Yes. It goes beyond the common sense arguments about identification being required for age verification to purchase certain items or enter certain areas. The sanctity of our voting system is dependent on making certain that living American citizens are the only ones who vote.
The argument from the left is that it’s discriminatory. They say that minorities are more likely to be without a valid form of identification and therefore requiring it discriminates against their right to vote. Let that argument sink in for a moment. If it made you chuckle, it should. It should also make you frown to know that this argument is working very well in many states around the nation.
We all know that the argument is not a valid one. Only in an entitlement society can the responsibility to vote be tarnished by partisan rhetoric designed to hide the real reasons to oppose voter identification laws. Voter identification neuters their ability to manipulate the results. Fake votes, double votes, and even deceased person votes would be more challenging if voter identification laws were imposed.
The discrimination argument crumbles when we look at voting as a right and a responsibility rather than as an entitlement to be given to anyone with or without a pulse. Being a right means that when the authenticity of votes are degraded by manipulation, every voter’s right is being diminished. Being a responsibility means that one must meet the reasonable bare minimum requirements in order to be trusted to accept the responsibility. It isn’t hard to get a valid form of identification. More importantly, acquiring ID is not more difficult for any particular race, sex, or people group. Therefore, voter identification laws do not qualify as discriminatory.
There are arguments by some on the right that requiring identification takes away from an individual’s rights. I get the argument, especially when people start proposing national identification or other draconian solutions to voter fraud. But the risks of ID requirements are greatly superseded by the necessity to maintain our sovereignty as a nation. If we continue to allow non-citizens, deceased citizens, and anyone else who shouldn’t be voting to have a say in the direction of our nation, are we really a sovereign nation at all? I do not believe the ID requirements need to be harsh, nor do I think they should bring about crazy measures like biometric scanning or universal federal identification, but basic ID requirements make sense.
Nearly every politician knows requiring voter identification makes sense, whether on the right or the left. The difference is that admitting it does not jibe with the left’s voting manipulation agenda, therefore they willfully lie to protect themselves.
Is the nation ready to revive the American Conservative Movement?
Promo for Mike Lindell's New Daily Show
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC