Connect with us


Predicting the results of a GOP surrender on Intergalactic Background Checks, aka Universal Background Checks



Predicting the results of a GOP surrender on Intergalactic Background Checks aka Universal Backgroun

Giving into the Left will only in result more demands to give up more of our God-given civil Liberties.

It is relatively easy to predict what will happen if the GOP and Trump chose to betray their base in favor of Leftists who will despise them no matter what they do. It’s just a matter of looking at what has happened with similar situations in the past to see what will transpire in the future. ‘Read my Lips’ should be the watchword for any politician about to knuckle under to the Left in betraying their supporters. As Tom Knighton of Bearing Arms noted, showing weakness on the issue has only emboldened the Liberty Grabbers even more.

It’s also easy to forecast what the Liberty Grabber Leftists will do with another ‘progressive’ move towards tyranny by looking what they have done with previous situations. The Authoritarian Socialist Left has only one goal in mind – Gun Confiscation – that informs on what they will do at any point on the progression towards that point.

What the Liberty Grabber Left has done in the past.

The Left is like a Boa Constrictor around the cause of Liberty, ‘progressively’ squeezing the life out of it at every opportunity and then waiting for the next. Each time it uses the tried and true method of building up each legislative measure as THE solution to the problem of too much freedom with the accompanying implication that nothing else has been done.

Then it downplays its wondrous solution as soon as it passes, terming it a meaningless gesture or just a first step. Teeing up the rhetoric for the constriction on Liberty, repeating the process once again.

Intergalactic Background Checks aka Universal Background Checks.

In the case of government control over private property, better known as Intergalactic Background Checks or Universal Background Checks, the Left’s National Socialist Media has been blatantly implying that these already don’t existwhen they have around for almost 20 years.

In the case of Gun Confiscation SWATing, the false implication is that there is a serious crisis because there is no way to handle someone who is ‘dangerous’ – what ever that means. This of course is another blatant lie since civil confinement or mental health holds already exist.

Downplaying the current step while calling for the Next.

There should be no doubt that the Liberty Grabber Leftists already have the talking points, press releases and plans for the next steps after the imposition of Intergalactic Background Checks or Gun Confiscation SWATing laws

While they are currently acting [in more ways than one] as though the current ‘solutions’ are the ultimate in keeping the entire country safe and secure, that will instantly change if they are passed. Then suddenly they will become meaningless gestures, unworthy of any praise or note.

It will abruptly become a case where a bug will be a feature in that Intergalactic Background Checks are worthless without gun registration. The Liberty Grabber Leftists know that it is pointless for the government to have control over private property without records of each and every transfer. Never mind that this is illegal and part of the 20 year ‘Bait and Switch’ in order to get people to accept background checks.

For Gun Confiscation SWATing, they will demand expanding the law to include anyone who might have a gun while making is easier for literally anyone to anonymously call in one of these strikes.

IBCs won’t ensure safety or serve any other purpose than setting up for gun confiscation.

Rest assured, Intergalactic Background Checks have no other purpose than to set the scene where by everyone will have to obtain permission from the government to keep a basic human right. Permission that can and will be withdraw at any moment with one’s firearms ironically confiscated at gunpoint.

Studies have shown they do not serve any useful purpose, nor would that have stopped the most recent tragedies. They would do nothing except to set-up demands for gun registration.

A prime example just happens to hail from Colorado, with the facts showing an increase in the per capita violent crime after Intergalactic Background Checks were imposed. As reported on News Busters: CNN Fails to Note Crime Jumped After Colorado Gun Control:

If the CNN staff had bothered to do basic research on the issue, they could have easily discovered that the per capita violent crime rate increased steadily from 307.4 per 100,000 residents in 2012 to 368.1 in 2017 — an increase of 20 percent — to the highest level since 2006.

Even more striking is the fact that there had been a steady drop every year between 2006 and 2013 before the rates started increasing.

[Emphasis added]

The instant Intergalactic Background Checks are passed, demands for Gun Registration will arise.

No one should have any illusions that Intergalactic Background Checks will stop anything, but that is the underlying point. This ‘progressive’ step will only serve as a rationale towards to demand that people obtain government permission to keep their basic human rights.

There will be further tragedies, since Intergalactic Background Checks and Gun Confiscation SWATing are entirely useless for their stated purpose. But as stated, that is a feature, not a bug. As they have consistently done in the past, the Liberty Grabbers will blithely pretend that no laws or regulations exist on guns. They will pretend that Background checks, Gun Confiscation SWATing don’t exist, just as they have done in every other instance.

The Bottom-Line.

It would be a fool’s errand to think that knuckling under to these demands of the Liberty Grabbers will placate them one iota. As always, they will be back with more demands against our Liberty. If they impose Intergalactic Background Checks, they will demand everyone obtain their permission to possess a basic human right. If they impose Gun Confiscation SWATing, these will be opened up for use by anyone for any reason.

Worse yet, if Trump and the GOP surrender to these demands they will lose – and lose ‘Bigly’- to the national socialist Left because they will have betrayed their base. Rest assured, that will lead to a civil conflict. Who knows what will happen after that point. The thought is too horrible to contemplate.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement




Why isn’t gun control considered to be sexist as well as racist?




Why isnt gun control considered to be sexist as well as racist

Liberty [Gun] Control is rooted in racism. It also adversely affects women. Why isn’t it considered to be racist and sexist?

A recent video from One America News Network entitled: ‘Gun Rights Are Women’s Rights’ made this very important point on the topic of Liberty Control. The basic facts of science have one sex at a disadvantage to the other, with guns being the great equalizer.

Why doesn’t the Left have to answer for the sexism and racism of Liberty control?

These days, the national socialist Left wields pejoratives Racism and Sexism like an assault weapon. So why aren’t these labels applied to them for their incessant attacks against freedom? Firearms are the great equalizers, with the Left’s gun confiscation agenda having a disproportionate effect on women and minorities.  Somehow the Left escapes these facts being applied to them, while they exploit those words with abandon.

We’ve already detailed the racism aspect of this issue here, and case for Liberty control being sexist made in this video.

Why the gun is civilization..

We will wrap this up with a column written in 2007 by Marko Kloos on a WordPress blogging site the Munchkin wrangler. It encapsulates the issue of firearms down to one proposition on how human being deal with each other.

Why the gun is civilization.
Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force. The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gangbanger, and a single gay guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat–it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed. People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser. People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level. The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weightlifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation…and that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.

[Emphasis added]

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading


The 2nd Amendment is the first target in the left’s war on liberty




The 2nd Amendment is the first target in the Lefts war on Liberty

The commonsense civil right of armed self-defense is the canary in a coal mine for the cause of liberty.

It was a little over a month ago that John Lovell from the Warrior Poet Society produced this video, but it seems longer given recent events. He expresses the thoughts of many that are becoming increasingly prescient by the day. We are witness to the fact that while those on the national socialist left like to profess support of liberty as being ‘liberal’ they are becoming ever more strident towards the concept.

While the common sense human right of self-defense is literally the tip of the spear in the defense of liberty. The people on the left who only pretend to be liberal are now branching out from this basic human right, going after other civil liberties with a vengeance. Topping their list is a concept that eviscerates several civil liberties with on fell swoop, Gun Confiscation SWATing [aka so-called ‘Red flag’ laws ]. So far they’ve done little to solve the problem and according to an article from colleague Blaine Traber: Baltimore’s homicides by firearm RISE 13% since red flag gun law went into effect. Thus, these abominations of Constitutional Liberties are not only useless for their intended purpose, they are making the situation even worse.

Presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris belched forth an even more egregious example in which she expanded her ire for self-preservation to what George Orwell characterized as ‘Wrongthink’. As reported in Bearing Arms, Senator Harris proposed opening up the criteria for gun confiscation to the realm of improper viewpointsThis case illustrates that the 2nd amendment is just the first target in the Left’s war on Liberty, but it certainly won’t be the last.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading


Twitter is against conservatives. Here’s how conservatives must fight back.



Twitter is against conservatives Heres how conservatives must fight back

There’s an easy answer to the question of how to hold Twitter accountable for its anti-conservative policies that often purge, silence, or censor its users who are committing their version of thoughtcrimes. Just delete your account. Unfortunately, this answer is insufficient when we consider the tremendous clout Twitter holds over the media and much of the population. It’s where many Americans get their news (and #FakeNews). It’s also a cesspool of rhetoric, and while I’m personally opposed to wading into cesspools of any sort, I recognize Twitter is still an important tool in the fight against socialism.

So, we’re stuck with it.

But that doesn’t mean we have to sit back and let the “algorithm” virtually silence us. Today, I participated in a “bootcamp” for conservatives, many of whom are new to Twitter, on how to be better virtual patriots. It was a refreshing experience; it had been too long since I engaged in teaching outside of my writing on NOQ Report. But one question sort of stumped me. It’s not that I didn’t have the answers, but Twitter is a platform of brevity and the answer to the question wasn’t possible to communicate briefly.

In short, the question was how can conservatives overcome the roadblocks that Twitter imposes on us? Here are the answers:

Know your goal

It’s surprising how many people join Twitter with the goal of showing support for President Trump. I ask them who they’re “showing” their support to. They usually reply with “everyone” or “my followers,” at which point I inform them that they’re probably not reaching as many people as they think, if any at all.

Reach is everything on Twitter. It’s like a tree falling in an empty forest. If a Tweet is sent out, and nobody reads it, was it really a Tweet at all?

But there are other worthy goals for patriots. “Trolling” is often frowned upon, but it’s actually a very powerful tool if used properly on Twitter. By trolling, I’m not a fan of personal attacks on anyone. But trolling policies and politicians in the face of their claims is often enough to get supporters or potential supporters to ask questions or research it for themselves. Let me go troll someone real quick and I’ll post an example…

…stand by…

…okay… done…

You don’t have to have a single goal. You can focus on multiple things depending on how much time you put into Twitter. But you must have at least one. If you’re here to support the President, decide how you want to show your support and work towards achieving that goal. Without knowing what you want to accomplish, you’ll likely accomplish nothing.

Follow those who like your stuff

When someone follows me, there’s a chance I’ll look at their Tweets and follow them back. But if someone likes or retweets me and they’re conservatives, I’ll almost certainly follow them even if they’re not following me. Interaction with content I post is far more important than following.

This isn’t an egotistical decision. It’s based on the algorithm. I’m sure you’ve noticed just because you’re following someone doesn’t mean you’ll see their Tweets in your feed. But if you like a post, retweet it, comment on it, or a combination of the three, there’s a good chance you’ll see what they Tweet and retweet in the future.

I follow those who interact with my posts because if they follow me as well, they’ve already engaged with my content. As a result, they are already more likely to see my posts in their feed. With reach being the goal, following people who have interacted with your posts and getting them to follow you back makes the most sense.

Replies are often more powerful than standalone Tweets

When we post a standalone Tweet, it has an opportunity to be seen by our followers and the followers of those who retweet us. When we reply to someone else, it has an opportunity to be seen by the same people as a standalone Tweet PLUS those who follow the person we’re responding to. Though fewer of our followers will see a reply than a standalone, there’s a chance to reach a different audience.

As noted above, I often troll those whose views I oppose. But sometimes I’ll reply to people I agree with wholeheartedly. There’s no rule about who you reply to, though I strongly recommend being cordial. The left gets unhinged. It’s incumbent on patriots to keep our cool, take the high road, and express our indignation intelligently. Just as we laugh at unhinged progressives, so too do they laugh at unhinged conservatives. But when we’re cordial and thoughtful, their only complaints can be about substance.

Guess who wins the substance debate? Conservatives. Why? Because we have the truth on our side.

One way to “double dip” is to retweet your reply. They don’t appear in your primary timeline otherwise and by retweeting it, you give it even more opportunity to be seen by your followers.

Don’t Tweet in batches unless it’s a thread

Don’t spread your Tweets thin. Tweeting one right after another reduces the chances of your Tweets being seen because Twitter usually only serves a few of your Tweets and retweets to followers at any given moment. Thankfully, The Twitter feed moves quickly, so it doesn’t take a long “cooldown” between Tweets. 5-10 minutes is fine.

The exception to this rule is with threads. There’s no time limit. I’ve seen threads that are a dozen Tweets long posted in a matter of seconds. I’ve seen threads extend for days at a time. With a thread, you have the opportunity for multiple Tweets to be seen as people click the “Show This Thread” button.

If I retweet a lot, I’ll often wait the 5-10 minutes before posting a fresh Tweet. This isn’t necessarily a rule of mine. Just habit, I suppose.

Keep in mind, some are able to take advantage of massive followings and Tweet constantly. This is only recommended if you’re regularly getting hundreds or thousands of retweets already.

Assume bias and proceed accordingly

Arguably the most important advice I can give any patriot wanting to make an impact through Twitter is to not take it too seriously. I know many people who put so much effort into Twitter that they have little time for other acts of patriotism. Twitter is important, but it’s not important enough to take away attention from other things.

I’ve been there. Before a strange algorithmic banning and a pair of long hiatuses from the platform, I would regularly get hundreds of retweets, sometimes thousands. I wasn’t nearly as popular as many of the strong conservative accounts today, but I had my share of semi-viral posts. But Twitter took that away. I helped by not paying enough attention, allowing my account to go stagnant. I’m embarrassed that some of my posts get literally zero interaction, but I don’t worry too much.

After all, it’s just Twitter.

We know the powers that be in big tech are determined to push the 2020 elections to the Democrats. We can give up or we can fight through it. I, for one, am choosing to push forward. There’s nothing worse than a quitter.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading