Connect with us

Guns and Crime

Pennsylvania lawmakers consider abandoning the 2nd Amendment

Published

on

Pennsylvania lawmakers consider abandoning the 2nd Amendment

“…shall not be infringed.”

For decades, the question of what constitutes infringement on the rights of people to keep and bear arms has been asked. One of the things that’s clearly considered infringement by a vast majority of conservatives is gun registration, the practice of filing paperwork with the government so they can keep tabs on who has what. Leftists argue that it’s not really infringing since it’s only adding information for government use rather than preventing a citizen from keeping and bearing.

This is a very clear abandonment of the 2nd Amendment because it represents the government getting directly involved in the “keeping” aspect of gun ownership. This is truly infringing upon our rights, from a conservative perspective. Will it be considered infringement by the various state legislatures?

The question of whether gun registration may be considered an infringement of the 2nd Amendment may play out soon in Pennsylvania:

It’s the type of move we’d expect to see from more left-leaning states than Pennsylvania, but here’s the thing. The hyper-leftist surge has been creeping authoritarianism and socialism into the background for years, but today we’re seeing the surge happening out in the open rather than behind the scenes. One of our missions as a publication is to expose these attacks on our rights early on before they build up steam. Unfortunately, if people wait until they get to Fox News or other big outlets, it’s too late. This is why NOQ Report is a necessary and needs support.

The only reason for gun registration is as a build-up to confiscation. If they believe illegal guns will be registered, they’re crazy. If they believe criminals with guns are going to start registering, they’re fools. This will hurt lawful gun owners only.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Advertisement
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Gene Ralno

    March 13, 2019 at 4:28 pm

    Pennsylvania lawmakers aren’t paying attention. The signs are clear. Nobody’s gonna’ comply with any of this nonsense. From experience in New York, Connecticut, Washington, Colorado, Nevada, et al., about a hundred million owners of firearms are hopping mad and will look their elected officials straight in the eye and tell ’em no. Seems to me they’re prepared to defy such grabs and bunker up to protect their beloved republic. Most law enforcement officers agree and many will not enforce such laws. And one more thing. There’s always gonna’ be another election.

  2. 4freedom

    March 15, 2019 at 8:36 am

    What’s with these politicians constantly trying to abolish our constitution, they are nothing more than terrorist’s in suits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Democrats

Snopes downgrades truth about Beto’s arrests to ‘mostly true’ because a meme got his band’s name wrong

Published

on

Snopes downgrades truth about Betos arrests to mostly true because a meme got his bands name wrong

Fact checkers are all the rage in the age of fake news. Unfortunately, all of the major fact checkers are left leaning at best, downright progressive at worst. That’s why I make it part of my daily routine to check the checkers to see what they spun today. This latest installment is minor in the whole scheme of things, but it highlights the intense need to protect Democrats whenever possible.

Snopes took on the task of fact checking the following statement:

Beto O’Rourke was in a band called the El Paso Pussycats and was arrested at least twice in the 1990s.

This is true. Beto was arrested twice, which makes him an ideal candidate for the party of lawlessness and disorder. But Snopes, in their certified fact checking wisdom, decided to pick the statement about the arrests that included the name of his band. The statement they chose had the wrong name for the band, using their album name instead. This was enough for them to downgrade the statement from “True” to “Mostly True.”

Not a big deal, right? Actually, it’s bigger than one might think. When people search for Beto and look only for things that are true about him, they will not be shown information about his arrests. The site could have picked literally any other claim about the arrests to fact-check, but had to dig deep to find an internet meme from his failed Senatorial bid last year in order to find one with a statement that included something incorrect in it.

Beto ORourke Arrest

You’ll notice they made sure to mention that both charges were dismissed. The circumstances behind the dismissals seemed to do nothing to negate the crimes he actually committed.

This is just another example of the “fact-checker” running cover for a Democrat they like. The meat of the fact, Beto’s arrests, won’t be found on this site as “True” because they were selective in how they wanted to frame this narrative.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Guns and Crime

Twice convicted, thrice deported Alberto Martinez Flores captured again by border patrol

Published

on

Twice convicted thrice deported Alberto Martinez Flores captured again by border patrol

Deporting criminal illegal immigrants while maintaining such porous and indefensible borders often proves to be a fruitless expenditure. Many of them simply do their time in jail, get deported, then come back the way they came last time. Rinse. Repeat.

Such is the case for Alberto Martinez Flores, 42, who has multiple convictions, including assault, strangulation, vehicular assault, and unlawful imprisonment. This is not a very nice person. In fact, he’s dangerous, yet despite three deportations over the years, including last year, he always finds a way back in.

My Take

Why do people like Flores keep coming back? Because there are too many places without a wall. There aren’t enough border patrol agents. There aren’t enough beds for ICE to house the dramatic influx of humanity crossing our border illegally.

I’m not sure where I read it, but there’s a good case that can be made for increasing jail time on crimes when committed by illegal immigrants. This is something that should definitely be considered in light of our open borders.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Guns and Crime

Nevada to seek death penalty for illegal alien Wilber Ernesto Martinez-Guzman

Published

on

Nevada to seek death penalty for illegal alien Wilber Ernesto Martinez-Guzman

Prosecutors in two counties where an illegal immigrant allegedly murdered four people are seeking the death penalty for his crimes. North Nevada was shaken by the string of murders until the alleged killer was apprehended by law enforcement in January.

Wilber Ernesto Martinez-Guzman, 20, was arrested January 19, 2019, by Washoe County Sheriff’s department and charged with multiple offenses while prosecutors and investigators worked on charging him for the four murders. They rarely invoke the death penalty but the severity and heinous nature of the crimes warrant capital punishment, according to prosecutors.

“We reserve the death penalty for the worst of the worst,” Washoe County District Attorney Chris Hicks said last Thursday. “We use it sparingly.”

The illegal immigrant from El Salvador is accused of shooting and killing Gerald David, 81, and his wife, Sharon, 80, in Reno and Connie Koontz, 56, and Sophia Renken, 74, in Gardnerville.

My Take

Just as traffic fines are doubled in construction zones, so too should penalties be increased when illegal immigrants commit crimes. His immigration status was not taken into account, but the crimes themselves were enough for prosecutors to seek the death penalty.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report