(Mises)—The Secretary of the Treasury and the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers are the two principal economic advisors for any president. President Biden chose Janet Yellen as Secretary of the Treasury and Jared Bernstein as the Chair of his Council of Economic Advisers.
Stephanie Kelton asked Bernstein a basic question about Biden’s monetary and fiscal policies. Bernstein responded with a shocking statement.
“The US government can’t go bankrupt because we can print our own money”
The idea that the government can print its way out of any fiscal deficit is a path to the dark side of hyperinflation. Bernstein apparently embraces Modern Monetary Theory, a crackpot theory that no serious economist embraces. Kelton then asked Bernstein to explain why any government would borrow in a currency that it can simply print; his response was either cringeworthy or hilarious, depending upon your political leanings (click link here). Bernstein had no answer, he simply babbled for a minute.
The correct answer is that governments borrow money as a supposed fiscal stimulus. Additional government spending supposedly raises aggregate demand and decreases unemployment. However, additional government borrowing raises interest rates. Higher interest rates slow private investment, decrease exports, and increase imports. Higher interest rates thus counteract fiscal stimulus. Federal Reserve officials can try hold interest rates down by printing money, but this is inflationary.
Bernstein was not educated as an economist. However, Bernstein has worked as a key economic adviser for Biden for years now. The issue which Kelton asked Bernstein about is at the center of “Bidenomics”. It seems that on the job learning doesn’t always work.
Secretary Yellen gave a speech in Kentucky recently. Yellen announced that the Biden administration will implement what she refers to as Modern Supply Side Economics. This so called modern theory is really just a rehash of what economists refer to as “industrial policy”, mixed with investment in infrastructure. The traditional industrial policy favored by the Biden administration has a dismal track record globally.
Harvard Economist Dani Rodrik has developed a more nuanced and less ambitious case for industrial policy. Rodrik admits to past failures of most industrial policies, and recommends a more limited role for government in future industrial policies. Yellen is peddling the old discredited version of industrial policy as new supply side economics. This is nonsense, and she must know it.
Yellen also claims that “trickle down tax cuts” don’t fuel economic growth and only benefit the wealthy. Yellen is attacking Supply Side Economics, which economists have embraced for centuries. Statistics prove the economists’ version of Supply Side Economics. President Obama enacted his American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in 2009. ARRA included spending increases (favored by Democrats) and tax cuts (favored by Republicans). Economists have performed dozens of tests on ARRA. Economist Valerie Ramey published a review article on these studies. What are the results of these tests?
According to Demand Side Economics government spending increases grow the economy and reduce total unemployment through a “multiplier effect”. What this means is that each dollar of public spending increase leads to more than a dollar of increased GDP. Studies show that the spending multiplier for ARRA was between 0.6 and 1.0. Hence the alleged spending multiplier effect is nonexistent. Each additional dollar of federal spending resulted in less than a dollar of additional GDP- a fraction not a multiple. Studies also indicate that each dollar of reduced taxes produced a two to three dollar increase in GDP. Tax cuts produce a true multiplier effect, which works at least partly through the Supply Side incentives that don’t exist according to Yellen.
All economists know that supply side effects of tax cuts really exist, we just disagree over the strength of these effects. Yellen is playing like a trick here. Some Republican politicians have exaggerated supply side effects of tax cuts, by claiming that their tax cuts will produce overnight miracles. Harvard economist Martin Feldstein pointed out the difference between statistically proven Supply Side Economics and the disproven politicized version of Supply Side Economics decades ago. Yellen surely knows all of this. Yellen is guilty of using the Strawman Fallacy to dismiss a sound alternative to Biden’s absurd industrial policies.
Jared Bernstein is the chief economic adviser to the highest elected official in the U.S., yet he doesn’t understand economics. Bernstein could be excused for his ineptitude due to his lack of education in economics. Biden’s reliance on this incompetent and uneducated man is inexcusable. Janet Yellen is highly educated in economics. Hence, there is no excuse for her peddling such nonsense to the American public. People in the political party which demands greater governmental involvement in the economy should really be concerned with this lack of competence and integrity among Biden’s key economic advisers.
It’s becoming increasingly clear that fiat currencies across the globe, including the U.S. Dollar, are under attack. Paper money is losing its value, translating into insane inflation and less value in our life’s savings.
Genesis Gold Group believes physical precious metals are an amazing option for those seeking to move their wealth or retirement to higher ground. Whether Central Bank Digital Currencies replace current fiat currencies or not, precious metals are poised to retain or even increase in value. This is why central banks and mega-asset managers like BlackRock are moving much of their holdings to precious metals.
As a Christian company, Genesis Gold Group has maintained a perfect 5 out of 5 rating with the Better Business Bureau. Their faith-driven values allow them to help Americans protect their life’s savings without the gimmicks used by most precious metals companies. Reach out to them today to see how they can streamline the rollover or transfer of your current and previous retirement accounts.
The party of socially promoted dumb phuggks!
#NeutralizeTheDemoNcratParty (the original party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow laws, continued modern racism and new slavery methods) – F A C T S
#WakeUp
#WalkAway
American #Hispanics4TRUERepublicans 🇺🇸 (POC are going to change the narrative, just look at our current polling)
VOTE A STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN TICKET IN 2024 for regained Rule of Law!
A Republican majority is required to do so.
*I did NOT say vote for a RINO
They got it wrong in purpose. They are jews here to Swindle us, as usual.
MMT is nothing but veiled marxism, approached from a different angle, and wrapped in a different package.
The government doesn’t print money. The Fed prints money. It does so by buying up treasuries (quantitative easing), and by making more money available to banks.
When the government deficit spends, if the treasuries are bought by the public, then the net change in public money supply is negative, because the interest on the debt is extracted. The money supply can only increase when the Fed buys those treasuries.
MMT completely ignores this function of the Fed. Their lead economist, in one of their propaganda videos, states the Fed’s only tool is setting interest rates. When even an uneducated dummy like myself knows that is not the Fed’s only tool. It also buys and sells securities.
It also completely ignores interest on the debt.
And its claim that tax dollars are essentially burned, that the only purpose of taxes is to give the currency legitimacy, and that every dollar spent by the government is printed money, is absurd.
MMT is nothing but a ruse to usher in marxism …
They’re intentionally trying to do as much deficit spending as they possibly can, to work toward their marxist goals, while using other tools to try to keep inflation under control. Their theory basically boils down to that – spend as much as you possibly can, as long as you can somewhat keep inflation under control. They’re intentionally pushing the limits.
And of course, the resultant inflation always harms the little guy the most. So more spending is then justified to fix what they broke in the first place. Rinse and repeat, the problem compounds, and the next thing you know we’re a full-blown communist country.
One thing I do somewhat agree with them on is that inflation can’t be addressed solely on the demand side. At some point you’ve got to start thinking about increasing the supply to meet demand, which will also bring down prices, or you’re going to slow the economy to such a snail’s pace that its in danger of completely stalling out. But that can be done without government spending, government investment, or their marxist idea of government controlled industry. It can be done with tax incentives, easing regulations, so on and so forth.
I’m not an economist, but then again it doesn’t take a degree in economics to see these very simple and obvious problems …