to free trade is by crushing China into economic submission. These and other issues define me as a Trump critic while still allowing me to support him unabashedly.

Detractors are against the President wholly. Those conservatives who have turned from criticism to insult are detractors. And in the nature of detractors, they are taking away from the President’s ability to win. Perhaps a better way of putting it is they are actively increasing the chances of Democratic Socialists taking control in Washington DC. They’ll justify their actions by saying things like, “Trump’s just as bad” or “If he can’t take criticism he shouldn’t be in the White House.” But what they’re really saying is they hate the President so much they’d rather America be transformed piece by piece into a socialist state.

Honest criticism is righteous and necessary to keep the President and the GOP heading in the right direction. Detracting from their abilities to lead and win in 2020 is de facto support for the opposition, which is the Democrats. There is ZERO chance any of the primary challengers now or in the future can do anything other than harm the President’s chances of victory. We can do advanced political calculus all we want and try to goad the President into debating Bill Weld, Joe Walsh, John Kasich, Justin Amash, or whoever else wants to challenge him, but it’s disingenuous to try to disguise this as anything other than an attempt to embarrass the President. Competition internally will not make the Republican Party stronger in this case. We had our chance to put someone else in the Oval Office during the 2016 primaries and we lost. Now, we must be proper defenders of the Constitution against the machinations of he radical progressives trying to take it down.

I was “NeverTrump” for a while, especially during and after the 2016 primaries. I was so against him and most of the GOP that I started a new political party. Over time I learned a few things, which I will detail below.

As a final point before diving into the topic at hand, it should be noted that our efforts to launch the American Conservative Movement hinge on support for President Trump and conservatives within the GOP. If there are opportunities to replace RINOs with Constitutional conservatives, we must seize on them. The protections against detractors given to President Trump within this movement do not apply to RINOs on Capitol Hill or in state offices around the country because we actually can make a difference there. We can support strong Constitutional conservatives to replace RINOs without fear of contradiction to the cause because the source of the movement is adherence to proper policies, not bowing to the party itself. And a movement that would exclude Trump supporters would’t be much of a movement at all.

In short, it behooves conservatives across America to support the President and conservatives in other offices as we push forward towards 2020. Many have grown indignant and disenchanted with the party and/or its leader, but there are five important reasons why these people need to suck it up and focus on doing what’s best for America.

The binary choice

It’s important to start with this one, not because it’s the most pressing reason but because two important points must be made regarding this. I’m not a fan of binary choices, which is why I tried to start a new political party. But until such a time comes when we aren’t forced to pick between Democrats and Republicans, those will be the only two valid cards we’re dealt.

There’s another component of binary choice that must be understood, one I eluded to before. Many of President Trump’s conservative detractors say we can get someone better to run as a Republican for president. They say that this “someone” has a very small chance of defeating President Trump. When they say this, they’re wrong. Any Republican who runs against President Trump has absolutely zero chance of defeating him. Striving for better in the face of futility is not honorable, not when the damage done is beneficial to the opposition.

But it’s bigger than just the Oval Office. Without massive support for President Trump, the down-ballot races will fall like flies hitting a bug zapper. Turnout is everything in presidential elections, and I can say with a high degree of certainty that Democratic turnout in 2020 will break records. If Republican turnout doesn’t do the same, we’re not just going to lose the White House. We’re going to lose the Senate. We’ll lose governors and mayors. The House of Representatives will return to the pre-1994 days when Democrats controlled it for decades.

The economy

Unemployment is at an all-time low, particularly for African- and Hispanic-Americans.

Wages are finally rising after nearly two decades of stagnation and fiscal mismanagement kept wage growth slowed compared to cost of living.

The dollar is strong. Wall Street is flourishing. Prosperity is on the rise.

Whether you attribute these positives to President Obama, Congress, or President Trump, you do so without knowing for sure because nobody can honestly and definitively give proper credit when it comes to the economy. That’s the nature of economics and why there’s still plenty of debate over what works and what does not. But the easiest attribution can be given to the 2018 tax cuts, and both President Trump and the GOP-controlled Congress delivered on them.

The last thing we need is a Democratic Congress and president reversing the tax cuts and potentially doing great harm to the economy.

The Supreme Court

When the 2020 election takes place, there will be three Justices in their 60s, two in their 70s, and two in their 80s. The next two presidential terms could realistically expect to control the nominations of 2-4 or more Supreme Court Justice seats.

