Connect with us

Culture and Religion

The top 5 interconnected mythologies of socialism

Published

on

The top 5 interconnected mythologies of socialism

These are the top 5 myths the Left uses in peddling their socialistic snake oil. We destroy them in turn.

The national socialist media is now torn between two diametric goals: Trying to keep up at least the appearance of objectivity while fostering the Left’s base ideology. The second goal directly conflicts with the first, therefore they need to be careful in how they sell the fraud of socialism [or one of it’s aliases: collectivism, communism, ‘democratic’ socialism, Fabianism, fascism, Leninism, Utopian socialism, etc].

Meanwhile socialist Venezuela is a constant reminder that their ancient ideas do not work. Thus they have to try to sell these wonderful new ancient ideas while trying to explain away their non-functional reality. If they could just convince people that socialist Venezuela really isn’t socialist, they won’t have to explain why those people are starving in the dark, having to eat garbage.

The NSM is openly advocating socialism

New York magazine has gone all in with a cover that asks ‘When Did Everyone Become a Socialist?’ In the case of the Washington Post, they chose to run through some ‘myths’ that were ostensibly of a ‘fact checking nature’. This is their way of taking on the imprimatur of object truth teller while selling the fraud of socialism, attempting to wring a last bit of advocacy out of what remains of their tattered objectivity. Thus inspired by their example we will address the critical myths rather than issues no one talks about such as ‘Socialism is a single coherent ideology’.

Myth number 1: Failed Socialist regimes of the past or present ‘weren’t really socialist’

This is one of the most encountered falsehoods, it stretches back to several decades to the nations of pre-W.W.II Europe in connection to a regime run by a National Socialist Worker’s Party. The myth is that this Socialist Worker’s Party wasn’t really a Socialist Worker’s Party has filled volumes, but keep in mind this was a regime steeped in collectivism to the point that they had the slogan: Gemeinnutz Vor Eigennutz on their coinage, translated as Common good before Individual good.

Leftists love to play games with words, whether it’s Global Cooling, Global Warming, Climate Change, Climate crisis or the number of euphemisms or aliases for socialism. They change the terms and change the debate: ‘that was communism, this is socialism’ or ‘that was socialism, this is democratic socialism’. It’s all the same fraudulent dead-end, but Leftists cast it like a product with a terrible reputation in new packaging, that is somehow different.

That Leftist denial of reality served as the prototype to a tactic that is still being exploited. The usual pattern is that a new socialist regime will be lauded such as that for the new minted USSR or the more recent example of the socialist Venezuela. Later on when it all implodes the typical ad hoc rescue is that some aspect somehow made it non-socialist after the fact.

Myth number 2: Those who oppose Socialism [or one of its aliases] don’t know anything about the subject

This is the usual go-to retort for most arguments from the Left, a subtle variation of the typical ad hominem attack. Aside from the Leftist commandment that one shall not generalise, except when they want do it such as accusing everyone on the right of being racist. It is at best highly questionable to make a statement based on information that it is unavailable on a limited basis. At worst, it is an outright lie. It is beyond that to make a blanket statement on millions of people based on data that is impossible for anyone to have. Of course, the Leftist rejoinder is to simply use circular logic as justification for their lies, but delving into all of this is beyond the scope of this discussion.

Myth number 3: Socialism [or one of its aliases] is a functional governmental system

A cursory look at history is all one should need to answer this question, which is why lie number one is so prevalent. If it actually worked, there would be no need to deny that systems of socialistic slavery weren’t or aren’t actually socialism.

It is manifestly obvious that socialism [or one of its aliases] does not work, the stack of over 100 million bodies of it’s victims should be the first clue. Four hundred years of failure is also convincing along with the need in those systems to have a very heavy police apparatus to keep the people in line.

Myth number 4: Certain Scandinavian countries ARE really ‘socialist’

This is one of the Left’s go-to deflections when the subject of the failure of socialist Venezuela or any socialist system crops up. It is usually tightly partnered with the ‘That wasn’t really socialism’ lie. Suffice it to say, many have eviscerated this lie, It’s been debunked too many times to count:

Capitalism vs. Socialism
Economists in Denmark to America: Yeah, We’re Not Socialist
The Myth of Scandinavian Socialism
The Nordic Democratic-Socialist Myth

Democratic Socialism Doesn’t Exist: Like the Loch Ness Monster and Bigfoot, Democratic Socialism Exists Only in Myth

These small, culturally harmonious nations have a good work ethic with the cost of their defense needs footed by the US Taxpayer. It also helps that they are blessed with mineral wealth that can fund an extensive welfare state with low expenditures on defense.

Myth number 5: Normal public functions of government are socialism

This exploits the absurd post-modernistic idea that words have no meaning. Thus they can define socialism as anything they want – think of it as Trans-collectivism. On this case, it would be LGBTOLeninism, Guild socialism, Bolshevism, Totalitarianism, Owenism.

For those whole dwell in the real world, socialism has a specific definition that doesn’t include normal governmental functions. That fact doesn’t stop Leftists from exploiting this myth to try to shame anyone who uses the roads or Libraries.

The Takeaway

Anyone who has dealt with the socialist-Left has most likely encountered one or all of these myths in some sequence. They are all mutually supporting, if you point out the plain fact that socialism doesn’t work, they will claim you don’t know what you’re talking about or that it works in Scandinavia. Knock those down and the ‘you’re a socialist if you drive on the roads’ myth will be thrown in your face. Circle back to one of the far too many failed experiments in the fraud of socialism [or one of it’s aliases] and the ‘that wasn’t really socialism’ will be used.

Were the fraud of socialism [or one of its aliases] a viable system, there would be no need for all of these interconnected mythologies. While it is far from perfect, the free enterprise system of economic Liberty is vastly superior to that of socialism, it just doesn’t fraudulently promise free stuff at the cost of individual Liberty.

Is the nation ready to revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report editors use ExpressVPN

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

Speculation about ancient human skull in Israel points to unscientific method of modern science

Published

on

Speculation about ancient human skull in Israel points to unscientific method of modern science

What does an ancient human skull found in a cave in Israel tell us about the past? It all depends on which perspective you take and whether you want to follow sound scientific practices or manipulated conclusions from circular reasoning.

Modern science can give us a tremendous view of the past. With nearly every discovery, we can see God’s work at play in molding the planets and the stars, the oceans and the lands, the people and the other wonderful creatures. Unfortunately, scientists often distort the findings to fit in with their secular worldview. A clear case of this comes to us from a study published four years ago in the scientific journal, Nature, titled Levantine cranium from Manot Cave (Israel) foreshadows the first European modern humans, that is still being erroneously taught today.

First, watch the way that it is being reported. Then, let’s discuss the conclusions.

This is an important discovery, one that clearly points to a Biblical worldview of the roots of man from the garden of Eden working its way from what is now Africa into what is now the Middle East. It jibes with the story of the great flood, stories from the life of Adam through Joshua, and a centralized end point of ancient man in the region along the Mediterranean Sea from North Africa up through modern day Turkey.

Of course, that’s not what the scientists doing the research concluded.

“The is the first evidence that shows that, indeed, there was a large wave of African migrants coming out of East Africa and inhabiting the Eastern Mediterranean region,” said Israel Hershkovitz of Tel Aviv University.

One of the biggest problems with modern science is that our society blindly accepts their conclusions. They know, right?

Proper scientific method that we all learn in high school tells us the conclusions of the research are completely unscientific. We know a few things that are truly observable:

  • Humans very likely started in Africa and Neanderthals were in the Middle East.
  • Humans and Neanderthals interbred to form the basis for Europeans. Today, everyone other than purely African people have at least a little Neanderthal DNA.
  • A human skull fragment was found in Israel.

Given this information, it is obtuse to draw the conclusion that this represents a large wave of African migrants inhabiting the Eastern Mediterranean region. One skull fragment does not tell us that there was a large migration. One skull fragment does not tell us that it was a migration at all. Modern science must establish hypotheses based upon observable facts, but it almost always extrapolates too much.

This wouldn’t be a bad thing if it extrapolated based upon the Bible. We are told the general story of everything that happened from creation through the rise of the Greeks within the Old Testament. Every scientific and archaeological discovery in the region supports this general story, but a culture that utilizes far more distant time frames to explain the discoveries has generated the faulty conclusions that scientists present to us today.

The evidence tells two different stories depending on the observer’s worldview. It’s unfortunate that most have pushed aside the obvious and verifiable conclusions in order to perpetuate the paradigm of secularism.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Seriously, ‘eat mor chikin’ at Chick-fil-A

Published

on

Seriously eat mor chikin at Chick-fil-A

A month doesn’t pass without some organization protesting Chick-fil-A to exclude them from participating in some program or even open restaurants in certain locations. This month’s version of Chick-fil-A hate was the last straw for Senator Ted Cruz (and me) as San Antonio’s city council has voted to prevent the fast food chain from operating at the airport.

Let’s call this what it is. Any individual, organization, or company that supports a Biblical worldview or donates to Judeo-Christian causes are considered to be anti-LGBTQ. The only ones who are not labeled as such are those who go out of their way to embrace the LGBTQ community and who promote such things as gay marriage. Faith-based institutions that prioritize modern day’s version of “tolerance” over the Bible’s teachings are often considered to be A-OK to the leaders of the LGBTQ community (as compared to the actual members of the community, most of whom are not involved in pushing the leadership’s agenda beyond believing marriage is not only between a man and a woman).

Chick-fil-A has done nothing to attack the LGBTQ community. They’ve always been stalwart defenders of equal rights and do not deserve the type of treatment they get from people like the six who voted against them in San Antonio’s city council. Yes, they donate to Christian causes. Yes, they let their employees off on Sunday except in those rare circumstances when they’re presence on Sunday is a blessing. Yes, ownership expresses a Biblical worldview. But such things shouldn’t earn them a place on the blacklist.

Nevertheless, they are, and it’s time for patriotic Americans to commit to a sustained campaign in support of this company which has become a symbol as a primary victim of the left’s contempt and discrimination.

Starting tomorrow (can’t start today since it’s Sunday), it’s time to eat out at Chick-fil-A whenever it makes sense. But don’t just do it once. Make it a regular thing. Thinking of other fast food joints for lunch? Whenever possible, don’t. We need to let them and everyone else know that if the left is going to continue to denigrate and block Chick-fil-A, that we’re going to counter their maneuvers by supporting them with our business.

It can’t stop there. We also need to let those who act against Chick-fil-A know, such as those discriminating against religious freedom at the San Antonio city council, that it’s unacceptable. Notice that I’m referring specifically to those who act against Chick-fil-A and not average citizens who protest Chick-fil-A. Protests are protected by the 1st Amendment, so anything beyond respectful discourse should be avoided with the people who have a conscientious difference of opinion. But those who act against Chick-fil-A, especially if they’re part of the government, must be dealt with at the ballot box. A strongly worded letter wouldn’t hurt, either.

Chick-fil-A doesn’t need our help. They’re doing just fine. But that doesn’t mean we can’t expand our support for them anyway. The best way to show or deny support is with our business. Give it to them. Withhold it from those who oppose American freedom.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Did Jesus die exactly 1000 years after King David died?

Published

on

Did Jesus die exactly 1000 years after King David died

History doesn’t tell us exactly when Yeshua was born. Luke tells us that He was about 30 years old when He began His ministry and we know it lasted approximately three and a half years.

And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, – Luke 3:23 (KJV)

We know that King David died in 970 AD. The math might start sounding pretty cool at this point, but I’ll elaborate.

Scholars put Yeshua’s birth to likely fall in the 6-4 BC range. Experts place the range of His death (and resurrection) between 30-33 AD as a result of the data that they’ve worked out.

If He did die in 30 AD, that would mean that he died exactly 1000 years after his human ancestor King David.

Some will point out that the calendars were changed, going from 364 to 360 up to 365 at different points within this time range across the various regions, but using the accepted calendars, we can claim that it’s possible for it to be a 1000 year gap. Knowing the amazing order and precision with which our Father has established His creation, it wouldn’t shock me to find out some day that it was precisely 1000 years all the way down to the second.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report