Connect with us

Democrats

Hillary tells Fallon she wished a different Republican had won, what a crock

Published

on

Hillary Clinton opened her mouth, which means she lied. This one was such a whopper that only the newest liberal mouthpiece Jimmy Fallon could have swallowed it. But Fallon set it up for her.

Jimmy: Do you think, like, if you were up against a a different Republican, would you have felt different?

Hillary: I would have. I would have. Yeah, I thought about that a lot. You know, look, if I had lost to another Republican, somebody who I disagreed with, but who I thought was temperamentally capable of being president, who would take the job, and the awesome responsibility seriously, of course I’d be disappointed, but I wouldn’t be so worried about my country, and the world as I am now when I see what’s going on every single day.

This has to be the biggest crock of lies since Hillary’s husband Bill said “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.”

Hillary Clinton wanted to run against Trump. She conspired and colluded with the leftist media to “elevate” Trump’s campaign. In April 2015, before Trump entered the race, Hillary’s campaign and the DNC came up with a strategy to promote the most extreme GOP candidate, to “make whomever the Republicans nominate unpalatable to the majority of the electorate.” Then Trump came along and they drooled over him like Pavlov’s dog.

They did everything they could to avoid running against any centrist like Chris Christie or Jeb Bush. Granted, conservatives had no problem helping her there. Hillary’s biggest nightmare might have been Carly Fiorina, or even Ted Cruz, but it was not to be. They put all their eggs into the Trump basket and handed the election to him.

Hillary Clinton Allegedly ‘Elevated’ Trump Campaign | The Resurgent

http://theresurgent.com/hillary-clinton-allegedly-elevated-trump-campaign/Among the documents in the leaked John Podesta emails recently posted by Wikileaks was a strategy memo that suggested that the Clinton campaign may have colluded with the Democratic National Committee and the media to promote certain Republican primary candidates that the Democrats considered extreme. If genuine, the memo indicates that the Clinton campaign interfered with the Republican primary with the help of the media. The memo was an attachment to an email with the Wikileaks ID number 1120. It was sent to numerous staff members on April 23, 2015 with the subject line “[AGENDA & MEMO] Friday Strategy at…

Hillary literally–and I mean this–handed the election to Trump. And she lied about her campaign. Clinton campaign workers in Wisconsin and Michigan begged the Brookyln hipster-ranch that was the Clinton campaign HQ for more help, knowing they were losing ground, but received none. She got exactly what she deserved.

Hillary: …I mean, that’s one of the big mysteries about this election is that the information that I had was not just from my campaign, but from so many different sources. Obviously, different campaigns, and candidates, and the press, and others, and so when the first returns started coming in, and we heard that it wasn’t going well for us in Florida, and North Carolina, you know, it was worrying, but not definitive because there are a a number of different ways to get to the votes you need in the electoral college, but then by, you know, the end of the night, by midnight, and we saw what was happening in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, you know, look, I was devastated, and I was not just because I thought I was going to win, and I wanted to be president, and to do the work of being president, but because I was so worried about what it meant to have my opponent win, so, it was a really tough night.

I’ll give her credit for this one bit of truth. It really was a tough night for Hillary. So tough she refused to even show her face to her devastated supporters. She dismissed them without even making an appearance. She sent them home while the Trump campaign celebrated just blocks away.

Hillary would have been a terrible president. She’s a wicked, wicked person who can’t find the truth with both hands, a flashlight and a bloodhound. Anyone who buys her fictional book deserves to throw their money away.

Advertisement

0

Democrats

Dianne Feinstein’s comment on Dayton shooter skipped one important point

Published

on

Dianne Feinsteins comment on Dayton shooter skipped one important point

Gun control is the talk of the town as the week comes to a close. Well, that and Greenland. And Jeffrey Epstein. But the mass shootings two weeks ago has DC buzzing, media furiously reporting, and activists on both sides of the debate furiously Tweeting at each other. Senator Dianne Feinstein weighed in on the discussion by pointing out some important facts about the alleged Dayton shooter, Connor Betts.

Her facts are correct. Her analysis is off because it missed one important point. We’ll get to that in a minute, but let’s declare once and for all (though I’m sure I’ll have to repeat myself later) that the 2nd Amendment IS NOT ABOUT HUNTING OR HOME PROTECTION. Our right to keep and bear firearms was put into the Constitution by our founders because they recognized what could happen if the people had no recourse against an oppressive government. Just as Venezuelans didn’t realize they danger they were putting themselves into when they allowed their guns to be taken away, so too do many Americans put way too much trust in government.

The authoritarian left wants guns because they know they’ll never achieve their endgame as long as the people can defend themselves from tyranny.

Feinstein is correct that the Dayton shooter was able to cause an extreme amount of death and injury in a short period of time. Police were quick to respond, otherwise it could have been much worse. But as our EIC pointed out in a Tweet, Feinstein’s narrative is worthless when you look at it from the opposite perspective.

Gun control is not the solution to our mass shooting problem. If anything, gun control has enabled shooters to enact their crimes without fear of many “good guys with a gun” to stop them. We must never give up our 2nd Amendment rights.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

President says AOC ‘fuming’ that Tlaib, Omar are becoming the faces of the party

Published

on

President says AOC fuming that Tlaib Omar are becoming the faces of the party

President Trump took to Twitter to make fun of the opposition party as two of its most outspoken members, Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, continue making headlines and stirring up controversy. He even threw in an accusation against Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for good measure.

There are no indications that this is accurate, but that’s not the point. This isn’t hard policy or thoughtful analysis. It’s a petty jab, and while many Americans, including some of his fans, are against him taking shots at the opposition in such a manner, this is the society we live in and it includes a President who takes jabs on Twitter. You can stress over it or sit back and enjoy it. I choose the latter.

For AOC’s part, she took the jab with a chuckle.

Beyond the diversion this offers ahead of a weekend, reality is probably more closely reflected by the President’s Tweet than Democrats are comfortable admitting, at least the part about them being the face of the party. “The Squad” makes more headlines among the four of them than the rest of the Democrats combined, and this includes the powerful heads of committees who are actively investigating President Trump ahead of a possible impeachment.

Both Democrats and Republicans have different degrees of infatuation with “The Squad.” Are they a real threat to our republic, as many on both sides claim, or are they merely a diversion from real decisions being made in DC?

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

Kirsten Gillibrand wants to confiscate guns

Published

on

Kirsten Gillibrand wants to confiscate guns

Senator and failing Democratic candidate for president Kirsten Gillibrand wants to confiscate your guns. The former “conservative” when it was politically expedient to be one in upstate New York has now gone the way of most her new party. She’s a radical progressive who wants your guns.

For someone who used to have an “A” rating with the NRA, she’s come a long way to hit rock bottom by calling for “assault weapons” bans and mandatory buybacks, AKA confiscations. Oh, but she won’t actually SAY they’re mandatory buybacks. She danced around that question like a pop star.

Gun activist Colion Noir broke down a recent interview she did with CNN. It was clear, as Noir pointed out, that CNN has already weighed Gillibrand in the balance and found her wanting. They went after her to corner her on her old gun rights support and tried to get her to admit what she wants to do as president with gun confiscations.

It’s funny watching Democrats flail around trying to get attention for themselves. There are only a handful of candidates leaving a mark, and Kirsten Gillibrand isn’t one of them. But she’s still trying to do damage to the 2nd Amendment on her way out.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending