• About
  • Contact
  • Give
Newsletter
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
Thursday, May 19, 2022
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
No Result
View All Result

So-called Red Flag laws: An unconstitutional solution to a non-existent problem

by D Parker
January 17, 2019
in Opinions
TOP Organic Freeze-Dried Chicken

As with most Leftist affronts to Liberty, unconstitutional gun confiscation SWATing or so-called ‘Red Flag’ laws are based on a lie. The usual contention is that these laws that eviscerate basic constitutional protections of due process are desperately needed because there are no other means to deal with people who are alleged to be a danger to themselves or others. Our previous article on the subject dealt with this outright falsehood. There are laws and procedures for involuntary civil commitments already on the books to handle these extreme situations. In the case of Florida and the Parkland mass murder, the “The Baker Act” was already in place, but the authorities failed to take action in time. Other states such as Colorado already have procedures in place for Mental Health Holds.
The existence of these laws have been ignored in the effort to ‘enhance’ the government’s ability to confiscate guns. Its just another case of the Left exploiting a tragedy to ‘Rahm’ through new laws to deprive the people of their means of self-defense.

Laws built on lies

Most articles on what is supposedly the urgent need for gun confiscation SWATing or ‘Red Flag’ laws will make vague allusions there are no other ways of handling these situations to the point of asserting that the government has never had the authority to deal with these situations.
State governments clearly have these abilities, but the existing laws protect the Constitutional rights of the accused without having the primary purpose of confiscating guns – an intolerable situation for the authoritarian Left that sees 120 million gun owners as a threat simply because they are gun owners.

Why violate one human right when several can be attacked at once?

Leftists seem to be in some perverse competition to see which one of them can conjure up new laws to attack Liberty in as many ways as possible. For them, it’s a more efficient form of tyranny with one law doing the work of several. What better way to suppress Liberty than to confiscate guns because of someone exercising their right of free speech while destroying due process protections?

The dangerous implications to the 1st Amendment

These laws will have devastating consequences for the natural right of free speech. It will only take one concerned person in the group of people who can initiate these actions to decide an innocent gun owner is guilty of ‘thoughtcrime’ to have their property confiscated. The odds are that the Left will also expand who can initiate these gun confiscation SWATings and streamline the process.
This will only serve to further stigmatize gun owners and suppress their right of free speech. Talk too much about the human right of self-defense and the law-abiding could experience a knock on the door at 5:00 AM with property confiscation conducted at gunpoint. One would then have a protracted legal battle on their hands to prove they are innocent after being treated as guilty with all manner of legal costs and red tape just to have their property returned.

Prepper Organics 2

The 2nd Amendment – the primary target

In their ongoing efforts to rid the nation of Liberty, the Left has decided that it should be illegal to defend oneself. Thus they have expended copious amounts of digital ink in demanding the death of the 2nd amendment and the confiscation of guns. They are perfectly willing to do this one innocent gun owner at a time if they have to. Never mind that the common sense human right of self-defense is the bedrock of the Bill or Rights. They have no use for the limitations of their power afforded by the Constitution, much less the Liberty conserving provisions of the Bill of Rights.

But wait, there’s more – The 4th and 5th amendments also on the chopping block

These laws turn the presumption of innocence on its head, forcing the victim of one of these gun confiscation raids to have to prove they aren’t guilty of thoughtcrime before they can get their property returned. Not to mention the ‘ex parte’ nature of these proceedings depriving innocent of the critical right of due process and the right to face one’s accuser before these confiscations take place. Lastly, there is the takings clause applicable to the private property being taken for public use since not many innocent gun owners will have the means for a protracted legal battle with the government, resulting in the loss of private property.

Why the focus on firearms?-

The existing laws for Involuntary Civil Commitment are not only superior in protecting everyone’s civil rights. They also serve to keep people from harm by other means. The unconstitutional practice of gun confiscation SWATing only addresses the issue of guns, leaving the supposed danger to society free to use alternative methods to cause harm.
If safety is the point of the so-called ‘Red Flag’ or ‘ERPO’ laws, then why aren’t their proponents concerned about this issue? If someone has their guns taken away suddenly by unconstitutional means, what’s to stop them from using explosives – flour, etc.- from carrying out their deadly deeds? Suppose an alleged ‘danger to society’ no longer has their guns, but still has a motorized vehicle or the ability to make edged weaponry. What about that circumstance?
Well, if it were really the case in that these people are concerned about other people’s welfare to the point of having them committed, they would have to follow the rule of law and afford the target their right of due process, etc. They wouldn’t be able to take someone’s means of self-defense just on the word of some other aggrieved party. It wouldn’t serve their desire for gun confiscation and gun confiscation alone, so it has no usefulness for them.

Things aren’t going according to plan for the Liberty Grabber Left

The progression for the Left has always been one of control, registration and then confiscation. They used to think that it was just a matter of time before Intergalactic Background Checks would be put in place, then registration would be required – both of which would do nothing to keep people safe or ‘cut down on the carnage’. It was all supposed to happen as it did in the UK and Australia. Intergalactic Background Checks, registration, then confiscation.
But that isn’t happening, despite the baseless polling to the contrary, everyone isn’t clamoring to have the government control their private property. Most of the Pro-Liberty see the danger in this control, with it leading to registration, followed by confiscation. Most on both sides have already admitted that Intergalactic Background Checks don’t work, that the dirty little secret being that these have no other purpose than as a stepping stones to confiscation.

The Takeaway

As others have indicated, Leftists aren’t anti-gun, they are anti-Liberty. They love to see them in the hands of the ‘politically correct’, but cannot deal with them in the hands of the right people.
Leftists desperately want to deprive the Pro-Liberty Right of their guns. These firearms represent a vitally important and final check on unlimited governmental power. It’s the primary bulwark against them attaining government power to attain their wondrous utopia they desire. They are so desperate to remove it that they will confiscate them one innocent person at a time, without a care for its effects on safety or Liberty.

Mixi.Media News



NOQ Report Needs Your Help

TOP Prepare Now



Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?

Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.

There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.

Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.

Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.

We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.

To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.

Thank you, and God Bless!

JD Rucker


Tags: Bill of RightsConservativesConstitutionCrimeDemocratsDonald TrumpFeaturedGOPGun Confiscation SWATingGun ControlGunsLibertyLiberty ControlMediapoliticsRed Flag Gun LawsRepublicansTop StoryWilliam Barr
  • Gene Ralno says:
    January 18, 2019 at 9:45 pm

    Fact is, red flag laws are intended to remove firearms from the hands of deranged persons but aren’t crafted to succeed. No state thus far has crafted a law that ensures the disarmed person is deranged. Seems they empower mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, uncles, cousins, friends, neighbors, judges, police officers, boyfriends, girlfriends and everyone except those actually qualified to judge mental competence. Bills in other states would allow classmates to partner with judges to the ones they don’t like.
    Until two independently chosen psychiatrists, one from each side of the dispute, analyze and formally issue an opinion, these confiscations are devoid of due process. Besides, judges and police officers don’t wish to be saddled with the responsibility and potential litigation because they know they’re not qualified. It’ll never end with these radical leftists. Perhaps under the choke-point strategy, mortgagees, auto lien holders and insurers will be empowered to confiscate. Think about those notions when you vote and carefully consider the consequences of not voting.

  • Bypass Big Tech Censors



    My Show

    The Midnight Sentinel

    Our Sponsors

    MyPillow Promo Code NOQ

    MyPatriotSupply
    Z-Stack Life
    Our Gold Guy

    Shows

    The Pandemic Treaty's REAL Threat

    Kathy Barnette Can Win in November

    Falling on the Sword for Dr. Mehmet Oz
    Is Trump Losing Touch With His Base?

    The Israel Vaxx Study

    Bypass Big Tech Censors


    RSS The Federalist

    • Handwritten Notes From 2017 Show FBI Agents Mislead DOJ On The Trump-Russia Investigation
    • Michael Sussmann Defense Contradicts Itself On Another Key Argument
    • How A Republican Congress Can Protect Health-Care Workers From The Biggest Federal Erasure Of Their Conscience Rights Ever
    • How The Left Has Poisoned What It Means To Be Healthy, And Why It Matters
    • Putin’s Useful Idiots: How U.S. Climate Extremists Are Funding Russia’s Agenda

    RSS The Blaze

    • 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli gets early release from prison, boasts about it in social media post
    • Middle schooler placed in choke hold, gets neck wrenched; school allegedly faults victim while attacker, said to be a wrestler, is less severely disciplined
    • Lawmaker confronts abortion doctor over horrific reality of abortion procedures. Her reaction says it all.
    • Bette Midler demands Tucker Carlson and Newt Gingrich be thrown in jail
    • Bill Maher mocks the left's ABSURD sexuality-gender obsession with 'pride flag' parody

    RSS PJ Media

    • Democrats Facing the Grim Reality That Biden is Their Only Hope
    • You Won’t Believe What Woke Left-Wing Kooks Think Is ‘Racist’ Now
    • Dallas Mavericks Sex Trafficking Abduction Update: Names of Those Arrested and Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe
    • George W. Bush Hits the ‘Wholly Unjustified and Brutal Invasion of Iraq. I Mean, of Ukraine.’
    • Mad Vax, Yo: Buffalo Shooter Was a Left-Leaning COVID Nazi, Wore Hazmat Suit to School

    RSS National File

    • Female Skateboarder Calls Out Red Bull After Trans Competitor Wins Tournament
    • George W. Bush Accidentally Refers to Ukraine as ‘Iraq’
    • Biden Blames Tucker Carlson for Buffalo Massacre
    • Netflix Lays Off Dozens of Employees Involved With ‘BIPOC’ & ‘LGBTQ+’ Projects
    • General Flynn Files $50 Million Claim Against Feds

    RSS Townhall

    • Don’t Be Fooled By Leftist Wordplay — They’re Only Worried About ‘Free Speech’ When They’re Not In Power
    • Inconvenient Fact About Mass Killings
    • Demands to Defrock Washington
    • Buffalo Mass Murderer Explodes the White Supremacy Stereotypes
    • A Student’s Take on Student Loan Forgiveness

    RSS RedState

    • S&P 500 Index Drops Tesla From List of Woke Companies - Elon Musk Responds With Perfect Meme
    • Should an Ohio Father Listen to His HOA and Take Down His Thin Blue Line Flag?
    • Former Fox News Reporter Calls for Journalists to Be Jailed for 'Misinformation'
    • GOP Lawmaker Stuns Dem Hearing Witness in Revealing Exchange on 'Abortion Until Birth' Argument
    • Put Your Fears That Elon Musk Is Walking Away From the Twitter Deal at Ease
    • About
    • Contact
    • Give

    © 2021 NOQ Report

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
      • About
      • Give
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Quotes
    • Around the Web
    • Videos
    • Podcasts

    © 2021 NOQ Report

    Session expired

    Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.

    >