When it was revealed a couple of days ago that the whistleblower accusing President Trump of quid pro quo with Ukraine actually worked with a current Democratic candidate, speculation was rampant. But the revelation of which candidate it was makes way too much sense. Of course it was Joe Biden. We should have realized it the whole time.

We already knew he was a CIA agent, which potentially put him working with the White House. Biden is the only candidate who has ever worked out of the White House. We also know the subject of the call with Ukraine included discussions about Biden, so a sympathizer hearing about the call would be naturally compelled to blow the whistle if he thought it would help the candidate he knew and favored.

Now, we have the pieces of the puzzle coming together.

No, it’s almost certainly not innocent. We know the whistleblower first took his concerns to Representative Adam Schiff’s staff and that Schiff lied about it. Now that we know the whistleblower worked with Biden, it makes sense that he would want to protect his former boss.

Could there be more to it than that? If the whistleblower participated in work Biden did in Ukraine, it’s possible that he wouldn’t want his own actions or actions of others he worked with exposed in an investigation by the Ukrainians. There’s no indication that anyone other than Biden was involved in wrongdoing, but it’s conspicuous that the whistleblower may have been part of the Ukrainian entourage.

Every new detail that emerges about the whistleblower and the Democrats pushing impeachment paints it as more suspicious. What else are they trying to hide? Is impeachment a smokescreen as they cover their own trail of corruption?

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

Candidates running for office often defend their opponents in an effort to seem fair. We saw this back and forth “goodwill” play out before the Iowa caucus in 2016 when Ted Cruz and Donald Trump defended each other regularly before the gloves came off. Now, Elizabeth Warren has gone after Facebook for not taking down a Trump campaign ad attacking the former Vice President for his role in pressuring Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his son’s company.

Is this political goodwill and a launching pad for Warren to ramp up attacks on the social media giant, or is there more to the story?

“She’s less interested in protecting Biden and more interested in protecting herself and the DNC,” an aide to a Republican Senator said. “Their ties to Ukrainian corruption run deep. The last thing Warren wants is to be the nominee for a party that’s embroiled in the Obama administration’s nasty dealings with the previous Ukrainian government.”

The more we learn about the ties between Ukraine and the Democratic Party, the clearer the picture is becoming. We already heard the bombshell audio from the current anti-corruption chief in Ukraine saying that he helped Hillary Clinton in 2016. Could the whole Russia investigation have been a smokescreen to prevent the real collusion that took place from seeing the light of day?

Democrats already have progressive legacy media in their back pockets. Even The Hill article referenced above goes to great links to say there’s no evidence (other than Biden’s own words) that he pressured Ukraine for his son’s benefit. As they and the rest of mainstream media have been saying, it was just an administration policy to pressure Ukraine to drop the prosecutor because, “The Obama administration repeatedly said it sought to oust the prosecutor because of concerns he was not doing enough to root out corruption.”

Right. When was the last time the White House took such an interest in another country’s prosecutor doing an insufficient job? If you buy that story, there’s likely nothing that would convince you of wrongdoing by Democrats.

Unlike legacy media, social media is not necessarily under the Democrats’ control. Sure, big tech companies favor Democrats generally, but as their user base is responsible for spreading stories among their own connections, Democrats have no control over stories that go “viral.” Is this why Warren is so interested in keeping the Biden-Ukraine story from spreading on Facebook?

As an owner of a conservative news aggregator told our EIC earlier, Warren knows “Biden is just the tip of the iceberg.”

From the Russian hoax to the fake impeachment inquiry, Democrats have been radically intent on keeping attention away from their own dealings in Ukraine. Collusion is real, and Democrats are desperate to keep us from learning more about it.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

Progressive mainstream media will play its part in trying to keep the focus of the fake impeachment inquiry on a phone call and a whistleblower’s complaint. In doing so, they will also avoid talking about Democratic corruption associated with Ukraine, including but not limited to Joe and Hunter Biden’s string of suspicious actions and circumstances. But eventually, something’s going to give. Pressure will mount as story after story is reported by conservative media while being ignored by their progressive counterparts at CNN, the Washington Post, MSNBC, and the NY Times.

There are honest journalists out there, even among progressives, who can only ignore the obvious for so long before they have to go off script and call out the Democrats. One such journalist is Peter Schweizer, an expert on government corruption. This whole Biden-Ukraine mess is right up his alley and the NY Times surprisingly printed his story about the clearly shady dealings the Bidens had with Ukraine and China.

Is the NY Times’ shield coming down? Are they experiencing a random moment of lucid journalistic principles? Was the presence of a different scandal involving Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell the required attack on a Republican necessary for justifying printing the story? Or, is it simply the fact that there are no laws currently on the books that would make Hunter Biden’s cushy job in Ukraine illegal enough to take a swipe at the (former) Democratic presidential frontrunner?

Schweizer, a champion for ending government corruption at home and abroad, wrote the book on the matter: “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends”

Here’s the story:

Anyone who believes Hunter Biden would have landed such an opportunity if his dad wasn’t Vice President of the United States is delusional. Anyone who heard what Joe Biden said to the Council on Foreign Relations and claims they don’t smell anything fishy is being dishonest. These dots are not difficult to connect, even for Democrats.

The NY Times is starting to wonder. Americans should also be focusing on the real issues with the Ukrainian scandal. They were clearly pressured to act on behalf of a U.S. politician. But it wasn’t President Trump. The Bidens should be the ones in the hot seat.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.