Connect with us

Culture and Religion

Exclusive: Iconic civil rights leader tells Pastor John MacArthur to stop lying

Published

on

Exclusive Iconic Civil rights leader tells Pastor John MacArthur to stop lying

Civil Rights icon Charles Eversbrother of murdered Civil Rights activist, Medgar Evers is hoping to set the record straight, requesting that radio Bible teacher, best-selling author, seminary president, and mega-church pastor John MacArthur stop “lying” about being with Charles Evers on the night that Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated.

Testimony from Charles Evers and fellow Civil Rights icon, John Perkins – in concert with official reports from the Memphis police, the FBI, and the Congressional investigation into Dr. King’s assassination – are incongruent with Pastor MacArthur’s statements of the events of April 4, 1968, when Dr. King was shot.

Revising black history

In August 2018, shortly before the release of his widely-discussed “Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel,” Pastor MacArthur published a blog article entitled “Social Injustice and the Gospel” in which he described his alleged experience on the night Dr. King was murdered [7]:

I was again ministering in Mississippi with John Perkins and a group of black church leaders in April 1968 when Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis. One of the men leading our group was Charles Evers, head of the Mississippi NAACP. (His brother Medgar had been killed in 1963 by the KKK.) When news of Dr. King’s murder broke, we drove to Memphis—and literally within hours after Dr. King was assassinated, we were at the Lorraine Motel, standing on the balcony where he was shot. We were also shown the place where James Earl Ray stood on a toilet to fire the fatal shot.

On at least four other occasions, Pastor MacArthur has either alluded to or directly claimed to have learned of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination while in the company of John Perkins and Charles Evers, and to have traveled to Memphis with those men on that tragic night.

  • At the 2007, Desiring God Conference [8]

I was down in the South, in the office of Charles Evers–the brother of Medgar Evers–when Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated… I was in Jackson, Mississippi with some leaders and they actually put me in a car and took me to Memphis into the building where James Earl Ray shot him. I climbed up on the toilet to look through the window where he held the gun.

  • 2009, A Retrospective on 40 Years: John MacArthur with Rick Holland [9]

Well it was during those times that I was there and I will never forget, I can’t tell you the whole story, but I’ll never forget one night, I was in the middle of Jackson, Mississippi in the office of a man named Charles Evers. Charles Evers had a brother named Medgar Evers. Medgar Evers was the first martyr of the Civil Rights Movement. He was the first person killed. Charles became the first black mayor…the first black mayor in the south at Fayetteville, Mississippi. He was a friend of John’s [John Perkins], and I had come to know him. And we were sitting there and he was trying to explain to me that night in Jackson what was going on. Now remember, I was a very young guy, I had become immersed in that culture, grew to love those people. And Charles was talking and a man burst through the door and said, “Martin Luther King has been assassinated.” That happened that night while I was with Charles and John and some others.

The immediate issue was that there were serious things going on in the street in Jackson and they were trying to get me out of there because I was as pale as a ghost. And here we were worried what might happen to me. And so they escorted me. And then they said, “You know, we’re going to go to Jackson. We want to…we want to go…we’re going to Memphis, we want to see what happened.”

So they took me. And in those days the police weren’t nearly as protective, forensics hadn’t developed to what they had and they didn’t necessarily protect crime scenes. So we went to the motel, up to the landing, saw the blood where Martin Luther King had been shot just hours before by James Earl Ray. I actually went to the little building opposite the motel, went up on the second flood [sic], stood up on the toilet and looked out the window where James Earl Ray had shot him. And I was there at that very, very, very crucial time.

  • 2014, Bible Questions and Answers, Part 62 [10]

I happened to be in Jackson with all the black leaders when Martin Luther King was assassinated. I was in the room with all of them. I was the only white guy, but I was there preaching in all the black schools everywhere and living in John and Vera’s house with their family. It was so interesting because John reminded me at the table of something I’d forgotten. He said, “When Martin Luther King was killed, we had to go preach the next two days. We had to go preach in black high schools.” He said, “While the world was trying to figure out what was happening, the black kids were weeping. Every high school we went to,” he said, “the black kids were weeping because of the death of Martin Luther King.” 

