Read Hanne’s The Herland Report.
(WND)—Dr. Richard Dawkins has spent his life tearing down the belief in the cultural Christian values that have been the pillars of strength in Western civilization. He has been one of those white male, atheist fundamentalist intellectuals who have – with remarkable passion – belittled and rampantly attacked Christianity and its reverence of God in the complexity of nature, effectively denying the existence of the metaphysical dimension and its influence on the physical, material world.
In a recent interview with Britain’s LBC, this architect of the contemporary mainstream evil caricature of who God is, the designer of the hatred against anything Christian left in our culture, this man has the audacity to state that he was “slightly horrified Ramadan is being promoted instead of Christian Easter.” This is the very same man who for generations has demonized and twisted the message of the ancient Holy Books, calling God a sex-obsessed tyrant and actively pushing for the purging of anything religious. This arrogant atheist missionary now states that “we are a culturally Christian country” and again says, “I call myself a cultural Christian.” So, in his opposition of Islam this delusional man is suddenly a Christian, after all?
Dr. Dawkins seems surprised that Islam takes dominion in the West. Which powers did he think would dominate when Christian compassionate spiritualism is forcibly removed by the relentless work of atheist apostles like himself? His own raging revolt against God’s order in the traditional Western religion is about to succeed completely. Of course, Islam fills the spiritual vacuum.
Dawkins’ assumptions about the metaphysical world are quite well summed up in his notoriously destructive work “The God Delusion,” in which he states that God almost certainly does not exist. This he determines with the utmost demonic pride, he who speaks of biological science and empiricism, yet determines that there is little probability of a Creator, based entirely on his own subjective perception.
Or has this culturally destructive atheist, this influencer of New Atheism, traveled beyond the edges of the universe to examine whether God is there? Is he able to determine empirically that there is no God outside the scope of this universe? Or, can he scientifically prove that man’s heart, his innermost being, cannot be in touch with the celestial Spirit of God, who by the way exists outside of the realm of the empirical. Scientific hypothesis can only empirically prove that which exists in the material dimension.
Maximize savings. Support great patriot Mike Lindell. Use promo code “JDR” at MyPillow and take advantage of the $25 EXTRAVAGANZA happening right now.
So, this little man wants to disprove the metaphysical by applying empiricist methods that only describe the material dimension. He finds biological evolution more probable than creation, even if Darwinists never have been able to prove anything more than mutations within a species. Darwinism is a faith – belief not based on empirical evidence – like any other. Evolution from one species to another has never been observed while it was happening and therefore is non-verifiable. It has never evolved beyond an unprovable theory. So, while he warns of anti-scientific fairytales as a great evil, he should be sure to include his own.
Dr. Dawkins, who arrogantly only operates in the low dimension of empiricism, who cannot even add 10 years to the length of his own life, has preached that “God is dead” to generations and inserted nihilist hopelessness, emptiness and lovelessness into our century. For without God’s justice, His metaphysical love for the physical humankind and promise of a world after the current calamity, what is there to hope for? What does the 83-year-old Dawkins hope for after his own death? Does he expect to meet demons or angels? Does he actually dare to bet on nothingness, he who has not been able to prove anything regarding this topic?
As Dr. Dawkins joins Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud, Auguste Comte and other white male, ignorant Western atheists who were hellbent on tearing down the respect for traditional values, he points out that the Christian faith is a delusion. From these “delusional” Christian ideals stem groundbreaking values such as the belief in natural human rights, equality regardless of race, gender or social standing, the abolition of slavery, individual rights to own and control the fruit of one’s own labor, an economic system based on trustworthiness and accountability where private property rights, Christian moral standards and the separation of powers form the basis for stability and growth.
Naturally, the effect of willfully creating a burning hatred for Christianity in the general public and in the mainstream media, Christopher Dawkins has greatly contributed to the current Western collapse and disintegration of society.
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
It’s becoming increasingly clear that fiat currencies across the globe, including the U.S. Dollar, are under attack. Paper money is losing its value, translating into insane inflation and less value in our life’s savings.
Genesis Gold Group believes physical precious metals are an amazing option for those seeking to move their wealth or retirement to higher ground. Whether Central Bank Digital Currencies replace current fiat currencies or not, precious metals are poised to retain or even increase in value. This is why central banks and mega-asset managers like BlackRock are moving much of their holdings to precious metals.
As a Christian company, Genesis Gold Group has maintained a perfect 5 out of 5 rating with the Better Business Bureau. Their faith-driven values allow them to help Americans protect their life’s savings without the gimmicks used by most precious metals companies. Reach out to them today to see how they can streamline the rollover or transfer of your current and previous retirement accounts.
Unless Dawkins repents, he will receive the words at his judgment: depart from me to burn in the eternal Lake of Fire you worker of evil.
I would not be so cocky, Capt. Mack. There are plenty of reasons to doubt God. He is supposedly all powerful, yet evil persists, for what reason? To test us? Either he is not there, is not all powerful, can’t control Satan or he doesn’t care. Would you kill your own child to fix a problem? Especially if you were all powerful? I doubt it. Does that sound like a sane solution? His supposed plan is sadistic. We are little more than ants in a box with him holding a microscope burning us. The concept of God does not make sense on a moral level to me.
The concept seems to comfort people and teach some morals. I respect your right to believe, I am never offended by it as I am not offended by what I do not believe. Knock yourself out if it works for you. But I will occasionally challenge some of these assertions from pseudo scholars.
The ideals of America have many roots and not all of them are Christian. Democracy came from Greece, should we thank Zeus? Of course, not. The Senate came from Rome. Neither were Christian and the founding fathers were more deists than modern Christians. There are examples of kindness and love, in every culture of the world.
I ‘ll be in the Lake of Fire, but it does not scare me, because it does not exist. I do not believe in fairy tales, and I beat the brainwashing that my parents tried sending me to Church. In the end, you will be fertilizer just like me.
James, in similar manner, I find the notion that all that exists in the universe came from the explosion of a spec of dust to be a ridiculous fairy tale. Never mind explaining where the spec of dust came from.
It’s interesting that you would try to make a moral argument. Where did that moral come from?
We have people killing their children to solve a perceived problem all day every day. It’s called “abortion”.
The nazis, communists, and other socialists/collectivists killed some 100 million people to solve perceived problems.
Right now we have many eugenicists, overpopulation loons, hysteric climate change nuts, etc. who want to kill significant numbers of people in order to solve perceived problems.
In nature it happens all the time. Animals not only kill their own offspring, they eat their own offspring.
There is absolutely nothing in prevailing science, and nothing in the necessarily relativist, baseless, ever-changing, circular “reasoning” resultant from reliance solely on science, that would remotely indicate that it is wrong to kill your own offspring. Nothing. The word science means “knowledge.” Mankind’s knowledge is finite, always will be finite, and therefore severely limited and woefully inadequate.
Where did you get that belief that it’s wrong to kill your children?
Where did you get that love for your offspring?
What about killing the children of others – Is that ok, or not, and why?
What sets mankind apart from the animals?
Science cannot substantiate the existence of such morals. You got that from scripture. You don’t realize it, but you did. You believe the same supposed “fairy tales”. You just don’t realize it.
You’re proving the Bible to be 100% accurate, that things do work exactly as it says things work, and you don’t realize it. Follow that thinking through, and you’ll realize it truly was not authored by imperfect, finite, and therefore infinitely stupid human beings. It was authored by all-powerful, all-knowing God.
It’s a shame that an intelligent man like Dawkins is only now, at 83 years old, just barely beginning to actually give matters a tiny measure of any serious thought. If he were to follow the reasoning through, he might likely come to the same conclusion the rest of us have come to – God absolutely does exist.
As a result of multiculturalism, pluralism, relativism, critical theory, thanks in no small part to men like Darwin, Freud, etc., and the moral relativism it requires, we have a resurgence of paganism, satanism, and other such false “religions” that included human sacrifice.
The false religion of Islam says it’s ok to kill your own child, even when the “problem” is merely one’s “honor”.
The Bible clearly says that it is not ok. Read through Kings and Chronicles. The most wicked kings practiced false religions and made their children “pass through the fire” – they sacrificed their children to false gods.
You say it’s wrong. That’s essentially an appeal to an absolute truth.
Dawkins has spent a lifetime shouting from the rootfops that the knowledge of mankind is more than sufficient. Now he’s realizing it never was and never will be.
The Father did not kill His own son. Jesus willingly went to the cross, of His own accord.
If he were to wave his hand and make everyone sinless and pure, would they really be sinless and pure? Your argument that He would do so is no different than the argument of fake Christians who pervert the grace of God into a license for immorality to sin and keep on sinning. Those are two facets of the same wrong argument. If God were to do that, then He would be saying it’s ok to sin. Understand? Being perfect in all ways, He’s not going to do that. What makes one clean, and acceptable to Him is the full and complete Gospel of Jesus Christ. Repentance, submission to Him, and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit.
Mankind already sinned, James. He already basically killed his own child. Mankind already committed that sin. Mankind was already in a sinful condition.
You want all-powerful God, infinitely perfect in all ways, just and righteous God, to show off His power after the fact, by waving His hand, proclaiming mankind perfectly innocent after the crime.
What if someone killed your child, and God stepped in and made everybody, including murderer, innocent after the fact, just to show that He’s all powerful. Would that be just? No it wouldn’t.
You can’t selectively pick and choose isolated attributes of God, who is perfect in all ways, in order to try to make an argument. Sure He’s infinitely powerful. He’s also infinitely just and good. He’s also infinitely knowledgeable. Etc. The Bible explains all of this.
It wouldn’t hurt to give such things a bit more thought …
Lastly, as I have to get to work here.
Understand, that killing to solve problems is not necessarily wrong. It depends on the problem.
Self defense is a good example. If someone is imminently trying to kill you, then it is not morally wrong to kill them in self defense.
Even if the one trying to kill you were a rebellious son or daughter, right?
What if your child is a serial killer, and you find out? Would you turn him in knowing he’d be sent to the electric chair? In effect, killing him?
Would you kill your own child to solve such problems?
In the latter case, is it moral to aid and abet a serial killer?
Blatantly stating “it’s wrong to kill your own child” no matter what is an attempt at a moral absolute that fails miserably under scrutiny. The Bible clearly condemns murder. But it does not condemn any and all killing.
Might give that some thought to that also …