Connect with us

Economy

How Harley Davidson may expose another problem with tariffs

Published

on

How Harley Davidson may expose another problem with tariffs

The logic that many on the right and even some on the left understand about tariffs is the increase cost to overseas producers inevitably falls back on the American consumer. This is the primary argument made by many federalist-minded Libertarians and Republicans who oppose President Trump’s continued embrace of the practice. As we’re now seeing, there’s a potentially bigger problem with these tariffs.

Instead of bringing jobs back to America, they can actually drive jobs overseas. Case-in-point: good ol’ American Harley Davidson.

The motorcycle company that for many embodies the American rebellious spirit is at a crossroads. The European Union has raised its tariffs on American-made motorcycles from 6% to 31% in response to President Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum.

US to hit EU with steel and aluminum tariffs, report says

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/30/trump-administration-tariff-steel-aluminum-eu-trade-tensionThe move is likely to bring retaliatory action from European Union trade regulators, who have warned they will target US products as motorcycles, jeans and bourbon if additional US tariffs are imposed.

Signs of increasing friction between the US and Europe over trade came early on Wednesday when Wilbur Ross, the US commerce secretary, drew a sharp line with the EU over Chinese trade negotiations, telling counterparts at a trade development panel in Paris that Europe is using tariffs as an “excuse” to refuse trade negotiations.

Predictably, Harley Davidson is in a precarious situation. They must decide whether to continue exporting to Europe and pay the tariff, which averages around $2,200 per finished motorcycle, or move a portion of their operations to Europe to avoid the tariff. While they’re unwilling to admit it at this point, the latter will almost certainly force the company to cut it’s American workforce and even shut down some of their domestic facilities.

This isn’t the type of result we were promised when the President was selling us on tariffs, but it was easy to foresee.

Free trade works when it’s done right

The President was correct when he bashed NAFTA and TPP. However, his reasoning for doing so was wrong. Free trade empowers the real job creators in US companies to put Americans to work. It also allows for many to move jobs offshore, but the benefits of a freedom in trade greatly outweigh the detriments. As some jobs move offshore, more jobs are subsequently created in America.

NAFTA and TPP were never really free trade agreements. NAFTA was trade redistribution that ended up being detrimental to the whole continent and TPP was a handover of power to multinational companies without the benefit of proper oversight. To use them as the reason for imposing harsh tariffs and abandoning free trade is a farce. As a self-proclaimed master negotiator,Trump should have made better deals and embraced free trade. Let Americans go head-to-head with companies in other nations. Put their cheap workforce against our innovations and financial prowess. That type of free trade is good for them and better for us.

Harley Davidson won’t be the last company forced to make hard decisions because of the tariffs. Our best case scenario is that damage can be mitigated and some jobs truly do come back. Unfortunately, that may be wishful thinking.

Reference

Harley-Davidson offers no further detail on overseas production shift as European tariffs take hold | PennLive.com

https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/07/harley-davidson_offers_no_furt.html“We never contemplated moving our European volume out of the United States,” Olin said Tuesday.

“Consequently we’re analyzing the capacity options that we have… and we are working on the overall plans, and when we have them we’ll provide more information.”

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

Progressive think tanks: If the economy holds strong, Trump should win in a landslide

Published

on

Progressive think tanks If the economy holds strong Trump should win in a landslide

Tribalism makes it challenging to gauge where the sentiment of the most important voting blocks stand. Hyper-leftists would vote for a broken refrigerator before voting for President Trump in 2020, while the MAGA crowd would stand in line with no food, water, or a bathroom for two days if that’s what would be required for them to vote for their man.

But these won’t be the people who determine the results of the 2020 election. They never are, even if their numbers are greater on both sides as noted by Ben Shapiro in his new book. The rabid Republicans and determined Democrats may ebb and flow in size, but it’s the people in the mushy middle who win elections.

Knowing this, it’s often difficult to determine what the sentiment is if we go solely based on the news. Just as with the dedicated tribes, so too are media outlets generally spun in how they present the news. This is why a story from today on left-leaning Politico prompted a read. It was worthwhile going through the leftist spin to reach the meat of the story, which basically says if conventional wisdom about incumbents and the economy hold up and the economy can remain strong through the election, President Trump should win in a landslide regardless of who the Democrats nominate.

Models from multiple think tanks conclude the conventional model favors the President, but these are unconventional times. It’s still very possible for the economy to remain strong and for the President to be hit with another onslaught of scandals, as he was in 2016. Then, there’s the “it” factor of the Democratic nominee. Someone like Senator Kamala Harris throws in the minority-female combination as an appealing wildcard in the mix. Meanwhile, Beto O’Rourke and Senator Bernie Sanders still have incredible fundraising infrastructures that could help them dominate the money battle through the primaries and during the general election.

Of course, there’s always the possibility the economy could fall. Analysts have been predicting it in a way that’s vulgar, as if they hope the economy falls and people are hurt by it just to make sure President Trump loses in 2020.

If Republicans can put on a full-court press on the economy, something they failed miserably at in the 2018 midterms, they may be able to ride the President’s wave to victories on Capitol Hill as well. November 2020 will sneak up very quickly.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Democrats

TIL the famous bar AOC worked at shut down over rising costs, minimum wage increase

Published

on

TIL the famous bar AOC worked at shut down over rising costs minimum wage increase

Today I learned something that surprised me, not because of the event itself but because so few people have talked about it. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is known for being a leader of the socialist movement in Washington DC after rising from the humble status of bartender to the Congresswoman of the 14th district in New York. Her policies include a push for a “living wage” of $15 per hour. I’ve always thought the wording was odd considering Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and others have been calling for a rise in “minimum wage.” Today, I found out why she’s shying away from that phrase.

When New York City raised their minimum wage $15, many businesses were hit hard, especially in the hospitality industry. Restaurants and bars started cutting hours and often even closing their doors over the increase. One of those hit hard by the massive bump was The Coffee Shop. Owner Charles Milite blamed the closure on high costs, with the rise in minimum wage as the last straw.

“The rents are very high and now the minimum wage is going up and we have a huge number of employees,” he said.

The Coffee Shop is the bar where AOC once worked.

Keep in mind, this wasn’t some random bar. The Coffee Shop in Union Square was considered a high-end establishment, buzzing all the time with “A-list” patrons. It was featured many times in the HBO show Sex and the City and had built a reputation as an “it” spot for Manhattan residents and tourists alike. In other words, this wasn’t a hole in the wall hanging on by a string. It was a vibrant, successful business for almost three decades before New York City’s untenable leftist policies, including a $15 minimum wage, became more than the bar could bear.

On the surface, many voters may see the very basic math of “oh, Democrats want to pay me more” and assume there’s no repercussions for such actions. This is why Democrats prey on those people who currently make lower wages. They feel if they can promise them something that sounds good even if they know with 100% certainty based on empirical evidence that it will actually hurt them, these new socialists are willing to make that trade. They figure they can blame the conservatives later for why the place they were working at before cut their hours, removed their jobs, or shut down because of raising the minimum wage.

As usual, socialists rely on ignorance and emotion as the driving forces behind their plans. They’re not stupid. They know their ideas won’t work. But they’re willing to push them on people anyway in hopes that ignorance will keep them in power.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Economy

Thomas Sowell makes a clear point about Medicare-for-All

Published

on

Thomas Sowell makes a clear point about Medicare-for-All

How was the left able to take heat away from their Medicare-for-All proposal, and more specifically the estimated $32 trillion price tag over a decade? They tripled down with the Green New Deal, which some estimate would cost upwards near $100 trillion.

So, the price tag of the Democrats’ desired replacement for utterly failing Obamacare is to take current government control over healthcare and put it on a regiment of steroids and methamphetamine. When you’re going through Hell, keep going, I suppose.

But all of this could be alleviated if voters and politicians took a moment to think about the prospects of Medicare-for-All logically. Let’s erase, for a moment, the Utopian notion that taxing rich people extreme amounts will give us enough money to make healthcare free for everyone while also improving the quality. That’s the goal, right? Cheaper, better healthcare is what most people want. Conservatives believe it’s best to pull government administration out of the equation and put it all on a competitive capitalist model that has worked for nearly every other industry for over a century. Hyper-leftists want to add more government control.

Conservative commentator Thomas Sowell has some thoughts on the matter. One in particular can be wrapped up into an eloquent quote that should be ideological checkmate allowing us to win the healthcare debate.

“It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it.”

Of course, our version of checkmate requires common sense, logic, and basic math skills. These attributes aren’t as readily present on the left, therefore they might hear this logic and still think single-payer makes sense.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report