  • 2017, Bible Questions and Answer, Part 66 [11]

When I was down in Mississippi years ago, I was arrested by those kinds of people for preaching the gospel in Black high schools, and I was put in jail, and they took all my money away. I know that. I was with Black leaders in Jackson, Mississippi when Charles Evers, Medgar Evers brother – Charles was the first Black mayor in the South, Charles. His brother Medgar was the first martyr of the Civil Right Movement, he was killed. I was in the room when Martin Luther King was assassinated with those Black leaders. We went to Memphis, and I stood on the blood spots on that motel with those men. And I stood in the little bathroom on top of the toilet where James Earl Ray shot him out the window. Those men were my friends. That was my community. I couldn’t buy groceries in that town when I got back in Mendenhall, Mississippi. I couldn’t eat in a restaurant.

These remarkably detailed accounts are irreconcilable with the testimonies of Charles Evers and John Perkins.


 Stop telling that lie!

In researching this article, I spoke with Mr. Evers by phone, and he summarized his relationship with John MacArthur in four words: “He don’t know me.” One of my research partners also interviewed Evers, the full recording of which is provided below.

A few poignant comments from the interview with Charles Evers, however, serve well to illuminate the drastic difference between Evers’s and MacArthur’s versions of what happened the night of King’s assassination.

To the question “Did he [Charles Evers] learn of the death of Martin Luther King, Jr. while in his NAACP office and in the company of John MacArthur and John Perkins?” Evers responded:

CarphoneI know that didn’t happen… I know when I heard about Martin I was headed to Natchez, in my car driving, and my secretary called me and told me that Dr. King had been shot. And I said, “What!” (interview at 1:54)

No, ain’t nobody with me—period—in no office. (3:47)

That’s a lie. That’s a lie. (5:22)

And did Evers travel to Memphis to visit the Lorraine Motel and the boarding house with John MacArthur and John Perkins?

He [John MacArthur] would be lying. Wasn’t nobody with me. (2:48)

I don’t know what he [John MacArthur] knows, but I know I wasn’t—that ain’t true about me… I don’t know the stuff he’s talking about. (4:50)

I did not go nowhere with John. (6:17)

In conclusion, Charles Evers firmly requested, regarding MacArthur (6:51):

Tell him to stop telling that lie.”

Evers had previously published his own account of the night of King’s death in his 1997 book Have No Fear. There, Evers wrote, “On the evening of April 4, 1968, I was driving highway 28 to Natchez,” Mississippi when Dr. King was killed [12] [13].


John Perkins’ 2018 testimony

Was John Perkins with Charles Evers and John MacArthur in Evers’ NAACP office when, as MacArthur claims, “a man burst through the door and said, ‘Martin Luther King has been assassinated,’”? [14] Although Dr. Perkins (a long-time friend of John MacArthur’s father) declined to answer on the record when contacted, he had previously offered his heartfelt account of what transpired that fateful evening [15].

On an April 2018 United We Pray podcast, host Isaac Adams asked his guest, John Perkins, “What was it like when Martin Luther King was shot? What was happening? Who were you with? Describe that for me.” Dr. Perkins responded:

And so when I got in that evening, from [preaching the Gospel in] my rural school, I was getting called on the phone, but also at the same time, when I got there, some children and another lady in the community ran out to meet me. They saw me and they said, “I just heard it on the news that Martin Luther King was dead.” (podcast at 8:40)

This detailed response notably lacks any mention of John MacArthur, Charles Evers, or the NAACP office. Further, John Perkins’ recollection that he was informed of the death of King by a woman and children from the community, starkly contrasts with MacArthur’s narrative.


A Biographers Response

To help me make sense of the unambiguously differing accounts of MacArthur, Evers, and Perkins, I reached out to John MacArthur’s biographer in search of clarity.

In John MacArthur: Servant of the Word and Flock, Iain Murray’s biography of John MacArthur, the author had referenced MacArthur’s accounts of April 4, 1968.

Below, I’ve quoted my email to Murray followed by his response.

My Email to Iain Murray

Paige Rogers

Mon 1/14/2019, 2:18 PM

info@banneroftruth.org

Happy New Year, 

My name is Paige Rogers and I write for a website in the United States called NOQ Report (NOQReport.com).

I am writing you today in regards to information published in the biographical book, “John MacArthur: Servant of the Word and Flock,” by Iain H. Murray.

According to John MacArthur: Servant of the Word and Flock, (2011):

“On the night of April 4 [1968] John was in Jackson, Mississippi, talking with a group that included John Perkins and Charles Evers, the black Mayor of Fayette, whose brother was regarded as the first martyr of the Civil Rights Movement… As they were discussing events a man burst into the room with the news ‘Martin Luther King has been assassinated.’”

However, in Charles Evers’ book, “Have No Fear,” Mr. Evers stated that he was in his vehicle, on his way to Natchez, Mississippi, when he learned that Martin Luther King had been killed. 

I spoke with Mr. Evers on Thursday, Jan. 10, 2019, by phone. He denies knowing John MacArthur, and he denies being with John MacArthur when he learned that Dr. King had been assassinated. 

Additionally, in a taped podcast interview with John Perkins in April of 2018, on the topic of King’s assassination, Perkins stated that he was informed of Martin Luther King’s murder by a group of children and a woman from his community after returning from preaching the Gospel in a rural Mississippi school.

Thus, several questions arise regarding the incongruity of these accounts.

Did Iain Murray verify the claims published in his book? If so, what corroborating evidence was found?

Was there a ghost writer involved, from which Mr. Murray received this information?

Is there any information which you can share, or a direction you can point me, so that I may verify that John MacArthur, John Perkins, and Charles Evers were together when Dr. King was killed? Any information that may assist in clearing up this current incongruity of facts is greatly appreciated.

Do you wish to ask any questions of me regarding the information presented in this email?

Do you wish to make a comment, for the record, regarding the information presented in this email?

Most sincerely,

Paige Rogers 

Iain Murray’s Response

IainHMurray@aol.com

Wed 1/16/2019, 6:54 AM

You

Dear Friend

Thank you for your letter to me via Banner Of Truth publisher’s. I had that information direct from John MacArthur in personal conversation. Sorry, that is all I know.

Iain Murray


A forensic look at the forensics

Martin Luther King, Jr. was pronounced dead by doctors at 7:05 PM [16], and according to pastor John MacArthur, he arrived at the Lorraine Motel “literally within hours after Dr. King was assassinated,” [17]. This followed a 210-mile drive to Memphis, Tennessee—a city in the midst of riots and under a mandated curfew—that he allegedly made with Charles Evers. Yet, also according to MacArthur, he and John Perkins “had to go preach the next two days. We had to go preach in black high schools” in Jackson, Mississippi [18].

According to MacArthur’s description, his was a comprehensive—arguably time-consuming—review of the key locations involved in the King shooting. Did MacArthur arrive late on the evening of April 4, 1968, tour the crime scene, and then return to Jackson in time to preach?

According to pastor John MacArthur,  he “stood on the blood spots” on the balcony of the Lorraine motel, and, after being shown “where James Earl Ray stood on a toilet to fire the fatal shot,” MacArthur claims to have “stood in the little bathroom on top of the toilet” [19] [20] [21].

Yet, police reports are clear that James Earl Ray did not fire the shot from the toilet, nor was he ever suspected of doing so.

According to the report by the Memphis Police Department, the fatal shot was fired from the bathtub in the boarding house, where shoe smears were found.

MPD Report P12

As shown in the images and diagram below, the balcony of the Lorraine Motel is not visible from the toilet. Only from the bathtub could one look to the right through the window and see the balcony of the Lorraine Motel. From the toilet, one can only look to the left.

Had John MacArthur actually stood on the toilet in the boarding house bathroom, he would have immediately noticed that he couldn’t see the balcony of the Lorraine Motel from that vantage point.

bathroom 1 bathroom 2 bathroom 3 diagram 1 diagram 2


According to pastor John MacArthur, “in those days the police weren’t nearly as protective, forensics hadn’t developed . . . and they didn’t necessarily protect crime scenes” [22].

