Connect with us

Democrats

Democratic policies, rhetoric do the most harm to migrants

Published

on

Democratic policies rhetoric do the most harm to migrants

Democrats are doing everything they can to distract the media and the American people from the harsh reality that their policies, actions, and words are bringing great suffering to migrants from Central America and around the world. This isn’t even debatable. But they have a knack for creating smokescreens and a willfully ignorant leftist media establishment willing to echo their talking points, so the problems persist.

To understand why this is the case, we must start by looking at the root cause of the border crisis. The reason so many people are trying desperately to get into the United States isn’t because the oppression in their home countries is suddenly so great. The wars are over. Stability has been rising. Crime has been lowering, despite false claims made by the media. They aren’t running for their lives. They’re running towards economic prosperity in America, a prosperity that has been promised by Democrats and echoed through the open borders networks spreading this disinformation.

They are being told that if they come to the United States, they’ll be given free… everything. They’ll be allowed to come into the country and stay indefinitely as long as they apply for asylum. Some have reported the lies are so bold, they’re being promised full citizenship within a year because the next President will sign off on it. This is, of course, not how things work in Washington DC, but considering how little is understood by Americans about presidential powers, it’s no wonder those in other countries are buying into the lies.

This is why they’re willing to travel, often by foot, for thousands of miles with nothing but the kindness of strangers they meet on the way to feed their families. It’s why they give their life’s savings to cartels to “escort” them to the border. It’s why they’re willing to let the women and young girls in their families get raped along the way by multiple cartel animals. They arrive at our borders broken, sick, and confused when the lies they were told turn out to be false.

What makes it worse is that there’s an ounce of truth in the lies. Our asylum system, which was never intended to handle the masses of people trying to use it today, does allow protections for people with the expectation that if they’re released into the interior, that they’ll return for their asylum hearing. But 90% do not. Why? Because they realize their quest for economic prosperity does not fit the criteria for asylum. They’re told to get captured by border patrol, wait until their released, and disappear into the interior.

The whole asylum system needs to be fixed, but Democrats refuse to even consider that option.

Then, there’s the insanely disingenuous rhetoric of people like Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She has declared she will not vote for a dime of support to improve conditions at migrant facilities. But then she rails against the conditions. Her goal, and the goal of the radical progressives controlled by the Justice Democrats, is to end migrant detention altogether. They want all migrants to be immediately released to the interior, no questions asked. They’re finally coming out and admitting this openly, though the implications were very apparent even before their acknowledgement.

These are all contradictory and untenable ways of thinking. They want no border security, no deportations, full rights for illegal immigrants, and eventually full citizenship. Whether they get the last one is not nearly as important to them as getting voting rights for illegal immigrants. It doesn’t matter to the Democrats whether or not they have rights as long as they have THAT right. It’s a fundamental transformation of America that they want. Every policy, action, and word they utter is bent on achieving this goal.

The migrants truly are in a state of crisis. It’s being imposed on them by Democrats who don’t give a damn about them as people as long as they can eventually turn them into voters. It’s the ultimate scam, and people are being harmed by it daily.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Advertisement

0

Democrats

There will be no climate change debate because the DNC is scared of what would be said

Published

on

There will be no climate change debate because the DNC is scared of what would be said

Climate change activists were extremely vocal at the annual summer for the Democratic National Committee. They’re upset that climate change is effectively missing from the first two debates and have demanded a single-issue debate focused on the environment. But DNC leaders haven’t budged after declaring there would be no such debate.

This isn’t surprising. Conservatives may look at progressives and assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a flaming tree-hugger, but the reality is climate change ranks very low on the list of real concerns for actual voters. If it weren’t for the loud but small group of radical progressives who have been driving the agenda for the Democratic Party since President Trump was elected, climate change would still be an issue of passing importance on the periphery that it has been for decades.

It’s not that climate change isn’t a concern. It’s that it’s not a primary concern to most voters. Democrats are worried about it as they’re flooded with propaganda by progressive media, but compared to putting food on the table or paying for their kid’s braces, climate change is a distant concern.

Nevertheless, it’s an issue that’s important enough to talk about for Democrats because their party holds the edge on the matter in the eyes of anyone who believes it’s an issue at all. The ranks of Americans who believe man-made climate change is a real concern are growing. Polls show a majority of Americans who think it’s something that deserves attention are high even among Republicans. Considering the GOP stance on climate change ranges from mild interest to outright denial, one would think the Democrats would take advantage of this.

