Many are struggling in this economy. My family is among them. Please support what we’re doing here and help us to continue to spread the truth Americans need to read and hear.
There have been plenty of questions asked about who knew what when the Russia election interference revelations were popping up in 2016. Members of the FBI have and currently are being questioned by the DOJ. Former DOJ personnel have been scrutinized to the point that many are hiding away rather than talk to current DOJ investigators. President Obama was made aware at some point that Russia was trying to influence the elections, yet chose to do nothing, at least that his former staff is willing to acknowledge.
Then, there are further questions about the FISA warrants, Steele Dossier, and FBI agents who allegedly used circular reasoning and leaks to the press to “prove” their information was justification for spying on the Trump campaign.
Several investigations are currently underway under the direction of Attorney General William Barr. Speculation has pointed to many names of people who may have known the spying was inappropriate but chose not to stop it, including President Obama himself.
But there’s a name that hasn’t gotten nearly the attention it deserves in the whole Russian hoax. Then-Vice President Joe Biden was likely privy to a great deal of information being gathered through spying on the Trump campaign. This should be a much bigger concern than other angles many in the media are currently exploring.
Does Biden know things about Trump’s campaign infrastructure that a competitor simply shouldn’t know?
The spying done by the Nixon White House was minor compared to the spying done by the FBI under the DOJ as part of the previous White House. It’s not easy to dismiss the notion that the President and possibly his Vice President in 2016 had unfettered access to the data being accumulated, campaign sources uncovered, strategies, weaknesses, fears, and other pertinent information that can be used against someone in their election endeavors. It’s also likely much of what the Trump campaign did in 2016 that proved to be so successful will be used again in 2020.
If Biden and his team have access to this information as gathered while he was in the White House, shouldn’t we be asking him more questions? It would seem to be a very unfair advantage to have FBI-level surveillance and data collecting operations in the hands of a competitor. It’s safe to assume very little if any of the pertinent information was given to Hillary Clinton’s campaign because they didn’t really think she could lose and, of course, there’s always the fact that doing so would have been illegal. But if Biden had access to it, what has he retained? What information does he and his team have that can be used in their 2020 campaign?
The spying that was done on the Trump campaign was exponentially more in-depth than Watergate. How much of the information they gathered made available to the former VP and current Democratic frontrunner?
We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.
[gravityform id=”2″ title=”true” description=”false”]
Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?
Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.
There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.
Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.
Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.
We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.
To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.
Thank you, and God Bless!
JD Rucker