However, the official police report explains that, “According to the transcription from the police dispatcher’s radio log at 6:10, 10 minutes after the shooting, there were 135 police officers in the immediate area, and that the complete area had been sealed off” [28].

The MPD report casts serious doubt on pastor John MacArthur’s claim that the boarding house crime scene was not protected. On the night King was shot, investigators did not finish their initial processing until after 11:00 PM, at which time guards were stationed to protect the integrity of the boarding house crime scene overnight until investigators returned to resume their investigation [30].

(Note in the accompanying image that the report is so detailed as to even include the names of the police officers involved.)

MPD Report P15

Furthermore, as noted by the U. S. Congress’ Findings on MLK Assassination, the police sealed off an entire portion of the boarding house – even from the boarding house’s own residents [29].


According to pastor John MacArthur, there was little forensics work performed on the part of law enforcement authorities. Actual police and FBI records, however, indicate otherwise.

Martin Luther King, Jr. was shot at approximately 6:00 PM [23], and at 6:09 PM, homicide officers arrived on the scene [24]. A stringent investigation ensued which the official report describes this way: “On the arrival of these officers the most intensive investigation in the history of the City of Memphis Police Department was begun” [25].

As both the Memphis Police Department’s 64-page report and the FBI’s report detail, investigators meticulously collected forensic evidence [26]. For example:

Also at this time, various agents from the FBI office in Memphis, arrived on scene, and acted as observers, and advisors… Capt. Nick Carimi of the Memphis Police Department’s Bureau of Identification processed the bathroom for fingerprints before measurements were taken in the bathroom, and no measurements were taken anywhere, in the bathroom, or in the assailant’s room, until after it had been processed completely, and even though it had been processed the measurements were taken with care, so as not to disturb it, in case we needed to process it at a later time[27].

MPD Report P10-11

MPD Report P14 Police on BalconyMPD Report P14 In April 2018, Mary Ellen Ford (visible among the street-level witnesses in the iconic photograph below), who was working at the Lorraine Motel when Dr. King was shot, was interviewed by TODAY’s Craig Melvin. Ford is identified as “Witness 43.”

According to the interview, Ford stayed at the motel under lockdown for three days following King’s assassination as police investigated the scene” [31].

A three-day lockdown can hardly be construed as taking forensics lightly. 

FORD


A closer look at Pastor John MacArthur

Who is Pastor John MacArthur? Why does it matter whether or not John MacArthur falsified a story about his involvement with key Civil Rights leaders at the time of Martin Luther King’s assassination?

Pastor John MacArthur has built his ministry empire on the faithfulness of his Biblical teaching and on his own personal integrity. Millions of people have come to honor and respect what they know of Pastor John MacArthur.

MacArthur pastors the California megachurch,  Grace Community Church, and he is the founder of the wildly popular Grace to You media ministry. He is also among the framers of the widely-discussed evangelical “Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel,” a document compiled by evangelical leaders to clarify biblical principles in light of “questionable sociological, psychological, and political theories presently permeating our culture and making inroads into Christ’s church” [1] [2].

He is the author of more than 100 books, including a best-selling study Bible which bears his name (over 1 million copies sold).

MacArthur was also a frequent guest on Larry King Live, and in December of 2018, he was a guest on Ben Shapiro’s The Daily Wire Sunday show.

Christianity Today listed John MacArthur as one of the “25 Most Influential Preachers of the Past 50 Years” [3].

Finally, MacArthur is the president of Master’s University (and the Master’s Seminary), although the institution is currently on probation by a regional accrediting agency for monetary “conflicts of interest” and for fostering a “climate of fear, intimidation, bullying, and uncertainty among significant numbers of faculty and staff” [4] [5] [6].

