Congress is now poised to pass a $1.9 trillion stimulus package. This is following the $900 billion Covid relief deal in December, which followed the $2 trillion stimulus package in March. In total, the federal government has pumped $4.8 trillion into the economy over the past 11 months. The money has gone to support businesses, to extend and augment unemployment benefits, and as direct payments to households.
Article by James R. Harrigan from AIER.
The amount the government has paid out is unprecedented. Adjusted for inflation, we have spent 20 percent more than the U.S. spent on World War II – and the U.S. was involved in that war for about four years. On a dollars-spent-per-month basis, over the past 11 months, the federal government spent at a rate that is, adjusted for inflation, five times its rate of spending during World War II.
Has this unbelievable spending done any good? From one perspective, that’s almost impossible to say because we don’t know what the world would have looked like without the spending. But from another perspective, it’s much easier to say. Rather than trying to imagine what the U.S. would have looked like without this massive spending, imagine instead what the U.S. would have looked like had the government just divided that $4.8 trillion among U.S. households. What would that have done?
There are 123 million households in the U.S. Given income cutoffs, the stimulus checks have been going out to around 80 percent of those households. Had the government simply divided that $4.8 trillion evenly among the 80 percent of 123 million households, each would have received a check for almost $50,000.
Now think about what the United States would look like right now if 80 percent of households had received a check for $50,000. For one thing, and for the first time in the history of the human race, a country would have entirely eradicated poverty. The poorest 20 percent of U.S. households would have seen their standards of living skyrocket to the middle class overnight. A single full-time worker would have received the equivalent of a $24 an hour raise. A full-time $7.25 an hour worker would have suddenly found himself the equivalent of a $30.80 an hour worker. That’s enough to make the most ardent “Fight for $15” advocate blush.
Critics will say that we spent the stimulus money the way we did because we had to prop up businesses. After all, handing households $50,000 checks does no good if there are no businesses left from which to buy things. But, had we given the money to households, households would have turned around and spent the money, or saved it thereby making it available for businesses to borrow.
The money would have ultimately propped up businesses by propping up households. And that is exactly, though in reverse, the argument the government itself made in justifying the Payroll Protection Program in the first place. The government designed the PPP to hand stimulus money to businesses so that the businesses could pass it on to workers. If it works in that direction, it would work in the other direction just as well.
In evaluating whether the $4.8 trillion stimulus was a good idea, simply ask yourself whether we would have been better off had the government simply cut households $50,000 checks. If you’re not boiling mad right now, you haven’t been paying close enough attention.
Of course, this is nothing new. The government has been wasting our time and money for decades, and the War on Covid is only the second most expensive war our government has waged (World War II being the third). The most expensive – by far – is the War on Poverty. The price tag there is $23 trillion and counting.
Since the War on Poverty began in 1965, the U.S. poverty rate has been a pretty steady 10 percent (plus or minus 3 percent), consistently trending neither up nor down. To look at the numbers, one might argue that we’re doing our best to fight a really strong enemy because, despite spending $23 trillion, we’re just managing to hold poverty at bay, which brings us all the way back to the question of what would happen were we simply to make direct payments to the poor. If, instead of spending $23 trillion constructing and feeding over one hundred poverty programs for more than 50 years, what if the federal government had simply cut people checks? What would have happened?
For $23 trillion, not only could the government have eradicated poverty, it could have eradicated the entire lower class. If instead of feeding poverty programs, the government had cut every household among the poorest 20 percent a check, it would have launched the entire bottom 20 percent into the middle class – in every year from 1965 through to the present.
So why is it, then, that the federal government seems never to consider the option of replacing government assistance programs with direct payments? In the Covid crisis, and in the broader war against poverty, this would have solved a vexing problem as efficiently as possible. And therein lies the rub. Politicians aren’t all that concerned with solving problems efficiently. They seem always to prefer expanding the power they wield, and the government programs they create expand their ability to micromanage our lives.
Politicians make grandiose claims about their various and sundry programs because those claims resonate with the people who receive government largesse. Not surprisingly, those claims resonate even more with the entrenched, ever-growing federal bureaucracy. But in the end, people receive pennies on the dollar compared to what they could have received had we decided just to write a check.
In the end, our government has become a tool that politicians use to turn national problems into political power, so it should come as no surprise that they are not interested in solving problems at all.
‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us
Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.
For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip.
It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth.
The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled.
There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies.
During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology.
We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
Promo for Mike Lindell's New Daily Show
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC
@jdrucker
