New Orleans Jihad Attack: How Government Cowardice and Islamic Whitewashing Endanger America

The Islamic terror attack in New Orleans by an assailant identified as 42-year-old U.S. citizen Shamsud-Din Jabbar, who was found carrying an ISIS flag, was not just a tragedy; it was a damning indictment of a government that has spent years willfully dismantling the very defenses meant to protect us. Authorities have confirmed that Jabbar did not act alone, revealing ties to a broader network that enabled and supported the attack. This incident was predictable, not because of intelligence failures alone, but because of the systemic whitewashing of Islam by leaders too terrified—or too complicit—to confront the ideological threat it poses. This is not a failure of understanding; it is a deliberate betrayal of the American people.

The terrorist:
– Shamsud-Din Jabbar (Arabic/Islamic)
– Born in the US.
– Was arrested for theft and invalid driver's license in the past.
– Worked in HR and IT in the US military!!!
– Pledged allegiance to ISIS.
– Had explosives.
– Intended to kill as many Americans as possible. pic.twitter.com/YH0FxvhO61

— Ridvan Aydemir | Apostate Prophet 🇺🇸🇮🇱 (@ApostateProphet) January 1, 2025

Under the Biden administration, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) issued guidance warning intelligence personnel against using terms like “jihadist,” “Islamic extremist,” or “radical Islamist”—phrases that accurately describe the ideology motivating global terrorism. These terms were deemed “problematic” because they might “hurt Muslim feelings.” Think about that: the feelings of a religious group were prioritized over the lives of innocent Americans. This wasn’t a simple bureaucratic blunder; it was the result of years of infiltration by Islamic advocacy groups with ties to extremism.

The involvement of controversial figures like Shaykh Hamza Yusuf in shaping counterterrorism policy highlights the extent of this infiltration. Yusuf, a man with a documented history of anti-American, antisemitic rhetoric and associations with groups like the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)—a known promoter of jihad—has been invited to influence the U.S. government’s counterterrorism approach. This is the same man who once referred to Judaism as “a most racist religion” and America as “a country that has little to be proud of.” How can a government claim to defend its citizens while taking advice from someone with a track record of praising jihad and condemning the very principles of Western civilization?

The betrayal doesn’t stop there. This administration’s refusal to name the enemy is not new. Judicial Watch exposed how, under the Obama administration, FBI Director Robert Mueller met with radical Islamic groups like CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) to purge FBI training materials of anything deemed “offensive” to Muslims. These organizations have well-documented ties to terrorism. CAIR, for example, was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism financing case in U.S. history. Yet, instead of cutting ties, our government bent the knee, removing vital training materials that could have saved lives.

This political correctness is killing us. In case after case—Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon bombing, the Orlando nightclub shooting—the warning signs were ignored. Major Nidal Hasan’s emails praising jihad were dismissed. The Tsarnaev brothers were flagged by foreign governments as threats, yet no action was taken. Why? Because acknowledging these individuals as threats would mean acknowledging the ideological link between their actions and Islam—a link our leaders are too cowardly to name.  […]

— Read More: rairfoundation.com