Editor’s Commentary: There has been so much disinformation spread about Covid-19 over the last two years that it’s not even really news when more “accepted” narratives are proven to be false. Nevertheless, we must continue to expose it because the moment we accept that truth is not going to shine through, the powers-that-be will have won.
PCR tests have been exposed as presenting false positives and there’s no longer a pushback against the truth from the CDC and other “experts.” But what’s not as commonly known is that policies have been crafted based on the faulty data PCR tests provided and those policies have not been reversed. Moreover, new policies are still popping up today based on that false data. The biggest set of policies that make absolutely no sense in light of what has been demonstrated by science surrounds natural immunity.
It should be crystal clear to the entire world that natural immunity is far more effective at preventing the spread of Covid-19 than vaccines. The reason it’s not known is because if it were widely accepted, the universal vaccination agenda would come to a screeching halt. Imagine if people could get the coveted “fully vaccinated” status by showing they have natural antibodies in their system. Those who have not been jabbed would be rushing to see if they have those antibodies present in their system, and if so, they could get their passports and return to “normal” life without getting injected.
The powers-that-be do not want this. They want everyone injected. They want children jabbed despite a 99.993% recovery rate. They want young, healthy adults injected despite a 99.94% recovery rate. And they want those with natural immunity injected despite having far superior protection already in their bodies.
The Denmark study discussed by S.D. Wells below is a key to suspending disbelief in the efficacy of injecting previously infected people. If lawmakers were forced to acknowledge that natural immunity works better than the jabs and makes them essentially obsolete for millions of Americans, they would need to explain why they’re unwilling to address the issue. That’s something the powers-that-be simply cannot allow.
It’s important to spread this type of information far and wide. Unless there is a massive call from the people to address the natural immunity issue, it will continue to be ignored. Draconian mandates that defy science will continue to spring up. The nefarious goal of nearly universal vaccinations of the American people and the world’s population will eventually be reached. We must do everything we can to stop it. Here’s S.D.’s story…
craft estimates about SARS-CoV-2 repeat infection.n early 2020, from March to May, during the first surge of Covid, Denmark ran free-of-charge PCR tests on 70 percent of their population, about 4 million people, and used the warped data to
Then, the researchers took statistics from those who tested positive the first round, in order to analyze their infection rates (and seriousness of cases) from the “second surge” of Covid-19 in Denmark, which took place during the final quarter of the year. From this Danish Microbiology Database analysis comes shocking information, but not really.
First off, the CDC and the FDA have both conceded that PCR tests are not as accurate as they want them to be, with increasing numbers of tests resulting in false-positives, while actual cases of Covid decline. This is very concerning, especially as related to the recent Denmark Study and analysis of its findings, since they used the same kind of testing. In fact, the FDA released guidelines for rapid antigen testing and acknowledged a “high likelihood of incorrect results,” and that healthcare professionals should “expect some” false-positive results to occur.
Governments around the world are questioning PCR testing efficacy and deeming the method unreliable, including in Portugal, with decisions pending in Switzerland, South Africa, Italy and Germany.
PCR testing used for Denmark Study served as faulty foundation for skewed statistics, all to discredit the power of natural immunity to Covid
That brings us back to the fake Denmark Study, where doctors are seeing symptoms that are “worse” with a second infection, but how many in their study never really had Covid, but just tested positive? It’s not “re-infection” if you never really had it to begin with. How many people never caught Covid, tested positive, and are now part of a study on reinfection? A million or more? So now the study could also easily be looking at 2 to 3 million people who never had Covid and the study claims natural immunity did not help them. It’s a lie weaved in and then fabricated from the PCR testing lie.
It doesn’t take an infectious disease epidemiologist at Columbia University’s School of Public Health to see how this study is skewed, twisted and contorted to fit a narrative (claiming natural immunity is worthless, basically).