They won’t. They can’t. Today’s candidates aren’t Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton calling for incremental action to address climate change over the next three decades. Today’s leading candidates, especially Bernie “Green New Deal” Sanders and Elizabeth “Bold Action” Warren, are speaking of radical changes when they’re talking to their base. And lower ranked candidates are even more expressive of their concerns in hopes the environmentalist crowd can help propel them to the upper tier in the race for the nomination.

Candidates can’t speak boldly on a topic to their base and then give more moderate responses to a national audience. In today’s social-media-driven society, major contradictions are captured. They go viral. Then candidates have to answer for their reversals. Therefore, whatever the candidate tell radical progressives in small gatherings about their climate change plans must be the same thing they say during a nationally televised debate.

The DNC realizes this would be the kiss of death for their White House ambitions. If mainstream moderate American voters, who often receive their only exposure of candidates during televised debates, were to hear the insane ideas most of the candidates are proposing, they will quickly warm to the idea of reelecting President Trump.

The moment a candidate talks about limiting air travel, they’ve lost 2020.

The first Democrat to say we need to be driving electric cars exclusively by 2030 will get demolished in the general election.

Some may point out these policy proposals are available to the public already, but availability does not highlight the issue to the vast majority of Americans. But on the debate stage where consistency must be maintained, they’re done the moment they announce their real perspectives on the issue.

If moderates and independents heard the things Democratic candidates were proposing to tackle climate change, any hope of beating President Trump would be lost. The DNC won’t risk letting the radical truth come out in a debate.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

Tucker Carlson: Moderates aren’t welcome in the Democratic Party anymore

Published

on

Tucker Carlson Moderates arent welcome in the Democratic Party anymore

It’s true. If you’re a moderate, your ideas are anathema to the Democratic Party. Oh, there are still moderate Democratic voters out there. Otherwise, Joe Biden wouldn’t be leading the polls, though even Biden has taken several pages out of the hyper-leftist policy playbook since announcing his candidacy in April. But the radical progressive wing of the party is taking over and many Democratic voters are following their lead.

This is why, as Tucker Carlson put it, this is a two-person race. Which radical will emerge at the end, Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Warren has had the upper hand since the debates, but Sanders hopes his more-radical Green New Deal proposal will resonate with the far left enough that they’ll give him back his mantle as the socialist of choice.

Noteworthy in Carlson’s commentary is the fact that the DNC declined having a climate change debate. Why? Because the last thing they want is for their candidates to be spouting off radical proposals to deal with climate change on national television. They don’t mind it when candidates are talking to the base, but considering many Americans have their only exposure to the candidates during the ultra-hyped televised debates, the DNC doesn’t want the candidates scaring moderates towards the Republicans.

Conservatives were so concerned about Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and rightfully so. But this new batch of Democratic presidential candidates are completely detached from reality. It’s radical progressivism or hit the road for today’s Democrats.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Dean Cain’s label of San Francisco’s new incarceration language is spot on

Published

on

Dean Cains label of San Franciscos new incarceration language is spot on

Actor Dean Cain is one of the few outspoken conservatives in Hollywood. The star of Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman has taken plenty of heat for voicing support for President Trump and for calling out his progressive peers as they rant unhinged.

One of his latest critiques of leftism was in response to San Francisco’s plan to change official words that pertain to convicted felons and juvenile delinquents. In pure Bay Area-style, the city is planning on sanitizing certain phrases so as to not “further victimize” criminals.

Once we catch our breath after laughing at the way these progressives see criminals, reality sets in about how asinine – and potentially dangerous – it is to cater to the criminal aspects of society at the expense of law abiding citizens.

Here are some of the details of the proposal:

San Francisco to do away with terms like ‘convict’, will instead call them ‘formerly incarcerated person’

They recently passed a resolution containing “person first” language guidelines that all agencies and departments are urged to used.

For example, an offender will now be called a “formerly incarcerated person”, “justice-involved person”, or “returning resident.”

A juvenile delinquent will go by “young person with justice system involvement” or a “young person impacted by the juvenile justice system.”

How did San Francisco leaders find time to address this non-issue when homelessness has reached crisis-levels and their city is literally covered in human feces? Have voters become so engulfed in tribal allegiance that they can’t see the absurdity in front of their faces?

Cain’s reaction was short and perfect.

In George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the nation of Oceania had adopted the official language of Newspeak, “a controlled language of restricted grammar and limited vocabulary, meant to limit the freedom of thought.” It’s both a partial precursor to and a necessity of socialism because freedom of thought allows deviations from authoritarian control. Whether the leaders of San Francisco know it or not, they’re building a version of Oceania right now.

As long as Americans stand by and elect leaders who are more interested in not offending criminals than solving the massive problems faced by law abiding American citizens, this lunacy will continue. San Francisco is dying.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending