Connect with us

Culture and Religion

Why do we even listen to Leftists?



Why do we even listen to Leftists

The Green New Deal is just the latest reason why those who bespeak nonsense should be ignored.

There are times when it’s truly mind-boggling that we even listen to the self-righteous pontifications of the Left. After all, these are based on a bizarre concept that somehow there is a fixed amount of wealth and that it is under the collective authority of society. That people incapable of running something other than a campaign for political office somehow know how to begin and grow a complex business or develop new technologies. Perhaps it’s a secret part of the swearing in of every politician whereby the knowledge of the universe is bestowed upon them, making them an instant expert in every field imaginable.

That would be the only explanation of how those people think that they can call into existence that which is physically impossible with the wave of a pen or a phone. Or believe that a concept that has failed for 400 years will somehow suddenly work under their auspices. Thomas Sowell once stated that “People who enjoy meetings should not be in charge of anything.” The addendum to this would be that anyone who thinks of doing something beyond naming a new post office with a supercilious resolution shouldn’t be in control of anything.

The Green New Deal is just the latest expression of the Left’s absurd ideas

Many have had a lot of fun ripping apart the extreme aspects of the Green New Deal, and rightfully so. From the trenchant analysis from our own Ted Noel, MD  to the pointing out of it’s inherent magical thinking and inane references to ‘cow farts’ as well as the scrapping of our modern transportation system. It’s to the point that going after this resolution from everyone’s favourite socialist is akin to firing conical projectiles at aquatic creatures within the confines of a substantially cylindrical container of water.

However, in a larger sense all of that should surprise no one. All of these, including the more mundane aspects are predicated on the absurd concept of socialism. That somehow the forcible taking of property from the productive and handing it out to the unproductive will somehow redound positively to society. This flies in the face of basic psychology, punishing some for being productive while rewarding those who produce nothing with destroy the economy, no matter how many invocations to unicorn emanations or pixie dust power that are made. The proof being 400 years of failure of the very same ideas with an accompanying butcher’s bill ranging over the 100 million mark.

Socialism has to parasitically feed off the far superior systems of Economic Liberty

Since it needs a healthy host born of the Economic Liberty of free enterprise, the advocates of this system of organised theft have to make it seem like it will turn out better than the status quo based on freedom. Thus they have to sell it with a raft of farcical promises of free health care, free housing, free college, even to the point of promising a free-living. They sort of gloss over the fact that all of this largess will be at the cost of everyone’s Liberty. Perpetuating the fraud with their self-labeling as ‘Liberals’.

The essential indicator that this is all a swindle of epic proportions is that they can never seem to specify the source of other people’s money to fund all of their wonderful projects. They make used car salesmen seem honest by comparison, given that at least they have something tangible to sell. Socialists at best only have a few slogans and empty promises in selling their snake oil. Never mind how they are going to pay for all the goodies.

A long line of failed promises of perfection that have never come to fruition

The absurd and fraudulent concept of socialism is always sold as a wondrous ideal, just out of reach. It’s the false promise of an ‘Ideal state’ or perfect Utopia that can be attained if only a certain set of Leftists are put in charge of everyone else. A perfect ‘heaven on earth’ or ‘worker’s paradise’ because the purveyors of these ideas know exactly how to run things so everything is ‘fair’ and ‘equal’. It will be ‘The wonderful world of next Tuesday’ as it is called on ‘The People’s Cube’.

Never mind that this is all based on ideas that don’t make sense in the real world. Or that it soon takes a version of the Cheka, Gestapo or in the latest incarnation the Fuerzas de Acciones Especiales (FAES) in the wondrous paradise of Venezuela to arrest, torture and kill people when they notice the promises aren’t coming forth.

The Takeaway

The Green New Deal is just the latest emanation from the Left that demonstrates that their absurd and failed ideas should be rejected. It shows that they shouldn’t even sell used cars much less be in a place to control society.

Granted, there is the sheer entertained value in looking at their ideas of a society based on unicorn farts and pixie dust power. Unfortunately there are those who can be taken in by this colossal fraud. Those who may actually think that it’s perfectly reasonable to rebuild every structure or no longer have air travel. Not to mention that this something for nothing scam that has no visible means of support.

The Green New Deal should be an object lesson as to why the National Socialist-Left should be ignored and their absurd ideology relegated to the ash heap of history.


Subscribe on YouTube

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

Not even close: Socialism isn’t about social media, being social or ‘sharing’




Not even close Socialism isnt about social media being social or sharing

Leftists would like their label for organised evil to mean something other than subjugation and mass murder.

We tend to avoid making light of America’s favourite socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [aka ‘AOC’] from the rationale that when someone is making a mistake it’s best to just get out of their way. However in this case, this is not about the women whose antics will cause her ideology of organised evil to be laughed from the pantheon of practical governmental forms. This is about an adorable 8-year-old and perfect her impression of Ms. Cortez, specifically the point that socialism isn’t about being ‘social’, ‘social media’ or ‘sharing’.

For those who haven’t seen this viral video, it’s a perfect rendition of ‘AOC’ and her ruminations on climate change and socialism.

In light of this adorable impression, we will take this occasion to eviscerate what seems to be a very odd understanding of some basic words on the part of the National Socialist-Left.

Socialism is not about being ‘social’

No doubt this partially arose from certain elements who like to weaponize words to maximum effect. First principles hold that politics can be considered to be of the two basic forms: Individualism or Collectivism. With priority given to either the Individual or the collective.

Liberals, Conservatives and Libertarians favour the rights and freedoms of the Individual. Certain civil Liberties such as the common sense human right of self-defence stems from this first principle.
Even though it may at first blush seem counterintuitive, the individual striving to improve themselves and their lot always tends to do the same for everyone else. As stated in The Wealth of Nations:

‘It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our necessities but of their advantages.’ – Adam Smith

Conversely speaking, Collectivism is the other basic form whereby the group is favoured over the Individual. In point of fact, since a group is merely an arbitrary aggregation of individuals with no true form, the result is that it cannot have any true civil Liberties. This is exemplified by the treatment of the common sense human right of self-defence. Whereby the principle ‘collective’ rights is applied, meaning there is no Liberty in this regard.

Individualism is vastly superior to Collectivism

Collectivists like to phrase their construct of one of the labels of their base ideology as simply adding the suffix ‘ism’ to their idea of ‘social’ or group dynamics to make ‘social+ism’. Even though this word has come to signify the worst excesses in authoritarianism.

The problem is that when the ‘rights’ of group are prioritized, the rights of the individual disappear. Despite the window dressing of supposedly being ‘Liberal’, the Collectivist-Left only sees the group as having importance. Individuals become disposable to the whims of the collective. This is how the Left terms idea of self-defence as unimportant and how they end up will millions of dead individuals.

Socialism is not about ‘sharing’

Despite being extremely late to the party of collectivist ideological thought, Karl Marx did imbue one of the lines that epitomises it’s base principles with the saying: ‘From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.’

Sharing has to be a voluntary process. Such is not the case with socialism where that ‘From each according to his abilities’ is done at the point of a gun. This is why the Collectivist-Left obsesses over the disarming of individuals with Liberty control aka ‘Gun Reform’.

The Takeaway

Leftists love to exploit the language to hide their true base ideological intent. This is why they use words like ‘socialism’ or ‘Liberal’. They cannot be honest about what they truly want: control over everyone.

Thus, they have to pretend that ‘socialism’ means being social or sharing instead of an ideology that is truly organised evil at its core.

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

John 16:33 – ‘ye shall have tribulation’



John 16:33 ye shall have tribulation

These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world. – John 16:33 (KJV)

One of the most confused and misunderstood verses in the Bible is John 16:33. In it, Yeshua comforts His disciples as well as those in all all generations of the upcoming tribulation. He tells than that they will have tribulation. They will be tested. The will be persecuted. The good news is that they will not have to overcome the tribulations as those in the past have had to overcome.

Yeshua has already overcome the world. Regardless of what tribulations come, we are protected through faith. As long as we stay true to Yeshua as Lord and Savior and do the Will of the Father through until death, we will be saved. In the past, the Will of the Father was based upon our responses and how we handled persecution. Once Christ was resurrected, we no longer had the same burden. We need only to look to Yeshua and believe on Him as our salvation through the tribulations and we can be saved.

Incidentally, this is one of the verses commonly used to fight the concept of a pre-tribulation rapture. While it is clear He is talking to His disciples, it’s a message that transcends time and acts as a reminder that we don’t need to worry about the problems in the world. We simply need to walk through the narrow gate.

Boost This Post

Get this story in front of tens of thousands of patriots who need to see it. For every $30 you donate here, this story will be broadcast to an addition 7000 Americans or more. If you’d prefer to use PayPal, please email me at and let me know which post you want boosted after you donate through PayPal.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

CNN does 67 updates for Sri Lanka story with ZERO mentions blaming Islamic terrorists



CNN does 67 updates for Sri Lanka story with ZERO mentions blaming Islamic terrorists

The narrative has already been set by American mainstream media on how they’re supposed to handle the Sri Lanka terrorist attacks on Easter Sunday. There are certain things that can be said and others that must be avoided at all costs. With reporting that has spanned nearly 24 hours and included 67 updates to the story, guess how many times CNN blamed Islamic terrorists for the attack.

If you guessed anything higher than zero, you gave CNN way too much credit.

I scanned the entire series of live updates they’ve been doing since the news broke. It’s all within one long story, making it easy to search for individual words, so I did. The results were depressing but expected. Even at this late hour, they still have not acknowledged the possibility that the act was committed by Islamic terrorists.

The closest they came to blaming radical Islamic terrorists in their primary coverage story was a mention in a quote by Diplomatic editor Nic Robertson in which he notes the obvious – that it has the “hallmarks” of Islamic terrorism – but then quickly notes that there are no known radical Islamic terrorist groups in the area.

“It is a very confused picture in terms of who may or may not be responsible. The Sri Lankan civil war ended 10 years ago, a 25 year long civil war, and the Tamil separatists there were a secular group. It would be very, very unlike them and their tactics ever to attack churches and particularly on such a holy day.”

“It has the hallmarks — or is intended to have the hallmarks — of Islamic extremists. But, again, these kinds of groups are unknown in Sri Lanka.”

This last notion is absolutely untrue, of course, as we now know the Chief of Police in Sri Lanka issued a warning about the Nations Thawahid Jaman (NTJ), an Islamist group led by Mohomad Saharan.

The CNN report mentioned the word “Muslim” four times: twice to note the percentage of the population of Sri Lanka that is Muslim, once to warn against reprisals against Muslims, and another to note there have been attacks against Muslims by Buddhist groups. Not once was it even speculated the attacks were carried out by Muslims.

The leftist narrative must be maintained and CNN will not break their allegiances. This was just some people that did something. It may look like an apple, but CNN will scream “banana, banana, banana” for as long as they can.

Continue Reading



Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report