USA Today pushes Lancet Study that relied on FAULTY PCR testing methods
The latest hit piece on natural remedies and natural immunity from infections comes from a twisted study that claims natural infections have never been able to “slow the spread” of a virus, nor could natural infection prevent the “recurrent waves of infection.” This is pure bunk. Here’s a quote from the reviews/conclusion drawn from the study: “There is no country in the world where natural infection and natural immunity has slowed the pace of the pandemic or helped to bring it under control.”
Over here, the CDC stopped collecting data of how many people get infected AFTER vaccination. There’s a two week window where they won’t blame the vaccination for any injury or death, yet the vaccine is deemed “ineffective” during the 1st two weeks after injection, so if anyone dies from the vaccine itself, then pharma blames Covid. In comes talk of taking “precautions” and the fake study is used to influence “vaccine hesitancy” back towards fear and compliance.
The latest claim is of some “growing body of research” that’s never cited or sourced in these articles, that somehow infection and vaccination provide “the strongest protection against a wide range of variants, possibly for a long time.” A wide-range of variants? Where do they come up with this stuff? There’s no study proving that. Key word there also being “possibly” which isn’t very scientific. Let’s see that study, they claim here. It’s nowhere to be found because it does NOT exist. Where are the people who caught Covid naturally, then got a vaccine, then tested positive for “better” immunity to Covid, thus proving this wildly concocted theory?
The irony of the whole study is that if you look deep enough, you find out they admitted that for young, healthy people, “an infection may provide 80% to 90% protection” against re-infection. Now that is some useful information coming from a pile of junk science. Common sense alone tells you that if you already beat Covid, you would definitely want to avoid the serious health risks associated with getting the Fauci clot shots, including prion diseases, blood clots and myocarditis.
Tune your truth news dial to Pandemic.news to stay informed of the engineered pitfalls of the Covid scamdemic. It doesn’t take a scientist or doctor to see that Covid vaccines, Remdesivir and ventilators are compounding the problems of the pandemic, creating a pandemic of their own.
Sources for this article include:
One Sick Day Proves We Need More Voices in Truthful Media
On October 19, I was sick. It crossed my mind that I had finally gotten the ‘rona, but my wife’s cream of chicken soup and a few extra hours of sleep into mid-afternoon had be back up and running after a sleepless night before.
When I finally stumbled over to my computer in the evening, I was met with a deluge of concern from readers. They asked what had happened as only one article had been posted that day. Generally, we post between 10-20 daily between all of the sites, not included curated and aggregated content. Seeing that we’d only posted my super-early morning article before taking the rest of the day off had readers assuming the worst.
We have a wonderful and talented group of writers who volunteer their time for the sites and their readers. Sharing their amazing perspectives has always been a blessing to us because we cannot afford to hire anyone at this time. But having great writers is meaningless if we don’t have great editors, or at least one additional. My wife helps me read and edit stories from time to time, but I’m a one-man show when it comes to getting the stories posted.
Whenever I highlight our desperate need for donations, I note that we do not receive money from Google ads even though most in conservative media are beholden. I often ambiguously note that the money donated will help us grow. Today, I’m highlighting a specific need. We must get an editor to help take some of the load and to expand on our mission of spreading the truth to the world. One sick day proved that.
The great news is that there is no shortage of people who CAN help. I am emailed variations of resumes every week by people who are much smarter than I am. As much as I’d love to hire some of them, we simply cannot. That takes money and as blessed as we’ve been to receive donations and collect ad money (though not from Google or Facebook), we have still fallen short.
Those who have the means, PLEASE consider donating. We have the standard Giving Fuel option and people can donate through PayPal. We are also diving into what we believe is extremely disruptive technology at LetsGo.finance, the world’s first major donation portal for crypto. I’ll be talking a lot more about them in the near future. Those who prefer Bitcoin can send to my address here: 3A1ELVhGgrwrypwTJhPwnaTVGmuqyQrMB8
We can get the voices out there and we’re willing to shine a spotlight on new talent. We just need the resources to make it happen. If you can help, we would be extremely grateful.
Thank you and God bless!
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC