• About
  • Contact
  • Give
Newsletter
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
    • Give
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Quotes
  • Around the Web
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes
No Result
View All Result

Christine Blasey Ford's Rate My Professors conveniently blank

by Ray Fava
September 18, 2018
in News

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.

As soon as Christine Blasey Ford went on the record, it became known that she was a professor in the field of psychology at the Palo Alto University who also taught at Stanford University. Recent reports circulated on Twitter and Facebook of how students brutalized Professor Ford in their reviews. However what garnered an equal amount of attention was the censorship of this article. And perhaps Rate My Professors is also guilty of censorship.

TWITTER CENSORING
article about
Christine Blasey Ford
WATCH AS IT BLOCKS ME
FROM TWEETING#ConfirmKavanaugh #MAGA@parscale @RandPaul #QAnon pic.twitter.com/euMkzEiqYo

— ?? Miguelifornia ??KEEP AMERICA GREAT?? (@michaelbeatty3) September 17, 2018


The article in question was published on TheFederalistPapers.org by the site’s ringleader, Steve Straub. However Miguelifornia was unknowingly tweeting fakenews. It’s understandable how someone who believes is QAnon would so willingly overlook critical details, mainly that this isn’t the Christine Ford that is accusing Brett Kavanaugh.

Firearms and Ammunition on sale now: $150 off $1,000+ (use code: APRIL150)

She’s currently a professor in the Social Work Department at California State University – Fullerton.

Christine Blasey Ford does not teach at Fullerton. Meaning, this article is connecting the wrong person to the Kavanaugh accuser. This is a case of shoddy journalism. Now the issue of Twitter censorship is real. It also appears Twitter does not like Mr. Straub’s site.

What do the reviews actually say?

Christine Ford has been a professor so having taught students, its more than likely she has true reviews that can actually be found. Except she doesn’t. The two pages on Rate My Professors, the gold standard website for professor reviews are both void of reviews.

Palo Alto University page

Stanford University page

No reviews could be found on lesser competitors or indirect competitors. Stephanie Dube Dwilson of Heavy noted:

It’s not known if they never had reviews or if reviews were removed, but there are no reviews on her two pages.

Key Questions

So how do reviews just not exist for a professor. It’s understandable how the Stanford page may be blank, but the Palo Alto page should, in theory have some reviews. So this invites speculation as to whether Rate My Professors wiped her page clean after she went public and before the internet could vet her page for curiosity. If she had a 4.5 would her review still be up there? If they were worried about spam posts to smear Ford, why not simply lock her page. It does a disservice to students who are deciding to take her to censor information that could be used in a class scheduling decision. Why does Rate My Professors even care to intervene on Christine Ford’s behalf? It’s completely understandable to lock the page, like Wikipedia often does on controversial topics.

Final Thoughts

It is unlikely any student ratings would have been germane to Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Brett Kavanaugh. However, they could have undermined her character. Suppose more than one student rated her and their reviews said that she was a liar. Or what if a review said that she sexually harassed a student. This information could have undermined her accusations against the Supreme nominee, as opposed to her being a tough grader or even a poor educator. However the issue here has less to do with how the reviews impact the situation at-hand and more about how Rate My Professors likely wiped reviews in an effort to minimize scrutiny in regards to Ford.

Genesis Won't Use Gimmicks

Mike Adams: Force Majeure Could Be Unleashed as Part of the Engineered Great Reset

Covid variant BA.5 is spreading. It appears milder but much more contagious and evades natural immunity. Best to boost your immune system with new Z-Dtox and Z-Stack nutraceuticals from our dear friend, the late Dr. Vladimir Zelenko.

Why We “Moderate” a Commentor’s First Post

Tags: Brett KavanaughCensorshipChristine Blasey FordFake NewsFeaturedPalo Alto UniversityRate My ProfessorsStanford UniversityTop Storytwitter
Previous Post

In the case of FEMA Chief Brock Long, don't assume wrongdoing

Next Post

Dr. Jordan Peterson has a warning for America

  • Anonymous says:
    September 20, 2018 at 2:53 am

    I can answer this, as I was lucky to click a link to her ratings the day her name was announced. They did in fact quietly remove the reviews.
    There were maybe 6 or 7 reviews and they were polarized. About 3 good and 3 bad from what I remember. The bad ones said she was an annoying grader, made her seem like a bitch, and one said something along the lines of being unhinged. The others were your typical positive reviews. If I remember correctly, the latest reviews were posted in 2014. The earliest, 2011?

  • Water Bear says:
    September 20, 2018 at 1:07 pm

    The score on her reviews (or lack thereof) prompted me to make a face similar to them.
    0.0

  • Sabre22 says:
    September 20, 2018 at 3:15 pm

    Last time I looked the god reviews were there and there were no bad ones (NO surprise there)

  • meThree says:
    September 20, 2018 at 9:16 pm

    It does not really matter, does it?…. Giving the fact that we all know that she lies and that she is an extreme Leftist who associates with Hillary’s lawyer and other “great” people.

  • DBS says:
    September 27, 2018 at 4:45 pm

    I saw one from 2016 and one from 2017. They are now gone.

  • M says:
    September 28, 2018 at 12:13 pm

    She’s a total liar. Wonder how much she was paid for this bs?

  • Ronald says:
    September 30, 2018 at 10:24 am

    Another interesting thing is that the wayback machine (internet archive) only shows archives saved twice, starting on Sept. 16, 2018 and ending Sept.20, 2018. This is referring to the California State University, Fullerton entry, which is now being claimed as a “different” Christine Ford, but I am not buying it. They also scrubbed the bad reviews from that page as well.

  • Ganon says:
    September 30, 2018 at 7:38 pm

    ask the anons on 8chan. they screen shot it before it was scrubbed

  • Bypass Big Tech Censors



    My Shows

    The JD Rucker Show (Rumble)
    The JD Rucker Podcast (Apple)
    America Out Loud (M-F 8pm ET)
    America First Report (Substack)
    The Late Prepper (Substack)
    End Medical Tyranny (Substack)

    Our Sponsors

     
    MyPillow Promo Code

    MyPatriotSupply

    Z-Stack Life

    Precious Metals

    Bypass Big Tech Censors

    RSS The Federalist

    • Tucker Carlson: ‘Information Control’ Via Internet Censorship Is A Huge Problem For Democracy
    • Law Group Demands Answers From Wisconsin School District After Trans-Identifying Male Student Showered In Front Of Four Girls
    • Ray Epps ‘60 Minutes’ Interview Raises More Questions Than Answers
    • What Other Cries Of ‘Russian Disinformation’ Were Lies To Help Biden?
    • If The Right Wants To Win, It Must Drop Its ‘That’s Not How We Do Things’ Approach To Organizing

    RSS The Blaze

    • People are cancelling Fox Nation subscriptions after Tucker Carlson and the network split
    • 'There's no such thing as someone else's child!' Biden faces fierce backlash over bizarre claim: 'Our nation's children are all our children!'
    • Longtime 'Dancing with the Stars' judge dead at age 78
    • Lizzo fills concert stage with drag queens to protest Tennessee law: 'Why would I not create a safe space?'
    • Lizzo's ENTITLEMENT: I AM the beauty standard!

    RSS PJ Media

    • What Is Going On With the Strange Deaths and Mutilations of These Cattle?
    • We Need You to Fight With Us
    • Oh Brother: Warner Bros. to Mark Its 100th Anniversary by Wokeifying Its Old Classics
    • How Strong Is the Power of American Capitalism?
    • Did a Hindu Woman Really Try to Blow Up a Mosque in Virginia?

    RSS National File

    • Video: Neil Cavuto Shuts Down RFK Jr When He Calls For Peace in Ukraine
    • DeSantis Becomes Shaken When Asked About his Failing Poll Numbers vs Trump
    • Breaking: CNN Fires Don Lemon
    • Breaking: Fox News, Tucker Carlson ‘Part Ways’
    • ‘Call to Arms’: Trans Militant Says He Will Shoot ‘Christian’ Women

    RSS Townhall

    • Why House Passage of the Parents Bill of Rights Act Is So Significant
    • Democratic Fantasyland
    • Cleopatra Blacklash: Why Aren’t Hollywood’s Diversity Casting Stunts More Diverse?
    • How Many Times Will the Democrats Say Mega MAGA Republicans?
    • Weird Weather

    RSS RedState

    • Déjà Vu for Trump? Fulton County District Attorney Set to Announce Criminal Charges Against Trump and Associates
    • Bud Light Sales Fall off a Cliff, Rivals Gain
    • School District's New Math Curriculum Teaches Kids They Don't Have to Be Boys or Girls
    • WATCH: 7 Arrested as Trans Activists Disrupt Montana Legislature and Bring Proceedings to Halt
    • Biden's Brain Breaks Mid-Sentence, Makes Bizarre Claim About 'TN Three'
    • About
    • Contact
    • Give

    © 2022 NOQ Report

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
      • About
      • Give
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Quotes
    • Around the Web
    • Videos
    • Podcasts

    © 2022 NOQ Report

    Session expired

    Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.

    >