Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for the Supreme Court the “bump stock firearms” case may be more important for what it does not say than for what it does.
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for the Supreme Court in Garland v. Cargill—the “bump stock firearms” case—may be more important for what it does not say than for what it does.
On its face, Cargill granted a statutory victory to gun owners. Below that, however, it granted a constitutional victory to all grassroots Americans and inflicted a defeat on the powerful federal bureaucracy.
The topic addressed overtly was the ban on machine guns in the National Firearms Act of 1934. That law defines a “machine gun” as a firearm that can “shoot, automatically more than one shot … by a single function of the trigger.” […]
– Read More: www.theepochtimes.com
Wouldn’t it ne nice if for even just ONCE, we could elect a “Government” that is for The People, Of The People and By The People ?
JUST THE ONCE EVEN ?????