• About
  • Contact
  • Give
Newsletter
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
Thursday, August 11, 2022
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
No Result
View All Result

NOQ Report Is Moving to AmericaFirstReport.com

Debunking the fake news about Section 230 and the President’s executive order

Social media censorship is seeing step one of its demise. But leftists are already attacking the move. Here's the truth about it all.

by JD Rucker
May 28, 2020
in Opinions
Debunking the fake news about Section 230 and the Presidents executive order

NOQ Report Is Moving to AmericaFirstReport.com

With food shortages hitting, patriots prepare themselves and their families with long-term storage food. We recommend THREE options.

Like clockwork, leftist mainstream media and blue checkmarks on social media started lambasting President Trump’s executive order about social media censorship while he was in the middle of the press conference discussing it. Their Trump Derangement Syndrome is so strong, even a sensible call for fairness on social media platforms is worth opposing, in their unhinged view.

Here are some of the arguments being made against his executive order, followed by the reality of it all. Everything the President discussed today aligns perfectly with what we predicted yesterday, so we’ve had some time to prepare these thorough debunkings…

“This will destroy free speech!”

.@realDonaldTrump, you can't lash out at social media companies just because they fact-check you when you deliberately spread mistruths. This executive order isn't a defense of free speech: it's an effort to intimidate so that you can continue to lie.https://t.co/3JyahQvzqf

— (((Rep. Nadler))) (@RepJerryNadler) May 28, 2020

This particular argument has been levied against the executive order since before there was an executive order. It’s absolutely incorrect. The President’s executive order is designed to make sure speech on social media is not edited or suppressed for political reasons. That means those who hold a view that runs contrary to Twitter’s accepted political worldview should not have to fear reprisal for “Tweeting while conservative.”

The argument that this destroys free speech centers around the fact that Twitter is a private company and should be allowed to express their opinions, even if that means tagging the President’s Tweets about mail-in ballots with “fact checks.” Here’s the problem with that argument. Twitter receives protections from Section 230 that shield it from lawsuits. As a content platform, they are not to be held responsible for content on their site. But since they’ve taken many steps towards becoming content publishers, such as tagging the President’s Tweets with editorial fact checks, they are disavowing those protections.


Don’t get caught unprepared as things go south. Order a case of five life-saving antibiotics prescribed directly to you by board certified physicians. Use promo code “RUCKER10” for $10 off. Having an emergency supply of antibiotics is crucial before the crap hits the fan.


It’s not that the President’s executive order says they can’t have free speech. It’s that they can’t be protected as a platform if they’re going to act like publishers.

“This will destroy Section 230!”

I think Trump would be on solid ground if he were to argue that Twitter's incredibly stupid decision to append "fact-checks" to his tweets does constitute traditional "publisher" activity, and therefore deprives Twitter of Section 230 protections https://t.co/xtArutw4sB

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) May 28, 2020

As Attorney General William Barr noted in his portion of today’s announcement, the intention of this executive order is to bring Section 230 back to its original intent. It has been “stretched,” as he put it multiple times, to include protections for actions that should never have been protected in the first place. By making this executive order specify a set of rules in order for platforms to maintain their Section 230 protections, both free speech and the code itself will be better maintained, not destroyed or weakened.

“This is a distraction from 100,000 people dying of COVID-19!”

Don’t mind the more than 100,000 Americans who have died from Coronavirus, nope, Predator trump is the real and only victim because Twitter attacked his lies with truth. Crybaby criminal lying asshole.

— Ricky Davila (@TheRickyDavila) May 28, 2020

This is laughable. The White House and the President are doing everything they can to fight the coronavirus. That doesn’t mean time cannot be spent on other pressing matters. This is a disingenuous argument that claims the President is distracting from the truth when in reality these arguments are using the coronavirus to distract from the facts about social media censorship.

It is tragic that so many Americans have died from the coronavirus. But just as it cannot be used as an excuse to shut down the nation, so too should it not be an excuse to shut down all other conversations relevant to the function of this nation. As Democrats often say, the White House can walk and chew gum at the same time.

“The President is trying to shut down Twitter!”

In the same event where the president said Twitter is inappropriately cracking down on free speech, he says he would be willing to shut Twitter down if he could.

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) May 28, 2020

First, the accuracy of this Tweet is off. The President said he would leave Twitter “in a heartbeat” if it weren’t for the fake news mainstream media. He said social media in general is his way of debunking fake news reports and therefore is a crucial part of his communication with the American people.

The part where he said he would shut Twitter down wasn’t intended as a threat nor even a wish. As he has said many times in the past, he wants them to be an unbiased platform, not one that actively attempts to sway the perspectives of Americans through propaganda and lies. If he were to “shut down” anything, it would be the biased activism from Twitter, not the site itself.

“He doesn’t have the power to do this!” or “This will get shot down in courts!”

Basic civics teaches us that the legislative branch writes the laws and the executive branch enforces them. What this executive order does is define how the executive branch will be enforcing laws pertaining to protections for platforms as well as how those platforms can qualify for the protections. That is perfectly within the purview of the presidency.

It’s true that a court will likely delay it. The left can always find an activist judge to do their bidding. But many constitutional “experts” are declaring that the Supreme Court will not side with the executive order because it hampers free speech. As Judge Andrew Napolitano told Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto today, this is the most 1st-Amendment-friendly Supreme Court in history. But what Napolitano gets wrong is this is somehow an attack on free speech. It is not.

Either way, legislation is necessary to codify this. The executive order may be stalled and may end up surviving, but legislation is necessary to make it permanent. This can and should be an election issue as we need more conservatives in Congress to protect it.

“President Trump is ______ and Twitter is ______ and ARRGGGHHHH!”

This is an unambiguously positive move for all Americans. Those on the left may see it as a bad thing because it will take away their social media advantages, but in the whole scheme of things this should be viewed as a win for all Americans.

If Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi had proposed this, there would be no griping from the left. It’s all about President Trump’s signature on the bottom of the executive order that makes it so heinous in their eyes. #TDS is real, folks.


Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast.

Many are struggling in this economy. My family is among them. Please support what we’re doing here and help us to continue to spread the truth Americans need to read and hear.


American Conservative Movement

Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.

[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]




Mixi.Media News



Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?

Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.

There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.

Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.

Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.

We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.

To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.

Thank you, and God Bless!

JD Rucker


TOP Prepare Now
Tags: 1st AmendmentAndrew NapolitanoDonald TrumpElection 2020Executive OrderFeaturedFree SpeechJournalismMainstream MediaMediaNeil CavutoSection 230Social MediaTop StorytwitterWilliam Barr

Bypass Big Tech Censors



My Shows

The JD Rucker Show (Rumble)
The JD Rucker Podcast (Apple)
Red State Talk Radio (M-F 2pm ET)
America Out Loud (M-F 7pm ET)
America First Report (Substack)
The Late Prepper (Substack)
End Medical Tyranny (Substack)

Our Sponsors

 
MyPillow Promo Code NOQ

MyPatriotSupply

Z-Stack Life

Our Gold Guy
 
Valley Food
 

Shows

Prepare for Civil War

7 Signs of Hope

Pandemic Panic Theater 2.0

Precious Metals Companies Hate You

Trump Fixes

Kari Lake Almost Robbed

Bypass Big Tech Censors

RSS The Federalist

  • Attorney General Merrick Garland Admits He ‘Personally Approved’ FBI Raid On Trump’s Home
  • EXCLUSIVE: Missouri AG Sends Letter To IRS Demanding Army Of New Agents Back Off
  • New Wyoming Poll: Liz Cheney Supported By 15 Percent Of Republicans, 98 Percent Of Democrats
  • The Mar-A-Lago Raid Could Mark The End Of The Republic
  • Media, Democrats Admit They Expect The FBI’s Trump Raid To Bait People Into Violence

RSS The Blaze

  • Twitter announces plans to 'protect' users from 'harmful misleading information' ahead of midterms
  • Three teens assault 6-year-old girl in broad daylight — she's allegedly punched in the chest — then they steal her $30 scooter
  • American Bar Association nixes 'diversity and inclusion' admission demands on law schools — for now
  • Deace: Tim Scott would make a better snitch than senator
  • Longtime California family business folds up tents over recent spike in crime, moves to Alabama where they've found 'hard-working people just living their life'

RSS PJ Media

  • Cincinnati FBI Office Attacked, Gunman Involved in 'Standoff Situation'
  • Move Over, Hunter Biden: Pelosi Takes Her Investment Banker Son Along on Taxpayer-Funded Taiwan Trip
  • Victor Davis Hanson Takes a Deep Dive Into the Historic Conflict Between Muslims and Christians
  • Brittney Griner's National Anthem Stance Mocked After Her Nine-Year Russian Prison Sentence
  • Beto O'Rourke Snaps, Calls Heckler 'Motherf***er'

RSS National File

  • Anti-Republican Dark Money PAC Attacks Anthony Sabatini as Election Day Nears
  • Gov. Abbott’s Illegal Immigration Scheme Backfires, NYC Mayor Threatens To Send New Yorkers To Texas
  • FBI Serves Several PA Republican Lawmakers With Subpoenas
  • Watch Live: AG Merrick Garland Makes Statement Following Trump Raid
  • Suspicious Vote Tallying Mars Robin Vos ‘Win’ in Wisconsin

RSS Townhall

  • An Authoritarian Regime, If You Can Keep It
  • When Does Life Begin?
  • Supreme Court’s Dissent Gives Hope to Victims of Media Smears
  • The Dwindling Difference Between Our Two Parties on Spending
  • What About Democrats Who 'Deny Elections'?

RSS RedState

  • Associated Press Resorts to Base Prejudice In Flawed Study to Accuse Florida of Intolerant Lawmaking
  • Why Did the FBI Raid Mar-a-Lago After Trump Extensively Cooperated With Grand Jury Ordered Search?
  • Stacey Abrams Commits a Disqualifying Self-Own in Desperate Attack on Brian Kemp
  • WATCH: Quisha King Goes to the Street to See What Everyday People Think of Drag Shows for Kids
  • Update: Incident at Cincinnati FBI Building and Subsequent Shootout
  • About
  • Contact
  • Give

© 2021 NOQ Report

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts

© 2021 NOQ Report

>