Connect with us

Culture and Religion

New year, new resolutions, new party

Published

on

New year new resolutions new party

Looking forward to 2019 and the socialistic slavery being offered by the Left.

Now that we’ve assessed 2018, its time to look at the ‘fresh’ ideas of the Left based on very, very, very old ideas. Never mind that the old ideas didn’t work, the new versions will work because of a new label. After all, these are people who excel at repackaging old failed ideas as new failed ideas.

Socialism: Four centuries of doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results

Granted, when Plato first proposed many of the vestiges of the ‘Ideal State’ 2,400 years ago in ancient Greece they were actually new and untested. Expressed again in Sir Thomas More’s Utopia over 500 years ago in 1516, they still hadn’t been tried. However, now that it’s 5 centuries later that is no longer the case. What began with the first colonies in the New World in what would become the United States. Continuing on with the first use of the word Socialism in connection to another short lived experiment in collectivism in New Harmony, Indiana. These ideas have a consistent track record of failure that cannot be denied, except by those uncaring of the cause of Liberty – people who pretend to be Liberal – who cynically use such ideas to obtain a death grip on power.

Never mind that these ancient ideas fly in the face of basic human nature or that they take the brutal repression of Liberty to be implemented. Never mind that these ideas have caused the deliberate mass murder of over 100 million people.

The authoritarian socialists on the Left assure us that this time around, their ideas will miraculously work. This time around, their ideas that run contrary to basic psychology will suddenly no longer do so. This time around, the magical dollars to fund their farcical schemes will flow like unicorn droppings. This time around, they will able to set up a wondrous Utopia before running out of other people’s money. Rest assured there will be no brutal repression of Liberty, even though they have already begun doing that with the basic human rights of self-preservation and self-expression. There won’t be any mass murder, despite their obsession with taking away the people’s ability to ‘resist’.

The Left’s underlying agenda is one of collectivism and coercion versus individualism and Liberty.

One finds it hard to believe that Leftists don’t understand that their collectivist mindset is anathema to Liberty. They are either deceiving themselves or trying to deceive everyone else. While they can claim to be ‘Liberating’ people by handing out freebies, the plain fact is that it is paid for with other people’s money. Other people’s money taken at gunpoint.

New Resolutions.

Last year, one of these was on using the proper terms to describe the Left. Halting the practice of complimenting them with a term that implies what they are not: Liberal. Their Liberty destroying antics makes it imperative that we redouble these efforts as well as expand them in the other areas where they use words that contrary to their meaning: Progressive, Democratic. Most of the Left’s socialist national agenda is based on deception, we have to call them out on this whenever possible.

A new Liberty lexicon to push back on the ever so tiresome PC culture.

We’ve in a cold war of words [Being less and less civil by the day] The Left is far ahead of us in reshaping the conversation with words such a ‘migrant’ instead of illegal alien, gun ‘reform’ instead of gun confiscation. So it is time we push back on the practice. These are but a few suggestions:

  • Socialistic Slavery instead of Socialism.
  • Parasite Left instead of Progressive Left.
  • Gun Confiscation SWATing instead of ‘Red Flag’ laws.
  • Authoritarian Socialist or Leftist instead of Liberal, Progressive or even Democrat.

One other suggestion.

This would to become more concise in writing. [‘Physician, Heal thyself!’] Even though the explanations of Leftist ideas take up a lot of digital ink, they do manage to deceive with short, emotionally laden talking points.

This is why we of the Pro-Liberty Right are better at the ‘meme’ art form and area we should push to advantage. Liberty and freedom are easily understood concepts. Leftists have somehow twisted these words to make it seem that voting to enslave oneself in socialism is somehow ‘Liberating’ or ‘Liberalism’. That clearly isn’t the case, we need to make that clear to everyone else.

New Party.

There is an old Chinese proverb that one should dig a well before one is thirsty. Such is the case here, if we wait until the electoral season is upon us, it will be too late. We shouldn’t have to detail all worsening frustrations with the Republican Party. Trump has already indicated that he’s willing to deal with the Left in getting certain things implemented.

At present, the voting population seems to be dividing into 3 camps. Most people fall into one of two towards the Middle-Right of the political spectrum. With most being of the Libertarian, Conservative and True Liberal camp on the right. With others are of the moderate mentality being of a right leaning stance while being buffeted by Leftist propaganda making them think they on the Left. Then there are the far-Left Socialist cadres full of sound and fury, signifying nothing that dominate the media culture and indoctrination centres (government schools).

Perhaps it is time to have three parties representing these three camps – A far Left, National Socialist party, a moderate party and finally a Conservative, Libertarian, and True Liberal party standing for Limited government.

The far Left, National Socialist party could finally be honest for once about their desire for a ‘worker’s paradise’ instead of Liberty. Hopefully, most people would see this as a dead-end and it would slowly ‘wither away’. The GOP could be the moderate party in the middle, since that us the direction they are heading anyway. The new party would stand for the conservation of Liberty and limited government. After the far Left leaves the scene, the remaining parties could have a civil debate over the proper role of government, setting forth a new pattern of freedom.

0

Culture and Religion

William Barr nails the secular upheaval of Judeo-Christian morals

Published

on

William Barr nails the secular upheaval of Judeo-Christian morals

Humans have a moral compass. We’ve had it for over 2000 years. Before we had it, there were other parts that were already being formed so mankind would have a basis for morality and absolute truth that differs from postmodernism or its emerging despicable cousin, the post-truth society of false absolutes based on personal feelings.

This moral compass is the Bible, and our adherence to Judeo-Christian beliefs as a nation and in many places around the world has helped mankind keep evil at bay. Our flawed efforts through the millennia have fallen short, not because the Word wasn’t perfect but because we are not perfect. This has eroded to the point that modern society is experiencing a secular upheaval forcing cataclysmic decay of our morality.

We are flawed. Progressives are trying to use these flaws to pull us further away from the truth of our existence and the only truly moral compass we possess. They’re doing it through media, education, and entertainment. They’re attacking churches, synagogues, and adherents to the Bible with an anti-Biblical worldview that is growing increasingly militant.

Attorney General William Barr recognizes this and expressed as much during a speech at Notre Dame last week.

William Barr’s speech on religious freedom should resonate with everyone who recognizes the degradation of our values as a people and a nation. The further we diverge from the Biblical worldview, the worse the world becomes.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Should Church be the mission field?

Published

on

Should Church be the mission field

There is a growing prevalence of churches that want to draw people in to present the gospel. These churches, commonly referred to as “seeker friendly” churches have been one of the biggest trends in Christianity in the postmodern world. A comparison would be the analytics of Major League Baseball. Some people champion it; others loath it. For these seeker friendly churches are engaged in the advance usage of analytics and marketing. In the effort of not being dismissive in a traditionalist “get off my lawn” way, I want to examine, giving a fair shake, this prevalent trend in Christianity.

In the early church, it was inconceivable that churches would attract large audiences to present the gospel. During the time of persecution, Christians building coliseums for worship would have been lit as candles to light those coliseums while lions were fed to their brethren in an evening pagan spectacle. During the reign of the Papacy, this second phase of Christian history built cathedrals, however these architectural feats were never intended to be mission fields, rather home bases. The post-reformation segment of Christendom saw large gatherings and generational revivals but a large church does not equal a “seeker friendly” church. In American history, we have seen some readily obvious cycles of rebellion and repentance with the Great Awakenings. We aren’t in one of those periods of repentance as a society; we need to be, but I digress. If you build it and they will come is an entirely new phenomenon for physical churches.

I am unsure whether this phenomenon of seeker friendly is the result of the rebellion in our societies or a response to. However, many prominent proponents of seeker friendly churches have questionable theology such as Andy Stanley. Andy Stanley’s Deep and Wide is the bible for seeker friendly churches. There’s obvious problems with the seeker friendly church model that stem from belief systems that counter scripture, the Popularity Gospel as I have coined it.

But the original question was not contemplating the theological legitimacy of seeker friendly churches. Rather we are examining the use of church as the mission field which these famous megachurches’ methods have permeated into many bible believing churches. The origin comes from theologically void sources, however legitimate churches use much of these methods to increase the audience of the church, but I am wondering how these methods can increase the size of the church.

1Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain.

3For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 NASB

So if the church is to be the mission field why then is the church not interested in preaching the gospel every Sunday? Sermons on money don’t save. Sermons on not being “judgmental” don’t save. Not even sermons on loving your neighbor save. 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 concisely articulates a saving message that Paul seems to have preached regularly during his time in Corinth.

Comfort

The Good News of Jesus Christ is a call to a painful death to self, daily. No work-around backdoor preaching in a way non-believers can agree with is a sufficient substitute. Using the physical building and programs as a mission field is an unprecedented means modern Christianity finds itself in. By no means, should we turn down innovative ways to baptize believers and make disciples. However, these means must do exactly that. If the church is to draw non-Christians, specifically church adverse people, in with music, atmosphere, and accommodations then the duty of the Church to Christ is to present the gospel daily.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Child abuse: CNN uses 9-year-olds as ‘transgender’ props at Equality Town Hall

Published

on

Child abuse CNN uses 9-year-olds as transgender props at Equality Town Hall

Two distinct sciences – biology and psychology – contradict claims of inherent gender dysphoria in children. It’s not that it never happens, but study after study shows parental bias, abuse, or both are more prominent causes for children to believe they are misgendered than being “born this way.” Undeterred, the radical progressive left continues to promote the concept that child transgenderism is common and totally not the results of activist, misguided, or abusive parents.

During CNN’s “Equality Town Hall,” two 9-year-old children have been brought to the podium to ask questions of candidates. One such child, Jacob, was accompanied by his mother, Mimi Lemay, who happens to be a member of the Parents for Transgender Equality National Council.

Conservatives on Twitter were quick to point out the spectacle CNN was trying to propagate in their question to stay “woke” and relevant at the same time.

What? Only three Tweets? Fortunately, most Americans were either watching football, shopping for Halloween candy, or doing literally anything other than watching CNN’s town hall. It was that bad… from what I hear.

Here’s the reality of the Democrats’ agenda. They feel like they must pander to secure not only the votes of those in the community but also the large number of radical progressives not in the community, but who wish they were. This is 100% for nomination purposes only. Once a Democrat emerges victorious, the LBGTQ community will be pushed to the bottom of the Democrats’ and CNN’s priority list. Why? Because they represent a secure voting block for Democrats.

This is what makes it so unfortunate that children like Jacob are used to promote an agenda. At 9-years-old, he isn’t old enough to understand the complexities of politics. He’s also not only enough to be definitively experiencing gender dysphoria from a clinical perspective. Even progressive doctors acknowledge post-puberty sexual awareness is a prerequisite for true gender dysphoria to arise. At 9-years-old, he’s still just confused at best and brainwashed at worst.

Parents participating in this type of brainwashing should be investigated for abuse. Shame on CNN for promoting this type of child exploitation for the sake of appeasing those who hold a radical political ideology.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending