Connect with us

Democrats

Tulsi doubles down

Published

on

Tulsi doubles down

SETTING THE SCENE

Presidential candidates and other politicians cannot rely upon consensus to determine which path to take. But they do need to listen to what the people are saying.

Tulsi Gabbard is more than just a presidential candidate and a politician. There is no realistic expectation that the Democratic National Committee will rein her in for her campaign rhetoric. Likewise, there is zero possibility that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi cares what Congresswoman Gabbard says or does.

So if she were just a presidential candidate and a member of Congress, there would be no need for this concern over her extreme comments. But she is also a commissioned officer in Hawaii National Guard. That is a different matter altogether.

SEQUENCE TO FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH THE SITUATION

First, watch this latest in a nearly daily stream of videos which she is putting out:

Second, read our previous warnings:

Missed signals can lead to tragedy!

Third, read this article which focuses upon Major Tulsi Gabbard and the Uniform Code of Military Justice:

Tulsi and UCMJ

Fourth, read our recent retrospective on the threat posed by Iran:

Where were you?

Fifth, to dispel any notion that we are now just making an apologetic on behalf of Donald Trump, read this one:

Cults of personality and the U.S. presidency

WHAT YOU CAN DO

Then you will be prepared to take action and contact Major Tulsi Gabbard’s chain-of-command to demand accountability from them that she be kept in compliance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Hawaii Army National Guard Commander
Deputy Hawaii Adjutant General
Brigadier General Kenneth S. Hara

Gen Hara

Hawaii Army National Guard
Commander and Chief of Staff Offices
91-1227 Enterprise Avenue
Kapolei, HI 96707
Phone: (808) 672-1012
Fax: (808) 672-1252

Hawaii Adjutant General
Major General Arthur “Joe” Logan

Hawaii Governor
David Y. Ige

A VERY BIG “IF”

IF Major Gabbard were to be called to active duty for a conflict against Iran, her condemnation of Commander-in-Chief Donald Trump and National Security Advisor John Bolton would most definitely make her a national security risk. So would her outspoken support of Bradley Manning and Julian Assange along with her inability to comprehend the significance and consequences of compromising classified information in a war zone.

If you send her there, you better watch her like a hawk!

RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AUTHORITIES

Military echelons of command at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, U.S. Army Pacific, U S. Indo-Pacific Command, U.S. Central Command, U.S. Army Chief of Staff, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secretary of the Army, Secretary of Defense and ultimately President of the United States must take heed of the extreme bizarre rhetoric of Major Tulsi Gabbard.

Though not in her chain of command, but as target of her unfounded accusations, National Security Advisor John Bolton and White House National Security Council should also be alert to what she is saying.

Force protection and security of national secrets are of paramount importance and all necessary measures must be taken to ensure that a rogue officer does not compromise them to further her own political ambitions.

Remember, those in positions of authority and responsibility were forewarned what Major Nidal Hasan was spewing forth before he committed the Fort Hood massacre of his fellow soldiers. Nobody is suggesting that Major Tulsi Gabbard is a threat to do something of that nature.

CONSEQUENCES OF INACTION

But if nothing is done about her constant videos and other statements condemning her Commander-in-Chief and National Security Advisor in which she paints them as warmongers and portrays Iran as the victim, somebody is going to have a lot of explaining to do if she ever translates her words into actions, whatever those actions might be.

NOQ Report continues to make the clarion call for alertness and situational awareness. You won’t be able to claim you weren’t warned in advance to adequately vet Major Tulsi Gabbard.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Advertisement

0

Democrats

Dianne Feinstein’s comment on Dayton shooter skipped one important point

Published

on

Dianne Feinsteins comment on Dayton shooter skipped one important point

Gun control is the talk of the town as the week comes to a close. Well, that and Greenland. And Jeffrey Epstein. But the mass shootings two weeks ago has DC buzzing, media furiously reporting, and activists on both sides of the debate furiously Tweeting at each other. Senator Dianne Feinstein weighed in on the discussion by pointing out some important facts about the alleged Dayton shooter, Connor Betts.

Her facts are correct. Her analysis is off because it missed one important point. We’ll get to that in a minute, but let’s declare once and for all (though I’m sure I’ll have to repeat myself later) that the 2nd Amendment IS NOT ABOUT HUNTING OR HOME PROTECTION. Our right to keep and bear firearms was put into the Constitution by our founders because they recognized what could happen if the people had no recourse against an oppressive government. Just as Venezuelans didn’t realize they danger they were putting themselves into when they allowed their guns to be taken away, so too do many Americans put way too much trust in government.

The authoritarian left wants guns because they know they’ll never achieve their endgame as long as the people can defend themselves from tyranny.

Feinstein is correct that the Dayton shooter was able to cause an extreme amount of death and injury in a short period of time. Police were quick to respond, otherwise it could have been much worse. But as our EIC pointed out in a Tweet, Feinstein’s narrative is worthless when you look at it from the opposite perspective.

Gun control is not the solution to our mass shooting problem. If anything, gun control has enabled shooters to enact their crimes without fear of many “good guys with a gun” to stop them. We must never give up our 2nd Amendment rights.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

President says AOC ‘fuming’ that Tlaib, Omar are becoming the faces of the party

Published

on

President says AOC fuming that Tlaib Omar are becoming the faces of the party

President Trump took to Twitter to make fun of the opposition party as two of its most outspoken members, Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, continue making headlines and stirring up controversy. He even threw in an accusation against Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for good measure.

There are no indications that this is accurate, but that’s not the point. This isn’t hard policy or thoughtful analysis. It’s a petty jab, and while many Americans, including some of his fans, are against him taking shots at the opposition in such a manner, this is the society we live in and it includes a President who takes jabs on Twitter. You can stress over it or sit back and enjoy it. I choose the latter.

For AOC’s part, she took the jab with a chuckle.

Beyond the diversion this offers ahead of a weekend, reality is probably more closely reflected by the President’s Tweet than Democrats are comfortable admitting, at least the part about them being the face of the party. “The Squad” makes more headlines among the four of them than the rest of the Democrats combined, and this includes the powerful heads of committees who are actively investigating President Trump ahead of a possible impeachment.

Both Democrats and Republicans have different degrees of infatuation with “The Squad.” Are they a real threat to our republic, as many on both sides claim, or are they merely a diversion from real decisions being made in DC?

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

Kirsten Gillibrand wants to confiscate guns

Published

on

Kirsten Gillibrand wants to confiscate guns

Senator and failing Democratic candidate for president Kirsten Gillibrand wants to confiscate your guns. The former “conservative” when it was politically expedient to be one in upstate New York has now gone the way of most her new party. She’s a radical progressive who wants your guns.

For someone who used to have an “A” rating with the NRA, she’s come a long way to hit rock bottom by calling for “assault weapons” bans and mandatory buybacks, AKA confiscations. Oh, but she won’t actually SAY they’re mandatory buybacks. She danced around that question like a pop star.

Gun activist Colion Noir broke down a recent interview she did with CNN. It was clear, as Noir pointed out, that CNN has already weighed Gillibrand in the balance and found her wanting. They went after her to corner her on her old gun rights support and tried to get her to admit what she wants to do as president with gun confiscations.

It’s funny watching Democrats flail around trying to get attention for themselves. There are only a handful of candidates leaving a mark, and Kirsten Gillibrand isn’t one of them. But she’s still trying to do damage to the 2nd Amendment on her way out.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending