‘The fact that something is published in a journal doesn’t mean it’s true,’ scientist said
Scientific censorship mainly comes from well-intentioned scientists, not from media outlets or activists, a group of authors wrote in a recently released study in a major academic journal.
Thirty-eight academics, including Glenn Loury, John McWhorter, and Steven Pinker, co-authored a paper in the Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences , released Nov. 20, titled “Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda.” The authors examined censorship of scientific research, concluding that it is primarily driven by other scientists or the authors themselves.
Scientists censor the work of their peers and themselves in attempts to save others from allegedly harmful information and themselves from backlash for unpopular conclusions.One author, who teaches at Columbia University, told The College Fix that readers must remember scientists’ fallibility. “We should be mindful… that scientists are people […]
Read the Whole Article From the Source: www.thecollegefix.com