Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has next to zero chance of securing the Democratic nomination for president. She is currently polling around nil as her campaign failed to register well with women. Or men.
Under normal circumstances, I wouldn’t even consider writing about her, but something she said in Iowa this week points to a dangerous trend among Democrats that’s a much bigger problem than she is. She compared pro-life thoughts to racism. It wasn’t that she said it but how she said it that struck me. She was casually passionate about it, demonstrating a real sincerity in her stance. That’s concerning because if she so easily believes people with pro-life beliefs are similar to people with racist beliefs, what does that say about her fellow Democrats?
Does she represent them generally? Actually, yes. Even though she’s not among the leaders in the presidential race, she has been an influential voice in the Democratic Party ever since her seat was handed to her by the previous occupant, Hillary Clinton. Her stunts on social media have brought her much ridicule as she tries to make herself seem human, but this particular minute-and-a-half talking about “reproductive rights” tells a story about how the Democratic Party has shifted in their perspectives towards pro-lifers. It’s no wonder pro-life Democrats are essentially anathema today.
Here’s the clip:
“I think there’s some issues that have such moral clarity that we have as a society decided that the other side is not acceptable. Imagine saying that it’s okay to appoint a judge who’s racist or anti-Semitic or homophobic. Asking someone to appoint someone who takes away basic human rights of any group of people in America – I don’t think that those are political issues anymore,” Gillibrand said.
And therein lies the problem. If it’s not a political issue, then she’s making it a cultural and religious issue. In the video, she decries the notion of pro-lifers forcing their religious views on the rest of the nation.
As I’ve said many times, the real battles that can win the war against abortion will not happen in courtrooms or in legislation. We must fight this as a cultural battle. The reason the pro-abortion side is making strides despite science increasingly backing the pro-life perspective is because they’re doing a better job at winning the cultural debate. Many pro-lifers fail in that regard and it shows.
Kirsten Gillibrand is insignificant in the race for the nomination, but her perspectives on abortion are an important glimpse into the direction of the Democratic Party. We must fight smarter to overcome their ignorance.
We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.
[gravityform id=”2″ title=”true” description=”false”]
Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?
Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.
There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.
Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.
Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.
We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.
To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.
Thank you, and God Bless!
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC