Connect with us

Democrats

The liberty grabber leftists are coming back with a vengeance, and they want to confiscate your guns

Published

on

The liberty grabber leftists are coming back with a vengeance and they want to confiscate your guns

Like a bad zombie movie from the 60’s the leftists are coming back to attack our basic human rights once again.

They’re back. Once again, as reported in The Daily Caller the authoritarian socialist left is going to make a big push for “Liberty Control” in Congress, beginning September 4th with hearings on three new restrictions on your freedom:

The “Keep Americans Safe Act,” which would ban any ammunition magazines over 10 rounds.

The “Extreme Risk Protection Orders Act of 2019” to encourage entirely redundant  and unconstitutional Gun Confiscation SWATing to take confiscate guns on the word of just about anyone and without due process.

The “Disarm Hate Act,” which would deprive people of their Constitutional rights that is convicted of a misdemeanor ‘hate crime’

Then the full house returns on September 9th for hearings on Liberty Control. So they are coming back with their usual obsession with exploiting a serious crisis. We’re past the hysterical ‘do something – anything!’ stage, the ‘ban and confiscate guns stage’ and moving through the ‘compromise’ stage. The phase after a ‘serious crisis’ where the patriots of the pro-liberty right have moved on while the liberty grabbers have bided their time knowing the national socialist media will back them up.

Haven’t we seen this movie once before?

The zombie genre has certain tropes, as do the liberty grabbers. In this case they will write things as “It’s been ____ days since the ______ tragedy and the Republicans still have done nothing to restrict freedom even more.” Of course, they can’t use those words  since can’t admit to what they are actually doing.

As is usually the case, they will couch the destruction of liberty in sheer Orwellian terms such as ‘reform’, ‘safety’ or ‘security’. Better yet, they could max out the chutzpah and claim that more restrictions on liberty will bring ‘freedom’ or something. Sometimes you have to admire the audacity of some to go full Orwellian to the point of almost coming out and saying ‘Freedom is Slavery’.

Perhaps it is best to show their absurdity with similar contentions with other recent events of societal violence. Applying the same knee-jerk reactions that illustrate that their obsession with only certain ‘solutions’ prove they have no interest in ‘reform’, ‘safety’ or ‘security’, but only their political power.

Should we ban fire?

Illustrating absurdity by being absurd is one way of proving the liberty grabber left is un-serious when it comes to solving societal problems. Problems they have caused themselves, but that’s for another time. There were two recent mass casualty events that took place that have been ignored by the people who profess to be concerned about safety.

There were two primary reasons both were ignored by the national socialist media. Both took place outside the states and both did not involve guns or something the liberty grabbers could exploit in restricting freedom while empowering themselves.

The first occurred in Japan, a place that is often cited as an example of the success of liberty control, as reported by the Associated Press: Man shouting ‘You die!’ kills 33 in Japan anime studio fire.

TOKYO (AP) — A man screaming “You die!” burst into an animation studio in Kyoto, doused it with a flammable liquid and set it on fire Thursday, killing 33 people in an attack that shocked the country and brought an outpouring of grief from anime fans.

The second took place recently in Mexico, a bastion of Liberty Control that also proves that this part of the Leftist fantasy program for a new Utopia is a failure. Again, as reported by the Associated Press: 26 killed in fiery attack on bar in southern Mexico.

COATZACOALCOS, Mexico (AP) — Gang members burst into a bar, blocked all the exits and then started a fire that killed 26 people and injured about a dozen others, Mexican officials said Wednesday.

Proving the liberty grabber narrative of the left.

Where was the breathless, wall to wall coverage of these tragedies? This absence can be explained with a basic thought experiment that illustrates the incredible bias of the national socialist media. The idea is to simply substitute another word into the headline or story and imagine the difference that would make. Consider what would have been the reaction with one more word in the headline of the fire massacre:

‘Man shouting ‘You die!’ kills 33 in Japan anime studio [Gun] fire’

Alternatively, contemplate what would have been the reaction – and wall to wall coverage – had the headline in the second attack:

‘26 killed in fiery Firearm attack on bar in southern Mexico’

One can easily imagine the vitriol and rancor directed towards the common sense human right of self-defense had those tragedies involved guns. But since they did not, those stories engendered hardly a blip on the media radar.

The Bottom Line.

All of these attacks illustrate that evil will find a way to kill, no matter what restrictions on freedom that are put in place. One could hope that the politicians who cynically demand gun confiscation would know this. It could be that some have a Utopian outlook that they never learn is an impossibility.

Alternatively, as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn noted in his classical work The Gulag archipelago, the administrators of these prisons and extermination centers consider criminals to be victims of the system. Thus they tended to go easy on them as happens with the national socialist left in the states.

Therefore, they don’t care that criminals don’t obey the laws or that even more restrictions on liberty will only make things worse. They only have the goal of empowering themselves, never mind their falsely professed concerns about safety or the children.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Democrats

How the left is redefining ‘quid pro quo’ to make it seem ominous

Published

on

How the left is redefining quid pro quo to make it seem ominous

Did you know you engage in “quid pro quo” every day? As you drive away from Starbucks with a latte in hand, you’re leaving the scene of your latest quid pro quo. When you tell your kids you will ground them if they don’t do their homework, you’re committing quid pro quo. When cover someone’s shift at work so they’ll work for you Saturday night, that’s blatant quid pro quo.

Literally, it’s Latin for “something for something.” It’s an exchange. You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. It’s part of literally every negotiation between any two countries ever. Without quid pro quo, there would be no treaties, no trade agreements, and wars would always go on indefinitely. It’s not a bad thing.

When something inappropriate is offered as part of quid pro quo dealings, that’s when politicians get into trouble. Accepting gifts from lobbyists in exchange for favorable votes is an example of illegal quid pro quo. Or, as House Democrats are trying to prove, if a President holds back aid to a foreign government unless they investigate a political foe so dirt can be found on them for an upcoming election, that is bad quid pro quo.

Yesterday, acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney famously told the press to “get over it” when it comes to quid pro quo. His words were careless, not because they weren’t true but because in the current political atmosphere, his acknowledgement there was quid pro quo over the ongoing 2016 election corruption investigation muddies the waters. Democrats and the media have painted the common action of quid pro quo between two governments as negative by conflating their impeachment inquiry topic – Ukraine investigating the Bidens – with the other aspect of the phone call between President Trump and President Zelensky, the CrowdStrike’s involvement with the DNC hack in 2016.

The first is truly impeachable. The second is part of everyday business between two countries. Mulvaney admitted to the second, which is neither illegal nor impeachable. But the media pounced by conflating the two.

Democrats and mainstream media are trying to redefine quid pro quo as a negative thing worthy of impeachment. They’re doing this by confusing the language behind the action with the topic of the impeachment inquiry. Unfortunately, they’re doing this to an American public that is easy to confuse and easier to distract.

We’re witnessing a disingenuous attempt to make Americans believe quid pro quo in and of itself is bad. This is ludicrous, or course, but they’ll do or say anything to make President Trump look bad.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

The 5 biggest lies from the Democrat debate

Published

on

The 5 biggest lies from the Democrat debate

Liz Wheeler and her production team took on a very difficult task. They sifted through over three hours from the Democratic debate this week in an effort to try to identify the five biggest lies told on stage that night. We should applaud their Herculean efforts; it must have been like trying to determine which types of vegetables taste the worst when they’re spoiled. There aren’t enough Pinocchio images on the internet to cover all of the lies told at the debate.

Undaunted, the team at One America News show Tipping Point took on the challenge and came up with a list of five infuriating lies told on the debate stage Tuesday night.

  1. Elizabeth Warren’s big lie came through omission as she refused to answer the yes-or-no question about raising middle class taxes. This was around the 500th time she’s done this (we lost count at 342), choosing to redirect her answer to focus on “costs” rather than taxes.
  2. Cory Booker, Julian Castro, and Kamala Harris claimed abortion is a constitutional right. It is not. Even the majority brief from the Supreme Court admitted this in their ruling on Roe v. Wade.
  3. Beto O’Rourke pretended like his proposal for confiscation of “assault rifles” would not mean law enforcement will come to people’s homes to collect their firearms. His claim that law-abiding citizens will comply is not only false, it’s also a scary prospect. If law abiding citizens are the only ones forced to comply, what about criminals? They aren’t known for abiding by laws, especially ones that prevent them from committing their crimes.
  4. Elizabeth Warren made it on the list a second time with her claim that the wealth tax would pay for a myriad of socialist policies she intends to implement. This would be true if it weren’t for math. Unfortunately for her (and everyone else if she gets elected), the wealthy simply don’t have enough money to tax in a way that would pay for her plans. Moreover, every time a wealth tax has been tried elsewhere, it has failed miserably. But hey, at least she takes a lot of selfies.
  5. Impeachment. This is the ongoing lie of the day for both media and Democrats. All 12 candidates on stage supported impeachment (though Tulsi Gabbard was clear she only supported it if the House Democrats made a proper case for it), but only Bernie Sanders actually gave a reason why. Even his singular reasoning was false, though.

I’ll add another for the list – Kamala Harris kept saying, “When I’m President…” This is a big lie. It’s doubtful she even believes it herself judging by the direction she’s been heading in the polls.

There were enough lies told in the last Democratic debate to fill three hours of television, which is exactly what CNN did. Thanks to Liz Warren and the folks at One America News, we now know the five biggest one.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

Will Texas become a blue state?

Published

on

Will Texas become a blue state

If you listen to mainstream media, you’ve probably heard multiple times over the last few months that Texas may turn blue in the next election. That’s been a drumbeat by the left for a while as an influx of people escaping California and the rising Hispanic population is supposed to mean more Democrats in the Lone Star State.

The first piece of their puzzle is true. As Californians realize their state’s policies and cost of living are untenable, more of them turn to Texas where they bring their generally progressive views. But assuming that Hispanics are going to vote Democrat is false. Studies and polls show an increased preference for Republican policies, including the border and illegal immigration policies that are allegedly turning Hispanics off.

Laura Ingraham tackled the topic last night after the President had a massive rally in Dallas. She and her panel made important points that make sense as the idea of Texas turning blue seems more like a leftist pipe dream than a real risk.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending