It’s hard not to consider the way things have shaken out in a linguistic turn of fate. That has one side labeled with a word that also signifies departure. We are coming up on a momentous chain of events determining whether self-governance can survive. With the people who should be leaving saddled with a word that means the same thing, amongst others.
Authoritarian socialists [Abbreviated: Asols] of the nation’s left are very much like the dog that chased cars all its life and has finally ‘caught’ one and now doesn’t know what to do with it. They’ve ostensibly attained all of their hopes and dreams – mostly by the suppression of liberty and electoral cheating. However, they finally have control of the government. Now what?
By hook or by crook – mostly crook rather than hook – they could rid themselves of the filibuster and Rahm through all their authoritarian hearts desires. However, like the Nazis at Dunkirk, they are holding back. Yes, we dared compare one set of authoritarian socialists to another set of authoritarian socialists.
So why are they holding back? Could it just be the filibuster or is something else at work? Did the genius of the founding fathers create a system that systematically defeats these types of authoritarian socialist schemes before they even can gain any traction?
Consider the effects of the left’s socialist national agenda on some of the states
El American Unapologetically Pursuing Freedom reported on what is taking place in the formally Golden State: The Consequences of Socialism in California:
The state of California, famous for its beaches, great natural parks, and for being the center of the pompous and very glamorous American film industry, hides another face, a face hidden by audiovisual productions and the mainstream media: misery, regulations, shortages, and crime. They are, in the end, the consequence of the systematic application of socialism in California, more akin to Third World countries in Latin American than to the world’s greatest power.
The article details the stories of many in the state who find it reminiscent of nations that have fallen under the hobnail boot of socialistic slavery that are joining the exodus from the state. Other states in the union have befallen the same fate, with the productive people fleeing to be substituted for those who only consume.
Some states are trending towards liberty – and thriving because of it
Meanwhile, other states are keeping people safe by making it easier to defend themselves, opening up their economies, and other measures. These are not sitting well with the authoritarians because freedom in other states tends to show up the inadequacies in their states: States undermining federal gun laws put every state, including Illinois, at risk:
In more than a dozen states, lawmakers have introduced legislation to nullify new federal laws designed to reduce gun violence. Some state bills would even penalize police officers and others who work with federal law enforcement or dare to enforce the federal laws.
…
Lawmakers in Illinois are trying to close loopholes in Illinois laws, as they should. Bills to do so have been reintroduced in the Illinois House and Senate. But Illinois can’t control the actions of lawmakers in other states.
Instead of recognising the problem and fixing it, anti-liberty leftists in one state would like to restrict the civil rights of innocent people in other states. They aren’t satisfied with destroying the people’s civil rights in their bailiwick, but they have to do so elsewhere, lest the productive people flee to freedom.
The federalism fireline against fascism
We suspect that we know why they are reticent in pushing forward no matter what. It can be seen in the system of Federalism with some states failing with societal slavery while others are thriving in liberty.
It was the true genius of the founding fathers that they set up this system in separate experiments in societal governance. Some of the states moving to the right and liberty while others are moving to the left and the societal slavery of socialism.
The disparate impacts of the differences between the pro-liberty agenda of the right compared to the anti-liberty agenda of the left makes it clear that our side is superior. But the authoritarian socialists won’t want to give up that easily.
If they can ‘hide the decline’ as part of the overall picture then they can still pretend that authoritarian socialism can still work – somehow. But if all of this breaks apart – namely if the left were to take their ball and go home – they won’t have any more excuses.
The bottom line – What if they left?
If they left – fulfilling their definitional destiny in more ways than one, they would have to take responsibility for their non-functional agenda. They wouldn’t have anyone to blame but themselves and it would finally dawn on them that authoritarian socialism can never work. They wouldn’t be able to parasitically subsist off of those of us on the pro-liberty right.
Meanwhile, those of us in the free states would be able to live our lives in liberty. The disparate differences between pro-liberty states and those of the anti-liberty left already show what would happen, only it would be become much more pronounced.
Were the authoritarians confident of their socialist national agenda they would be anxious to show everyone else how it’s done. How a real socialist Utopia is set up and run, but without the umbilical cord of economic freedom to keep them sustained. Given their hubris in cheating to win elections and running the show, you’d think they would want to go off and do their own thing and leave the rest of us alone.
Why aren’t they doing that? What’s holding them back?
‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us
Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.
For the last few months, NOQ Report, Conservative Playbook, and the American Conservative Movement have appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip.
It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. Both of our YouTube accounts were banned. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Medium canceled us. Apple canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancellation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth.
The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects, including death. One of our stories about the Johnson & Johnson “vaccine” causing blood clots was “fact-checked” and removed one day before the government hit the brakes on it. These questions and news items are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting canceled.
There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ, CP, and ACM readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $4100 per month in order to maintain operations.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies.
During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology.
We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
Promo for Mike Lindell's New Daily Show
Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
Promo for Mike Lindell's New Daily Show
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC
@jdrucker
