• About
  • Contact
  • Give
Newsletter
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
Friday, May 27, 2022
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
No Result
View All Result

Here’s Why You Aren’t Allowed to Watch the Ghislaine Maxwell Trial

This isn’t a conspiracy. This is just plain old government corruption.

by Hannah Cox
December 2, 2021
in Opinions
Here’s Why You Aren’t Allowed to Watch the Ghislaine Maxwell Trial
TOP Organic Freeze-Dried Chicken

The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, the socialite who stands accused of procuring young girls for the sex predator Jeffrey Epstein, began last week.

Though the mainstream media has not focused as heavily on this case as other high-profile trials in recent months, the proceedings have certainly not been forgotten by the general public. But much to the chagrin of that public, the trial will not be filmed.

Some have even painted this fact in a conspiratorial light, a tint that has surrounded much of the story around Epstein, his death, and now Maxwell’s trial.

More specifically, many believe high-ranking officials across multiple governments and celebrities were caught up in the sex ring Epstein allegedly ran, and that the powers that be within our government are invested in preventing these details from coming to light.

Don’t wait until food shortages get REALLY bad before stocking up. Get a three-month’s supply now while it’s still available.

So Ghislaine Maxwell is on trial for sex trafficking for Jeffrey Epstein but media are banned from the courtroom, no live stream because of “sensational” elements, the judge is an Obama appointee just promoted by Biden, & the prosecutor is James Comey’s daughter. FISHY. 👀

— Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) November 29, 2021

BREAKING: “Judge In Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Issues Media-Wide Gag Order: All Press & Spectators Barred From Courtroom.”
We know who they are protecting and we can’t allow it!

— Tim Kennedy (@TimKennedyMMA) November 28, 2021

The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial should livestreamed on every news station in the world. But it isn't because powerful people in her black book will do anything to keep the truth from the people.

— Maxwell Trial Tracker (@TrackerTrial) November 29, 2021

Conspiracy, Or Regular Government Corruption?

People will be forgiven for having little to no faith in our government or our systems, and this wouldn’t be the first trial with foul play by the system (a fact supporters of our justice system, capital punishment, and qualified immunity would do well to remember when they approach public policies).

But, the vast majority of these reports have been flatly false. Maxwell’s trial will not be filmed for one reason and one reason alone: cameras have been banned in federal courts for decades, which is the level at which she will be tried. Media will still be allowed in the courtroom, as will a certain number of spectators.

According to the United States Courts website:

“Electronic media coverage of criminal proceedings in federal courts has been expressly prohibited under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53 since the criminal rules were adopted in 1946. Rule 53 states: “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.”

Furthermore:

“In 1972 the Judicial Conference of the United States adopted a prohibition against ‘broadcasting, televising, recording, or taking photographs in the courtroom and areas immediately adjacent thereto.'”

Now, this isn’t to say there’s nothing fishy going on in this case, just that there’s nothing especially fishy going on with this practice in this case. It also does not mean there’s nothing wrong with the protocol, evenly applied though it may be.

Indeed, there is a very good argument to be made for why cameras should be allowed in all trials, but the courts, prosecutors, and judges all continue to argue stringently against it.

Bill Gates wants meat to go away. He wants us to eat bugs. I won’t eat bugs. I am getting organic, roasted, freeze-dried chicken for long-term storage from Prepper Organics.

Some of their arguments are more valid than others, like the need to protect witnesses and victims. That’s a valid concern in a case like this one. The victims have all already suffered greatly, and the global attention on the case could be enough to scare away even the strongest of individuals from choosing to participate. But, there are better ways of addressing this concern than banning cameras from the courtroom. Witnesses could be allowed to testify remotely, utilizing technology that could obscure their identity, as one example.

As a whole, this is just another way the government avoids accountability and transparency. And knowing what we know about the justice system, there is nowhere that this scrutiny is needed more.

The Need for Transparency

The Founding Fathers were well aware of the need for transparency in government. As James Madison once said, “A popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” It is essential that the American people have access to information about the inner workings of our government if we should ever hope to be able to hold its actors accountable. Without this essential component, our civil liberties will not stand for long—and this is already evident in our crumbling legal system.

