As I read Megan Redshaw’s article in NOQ Report, a table just jumped out at me.
The first thing to note is that this table was generated by the CDC. It wasn’t put together by some anti-vaxxer trying for a clickbait headline. It is up to date as of September 10. By itself, it’s just numbers, but when we look at a bit more CDC information, there’s a key truth that’s hidden in them. To get at it, we need to know that 212 million Americans have received at least one dose of vaccine, and 182 million are considered fully vaccinated. If we use those numbers, we can create information.
Our first task is to consider everyone reported to VAERS with a permanent injury. That includes death, since the last time I checked, that’s permanent. The CDC tells us that 34,135 have been permanently injured. That’s larger than the population of every Oregon city east of the Cascade mountains but Bend.
When we inspect that number we find 16.1 permanent injuries reported to VAERS per 100,000 people who are fully vaccinated. That number is actually higher, since some didn’t get the second Pfizer or Moderna shots. VAERS is commonly estimated to capture only 5-10% of the injuries. The US Department of Health and Human Services suggests the real number is only 1%.
This can’t be good. Also, remember that we’re only looking at the really big stuff like headstones and handicapped parking. For comparison, we should look at the official government statistics on vaccine injuries from 2006-2019. There were over 4 billion doses administered, and a grand total of 8,438 claims of a compensable injury. 2,455 were dismissed as not valid, leaving “for every 1 million doses of vaccine that were distributed, approximately 1 individual was compensated.” One in a million. Let that sink in for a moment.
Using the most conservative interpretation of the numbers for the COVID-19 vaccine, 161 people per million were maimed or assumed room temperature. If we accept the DHHS estimate that VAERS only captures 1% of the adverse reactions, it’s 16,100 per million, or 1.6% of all the people who got the shot ended up with something really bad happening.
Using the number in the literature, the real number is between 0.3 and 0.15%. Since we know that the overall mortality from the virus falls in the middle of that range, we’ve just uncovered a real problem. You have roughly the same risk of getting a serious injury from the vaccine as you do from getting the virus.
Now the rubber meets the road. We’ve been told that bad effects from the vax are “rare.” As Tommy Smothers exclaimed when Dick told him the Russians had a ballet company, “Bolshoi!” We have to have the truth before we can properly consent. Anything else is a criminal act, similar to the Tuskegee Experiment with syphilis.
It is in violation of CFR Title 45 which requires that the “experiment” have “minimal risk,” meaning that “the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests.”
There are two basic principles of Informed Consent. First, if a risk is common enough that a patient might see it as likely, it must be disclosed. It doesn’t have to be a biggie. An ordinary example is the risk of a wound infection after surgery. We take every effort to avoid infections, but they still aren’t rare.
The second principle is that if a risk is severe enough that a patient might refuse the procedure if they knew of it, it has to be disclosed, even if it is very rare. In my specialty, the “possibility” of paralysis after a spinal anesthetic is frightening. It has happened, but not for decades. Its potential severity makes it a mandatory discussion.
Neither of these principles have been followed in the vaccine discussion, and now we know why. There are enough complications following the Fauci ouchy that informed consent would make most people avoid it. The Tuskegee Experiment primed the Black population to distrust The Man, explaining why they have a low vaccination rate.
But if we look at the bulk of the population, a comparison of risks and benefits would lead to a resounding “Hell, NO!” to the vax. We know from English data that the risk of death from the Delta variant under age 50 is indistinguishable from zero. Over age 50, it’s still low, but there might be a balance in favor of the shot in specific individuals.
I got the shot early because at age 68 and overweight, I looked at the balance as I saw it then. Knowing what I know now, which is a lot more than most people will ever be told, I will decline the booster. I’m acquiring the means to treat COVID at home should it knock on my door. In the meantime, I’m enjoying life. That bug is in the wild, and Fauci’s wildest dreams won’t control it for one moment. There’s no point in denying the truth. But there is an excellent case for preparing, and it doesn’t include the vax.
Ted Noel MD is a retired Anesthesiologist/Intensivist who posts on social media as DoctorTed and @vidzette.
Editor’s Note: I want to commend Dr. Ted for his bravery in coming out with this particular truth. Yes, he is retired, but even retired doctors can face blowback from their peers when it comes to spreading the facts about the Covid injections. It’s a blessing having him with us here. I am thankful every day that his writing graces our pages.
Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?
Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.
There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.
Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.
Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.
We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.
To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.
Thank you, and God Bless!
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC