President Biden, with a long political history of opposing plans to pack the Supreme Court, was facing political demands that he do exactly that, and delayed recently.
Article by Bob Unruh from WND.
He announced a “commission” to study the issue that even members of the court and leftist icons like the late Justice Ruth Ginsburg opposed.
It was clear what the recommendation of the study group, made up of mostly leftist and progressive activists, would be.
But Democrats weren’t content to wait for the predetermined outcome: they’ve already proposed legislation to change the makeup of the court and give Biden permission to appoint four new liberals to the court.
The result inevitably would be vast expansions in abortion, LGBT privilege, and taxes, with a corresponding reduction in freedoms and religious rights.
The plan recently was highlighted by a report at the American Center for Law and Justice.
There, Jordan Sekulow explained how the new legislation is by Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass.
He said they are “circumventing” the president who has named 36 individuals to his study commission.
The Democrats want to have 13 justices on the court, instead of the nine now. The problem as they see it is that because of President Trump’s appointees, there is a 6-3 or 5-4 conservative majority now, depending upon the issue.
Adding four justices picked by Biden would give Democrats a 7-6 majority at worst.
The report said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi initially didn’t support the plan, but, “But don’t let that fool you. This is a test balloon as the court-packing commission gets going.”
It is ACLJ Senior Counsel Andy Ekonomou who explained what the Democrats are doing.
“They’ve already made up their mind. What’s the point of having a commission if you’ve made up your mind that you’re already going to expand the Supreme Court to thirteen justices? And that’s exactly what has happened here. The commission seems to be redundant. There’s no need to have a commission if you’ve already decided that you’re going to expand the court by adding four justices.”
He continued, “And it seems that there’s a disconnect perhaps between the White House and Congress in terms of what the plan is. But the Congress – Nadler, Hank Johnson, and Ed Markey have already gone on and made their decision that they’re going to hostilely take over the Supreme Court of the United States, and that’s exactly what they’re doing.”
The ACLJ analysis predicted Joe Biden, Pelosi and other Democrats “would sign on in a heartbeat if they felt confident there would be no blowback.”
ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow said, “You’ve got to understand what this is. It’s pure politics. But it’s politics that’s very dangerous. You would give four appointments to the current president of the United States.”
The ACLJ noted that Biden, while a senator, had called packing a “bonehead idea.”
But the Democrats are dependent on the courts to impose their leftist agenda points when they cannot get them through Congress, and that makes a reliably progressive court so important to them.
“The more you look at the new commission, the clearer it becomes just how correct Justice Ginsburg was [that packing the court was a bad idea]. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell puts it in stark perspective, ‘This faux-academic study of a nonexistent problem fits squarely within liberals’ years-long campaign to politicize the court, intimidate its members, and subvert its independence as part of a malicious campaign to gain absolute power. This is not some new, serious, or sober pivot away from Democrats’ political attacks on the court,” the report said.
Critically, the commission is assigned to look at the length of service and turnover on the court, the membership there, and its case selection.
There are 36 on the commission, “most of them are hard-left partisans – individuals politically predisposed to have hostile viewpoints toward originalism and the role of the Constitution. It is likely that the majority of its members have already made up their minds on expanding the Supreme Court,” the ACLJ reported.
Chiefs there are leftist political campaign lawyer Bob Bauer who worked for Barack Obama and Kate Andrias, who also worked in the Obama White House.
Others are Cristina Rodríguez, yet another supporter of Barack Obama, and Laurence Tribe, is a Harvard Law professor who has openly supported packing the Supreme Court.
‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us
Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.
For the last few months, NOQ Report, Conservative Playbook, and the American Conservative Movement have appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip.
It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. Both of our YouTube accounts were banned. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Medium canceled us. Apple canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancellation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth.
The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects, including death. One of our stories about the Johnson & Johnson “vaccine” causing blood clots was “fact-checked” and removed one day before the government hit the brakes on it. These questions and news items are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting canceled.
There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ, CP, and ACM readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $4100 per month in order to maintain operations.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies.
During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology.
We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.