Upstaged by the Sturm and Drang of rising COVID cases in the media this week was far worse news about the health of our nation’s children. And in stark contrast to the science-bereft edicts keeping children out of school all over America and locked down again in many states, this bad news is backed by a credible study from a prestigious source.
Article originally published at Liberty Nation.
The Mayo Clinic released the results of a study that demonstrated a strong association between administration of antibiotics to babies and toddlers and the onset of ADHD, asthma, eczema, obesity, allergies, and celiac disease later in childhood. Worse yet, multiple treatments with antibiotics before the age of two was associated with multiple conditions – a revelation that seems tragically and intuitively correct.
With the World Health Organization warning about a post-antibiotic age in which diseases such as malaria, gonorrhea, and tuberculosis are gaining resistance against Alexander Fleming’s groundbreaking discovery, this latest study is dire news indeed.
Senior study author Nathan LeBrasseur of the Mayo Clinic attempted to soften and spin the sobering news when he stated:
“We want to emphasize that this study shows association, not causation, of these conditions. These findings offer the opportunity to target future research to determine more reliable and safer approaches to timing, dosing, and types of antibiotics for children in this age group.”
This “correlation vs. causation” argument is a time-honored back-pedal by scientists when reporting on studies that have the potential to impugn the medical and scientific communities by association. Similar claims were made, for example, in 2010 when spokespersons for the “Vaccine Court” (National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) strenuously labored to lowercase the news that Hannah Poling’s autism was the “result of” but was not “caused by” vaccines – a distinction with very little difference and a ruling conceded by the federal government. In both instances, two of modern medicine’s miracles – antibiotics and vaccines – were revealed to be associated with unforeseen and deeply concerning adverse events.
Some of the problem must be attributed to the liberal, even cavalier use of antibiotics such as penicillin in the last century. These remarkable drugs have been victims of their own success and have at times been over-prescribed by physicians as if a downside to such rampant use could never materialize. Antibiotics have also been used in massive quantities with livestock sold for consumption in the last decades, a further vector for introduction into our systems. Too much of a good thing may now have resulted in a bad thing occurring, as nature found a way to breach the antibiotic firewalls we have attempted to establish in our bodies via science.
Another pressing problem is that antibiotics are indiscriminate killers of both good and bad bacteria. It has only been in relatively recent years that alternative medicine protocols have emphasized the need for patients to take probiotics to replace the good bacteria needed to absorb nutrients, protect the system from pathogens, and break down food in the intestinal tract. Science has a way of singing the hallelujahs of its watershed discoveries while often demonstrating willful blindness to their potential impacts.
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), one in six children has a developmental disorder like ADD, ADHD, autism, hearing loss, learning disabilities, seizures, or stuttering. And according to an HHS (Health and Human Services) funded publication, 54% of children have a chronic illness, like diabetes, digestive allergies, epilepsy, seizure disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety issues, behavioral issues, chronic ear infections, depression, or bone and muscle disorders.
The idea that the dramatic increase in childhood illness may be in part caused by the very science we have relied on to safeguard our health is cause for consternation and grave concern. Or, as framed rhetorically by the Mayo Clinic:
“Additional research is warranted to establish practical guidelines to optimize the benefit and minimize the risk of antibiotics in children.”
Read more from Pennel Bird.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet
Nobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it.
When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that.
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance.
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.