Pastor John MacArthur has preached at length in his own church on the gravity of dishonesty [32]. For example:

It is not appropriate for someone in high levels of leadership responsibility to lie…

If a person will lie . . . and if a person develops a pattern of lying, if a person is comfortable with lying, that person will fall to any temptation. Because he never has to fear being discovered, because he’s so adept at deception. 

According to pastor John MacArthur, “Liars want to crush those who would accuse them. They despise them. They despise those who bare the truth. They despise those who speak honestly. They despise those with integrity,” [35].

Yet, according to Charles Evers, pastor John MacArthur has been lying about Evers for over a decade.


Unanswered Questions 

I reached out to John MacArthur through his personal assistant, but did not receive a response. Thus, we are left with several unanswered questions…

Will pastor John MacArthur honor Charles Evers’s request to “stop telling that lie”?

Why is pastor John MacArthur’s narrative so starkly different to the recorded testimonies of both Charles Evers and John Perkins––testimonies which indicate that pastor MacArthur was not with these men in Charles Evers’ NAACP office on the night Dr. King was murdered?

Was pastor John MacArthur in Memphis, TN hours after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered? If so, who was he with?

Why would such a successful pastor fabricate the events of April 4, 1968, as iconic Civil Rights leader, Charles Evers, insists?

Perhaps it is true that “Every man is a hero of his own story,” [33].


CITATIONS:

[1] The Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel, (2018). Retrieved at (official site): https://statementonsocialjustice.com/

[2] Michael O’Fallon, The Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel, Sovereign Nations (2018). Retrieved at: https://sovereignnations.com/2018/09/04/statement-social-justice-gospel/

[3] The Top 25 Most Influential Preachers, Christianity Today, (2006). Retrieved at: https://web.archive.org/web/20060201142833/http://www.christianitytoday.com/anniversary/features/top25preachers.html

[4] Samuel Smith, John MacArthur’s Master’s University Put on Probation by Accrediting Agency, The Christian Post, (2018). Retrieved at: https://www.christianpost.com/news/john-macarthurs-masters-university-put-on-probation-by-accrediting-agency.html

[5] Caleb Lunetta, Master’s University President Pays Son-In-Law Millions of Dollars Through Nonprofits, Hometown Station, (2018). Retrieved at https://www.hometownstation.com/santa-clarita-latest-news/masters-university-president-pays-son-in-law-millions-of-dollars-through-nonprofits-251199

[6] REPORT OF THE WSCUC TEAM For Reaffirmation of Accreditation To The Master’s University and Seminary, (2018). Retrieved at: http://pulpitandpen.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/PDF-2.pdf

[7] John MacArthur, Social Injustice and the Gospel, Grace to You, (2018). Retrieved at: https://www.gty.org/library/blog/B180813

[8] Tony Reinke, Biblical slavery and American slavery, (2007). Retrieved at: https://tonyreinke.com/category/john-macarthur/

[9] John MacArthur, A Retrospective on 40 Years: John MacArthur with Rick Holland, Grace to You, (2009). Retrieved at: https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/90-371/A-Retrospective-on-40-Years-John-MacArthur-with-Rick-Holland

[10] John MacArthur, Bible Questions and Answers, Part 62, Grace to You, (2014). Retrieved at: https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/70-38/bible-questions-and-answers-part-62

[11] John MacArthur, Bible Questions and Answers, Part 66, Grace to You, (2017): Retrieved at: https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/70-42/bible-questions-and-answers-part-66

[12] Charles Evers and Andrew Szanton, Have No Fear: The Charles Evers Story, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1997).

[13] Ashley Norwood, Mississippi Civil Rights Veteran Remembers King, Mississippi Public Broadcasting, (2018). Retrieved at: http://www.mpbonline.org/blogs/news/2018/04/04/activists-remember-mlk-on-the-50th-anniversary-of-his-death/

[14] Ibid. [9].

[15] John Perkins, Episode 0205- Stopping By Ephesus: Reflections 50 Years After MLK JR.’s Assassination (w/ John Perkins), United? We Pray, (2018). Retrieved at: https://praypod.com/feed/0205

[16] Memphis Police Department, Arrest Report for James Earl Ray. Retrieved at: https://register.shelby.tn.us/media/mlk/mlkviewimage.php?imgtype=pdf&local=Reports&image=Homicide%20Report.tif

[17] Ibid. [11]

[18] Ibid. [11]

[19] Ibid. [11]

[20] Ibid. [7]

[21] Ibid. [11]

[22] Ibid. [9]

[23] Ibid. [16]

[24] Ibid. [16]

[25] Ibid. [16], P 6.

[26] FBI Investigation Report. Retrieved at: https://register.shelby.tn.us/media/mlk/mlkviewimage.php?imgtype=pdf&image=ray_material_2011-02-08/fbi_investigative_report/0185-0376_fbireport_000904ag03.tif#ray_material_2011-02-08/fbi_investigative_report/0185-0376_fbireport_000904ag03.tif#

[27] Ibid. [16], P 12.

[28] Ibid. [16], P 6.

[29] Findings on MLK Assassination. Retrieved at: https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/part-2a.html

[30] Ibid. [16], P 15.

[31] Caroline Gottlieb and Eun Kyung Kim, Eyewitness in iconic photo opens up about Martin Luther King Jr. assassination 50 years later, TODAY, (2018). Retrieved at: https://www.today.com/news/eyewitness-martin-luther-king-jr-assassination-lorraine-motel-talks-50-t126354

[32] John MacArthur, The Destructive Sin of Lying Part 1, Grace to You, (1998). Retrieved at: https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/90-196/the-destructive-sin-of-lying-part-1

[33] Quote by Brandon Sanderson. Retrieved at: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/176539-every-man-is-a-hero-of-his-own-story

[34] Ibid. [9]

[35] Ibid. [32]

 


Subscribe on YouTube

Advertisement

0

Conservatism

A renewed call for prayers for our nation

Published

on

A renewed call for prayers for our nation

Prayer is a powerful thing. Whenever we give praise to our Father in Heaven and beseech Him for blessings, He hears us. He may not always grant us our wishes; he’s not a fictional genie. Our wishes are not His command. But He does hear us, and when the chorus of prayers for a particular event are strong, it is a benefit to the cause. Today, America needs prayers. Society is slipping into a state of decadence that only He can reverse.

We often rely on ourselves to get things done. Hard work and perseverance go a long way. We also often rely too heavily on our elected officials to do the right thing, but as solid as our constitutional republic is in form, it is beset by turmoil and and a rising anti-Biblical worldview that is pervading the collective consciousness of many Americans who aren’t even aware that it’s happening.

Sex and violence have been normalized as “entertainment.” More attention is often paid to our mobile devices than our children, who themselves are given mobile devices to keep them busy so we can spend more time on ours. Churches are becoming more progressive to keep up with changes in society. Meanwhile, other religions such as Islam, atheism, and transhumanism are growing dramatically.

On the political front, many Americans are becoming increasingly dependent on government and are embracing politicians who want to bring us all into a forced state of dependence. Washington DC in general has denied the wise tenets of federalism and gone for full-blown federal supremacy across the board. We have good people fighting for us in DC, but they are outnumbered and oftentimes overpowered by their cohorts, bureaucrats, and an activist judiciary that holds its own delusions of grandeur.

I find myself seeking solutions to America’s problems most hours of the day. It’s my job to analyze what’s happening in the news and decipher what it means to the American people. Then, I try to either side with the most righteous solutions or offer new ones of my own. In this daily cycle, I often lose sight of the true nature of this world. There is Divinity holding everything together, but there are also principalities and powers stacked against us.

Unfortunately, part of our weakness as humans means the allure of the anti-Biblical worldviews and the progressive mentality on governance ring wonderfully in our ears. We hear the call of evil forces and all-too-often it sounds appealing to us. It’s like candy to a child. They’ve been told eating their broccoli is better for them but they love the candy so much more.

America needs a few revivals. We need a revival both of the church and within the church. More people need to be attending as well as actively participating more than one day a week. Meanwhile, the churches themselves need to abandon the politically correct version of Bible teaching and focus on the truths of the text itself.

We need a revival of conservatism. Populism may be alive and well, and for now it’s an acceptable alternative to the evils of radical progressivism, but we must strive for a stronger adherence to the philosophies that are necessary to keep American exceptionalism alive and widespread throughout our nation. There are simply too many “RINOs” out there not realizing their pushes for political expediency are betrayals to America itself.

Above all else, the United States needs more citizens to pray for our nation. Pray for wisdom for our leaders. Pray for discernment among the people. Pray that more people will open their eyes to the truth of the Gospel and our hearts to the gift of Jesus Christ. We must keep fighting the good fight, but doing so mustn’t get in the way of praising and beseeching our Creator.

Perhaps Daniel did it best in his prayers to our Lord.

Through all of the existential threats brewing in and out of the worlds of politics and religion, there is one action that is undeniably positive: Prayer. If we start praying for our nation and have others pray for her as well, perhaps there really is hope.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Moving left into the province of propagandists, the AP avoids the pesky issue of due process

Published

on

By

Moving left into the province of propagandists the AP avoids the pesky issue of due process

More akin to being authoritarian propaganda, a media source ignores an important civil liberty while casting opinion as fact.

Trying to come up to speed on what is going on in the world each morning is quite often akin to the “kawoosh” seen in the Star Gate genre, with a sudden onrush of stories and opinion pieces cast as ‘fact checks’. It’s also important to stay out of any type of echo chamber on either side, thus we check what AllSides would consider to be ‘Centrist’:

A Center media bias rating does not always mean neutral, unbiased or reasonable, just as “far Left” and “far Right” do not always mean “extreme” or “unreasonable.” A Center bias rating simply means the source or writer rated does not predictably show opinions favoring either end of the political spectrum.

Please note that as they state in their FAQ, a centrist bias rating doesn’t mean neutral or unbiased, just that it supposedly doesn’t favor either side. The problem is the Associated Press has been moving inexorably left exemplified by two stories from this weekend.

Due process, what’s that?

In our first example, the esteemed Associated Press that labels itself as ‘independent’ produced a long piece on Gun Confiscation SWATing also known as ‘Red Flag’ Gun Confiscation. With an almost tangential reference to the infringement on Constitutional rights several paragraphs in on the piece, and only casting it as the contention of other law enforcement leaders while ignoring the fact that laws for Involuntary Civil Commitment already exist:

Involuntary civil commitment

Involuntary civil commitment is the admission of individuals against their will into a mental health unit. Generally speaking, there are three reasons why an individual would be subject to involuntary civil commitment under modern statutes: mental illness, developmental disability, and substance addiction. In the case of mental illness, dangerousness to self or others defines the typical commitment standard, with almost all states construing the inability to provide for one’s basic needs as dangerousness to self. In terms of process, every state provides for a hearing, the right to counsel, and periodic judicial review, while most states have statutory quality standards for treatment and hospitalization environment.

Source: Ralph Reisner, Christopher Slobogin, and Arti Rai, Law and the Mental Health System: Civil and Criminal Aspects (2009), pp. 704-705.

[Emphasis added]

They avoid any real discussions on critical Constitutional principles such as due process [5th amendment], searches and seizure [4th amendment], private property rights and of course the 2nd amendment. They spend an inordinate amount of time in what could be characterized as a one-sided infomercial for the destruction of due process and gun confiscation.

The headline for the piece was a masterful casting as the destruction of civil Liberties as a ‘tool’, while hedging their bets on this ‘tools’ effectiveness: ‘Red flag laws’ offer tool for preventing some gun violence.

Note the use of the phrase ‘some gun violence’ as a subtle hint that other measures against the cause of liberty will be needed. Authoritarianism never sleeps in keeping people safe and enslaved.

Opinion as a ‘fact check’

Our second example of authoritarian media bias also does a masterful job subtly casting opinion as fact in one of the national socialist media’s interminable ‘fact check’ diatribes. Once again we turn to the ‘independent’ Associated Press with a piece entitled: AP FACT CHECK: Trump’s swerves on economy, guns and migrants .

We’ll leave some of their use of ‘Newspeak’ on the subject of illegal Invaders and other issues to emphasize this excerpt on the subject of ‘gun’ violence:

TRUMP: “I don’t want people to forget that this is a mental health problem. … Just remember this: Big mental problem, and we do have a lot of background checks right now.” — remarks Sunday to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey.

THE FACTS: He’s oversimplifying the role of mental illness in public mass shootings and playing down the ease with which Americans can get firearms.

Most people with mental illness are not violent and they are far more likely to be victims of violent crime than perpetrators, according to mental health experts. They say that access to firearms actually is a big part of the problem.

[Emphasis added]

How are the terms ‘oversimplifying’ and ‘playing down’ even close to being statements of fact? What numerical values translate to ‘big part’? Does the staff at the ‘independent’ Associated Press know the difference between fact and opinion? For example, it is a fact of history that the National Socialist German Workers’ Party or ‘Nazi’ Party was in fact the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

Whereas the descriptions layered on by the AP could hardly be considered factual in nature. As is usually the case, they couldn’t help themselves in also including a plug for the destruction of due process, touting something they would resist when it comes to their common sense civil liberties.

Their ‘FACT CHECK’ also included a push for Gun Confiscation SWATing, emphasizing the words of an executive of the American Psychological Association while forgetting the fact that media sources such as the ‘independent’ Associated Press contribute to the problem of Media Contagion.

The Bottom-Line: The equivalent to the media of ‘red flag’ gun confiscation

Since it’s been established that there is a direct connection between the mass murder tragedies and media coverage, would esteemed ‘independent’ sources such as the Associated Press agree to the ‘red flag’ gun confiscation equivalent for them: Prior Restraint?

They would most certainly object to the destruction of their civil liberties while they cheer for the same in the case of Gun Confiscation SWATing. Perhaps they need to understand that double standards are the grease that makes the slippery slope so dangerous. The whole point of the ‘first they came for..’ sentiment is that we who stand for freedom have to defend all aspects of liberty, Including the common sense civil right of self-defense.

Only defending one basic human right means that all the others will be soon swept away, with only one remaining on the chopping block.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Dean Cain’s label of San Francisco’s new incarceration language is spot on

Published

on

Dean Cains label of San Franciscos new incarceration language is spot on

Actor Dean Cain is one of the few outspoken conservatives in Hollywood. The star of Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman has taken plenty of heat for voicing support for President Trump and for calling out his progressive peers as they rant unhinged.

One of his latest critiques of leftism was in response to San Francisco’s plan to change official words that pertain to convicted felons and juvenile delinquents. In pure Bay Area-style, the city is planning on sanitizing certain phrases so as to not “further victimize” criminals.

Once we catch our breath after laughing at the way these progressives see criminals, reality sets in about how asinine – and potentially dangerous – it is to cater to the criminal aspects of society at the expense of law abiding citizens.

Here are some of the details of the proposal:

San Francisco to do away with terms like ‘convict’, will instead call them ‘formerly incarcerated person’

They recently passed a resolution containing “person first” language guidelines that all agencies and departments are urged to used.

For example, an offender will now be called a “formerly incarcerated person”, “justice-involved person”, or “returning resident.”

A juvenile delinquent will go by “young person with justice system involvement” or a “young person impacted by the juvenile justice system.”

How did San Francisco leaders find time to address this non-issue when homelessness has reached crisis-levels and their city is literally covered in human feces? Have voters become so engulfed in tribal allegiance that they can’t see the absurdity in front of their faces?

Cain’s reaction was short and perfect.

In George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the nation of Oceania had adopted the official language of Newspeak, “a controlled language of restricted grammar and limited vocabulary, meant to limit the freedom of thought.” It’s both a partial precursor to and a necessity of socialism because freedom of thought allows deviations from authoritarian control. Whether the leaders of San Francisco know it or not, they’re building a version of Oceania right now.

As long as Americans stand by and elect leaders who are more interested in not offending criminals than solving the massive problems faced by law abiding American citizens, this lunacy will continue. San Francisco is dying.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending