Connect with us

Democrats

Resolution 1776: The Red, White and Blue New Deal

Published

on

Resolution 1776 The Red White and Blue New Deal

A response to the attempt by the Left to sell socialistic slavery under the false pretense of environmentalism.

This is in response to the challenge issued by nation’s favorite socialist and budding authoritarian to come up with something better than the insanity, mass death and misery of the so-called ‘Green New Deal’. Never mind that she cannot manage to follow her own dictates. They consider themselves to be better than we of the great unwashed, being morally correct and all, so why should they have to follow the rules?

Our alternative is immensely superior to her ancient ideas with 400 years of failure. it’s called Economic Liberty.

Simply stated, socialism is a fraudulent ideology that promises all manner of largess, but never delivers on its Utopian vision. In the case of the ‘GND’ the scheme includes hilariously insane ideas for ocean-wide train travel, rebuilding every structure in the country, getting rid of cow flatulence and free stuff funded by gold coins made from unicorn droppings.

Thus, we have spared no expense – meaning none – in developing our own blurry ‘vision’ in response. This is Resolution 1776: The Red White and Blue New Deal or RWBND for short [pronounced ‘RoWBeND’ or something.]. Stipulating that this isn’t really a ‘deal’, unlike the Left we recognise that we have no right to lay claim to other people’s money, much less dole it out for the purpose of buying votes. We are also proudly using the colors of the flag, unlike the 2020 Democratic presidential contenders.

Is the nation ready to revive the American Conservative Movement?

Our option is based on clear thinking or its best semi-serious approximation with practical solutions that could work in the real world as opposed to ocean bottom train travel. We also won’t be so presumptuous to assume that we can halt a natural process driven by the sun that has taken place for eons. This will address the far more pressing issue of those trying to attain power with farcical promises of wealth redistribution entailing free health care, free college, free housing, free food, free park visitation, free day-care, free income and of course, free unicorn rides for all in lieu of airline travel.

The people’s [how is that for being pretentious?] Resolution 1776: The Red, White and Blue New Deal

Recognising the duty of the Feral Government to create a Red White and Blue New Deal [RWBND] to finally rid humanity of the scourge of socialism.

(1) Whereas the endemic fraud of socialism has been the existential threat to Liberty for over 400 years, finding that:

(A) It has its roots reaching back to at least 2,400 years ago in ancient Greece, discussed in classic works such as Plato’s ‘Republic’.

(B) Said classic work also referenced 500 years ago in book 1 of ‘Utopia’ authored by Sir Thomas More, collectivists admit that this as the ‘first theoretical expression of a genuinely socialist position’

(C) Said ideas inspiring the first experiments in the vile concept [oops, did we say that out loud?] 400 years ago in the first colonies of the Americas with Jamestown colony in 1607 and Plymouth colony in 1620.

(D) The first use of the word ‘socialism’ being from almost 200 years ago in another of its failed experiments in the town of New Harmony, Indiana in 1825.

(F) Other experiments in this fraudulent ideology having taken place over the past 400 years, including those in Albania, Angola, Bulgaria, Cambodia, China, Czechoslovakia, Ethiopia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Nicaragua, North Korea, Poland, Romania, Russia, Venezuela, Vietnam, Ukraine. [Just to name a few.]

Whereas the fraud of socialism has been the direct cause of untold human misery, oppression and violent death in this span of experimentation of over 400 years:

(1) The unfulfilled promises made to sell the fraud of socialism to new generations (such as in the Green New Deal) have necessitated the implementation of secret police apparatus to suppress discontent over these unfulfilled promises.

(A) That instead of bringing about ‘fairness’ and ‘equality’ the societal slavery of socialism has served to enrich the power elite of these collectivist systems.

(B) That the severe economic hardship imposed by the fraud of socialism have forced people to eat children, pets, zoo animals and garbage to survive.

(C) That to suppress the people who have fallen for the grandiose promises of ‘democratic’ socialism, secret police apparatus have instituted wholesale arrest, torture and imprisonment of untold millions of people.

(D) In addition to this, many of these experiments in socialistic slavery have resorted to using the mental health apparatus to also suppress dissent.

(F) That to maintain this suppression these experiments in societal slavery have instituted systems of deliberate mass murder on an industrial scale resulting in well over 100 million dead.

Whereas, to carry out this oppression and deliberate mass murder on an unimaginable scale, the purveyors of the fraudulent ideology of socialism obsess over having the government in control of its own constraints (referred to in this preamble as “systemic injustices”) the nation’s Socialist-Left (referred to in this preamble as “Reds”);

Whereas, basic human rights such as the commonsense human right of self-defence enumerated in the 2nd amendment of the US Constitution as a right of the People to keep and bear arms (referred to in this preamble as “The commonsense human right of self-preservation”);

Whereas, The commonsense human right of self-preservation poses a direct threat to the redistributionist policies of the Reds, they obsess over the destruction of this basic human right.

(1) This obsession with destroying said basic human right consisting of the following ‘progression’.

(A) Unconstitutional control over private property with Intergalactic Background Checks. [Or one it’s multiple aliases: Universal, Enhanced, Strengthened, etc.]

(B) Demands that the country’s subjects obtain permission from the government in order to exercise said basic human right (hereafter known as ‘registration’)

(C) Implementing unnecessary and unconstitutional gun confiscation (hereafter known as ‘gun confiscation SWATing’ or so-called ‘Red Flag’ laws).

(D) Followed by wholesale gun confiscation as demanded by the ‘Reds’ while still maintaining the false pretence of supporting a basic human right.

Whereas Red is the color most associated with socialism and the party of the Democrats was clearly the more socialistic of the two major parties.

Whereas, the nation’s Socialist-Left (referred to in this preamble as “Reds”); are enamoured with the prospect of a Utopia as was the case in the USSR, North Korea and currently in Venezuela and desperately want to participate in the deprivation and death of a socialist ‘Utopia’ we propose the following hereafter known as the RWBND Mobilization.

Whereas; since only a small percentage of the nation wants to enslave itself in the misery and death of socialism portions of some of the several states will be set aside for this purpose designated as being Red zones or Red states.

(1) Inspired by the odd effort to sell off Montana and in order to bring about the wondrous Utopian vision of a ‘Heaven on earth’ the socialist Red zone portions of the People’s Republic of California will be sold off the Mexico to pay off the national debt.

(2) The socialist Red portions of New York and possibly other similar states will be sold off to Canada to also pay off the national debt.

(A) Those dwelling in these Socialist-Red states enamoured with high taxes on other people, gun free zones for other people, severe restrictions on energy use for other people and the other Liberty destructive measures of socialistic slavery will swap places with those Liberty minded in the now designated Socialist-Red states.

(B) After the specified mobilization time period those in the Socialist-Red states will be required to remain where they are since they will now be experiencing the sheer joy of socialistic slavery that they wanted to forcibly impose on other people as has been the case in North Korea and Venezuela.

(C) Since most sane people will soon want to escape the societal slavery of the Socialist-Red States after experiencing the vestiges of these states, including but not limited to constant surveillance, oppression, starvation, torture, imprisonment and mass death; walls will be built by the Reds to keep those people confined as has been always the case.

The Takeaway

We hope that this thought experiment in political humor will be sufficient to convince the 18% enamored with the fraud of socialism the reason why the rest of the population despises its organised evil.

One last question directed at the 18%: Does it make any sense to throw away an admittedly flawed, but exceptional system that brought about our modern world and lifted untold millions out of poverty? Replacing it with a system based on ancient ideas that have never worked and have only brought untold misery, oppression and death upon mankind?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Facebook Comments
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Democrats

Blue Collar Logic: How the left is acting like a villain who wants to be caught

Published

on

Blue Collar Logic How the left is acting like a villain who wants to be caught

There are many ways to look at the unprecedented lurch to the left the Democratic Party has been experiencing over the last couple of years. Some, particularly the radical progressives leading the charge, see it as a natural evolution of ideas as their delicate sensibilities blossom. Establishment Democrats see them as a backlash against losing so inexplicably with Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. Many Republicans don’t see much of a difference other than a more vocal expression of what they’ve held in their hearts for some time.

The folks over at Blue Collar Logic have a different take. They’re seeing the strange actions and hyper-leftist lurching by the Democrats as a transition into a criminal mindset. Whether consciously or subconsciously, they’re throwing out ideas that make very little sense even when compared to what they’ve said in the past. Like a criminal that wants to be caught, they’re leaving clues that they know what they’re doing and saying is wrong, but they feel compelled to do them anyway.

The clearest example to me is the notion that abortions can and should be a consideration even after an “unwanted” baby is born following a botched abortion. Even in the most evil levels of consciousness, there has to be a sense of wrongdoing in the way they’re describing the events as they can hypothetically happen based on what’s being proposed in some states today, but they continue down this road as if they’re unaffected by logic or compassion. The push for “women’s rights” has so superseded their thinking when it comes to abortion that the most extreme version of abortion must be the one that they embrace.

As we approach the 2020 election season, let’s keep a close eye on the rhetoric and radical policy proposals candidates are throwing out. Just because it’s on record doesn’t mean enough voters will hear them. We need their ideas to stick to them like evidence in a murder case.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading

Democrats

Trump hits Biden on China connections

Published

on

Trump hits Biden on China connections

One thing has been made clear by recent events as they pertain to China: They are dying for someone to beat President Trump next November. In many ways, they’re banking on it.

This should make every American, including Democrats, concerned because even more than Russia, China has the capabilities to get in and change the hearts and minds of Americans, hack the 2020 election, and set in motion events that will benefit them. We’re talking about a country with nearly unlimited resources when it comes to cyberwarfare and social engineering. If Russia was ever a real concern to Washington DC, China is the true 800-lb gorilla in the political influence room.

The President called out former Vice President Joe Biden for his and his family’s involvement in China. Speaking to Steve Hilton on the Fox News show, The Next Revolution with Steve Hilton, the President pointed to alarming facts about the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination.

The threat from China is far greater than that from Russia, both economically as well as geopolitically. They have been a stirring giant for years. For the 2020 election, their stirring may turn into game-changing action if we’re not watchful.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

How Alabama’s abortion law sets President Trump up to be a pragmatist

Published

on

How Alabamas abortion law sets President Trump up to be a pragmatist

One of the favorite tactics for both major political parties is to paint opposing candidates as extremists. This is particularly true when it comes to presidential candidates; if you don’t recall, every Republican candidate since Ronald Reagan has been painted as a bigot by Democrats. But whether or not the people fall for the extremism play is usually based, at least to some degree, on reality.

That may not be the case in the 2020 election as both media and the expressions of the people seem to be favoring extremism as a reality rather than just a label. The President is a far-right bigot in the eyes of Democrats while every Democratic candidate (with the possible exception of Joe Biden) is a far-left socialist in the eyes of Republicans. Meanwhile, mainstream media is engaged in confirmation bias to appease their audiences. One need only look at coverage of the Mueller report to see how this is unmistakably true.

On the issue of abortion, the Democratic candidates have made no attempts to appeal to the middle. As each is either asked for or volunteers their perspective on abortion, invariably they are pushing no restrictions whatsoever. This is a far cry from the days when the Clintons thought abortions should be safe, legal, and rare. Today, abortions are to be embraced as far as Democrats are concerned, and any attempt to push for adoption or to fight for the rights of the child in the womb is considered bigoted. One by one, every Democratic candidate is adopting abortion extremism as their stated stance.

But President Trump did something yesterday that makes sense from a political perspective. I may disagree with his stance, but it’s a winning strategy for his reelection campaign. He said he is pro-life with exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother. This stance was once considered to be an extreme position for the right, but with the Alabama abortion bill removing exceptions for rape and incest, the President has the luxury of being closer to the middle than any of his opponents (again, with the possible exception of Biden – we’ll find out soon enough).

Thankfully, the President of the United States has very little they can do when it comes to abortion other than pick pro-life judges and act as the leader of their party. Executive orders on abortion would be certainly struck down regardless of what they say, so it comes down to ideological purity. With Democrats taking on abortion-on-demand as their stated radical stance, it’s hard to argue that the President is the extremist when even he doesn’t directly support the Alabama bill. He didn’t call it out, but by stating his personal position he established that he’s not as far to the right as the Democrats are to the left.

Today, the Democrats must embrace their primary voters, many of whom are the radical progressives “shouting their abortions” and pushing for a socialistic Dystopian future for America. Meanwhile, the President has the luxury of being more pragmatic with his approach since he’s already in general election mode. He doesn’t need to appeal to his base very much because they either stand behind him out of adoration or they fear the Democrats too much to consider going against him. Even most #NeverTrumpers are having a hard time reconciling their hatred for the President with the current batch of hardline hyper-leftists vying for the Democratic nomination.

We can argue the nuances of being pro-life and having exceptions, but as long as the Democrats are all onboard for on-demand abortions, the President’s less extreme stance on abortion will help him next November.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending