Connect with us


Democrats in the midterms: Are they qualified to ‘rule the population’? [Part I]



Democrats in the midterms Are they qualified to rule the population Part I

The many varied reasons why you shouldn’t vote for the Democratic collective.

All through the Kavanaugh confirmation ordeal, the Left incessantly repeated the mantra that he wasn’t qualified based on their rapidly moving goalposts. The rationale being a bizarre but unvoiced legal standard that he was ‘collectively’ unqualified because other women had been assaulted. With this collectivist viewpoint being completely at odds with Conservative and Liberal ideals of individual freedom and rights.

Then the New York Times published a piece from a professor of philosophy at Emory University that asserts this very idea out in the open – the idea that people can be ‘collectively complicit in societal issues

By now, many of you are probably saying, this doesn’t apply to me — I’m innocent.

It’s true that many of us, including me, have not committed vile acts of rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse the likes of which Harvey Weinstein has been accused of.

Yet I argue that we are collectively complicit with a sexist mind-set and a poisonous masculinity rooted in the same toxic male culture from which these men emerged.

That kind of emotional ‘Logic’ is abhorrent to those who are truly Liberal in that it rejects individual Liberty and individual responsibility, in favour of it’s ‘collectivised’ versions. But since the Democrats insist upon judging others with a broad brush, we should evaluate them on the same basis.

Applying collective judgement to the Democrats.

Consider how the Left would fair if they were all judged as a collective. Would they deserve our support or should they be shunned from polite society? It’s at this point the collectivists will show their duplicity in wanting to be judged as individuals, pointing fingers at others in their party as did Claire McCaskill. They act as a group, so they will be judged as a group.

Part I will examine the Left’s innate ability to lie and prevaricate beginning with their use of false labels. Part II will examine the Left’s temperament and predilection for violence and terror. Both will make the case for their being unfit to rule, and why they do not deserve any electoral support.

False labels: Leftist use of the term Liberal to imply that which they are not – advocates of Liberty.

Leftists love to exploit that term defined in the precepts of individual Liberty and freedom. It graphically shows their dishonesty in supposedly being liberators while tirelessly working against the cause of Liberty. This is exemplified by their use of the word Liberator as the name for several of their publications. With their astounding use of the term the collective to describe their editorial staff of one of them. In additon, they also use phrase ‘Wars of Liberation’ to describe their imposition of tyranny.

The Left’s collectivist basis is completely at odds to this word, but that doesn’t stop them from falsely using whenever it is advantageous for them. Their incessant attacks against most of the bill of rights while pretending to be ‘Liberal’ should make them unfit in and of itself.

Their term progressivism contradicted by their advocacy of post-modernism.

Postmodernism is the essence of a fair amount of ‘progressive’ thought. As the Encyclopaedia Britannica details this philosophy:

Indeed, many of the doctrines characteristically associated with postmodernism can fairly be described as the straightforward denial of general philosophical viewpoints that were taken for granted during the 18th-century Enlightenment.

[Our emphasis]

In other words, a rejection of the progress of the modern world that was born of the age of enlightenment. This of course includes rejection of the scientific method and the overwhelming benefits of technology, all from the ‘Party of science™’.

It should also be noted that most ‘progressive’ ideas reach back at least several centuries, if not to ancient times. Going backwards is supposedly ‘Progress’ to Democrats. As Andrew Klavan said in his latest video: Leftese Dictionary: K is for Ku Klux Klan ‘Leftese describes a world that is exactly the opposite of reality’.

The fascist tactics of the ‘Anti-fascists’

This is only a small segment of the Leftist collective, but since they insist on judging everyone else as aggregated entities, the same should be applied to them. This is also one of the Democrat’s most egregious false labels since these tiny mobs act fascistically despite their self-labeling. Part and parcel of this is that the Left’s media arm dutifully parrots the ‘Anti-fascist’ meme to the point of dishonourably comparing them to W.W.II veterans who fought against fascism and socialism in actuality.

Democrats rejecting democracy.

Failing to carry out their agenda via legislation, the Left tends to use the courts and specifically the Supreme Court as a 9 person ‘super-legislature’ to force their agenda on the nation. This was why they became so agitated over the Kavanaugh confirmation, since it closed off one of the avenues to implement their policies. This use of the courts instead of the will of the people is also a rejection of the very meaning of their label as ‘Democrats’.

They’ve also bolted this term onto the label for their base ideology, but the blood soaked history of socialism shows that it’s never been ‘democratic’. There is just something about gulags and firing squads that seems to be at odds with the word.

The one case where the Left is honest in self-labeling: socialist.

One might almost have to give them kudos for finally coming out of the authoritarian closet, but even that calls into question their veracity – at least in the past. For years, most mainstream Democrats denied being socialists, then as of late they’ve dropped the mask. Curiously enough, their raft of policy points didn’t change. It was as though they were pushing their socialist national agenda all along, but didn’t have the integrity to admit the truth of the matter.

This also highlights the Democratic duplicity in their media arm switching the colours that signify the two sides in the Left-Right political spectrum. The better part of the last century saw the socialist-Left being designated by the colour Red, with it’s adherents typically called ‘Reds’. Just as in other cases, the socialist-Left swapped the colours to confuse the issue. These are but a few examples of Leftist false labels that renders them unworthy of leadership.

Democratic Lies in other realms.

Trying to properly identify all the lies of the Left is a daunting task in and of itself, making this essay far too cumbersome in scope. These range from outright lies in specific parts of the Left’s socialist national agenda to subtle word play in how they frame the issues. We will try to touch only on the highlights of the most egregious examples. Please don’t become offended if we give short shrift to these lies since that we all have our favourites.

Tax cuts give money to the wealthy.

This linguistic word play comes in many forms, but they are all predicated on the collectivist viewpoint on property ownership. This is the only way one can logically assert that letting someone keep what they already own is somehow ‘giving’ them something. Leftist-Collectivist dogma is that all property is somehow the purview of the government. This is why they object to the phrase made famous by Margaret Thatcher that ‘There is no such thing as public money; there is only taxpayers money’. Coincidentally enough, this oft repeated talking point stokes the fires of division via class warfare while absolving the Left from charges of theft when they steal almost everyone’s hard earned property. They empower themselves while setting people against each other, does that even sound like people who should ‘Rule the population’?

No one is talking about gun confiscation.

This is a Democratic deception that deserves a place of honour in the pantheon of Leftist mendacity. As has been well documented with over 70 cases and counting, Leftists all over the countryside have demanded gun confiscation using multiple forms or euphemisms. While at the same time other Leftists will assert with a straight face that no one is talking about that very subject. Sometimes you have to admire the conjones of a collective that will lie both ways at the same time, but not here.

You can keep your doctor.

While it’s a bit dated, it’s present day equivalent is the fantasy proposal of ‘Medicare for all’. Yes, it will all be roses and rainbows with this and all kinds of goodies courtesy of other people’s money. Just don’t ask them to fill in the funding details, they might as well talk about unicorns that will come galloping in carrying bags of golden tickets to pay for it all. It’s just a simple matter of tripling taxes to on the top 80% and viola! Free Obamacare for everyone!

Socialism has never been tried before.

If there was any occasion for a necessary lie for the Left, it would have to be this abject denial of historic fact. They certainly cannot admit to the legacy of failure that has been the reality of socialism for almost 200 years. Neither can they admit to the logical fact that is it based on the brutal application of force or that it has been the cause of a death toll of over 100 Million. For the socialist-Left, they have no other choice, they have to deny abject reality at every turn. To do something else – admit the obvious – would be to condemn their national agenda.
They have nothing else to run on except for promises that can never be fulfilled. They have to emphasise all the free goodies that will be forthcoming in their upcoming Utopia instead of the brutal reality of forcing societal slavery on the population. Free healthcare, free education, free housing and free money are just the starting bids in buying votes. Who knows what else they will promise, never mind that there isn’t the money to pay for it.

Many a nation has seen this song and dance before, followed up with secret police raids at 3:00 AM, torture and imprisonment or firing squads when the promises cannot be fulfilled. By then it’s too late, and it’s only after whole system inevitably collapses that Leftists come to the realisation that it was really socialism. Right now we have a choice that will not be available if the Democrats ever attain power.

The Takeaway for part I

Keep in mind that this dissertation only touched Left’s woefully inadequate socialist national agenda. But there is so much to cover in detailing the Democrat’s unfitness for office that this can only be a quick review of their moral deficiencies.

Bottom line: The collective lies and false labels of the Democratic Party should make the case alone that it does not deserve your vote.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Biden to announce next week



Biden to announce next week

Former Vice President Joe Biden is going to announce his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President next week according to multiple reports. This comes as no surprise to most who have been paying attention as his elevated presence in the media and at speaking events led many to believe he was going to announce soon.

Biden has run for President twice before, bowing out in 1988 and 2008 but eventually landing on the latter ticket with President Barack Obama.

Some thought a report of inappropriate touching that came out last month may thwart his efforts once again, but the controversy has died down and the memes are getting old.

Now, it seems like the announcement is imminent.


The far-left wing of the Democratic Party doesn’t want to see Biden run. They’ve been able to pull every other major candidate to accept and appreciate socialism to one degree or another and they fear Biden might be too moderate.

This is true in some ways, but don’t be fooled by Biden’s centrist history. He’s not going to allow himself to be painted as a moderate. He will proudly point to his progressive record and tell the people he’s the champion on the far-left they need.

It may be enough to win him the nomination.


“My intention from the beginning was if I were to run would be the last person to announce. We’ll find out whether I can win in a primary.” – Joe Biden

Final Thoughts

It’s hard to tell which rich old white guy the President would rather face, Biden or Sanders. Personally, I’d like to see Joe win the nomination as his gaffes will make for a fun general election show.

Continue Reading


Dear Democrats, bring on the impeachment!



Dear Democrats bring on the impeachment

There is no doubting how accurate a previous column by our own EIC, JD Rucker, was. Its very title captured the reactions before the report was public. But perhaps the Mueller Report enhancing the public’s preconceived biases was low hanging fruit. However, I daresay the intensity of the Democrats’ reactions were underestimated, and I further argue that we should escalate their emotions for the sake of  political expediency. So please Democrats, go fourth with impeachment proceedings. It would be like their Battle of Crécy.

If you are a Trump-hating leftist or NeverTrump former-Republican, the report will give you days, perhaps weeks of ammunition you can hurl at your Trump-supporting friends and across your social media profiles. Your wildest dreams will be confirmed by whatever mainstream media outlets you love the most, and you will feel both vindicated for thinking the President has always been a lawbreaking bad guy who stole the election and deserves to be impeached before checking into jail.

#ImpeachTrump was all the rage on Twitter, with prominent fresh faces in Congress latching on to the movement of their social media base. The brightest minds of the Left at The Atlantic and The Intercept claim to have a roadmap to impeachment. Rep. Rashida Tlaib has begun the impeachment resolution and their brightest star AOC, has signed on.

Battle of Crécy


The French are famous for executing some of the worst military blunders in history. Among them is their repeated charges during the Battle of Crécy. King Edward III during his campaign across the channel found himself pursued by the French army of King Phillip VI and his auxiliaries. King Edward mounted a defense outside the town of Crécy on high ground. The French first engaged with crossbowmen who were at an inferior position compared to the English longbowmen. The French knights pummeled their own crossbowmen in a show of elitism as they charged to win the battle. But the charge failed. So, they charged again and again and again and again. It is said the French knights charged at least fifteen times, until it became too dark. During the earlier charges the French followed the blind King John of Bohemia.

It’s not enough to be wrong once. They have doubled, tripled and quadrupled down on what was an outlandish conspiracy from the beginning that only had an investigation because people in the FBI abused FISA warrants and the opposition media peddled these lies. No, Trump’s subsequent interview after firing James Comey did not warrant a special counsel. So if the Democrats want to charge yet again, this time believing they have reasonable findings of high crimes or misdemeanors then by all means charge once more. Following AOC is like following King John of Bohemia, if her Green New Deal debacle is any indicator. Meanwhile Don Jr. earned his spurs.

Conservatives are poised to win and each wave of attacks will only create mounting losses. This is a battle Conservatives might as well have. It would not simply be a political victory, it would be demoralizing. If Rachel Maddow cried upon hearing “no collusion,” can’t wait for the leftist tears after this impeachment assault fails. So go ahead Democrats, use King Phillip VI as inspiration for political strategy. Republicans will look like adults, on their high ground outside of Crécy, while the Democrats increasingly become infantile.

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Why does the national socialist-left overreact to the proper labeling of the Nazis as being far-left?




Why does the national socialist-left overreact to the proper labeling of the Nazis as being far-left

A recitation of basic historical facts will bring forth all manner of vitriol and condemnation from the left. Why is this the case?

Properly labeling the Nazis as a far-left National Socialist German Workers’ Party will bring forth a stunning overreaction from the nation’s socialist-left. Why do they overreact denying their past? Why is this one of the worst aspects of the cultural civil war being waged by the left?

Overreacting to history

The past few years have seen the Left become increasingly detached from reality with logical arguments verging further and further from their grasp, seeing them having to compensate for their abilities and lack of practical solutions with ad hominem attacks or childish invective. The worst examples being of the genre of the ‘debunking’ article or video of the statement of the facts of the Nazi party, with most beginning with vitriol unworthy of a 5-year-old. In many cases their circular logic has devolved down to there is no reason to debate those of us on the pro-liberty right because we are essentially wrong.

A debate on the biggest historical lies in modern history does bring forth a question in why the left overreacts to the discussion. Why do they care about the base ideology of a group of socialists that were only around for a mercifully short time, over 70 years ago? Are they terribly worried that the Nazis will be correctly identified as part of an ideology that has oppressed and deliberately murdered millions of people, thus tarring their reputation?

Leftists never directly explain why certain groups are ‘right-wing’

While they will often assert that fascism is some manifestation of extremism of the political right, they fail to explain why this is the case. They simply assert the presumption and quickly ‘move-on’ to issue further insults against the pro-liberty right. The best they can offer is that ‘fascist states practiced business-friendly economic policies’ or that certain people voted for them. Or it’s the shop-worn ‘rivalry’ talking point often trotted out by the left. The problem for the left is that none of those items even come close to proving the case no matter how many times they repeat them.

This is after all, the biggest lie in modern history and a complete reversal of the meaning of common words. Those kinds of extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but leftists never even get up to the starting block. Leftists begin with the presumption that the Nazis were ‘right-wing’ and they simply repeat the charge ad nauseam, despite not having any to proof this is the case. It could just be a coincidence that historic falsehood just happens to absolve their side of the political spectrum of the worst horrors of WWII.

Leftists presume the Nazis were ‘right-wing’ since they were ‘right-wing’, simply because they were ‘right-wing’. With the magic of circular logic, anyone can be ‘right-wing’ because they are said to be ‘right-wing’. Start off with a one-line editorial and simply build on the presumption, never mind proving the case with facts.

Why does the Left tar their opposition as ‘right-wing’ no matter how it defies basic logic?

Stalin was the originator of casting his political opponents as fascists and supposedly ‘right-wing’ despite a dearth of evidence. So it’s not without the least bit of historic irony that one of the ‘reactionary’ articles on the issue makes the stunning revelation that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics under good old Uncle Jo was in fact a ‘right-wing terroristic totalitarian regime’. Yes indeed, in an article on the admittedly leftist site ‘Wrath-Bearing Tree’ in a piece entitled: No, Nazis were Not Leftists: Or, How to Debunk Right-Wing Propaganda. The author makes this stunning revelation – without evidence –overreacting to an article on the subject in The Federalist.

For those who shout “What about Stalin?!”, the answer is that the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin, was also a right-wing terroristic totalitarian regime, despite the supposed “leftism” of Communist ideology that could be traced back to said Enlightenment values. The Soviet Union was never really Communist in anything but name, but from the beginning governed as just another kleptocratic oligarachy much more authoritarian than any Tsar ever dreamed of. Vladimir Nabokov, in his memoirs, calls the Bolsheviks (who assassinated his father, by the way) “fascists.” So the answer is that the Nazis weren’t “leftist,” but that the Soviet Union was actually “rightist.”

[our emphasis]

It would seem that the nation’s socialist-left doesn’t tire of going to the well in trying to foster the ‘that wasn’t really socialism’ lie. A lie, they insist on maintaining with the socialist nation of Venezuela.

Who knew that Bernie Sanders was ‘Right-wing’?

Lest anyone consider those previous revelations to top the heap of the illogic of the Socialist-Left, we present this piece from World Socialist Web Site entitled: Bernie Sanders silent on Assange, vocal in promoting nationalism at Michigan, asserting that socialist Bernie Sanders is really ‘Right-wing’:

Seeking to attack Trump from the right and outdo the president’s appeal to chauvinism and xenophobia, the Vermont senator declared: “The NAFTA treaty that Trump renegotiated with Mexico will still allow companies like General Motors to send our jobs to Mexico.

Sanders’ silent support for the persecution of Assange and his promotion of nationalism arise from his pro-capitalist, pro-imperialist political orientation. These right-wing positions demonstrate that his real aim is not, as he claims, to lead a “political revolution” against the “billionaire class,” but to misdirect, disorient and suppress opposition among workers and young people by channeling it behind the corporate-controlled, pro-war Democratic Party.

[Our Emphasis]

Leftists will brand anyone they consider to be the opposition as ‘right-wing’ at the drop of a hat, just as they will overreact to any challenge to their ‘That wasn’t really socialism’ mythology. They maintain these tactics and outright lies for two closely related reasons. This is to protect their base ideology, and to balance out the butcher’s bill.

Protecting the ideology of socialism

An ideology based on ancient ideas enslaves, oppresses and has deliberately murdered over 100 million people with a track record of 400 years of failure somehow tends to get a bad reputation. So it only follows that its current votaries in trying to foist it on a new generation would seek to make it sound like something other than what has brought on the horrors of the past. It’s akin to a car dealership that at one was called Robert Francis O’Rourke’s used cars is now Beto’s better deals in trying to take in a new class of suckers.

Balancing out the butcher’s bill

Even worse than keeping their base ideology ‘pure’ by insisting that it’s never really been implemented correctly is their use of these lies to try to absolve its blood soaked history. The presumption being that even though various sundry Communists have killed millions, they can point to the Nazis in one of history’s more perverse forms of ‘whataboutism’.

It is for this reason that the national socialist left overreacts with such vehemence to the recitation of the truth. Given these facts from history, it is clear that the organized evil of the modern age redounds mostly to the left. They are the one with blood on their hands, even though they attempt to project it on others.

The Dangerous mystique of Nazism

There are two very dangerous effects of leftist attempts of constantly trying to rewrite history. One is that it provides a certain level of ‘mystique’ to the Nazis, Lending itself to those of a certain disaffected status to emulate this horrid ideology. This would be far less likely if the truth about this party wasn’t undergoing constant obscurement by the nation’s socialist-left.

Shedding some of the dark side of socialism

This leftist mythology also keeps the full horror of the record of socialism under wraps. Leftists will always insist on the ‘that wasn’t really socialism’ lie. But with the Nazis as part of their own, they can’t palm off some it horrors on the ‘right wing’. Thus new adherents aren’t repulsed by the horrific past of the left’s base ideology. There would be far fewer new minted socialists if they were apprised of the full truth of the collectivist ‘faith’.

The Takeaway

There is a very good reason the national socialist-left overreacts to anyone daring to bring up certain historical facts. While it’s a part of the ‘that wasn’t really socialism’ lie, it also provides them with a convenient excuse for the deprivations of those nations that are at least for now acknowledged as leftist by the left. Soon enough they will try to work their magic in rewriting history to somehow term failed socialist nations to be somehow ‘right wing’. So at least in their minds, their base ideology will be left unsullied by oppression and deliberate mass murder.

For everyone else, the truth is becoming manifest, that the myriad variations in collectivism have all failed with horrific results for millions of people. We have reached the end of the age of experimentation in government. Those predicated on individual liberty and economic freedom are vastly superior to those based on collectivism and economic slavery. The truth of the matter will bare this out, leaving the socialist-left out in the cold as they deserve.

Boost This Post

Get this story in front of tens of thousands of patriots who need to see it. For every $30 you donate here, this story will be broadcast to an addition 7000 Americans or more. If you’d prefer to use PayPal, please email me at and let me know which post you want boosted after you donate through PayPal.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading



Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report