As Thomas Paine said, “A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.” The rate of prosecutorial and judicial misconduct ought to be enough to back up this statement.

So as Americans are becoming more aware of the abuses in our justice system, we should demand that practices like prohibiting recordings be abandoned so all citizens have a greater ability to hold government actors accountable.

Image by Ghislaine Maxwell, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

 Hannah Cox

Hannah Cox
Hannah Cox is the Content Manager and Brand Ambassador for the Foundation for Economic Education.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

TOP Z-Stack



Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?

Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.

There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.

Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.

Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.

We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.

To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.

Thank you, and God Bless!

JD Rucker


Tags: CrimeFEEGhislaine MaxwellJeffrey EpsteinTop Story

Bypass Big Tech Censors



My Show

The Midnight Sentinel

Our Sponsors

MyPillow Promo Code NOQ

MyPatriotSupply
Z-Stack Life
Our Gold Guy

Shows

Gun Control Doesn't Work

7 Globalist Monkeypox Scenarios

Food = Control

Pandemic Treaty Is Not a Nothingburger

The Pandemic Treaty's REAL Threat

Bypass Big Tech Censors


RSS The Federalist

  • New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham Used Taxpayer Dollars To Fund Mansion Party
  • Doors. How Do They Work? Let’s Find Out!
  • Ohio Court Green-Lights ‘Common Carrier’ Lawsuit That Could Block Google From Playing Favorites
  • MLB Denies Georgia An Apology After Record Voter Turnout Proved ‘Jim Crow’ Smears Baseless
  • Gas Prices Hit A Staggering $4.60 Average Nationwide In New Record

RSS The Blaze

  • Frank Luntz suggests referring to 'gun safety' rather than 'gun control'
  • Wendy's co-worker of Texas school shooter says he was open about plans to save up money for weapons
  • 'I dare you to run the same poll with your followers': Elon Musk polls people about whether they trust politicians or billionaires less, then challenges AOC to do the same
  • Florida IG report says Rebekah Jones' accusations against Gov. DeSantis on COVID-19 response are completely baseless
  • Julia Ioffe deletes tweet after posing the questions, 'What if you could perform an abortion with an AR-15? What if the 19 kids killed [in] Uvalde weren't children, but fetuses?'

RSS PJ Media

  • Why the Heck Did Amber Heard's Legal Team Call Her Back to the Stand?
  • The Trouble With Do-Somethingism on Guns
  • Chicago Thug Points Gun at News Crew During LIVE Report About Gun Crimes
  • Officers Tried to Negotiate With Uvalde Shooter While He Was Barricaded in School With Children, Officials Say
  • Timeline Shifts AGAIN in Uvalde School Shooting

RSS National File

  • Yankees Twitter Account Shares Anti-Gun Messages, Says ‘Latinx’
  • Dem State Rep. Goes On Facebook Meltdown, Tells ‘Small-Penis’ Gun Supporters To Kill Themselves
  • U.S. Marshals Were Outside Robb Elementary as Uvalde Massacre Unfolded
  • San Francisco School District Drops Word ‘Chief’ From Job Titles Over Native American Sensitivities
  • Armed Woman Thwarts Potential Mass Shooting at Charleston Apartment Complex

RSS Townhall

  • Ethanol: a Dumb idea or a Crime — or Both
  • About the Iraqi Asylum Seeker Who Allegedly Wanted to Import an ISIS Terrorist Hit Squad
  • The Trouble With Do-Somethingism on Guns
  • A Solution or an Issue?
  • You Blew It! Will More Gun Control Laws Eliminate Gun Violence?

RSS RedState

  • New Public Charter School Specializes in LGBT Affirmation — in a Rose-Red State
  • Judge Just Threw Another Roadblock Into Durham's Case Against Sussmann
  • Cereal Killer? Feminine Hygiene Brand's 'Period Crunch' Invites You to Eat a Uterus for Breakfast
  • Moore to the Point - Do the Exceptions Swallow the Rule?
  • Texas DPS Lieutenant Offers Jaw-Dropping Excuse for Why Police Didn't Engage Uvalde Shooter
  • About
  • Contact
  • Give

© 2021 NOQ Report

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts

© 2021 NOQ Report

Session expired

Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.

>