Imagine if Hillary Clinton won in 2016. Instead of two decent Justices in Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, we would have a very left-leaning Supreme Court that is pro-abortion, anti-gun, and pro-authoritarian rule.

This is the omnipresent argument about the presidency and the Senate. Every presidential election makes this the great equalizer when someone we don’t necessarily like represents our party for the presidency.

The border

Despite unhinged Democrats, activist judges, and feckless GOP leadership during the two years they had total control of Capitol Hill with a Republican in the Oval Office, the administration has still made the most strides to protect the border than any administration in history. Supporters often invoke “best in history” when referring to President Trump’s various policies, but this is one that is actually backed up by demonstrable actions.

The border crisis was inevitable. We should have seen it coming five years ago. We definitely should have seen it coming before the midterm elections. But we didn’t. Now, we’re stuck fighting the migrant surge with both arms tied behind our backs. But the President is doing everything he can to stop it. He listened to bad advice from the aforementioned feckless Republican leaders on Capitol Hill, but we can assume that won’t happen again. And hopefully, if the GOP regains control of both chambers, they learned their lesson as well.

We’ll make sure they do if they haven’t already.

Without the President’s stance on the border issue, we will have open borders. This is as inevitable as the border crisis was. This point alone should be enough to scare detractors into rethinking their stance, but I have one more, just in case…

The existential threat

I am sick of hearing from so-called conservatives that President Trump is no better than the Democrats running for office. It takes a heavy degree of willful ignorance to not recognize the difference between President Trump’s faults and the existential threats knocking on the White House’s door. The best-case scenario for healthcare under a Democratic president and Congress is a public option and massive expansion of Obamacare, which itself will bankrupt this nation. The various iterations of Medicare-for-All would set this country on an unavoidable collision course with Modern Monetary Theory, the destruction of the dollar, and an economic collapse that would make 2008 seem like a minor fractional correction.

Gun control will be enacted, and I’m not talking about universal background checks or red flag gun laws. The gun control the Democrats will enact will essentially suspend the 2nd Amendment.

Then, there’s the abortion issue. If there’s one thing that disturbs me the most about “conservatives” or “Christians” who oppose President Trump and/or the GOP, it’s this issue. We’ve seen what happens when Democrats are in control of states. Abortion isn’t just available. It’s promoted. There are laws passing now that allow babies born after failed abortions to be left to die. Every “conservative” or “Christian” who works to prevent the President and the GOP from winning in 2020 is pro-abortion in their actions even if their rhetoric pretends to say otherwise.

Self-righteous attacks on the President in light of what has been accomplished and more importantly based on what will be lost if the Democrats take control is not an expression of one’s conscience. It’s selfish and will work towards the unraveling of this nation as we know it.

America is heading in the right direction. President Trump is far from perfect. Everybody is. But “conservatives” who work against him in today’s political scenario are working towards the destruction of America through Democratic control.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

Leftists want gun confiscation, but it’s fear mongering to say leftists want gun confiscation

Published

on

By

Leftists want gun confiscation but its fear mongering to say leftists want gun confiscation

Our list of leftists demanding gun confiscation and a video of leftists denying they want gun confiscation.

Leftist love to lie and deny that they are demanding gun confiscation while they incessantly demand gun confiscation. The list at the bottom of this story from last September will make it plainly obvious to everyone that they want gun confiscation while they blatantly lie about it.

The problem for the liberty grabber leftists is that everyone is noticing that they are not only making outright demands for gun confiscation, they also want the stepping-stones to this or even worse, gun confiscation SWATing [a.k.a. ERPO or ‘red flag’ laws] without due process.

Even the Associated Press has noticed that their making these demand while lying about making these demands has landed them in a bit of a quandary. In a masterful demonstration of headline prevarication, the mere addition of a question mark has changed what was an emphatic [complete with profanity] demand for gun confiscation to a wishy-washy debating point. Here is the headline in all it’s glory:

Coming for your AR-15? O’Rourke scrambles Dems’ gun message

Note the use of a question mark in connection to Robert Francis O’Rourke profane demand for outright gun confiscation [Edited for content]: “yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47”.

It’s also quite fascinating when the storied press organization perpetrates outright propaganda with this little paragraph:

The Democrats have long contended their support of gun control laws does not mean they want to take away law-abiding citizens’ firearms. But on Friday, they struggled to square that message with their presidential contender’s full-throated call on national TV for confiscating assault rifles.

It’s almost as if they want to quell the calls for outright gun confiscation in order pass the precursors to their final solution to the liberty problem.

Leftist talk about gun confiscation as fear mongering while leftists talk about gun confiscation

Meanwhile, according to Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) while they are making demands for the stepping-stones to gun confiscation – ‘universal’ background checks, gun confiscation SWATing laws – and outright gun confiscation. It’s ‘fear-mongering’ to mention that they want gun confiscation.

As reported in the Daily Wire:

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) revealed on Friday that while he supports the federal government seizing certain firearms from American citizens, opponents who portray the program as gun confiscation are using fear to paint a narrative.

“You have to set up a system that is mandatory, you have to set up a system to pull them off, but this idea, this imagery that the fear-mongers and demagogues try to say of somehow armed police officers showing up and confiscating weapons – that’s the fear-mongering,”

Beto blows lid off ‘no one wants to take your guns’

The Washington Free Beacon has a wonderful compilation of clips of liberty grabber leftists solemnly promising that “nobody wants to take your guns away”

Our list of leftists demanding gun confiscation.

Coincidentally, while all of those leftists made those ever so solemn promises, that ‘no one is talking gun confiscation’ we have this list of leftists talking gun confiscation [from September 2018]

May 2018

Esquire: Okay, Now I Actually Do Want To Take Your Guns

Ban assault weapons, buy them back, go after resisters: Ex-prosecutor in Congress

April 2018

Observer: Is It Time to Repeal the Second Amendment?

Vox: Why an assault weapons ban can’t address America’s gun problem

Miami Herald Repeal the Second Amendment — it’s not a crazy idea

Emma González [March for our Lives]: Removing the assault and semi-automatic weapons from our Civilian society, instituting thorough background checks and mandatory waiting periods (and raising the buying age and banning the production of high-capacity magazines) are the ways to stop shootings in America.

March 2018

Paste Magazine: Repeal the Second Amendment, Idiots

USA Today: Repealing the Second Amendment isn’t easy but it’s what March for Our Lives students need

New York Times – John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment

The Charlotte News: Ban military-style assault weapons for the sake of our children

Vox: What no politician wants to admit about gun control “taking a huge number of guns away from a huge number of gun owners”

NAACP President OPINION: Gun Safety Is about Freedom [Australian style gun confiscation – making gun owners an offer they can’t refuse ]

February 2018

Maine Voices: It’s time for a gun abolition movement
We need to stand up to the NRA and push for what is so desperately needed: a complete ban on firearms.

Mercury News – Eugene Robinson
Robinson: Arming teachers is absurd — ban military-style assault rifles

PSMag: Repeal the Second Amendment Already

The Star: Want to end gun violence Mr. President? Get rid of guns

La Times: No one becomes a mass shooter without a mass-shooting gun

It’s Too Late. You’ve Lost Your Guns.

Democrat and Chronicle: Let’s repeal the Second Amendment

New York Times -To Repeat: Repeal the Second Amendment

November 2017

Splinter news: BAN GUNS

Redhawks Online: Guns must go

Boston Globe: Hand over your weapons

News-Press – USA Today Editorial Board: Renew ban on military-style assault weapons

October 2017

Dan Pfeiffer: What to Bring to the Gun Fight [national gun registry, Tracking and limiting purchases of ammunition and a national gun buyback program]

Eugene Robinson: Gun control should include buyback program like Australia’s

Washington Post: President Trump, end this ‘American carnage’.
[Members of The Washington Post Editorial Board]

The Week: Ban guns

New York Times: The Cancer in the Constitution

New Boston Post-Connecticut Professor: Repeal the Second Amendment

The New York Times: Repeal the Second Amendment

Plan A Magazine: Ban Guns. Amend the Constitution.

(CNN) Sachs: Ban semiautomatic assault weapons and save lives

Forget about ‘gun control,’ let’s repeal the Second Amendment

Prospect magazine: Dear America: it’s time to grow up and ban guns

August 2017

Mike the gun guy [A Magazine With News and Notes From Both Sides About Guns.]
What Guns To Be Safe? Get Rid Of The Guns.

December 2016

Huffington Post: Domestic Disarmament, Not ‘Gun Control’

June 2016

Rolling Stone: Why It’s Time to Repeal the Second Amendment

Washington Post – Eugene Robinson: Assault weapons must be banned in America

January 2016

W. Kamau Bell [CNN]: I want Obama to take away your guns

Huffington post: Can’t We Just Put the Damn Guns Down?

Anderson Cooper:”Speaking only for myself, watching Obama get repeatedly accused of wanting to take people’s guns away makes me sort of wish he’d just do something to earn that accusation. May as well!”

The Daily Beast: President Obama Isn’t Taking People’s Guns—But Maybe He Should.

December 2015

New Republic: It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.

The New York Times: End the Gun Epidemic in America [First Front Page Editorial In 95 Years]
This editorial published on A1 in the Dec. 5 edition of The New York Times. It is the first time an editorial has appeared on the front page since 1920.

Salon: The Second Amendment must go: We ban lawn darts. It’s time to ban guns

November 2015

The Daily Beast: Yes, They Want to Take Your Guns Away

October 2015

Hillary Clinton: “In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program.”…..“I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level”

Vox: Becoming a gun-free society would be hard. But we should still try.

Daily Kos: Effective Gun Control – A National Semi-Auto Ban

Washington Post: A gun-free society

Baltimore Sun: Repeal the Second Amendment

Obama: “We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings. Friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours. So we know there are ways to prevent it.”

September 2015

Grieving mom of two slain sons: Get rid of the guns!

January 2015

Tallahassee Democrat – Stop the insanity: Ban guns

June 2014

Obama: A couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting similar to Columbine or Newtown. And Australia just said, well, that’s it — we’re not seeing that again. And basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws.

May 2014

La Times: You say gun control doesn’t work? Fine. Let’s ban guns altogether.

April 2013

Huffington Post: Gun Control? We Need Domestic Disarmament

February 2013

America Magazine: Repeal the Second Amendment

January 2013

New York Times: [John Howard] I Went After Guns. Obama Can, Too.

Vanity Fair – Kurt Eichenwald: Let’s Repeal the Second Amendment

December 2012

Daily Kos: How to Ban Guns: A step by step, long term process

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo: “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

Detroit Metro Times: Ban all guns, now

Opinionator – New York Times: Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough

House Dem: ‘Turn in your guns’

Huffington Post: It’s Not About the Constitution [Getting rid of the Second Amendment]

Eugene Robinson: First, Get Rid of the Guns

Economist The gun control that works: no guns

July 2012

Huffington Post: Get Rid of the Damn Guns

Mar 2012

Yes conservatives, we want to take away your guns…

February 2011

Arizona Daily Star: Reinstate ban on military-style assault weapons

April 2007

Salon: Repeal the Second Amendment

December 1993

La Times – Taming the Monster: Get Rid of the Guns : More firearms won’t make America safer–they will only accelerate and intensify the heartache and bloodshed

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

Why Republicans should hope Sanders or Warren is the Democratic nominee

Published

on

Why Republicans should hope Sanders or Warren is the Democratic nominee

For the record, I am not condoning any activities by Republicans to sway Democrats one way or the other. It’s their nomination to make. But that doesn’t mean we can’t hope for an outcome, and based on a report from… wait for it… CNN, the best candidates for President Trump to beat are Senators Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders.

Both are popular, polling 2nd and 3rd with each flip flopping from day to day with the other. One claims to be a socialist while the other acts like a socialist pretending to not be one. But they have many policy proposals in common, including one that could either of them in the general election.

As it turns out, there are plenty of people who like their health insurance. To make matters worse, there are plenty of people who also do not like the idea of losing their health insurance or being forced to accept whatever concoction the government can spew forth with Medicare-for-All.

Warren and Sanders say Americans don’t like their health insurance. Polls don’t back that up.

A new Kaiser Family Foundation poll finds that when it comes to expanding coverage and lowering health care costs 55% of Democrats and Democratic leaning independents prefer to vote for a candidate who does so by building on the Affordable Care Act. Only 40% want do so by voting for voting for a candidate who replaces the ACA with Medicare for All.

This poll is consistent with previous Kaiser polls on the subject in finding Democrats wanting to vote for someone who builds on the ACA.

This tells us two things many conservatives have known for a long time. First, it tells us Americans like choices. Second, it tells us Americans do not want to be forced onto a government program even if it’s allegedly free… or perhaps especially if it’s allegedly free.

While most polls show former VP Joe Biden would be the toughest for President Trump to beat, I’ve long suspected his gaffes and potentially deteriorating cognitive state would make him the most vulnerable. But this new data seems to say the polls are right, that Biden may be tougher than Sanders or Warren simply because his proposed Obamacare 2.0 with a public option may be the most popular proposal out there, including with moderates.

Single-payer healthcare, which eliminates all choices while taking down the quality of services provided, could be the silver bullet that takes down the two socialist werewolves. The only question is whether Democrats or President Trump will get to use it.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending