Connect with us

Culture and Religion

New year, new resolutions, new party

Published

on

New year new resolutions new party

Looking forward to 2019 and the socialistic slavery being offered by the Left.

Now that we’ve assessed 2018, its time to look at the ‘fresh’ ideas of the Left based on very, very, very old ideas. Never mind that the old ideas didn’t work, the new versions will work because of a new label. After all, these are people who excel at repackaging old failed ideas as new failed ideas.

Socialism: Four centuries of doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results

Granted, when Plato first proposed many of the vestiges of the ‘Ideal State’ 2,400 years ago in ancient Greece they were actually new and untested. Expressed again in Sir Thomas More’s Utopia over 500 years ago in 1516, they still hadn’t been tried. However, now that it’s 5 centuries later that is no longer the case. What began with the first colonies in the New World in what would become the United States. Continuing on with the first use of the word Socialism in connection to another short lived experiment in collectivism in New Harmony, Indiana. These ideas have a consistent track record of failure that cannot be denied, except by those uncaring of the cause of Liberty – people who pretend to be Liberal – who cynically use such ideas to obtain a death grip on power.

Never mind that these ancient ideas fly in the face of basic human nature or that they take the brutal repression of Liberty to be implemented. Never mind that these ideas have caused the deliberate mass murder of over 100 million people.

The authoritarian socialists on the Left assure us that this time around, their ideas will miraculously work. This time around, their ideas that run contrary to basic psychology will suddenly no longer do so. This time around, the magical dollars to fund their farcical schemes will flow like unicorn droppings. This time around, they will able to set up a wondrous Utopia before running out of other people’s money. Rest assured there will be no brutal repression of Liberty, even though they have already begun doing that with the basic human rights of self-preservation and self-expression. There won’t be any mass murder, despite their obsession with taking away the people’s ability to ‘resist’.

The Left’s underlying agenda is one of collectivism and coercion versus individualism and Liberty.

One finds it hard to believe that Leftists don’t understand that their collectivist mindset is anathema to Liberty. They are either deceiving themselves or trying to deceive everyone else. While they can claim to be ‘Liberating’ people by handing out freebies, the plain fact is that it is paid for with other people’s money. Other people’s money taken at gunpoint.

New Resolutions.

Last year, one of these was on using the proper terms to describe the Left. Halting the practice of complimenting them with a term that implies what they are not: Liberal. Their Liberty destroying antics makes it imperative that we redouble these efforts as well as expand them in the other areas where they use words that contrary to their meaning: Progressive, Democratic. Most of the Left’s socialist national agenda is based on deception, we have to call them out on this whenever possible.

A new Liberty lexicon to push back on the ever so tiresome PC culture.

We’ve in a cold war of words [Being less and less civil by the day] The Left is far ahead of us in reshaping the conversation with words such a ‘migrant’ instead of illegal alien, gun ‘reform’ instead of gun confiscation. So it is time we push back on the practice. These are but a few suggestions:

  • Socialistic Slavery instead of Socialism.
  • Parasite Left instead of Progressive Left.
  • Gun Confiscation SWATing instead of ‘Red Flag’ laws.
  • Authoritarian Socialist or Leftist instead of Liberal, Progressive or even Democrat.

One other suggestion.

This would to become more concise in writing. [‘Physician, Heal thyself!’] Even though the explanations of Leftist ideas take up a lot of digital ink, they do manage to deceive with short, emotionally laden talking points.

This is why we of the Pro-Liberty Right are better at the ‘meme’ art form and area we should push to advantage. Liberty and freedom are easily understood concepts. Leftists have somehow twisted these words to make it seem that voting to enslave oneself in socialism is somehow ‘Liberating’ or ‘Liberalism’. That clearly isn’t the case, we need to make that clear to everyone else.

New Party.

There is an old Chinese proverb that one should dig a well before one is thirsty. Such is the case here, if we wait until the electoral season is upon us, it will be too late. We shouldn’t have to detail all worsening frustrations with the Republican Party. Trump has already indicated that he’s willing to deal with the Left in getting certain things implemented.

At present, the voting population seems to be dividing into 3 camps. Most people fall into one of two towards the Middle-Right of the political spectrum. With most being of the Libertarian, Conservative and True Liberal camp on the right. With others are of the moderate mentality being of a right leaning stance while being buffeted by Leftist propaganda making them think they on the Left. Then there are the far-Left Socialist cadres full of sound and fury, signifying nothing that dominate the media culture and indoctrination centres (government schools).

Perhaps it is time to have three parties representing these three camps – A far Left, National Socialist party, a moderate party and finally a Conservative, Libertarian, and True Liberal party standing for Limited government.

The far Left, National Socialist party could finally be honest for once about their desire for a ‘worker’s paradise’ instead of Liberty. Hopefully, most people would see this as a dead-end and it would slowly ‘wither away’. The GOP could be the moderate party in the middle, since that us the direction they are heading anyway. The new party would stand for the conservation of Liberty and limited government. After the far Left leaves the scene, the remaining parties could have a civil debate over the proper role of government, setting forth a new pattern of freedom.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Conservatism

What Steven Crowder’s latest pro-life Change My Mind reveals

Published

on

What Steven Crowders latest pro-life Change My Mind reveals

Steven Crowder in his most recent edition of “Change My Mind” experienced more aggressive pro-abortion arguments than he had in the previous installments. The episode featured people arguing that moral personhood began at birth or even “experience.” Often times, Change My Mind demonstrates that under scrutiny, arguments have flaws. Such is the method that got Socrates killed. With all of these discussions, the failure to prove the lack of humanity for a fetus proved unconvincing and logically undefended by its proponents. But I want to address the intrinsic instinct, the universal morality, that could not stay buried under layers of denial. These pro-abortion advocates, deep down, know they are wrong.

In all four conversations, late term abortion was supported. However the caveat of threat to the mother was brought up, despite the rarity of such occurrence. Steven Crowder called them out, citing the fact that they said they would support third trimester abortion even if it were not a threat to the mother by their own previous admission. The proponents then hesitantly agreed. So Crowder then asked “why bring it up?” That is the question. Why would abortion advocates rely on such extreme examples?

I believe that deep down, those who have not finished their leftist training have not intrinsically forsaken the convicting power of conscious, because of what I observed in this video. The latter two proponents came off as not even believing what they were saying. The first was a hardcore stoner. The second was a perhaps shy of being a feminist. The stoner gentleman said “breath” was the transfer of moral personhood and if a baby came out and had yet to breath, it would not yet be human, therefore justified in killing it. The last one suggested the ultra vague notion of “experience” rendered moral personhood. Yet she agreed that the experiences of the unborn were valid human experiences and then whimsically concluded that it was still okay to kill them.

She, in particular, sounded really unconvinced in her own stance. I thought she was going to make a utilitarian argument that would have led to an interesting discussion about quantifying human suffering. This would have been a better argument than “experience” which is even less defensible than sentience. The gentleman in the beginning argued that a fetus was a parasite but then insisted it was not autonomous. Biologically speaking a parasite is autonomous from its host.

These two claims are mutually exclusive. Three of these students presented arguments that I was unconvinced they themselves even believed. I am shocked that this was my takeaway, for on every other Change My Mind, even the other three installments on abortion, I believed that the guests genuinely believed their own arguments.

If a fetus is not human, there would be no need to rely on extreme examples to defend abortion. It’s becoming increasingly obvious that abortion is an affront to natural law, as science increasingly supports the notion of human life at creation. The Founding Fathers so cleverly wrote that our rights were self evident. The affront to these self evident rights will naturally be difficult to defend logically. This is why the abortion advocates had such poor arguments with premises that could not withstand charitable scrutiny. In this case, the pro-abortion advocates all believed a conclusion of abortion permissibility, without internally accepting the premises necessary to support the conclusion and the implications they would ensue from said premises.

There is a difference between a person being reputably evil and plainly gullible. That difference would be seen as someone who simply accept that a fetus is not human and simply doesn’t care. These college students weren’t there yet. Nor is the rest of the country as a whole. So there is reason for hope.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Intellectual discourse versus Biblical snippets to spread the Gospel

Published

on

Intellectual discourse versus Biblical snippets to spread the Gospel

In a world with a shortening attention span, is it better to drop “Bible bombs” on people in the short time they give us? With a topic as complex as a Biblical worldview, is it better to deliver long-form dissertations and engage in extended debate?

The answer to both questions is, “Yes.”

Those of us who are trying to spread the Gospel and bring more people to the light are tasked with a difficult challenge to overcome. Much of the world is shifting towards a secular worldview and abandoning the truth of the Bible. Even though people abroad are coming into the faith in astounding numbers, people in western culture are often pulling away.

We are faced with the two big challenges: time and effort. Sometimes, people simply won’t allow enough time to learn about the Bible, our Creator, our Savior, or any of the other portions of faith that are required to penetrate the evil haze that is sweeping across western culture. On the other hand, there is a need to be prepared for those instances when someone is open to discussion, when they have questions and are willing to look deeper to find the answers.

The former often requires us to be ready with a Biblical “elevator pitch” in order to establish the latter. This is one of the reasons why we’re so focused on social media. It’s a venue that we believe can bring people into the state of mind of asking questions. While it’s likely not possible for a Tweet to make people change their worldview, we see it as a prompt to act on the nagging feelings that have been hitting them but that they’ve never pursued in the past.

Once you have people asking questions, it’s important to have the right answers readily available. If they come to you for guidance and you’re not ready to deliver it, you can actually do more harm than good. It’s a fear that has enveloped us at times. It has driven us to a state of constant study; not a day goes by when we’re not doing something to expand our understanding and sharpen our abilities to deliver the right message at the right time.

Prayer is the most important thing you can do. It’s even more important than studying. If you can tap into the message through prayer and Bible study, the Lord will provide you with the words you need when the time to deliver them comes.

One does not have to go to seminary to be able to answer questions when they are asked. Between the internet and, of course, the Bible, the answers will present themselves if you’re are simply willing to look.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Lila Rose reveals the heinous statistics about Down Syndrome abortions

Published

on

Lila Rose reveals the heinous statistics about Down Syndrome abortions

Yesterday was World Down Syndrome Day, and while many celebrated the wonderful successes and challenges overcome by those with Down Syndrome as well as their families, many in the pro-life movement highlighted a disturbing trend. With our ability to identify Down Syndrome from the womb, aborting babies with the condition has become so commonplace, the Down Syndrome population is non-existent in some countries.

Live Action founder Lila Rose took to Twitter to share some of these depressing statistics, including the horrible increased frequency in which it now happens in the United States. Anyone who knows someone with Down Syndrome must acknowledge their value and the fact that their lives should not be snuffed out because the scientific community says it’s a good thing.

Every life is a gift. Every single one of them. The “humane” murder of preborn babies because of their condition is one of the most mystifying stances of the “progressive” left.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report