Connect with us

Healthcare

Just when you thought that Obamacare couldn’t get any worse…

Published

on

Just when you thought that Obamacare couldnt get any worse

Leftists obsess over controlling people, what better way to do so than with devices that track everyone’s movements.

Desire for control is the distinguishing feature of the left.  However, this control is highly dependent on knowing a person’s every move as well as having sanctions on incorrect behaviour. The people wouldn’t normally accept this level of control, but wealth redistribution for the cause of ‘free-healthcare’ may just fit the bill.

Wealth redistribution in the guise of healthcare.

Back when good old Karl Marx appropriated what were already the centuries old ideas of socialism, he came up with this cute little saying: “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” This redistribution was the perfect blueprint for enslaving people since some people could be controlled by how much of their property is taken from them by force. While others could be controlled with the doling out of this property with it depending on votes and loyalty.

In the case of Obamacare, it was only after passage that the word ‘redistribution’ was used with all of it’s socialist implications:

“Americans want a fair and fixed insurance market,” said Jonathan Gruber, a health economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who advised Mr. Obama’s team as it designed the law. “You cannot have that without some redistribution away from a small number of people.”

Translation from the Leftist double talk: Our voters want free stuff including free health care. Unfortunately, that cannot be accomplished without forcibly taking of property from ‘The Rich’ as defined by us. But don’t worry that you think you’re stealing, we’ll salve your conscience with the repetition of the lie that it was somehow your property in the first place.

Failure isn’t just an option with Obamacare – It’s a feature!

Like most socialist schemes, this will quickly fall apart because most people abhor having their property stolen from them for the purposes of buying the loyalty of Democratic voters. Obamacare was designed to implode, ushering in the worse alternative of national socialized healthcare (better know by the deceptive label “Single payer”). The abject failure of a government-run health care system will see it replaced with an even bigger failed government-run system.

Fitness trackers for healthcare rationing.

In the meantime, what better way for the nation’s Left to keep an eye on the people and under control than with the benevolent excuse of taking care of everyone? Enter the brave new world of ubiquitous ‘fitness trackers’ for the purpose of doling out Obamacare benefits.

At present, the use of this new piece of kit is  voluntary for saving on health care. However, no one should be under the illusion that with skyrocketing costs of the laughably termed ‘Affordable Healthcare Act’ that the control obsessed Left won’t want mandatory use of these trackers for the purposes of rationing health care.

So while Obamacare is bankrupting some and enriching others, it will soon inspire a whole new level of people control if it’s allowed to stand or metastasize into national socialized healthcare.

Healthcare

Brett Kavanaugh punts on Planned Parenthood cases, leaving conservatives baffled

Published

on

Brett Kavanaugh punts on Planned Parenthood cases leaving conservatives baffled

Conservatives were cheering when Justice Brett Kavanaugh was finally confirmed after a tumultuous process that polarized the nation. Leftists argued that Kavanaugh’s confirmation would be the end for women’s rights to make choices about abortions, among other things, even before the confirmation turned into a high school sexual assault circus.

Instead of hearing arguments in his first major abortion-related case since taking the bench, Kavanaugh sided with Chief Justice John Roberts and the four left-leaning Supreme Court Justices to decline to review it. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch all wanted to hear the case, but it takes four.

According to Thomas, the move was political.

Kavanaugh, Roberts, side with liberal judges on Planned Parenthood case

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/10/supreme-court-planned-parenthood-defunding-case-845056?lIn February, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that Kansas was wrong to to end Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding, writing that states can’t cut off funding for reasons “unrelated to the provider’s competence and the quality of the healthcare it provides.” Four other appeals courts have ruled that Medicaid patients have the right to access the provider of their choice.

But the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held that states do have the right to terminate a provider’s Medicaid contract and that residents cannot challenge that decision.

The Supreme Court’s action Monday allows the split decisions to stand in different federal circuits. Thomas, in his dissent, wrote that the Supreme Court should have taken the cases to resolve conflicting findings from lower courts.

“Because of this Court’s inaction, patients in different States — even patients with the same providers — have different rights to challenge their State’s provider decisions,” Thomas wrote.

My Take

Thomas is right. This is the type of case that is ideal for the Supreme Court to resolve the rights of individuals, who are currently bound by different laws in different states. The majority of the time, this isn’t a bad thing. States can and should act differently from one another. However, when it comes to a person’s right to challenge a federal funding, which Medicaid is in part, there needs to be clear direction from the Supreme Court.

As Thomas noted, the reasons for punting on this issue were clear.

“So what explains the court’s refusal to do its job here? I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.’ That makes the Court’s decision particularly troubling, as the question presented has nothing to do with abortion,” Thomas wrote.

This case had nothing to do with abortion, at least not directly. It was about the rights of the people to challenge how their tax dollars were spent, a fundamental right that drills down to the core of our republic. The mere mention of Planned Parenthood, even outside of the abortion issue, was enough to spook Justice Kavanaugh. He joins Chief Justice Roberts and Republicans on Capitol Hill who are so terrified of Planned Parenthood, they refuse to address the issue even at its most basic level.

Continue Reading

Economy

Medicare-for-All would cost more than every penny we’ve spent on defense in the country’s history

Published

on

Medicare-for-All would cost more than every penny weve spent on defense in the countrys history

Math is hard for many Americans. It isn’t just the sad state of our public school system that keeps the people down. It’s politicians like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who push lies and pipe dreams that keep many Americans thinking the government has unlimited money and there’s no real difference between millions, billions, and trillions.

There’s a big difference, of course, but leftists will never let the number of zeroes get in the way of promoting their ideological goals. As I posted earlier, even left-leaning news outlets like the Washington Post are calling out Ocasio-Cortez for her false statements about Medicare-for-All.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez earns 4 Pinocchios over bungled defense budget interpretation

http://noqreport.com/2018/12/04/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-earns-4-pinocchios-bungled-defense-budget-interpretation/Ocasio-Cortez must have realized when she Tweeted the article that there’s no way “66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.” She was certainly playing down to her base in hopes they’d ignore reality and embrace her false notions just because she said it. The Tweet was either a bald-faced lie or she’s an absolute moron. Or both.

Washington Post, which normally supports socialist initiatives recommended by their Democratic puppetmasters, had to call this particular claim out. They gave the claim “4 Pinocchios,” a designation they save for some of the most egregious lies in politics.

It isn’t just about being completely wrong on the Pentagon’s accounting errors. This goes deeper. While fact-checking her claims, PolitiFact decided to do some math of their own. They gathered defense spending data as far back as they could – 1940 – and tallied the totals. Those who understand the difference between millions, billions, and trillions probably won’t be surprised to learn the total spent in that time is under $18 trillion, well short of the $21 trillion Ocasio-Cortez claimed she could have used to pay 2/3 of Medicare-for-All.

The also stipulated that since defense spending was much lower in the past, it’s very likely the total spent since the nation’s inception still couldn’t hit Ocasio-Cortez’ number.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrong on scale of Pentagon accounting errors

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/dec/03/alexandria-ocasio-cortez/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-wrong-scale-pentagon-acco/One tip-off is the amount of Ocasio-Cortez’s “accounting errors” is far bigger than the actual Pentagon spending from 1998 to 2015, which was $8.5 trillion. In fact, it’s also far bigger than the amount the government has spent on national security since 1940 and, in all likelihood, in the nation’s history.

Here’s a chart we assembled showing national-security spending by the federal government from 1940 to today. Ocasio-Cortez’s $21 trillion estimate exceeds the entirety of national-security spending since 1940, which checks in around $17.8 trillion. And while full data back to 1776 doesn’t exist, prorating backwards for another 164 years would almost certainly not add enough to make the total $21 trillion.

Medicare-for-All is projected to cost $32 trillion over its first 10 years alone.

Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and all their mathematically challenged supporters need to hear this information now. If you could somehow take back every dollar spent on defense from the time the nation was formed until today, it still wouldn’t be enough to pay for Medicare-for-All. This isn’t a right-wing conspiracy. This is left-leaning Politifact crunching the numbers.

Continue Reading

Democrats

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez earns 4 Pinocchios over bungled defense budget interpretation

Published

on

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez earns 4 Pinocchios over bungled defense budget interpretation

Either Congresswoman-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is willfully trying to mislead the people through blatantly false statements or she’s a complete idiot. There’s really no room for anything in between, though both options may exist simultaneously.

Even leftist news outlets are walking away from one of her latest claims about how to pay for Medicare-for-All.

Here’s the Tweet that sparked disapproval from both sides of the political aisle:

As many have pointed out, the $21 trillion in accounting discrepancies at the Pentagon does not represent money that was just sitting there getting wasted while Medicare-for-All languished in mathematical oblivion. The figure referenced represents accounting discrepancies in both directions – money in and money out – as well as transfers between departments within the Pentagon.

Ocasio-Cortez must have realized when she Tweeted the article that there’s no way “66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.” She was certainly playing down to her base in hopes they’d ignore reality and embrace her false notions just because she said it. The Tweet was either a bald-faced lie or she’s an absolute moron. Or both.

Washington Post, which normally supports socialist initiatives recommended by their Democratic puppetmasters, had to call this particular claim out. They gave the claim “4 Pinocchios,” a designation they save for some of the most egregious lies in politics.

We can hope and pray an incoming member of the House of Representatives is simply lying to promote her agenda. If she’s not lying, then she’s an idiot, and that might be worse when we consider how many Democrats adore her right now.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement Donate to NOQ Report

Facebook

Twitter

Trending

Copyright © 2018 NOQ Report