Connect with us

Opinions

F*** Civility!

Published

on

This week Michelangelo Signorile wrote a piece for the Huffington Post titled “F*** Civility.” (I decline to print the full title since I try to live in a civilized world.) In it, he called for Democrats to “shut down the streets.” The Left should “continually confront” Trump officials wherever they can be found, including running them out of restaurants the way Sarah Sanders was run out of a Mexican Restaurant while trying to have a peaceful family dinner.

What did he think of prior Democrat actions? “Democrats and Obama… personified civility.” So it must have been a civil act when a Sandernista shot up a baseball practice and nearly killed Steve Scalise. It must have been a civil act when Democrats burned a limousine during protests at President Trump’s inauguration.

The Supreme Court properly examined the law and the Constitution, upholding Trump’s travel ban. This action was reviewed favorably even by left-wing legal scholars. Yet in Signorile’s alleged mind, this was a “stinging, bigoted blow to justice and equality.” Notice I said “alleged mind,” because his comment is nothing more than a primal scream. There is no thought process involved.

Another Supreme Court decision, upholding the right of Crisis Pregnancy Centers to NOT advertise abortion facilities is an “anti-abortion” ruling. In fact, it was a free speech ruling where abortion was not an issue.

I could go on, but it’s clear that Signorile exemplifies much of the Left. They are simply incapable of rational thought. All they can do is scream. Indeed, one such group gathered to “scream through their vaginas” at Trump. You can’t make this stuff up. And, as the key question asks, “How’s that working out for you?”

One more quote clearly lays out where the Left is at the moment. “Many Democrats and many in the media are still living in an alternate universe where decorum will somehow save the day.”

Curious.

Our American Revolution came about when a critical mass of people took up arms against an oppressive foreign power. But there’s no oppression of the Left. They are simply losing political battles. No one is running around “stripping anyone of their rights.” Medicaid is not a right, and neither is food stamps. If Planned Parenthood loses its Federal money, the government will not force them to close. And Trump is not “putting children in prison camps.”

Where will this go? The primary in New York’s 14th Congressional District offers us some guidance. This hard-left district threw out a ten-term member of Congressional leadership. Part of it was due to him simply ignoring a photogenic newcomer since it was “his seat.” But part was also due to the Democrat party moving into that alternate universe Signorile mentioned.

Alternate universes are a science fiction construct where much is the same in two universes, but they don’t have contact with each other. Since Signorile, who exemplifies the hard Left, thinks that civility is in an “alternate universe,” he’s saying that he’s in an alternate universe from civil society… Think about it…

What does this mean for the midterm elections? It’s obvious that the loonie Left is cranked up to full scream mode. There’s only so much any person can hear. For example, when CNN’s Brian Stelter tried to blame the Maryland newspaper shooting on Donald Trump, we tune him out. His statement is obviously nuts. When Signorile says that Trump is “putting children in prison camps,” we tune him out.

The Left and their echo chamber in the media have cried wolf so many times that we aren’t able to hear them anymore. Surveys have noted that the public is disregarding the legacy media. But this just makes them scream louder. They can’t seem to realize that we have already left the room and closed the door. We’re tired of their yelling and want to go somewhere peaceful. We have more important things to do.

There has been a lot of noise in the press about a “Blue Wave” in the midterm elections. But the generic ballot surveys have recently swung to a dead heat. Since Republicans historically outperform the generic numbers by about three points, that is a “Red Tsunami” waiting to happen. Public approval of Donald Trump is higher than it was for Barack Obama at the same point in his presidency. Economic sentiment is positive, employment is up, and wages are rising. Since people tend to vote their wallets, things look good for Republicans.

What are Democrats going to do? They are “obstinately convinced of the superiority of their opinions and prejudiced against those who hold different ones.” In short, they are bigots. Starting from that position is a guaranteed loser.

Retail politics is very much like retail sales. You do best in a warm market. In politics, that’s your base. But you can’t stop there. Your base just isn’t enough to get you over 50%. So you have to find a way to get some of the middle over to your side. But the middle is reasonably happy with the way things are going, and that number is increasing. You have to find a way to change their opinion.

Yelling is the worst way to change someone’s opinion. When you say that we are bigots, fascists, or Nazis, you just stopped all conversation. We know we aren’t any of those things, and your yelling won’t change that. It doesn’t matter what you say after that, because we’ve stopped listening. And you made that happen.

Democrats who carefully engage in the realm of ideas have a chance to actually persuade voters. But Democrats like Maxine Waters show the rest of us how insane you are. Why would we want you anywhere near the levers of power? Are we crazy?

The loud lunatic fringe of the Democrat party is making the rest of the Democrats look worse than they already are. The election in New York 14 looks like the Democrats are swinging further in that direction. And the further the Democrats swing, the harder it will be for them to get out of their alternate universe into the real world to make contact with voters. That’s good for Republicans.

It is not helpful for Democrat thought leaders to suggest that we “are lying through [our] teeth” when we disagree with them. We aren’t “stripping millions of their rights.” We’re tired of you telling us what to believe and then belittling us when we disagree. We’ll vote for people who actually live in our world, and you aren’t one of them. Don’t be surprised if there’s a Red Tsunami.

 

Advertisement

0

Democrats

There will be no climate change debate because the DNC is scared of what would be said

Published

on

There will be no climate change debate because the DNC is scared of what would be said

Climate change activists were extremely vocal at the annual summer for the Democratic National Committee. They’re upset that climate change is effectively missing from the first two debates and have demanded a single-issue debate focused on the environment. But DNC leaders haven’t budged after declaring there would be no such debate.

This isn’t surprising. Conservatives may look at progressives and assume everyone in the Democratic Party is a flaming tree-hugger, but the reality is climate change ranks very low on the list of real concerns for actual voters. If it weren’t for the loud but small group of radical progressives who have been driving the agenda for the Democratic Party since President Trump was elected, climate change would still be an issue of passing importance on the periphery that it has been for decades.

It’s not that climate change isn’t a concern. It’s that it’s not a primary concern to most voters. Democrats are worried about it as they’re flooded with propaganda by progressive media, but compared to putting food on the table or paying for their kid’s braces, climate change is a distant concern.

Nevertheless, it’s an issue that’s important enough to talk about for Democrats because their party holds the edge on the matter in the eyes of anyone who believes it’s an issue at all. The ranks of Americans who believe man-made climate change is a real concern are growing. Polls show a majority of Americans who think it’s something that deserves attention are high even among Republicans. Considering the GOP stance on climate change ranges from mild interest to outright denial, one would think the Democrats would take advantage of this.

They won’t. They can’t. Today’s candidates aren’t Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton calling for incremental action to address climate change over the next three decades. Today’s leading candidates, especially Bernie “Green New Deal” Sanders and Elizabeth “Bold Action” Warren, are speaking of radical changes when they’re talking to their base. And lower ranked candidates are even more expressive of their concerns in hopes the environmentalist crowd can help propel them to the upper tier in the race for the nomination.

Candidates can’t speak boldly on a topic to their base and then give more moderate responses to a national audience. In today’s social-media-driven society, major contradictions are captured. They go viral. Then candidates have to answer for their reversals. Therefore, whatever the candidate tell radical progressives in small gatherings about their climate change plans must be the same thing they say during a nationally televised debate.

The DNC realizes this would be the kiss of death for their White House ambitions. If mainstream moderate American voters, who often receive their only exposure of candidates during televised debates, were to hear the insane ideas most of the candidates are proposing, they will quickly warm to the idea of reelecting President Trump.

The moment a candidate talks about limiting air travel, they’ve lost 2020.

The first Democrat to say we need to be driving electric cars exclusively by 2030 will get demolished in the general election.

Some may point out these policy proposals are available to the public already, but availability does not highlight the issue to the vast majority of Americans. But on the debate stage where consistency must be maintained, they’re done the moment they announce their real perspectives on the issue.

If moderates and independents heard the things Democratic candidates were proposing to tackle climate change, any hope of beating President Trump would be lost. The DNC won’t risk letting the radical truth come out in a debate.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Dean Cain’s label of San Francisco’s new incarceration language is spot on

Published

on

Dean Cains label of San Franciscos new incarceration language is spot on

Actor Dean Cain is one of the few outspoken conservatives in Hollywood. The star of Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman has taken plenty of heat for voicing support for President Trump and for calling out his progressive peers as they rant unhinged.

One of his latest critiques of leftism was in response to San Francisco’s plan to change official words that pertain to convicted felons and juvenile delinquents. In pure Bay Area-style, the city is planning on sanitizing certain phrases so as to not “further victimize” criminals.

Once we catch our breath after laughing at the way these progressives see criminals, reality sets in about how asinine – and potentially dangerous – it is to cater to the criminal aspects of society at the expense of law abiding citizens.

Here are some of the details of the proposal:

San Francisco to do away with terms like ‘convict’, will instead call them ‘formerly incarcerated person’

They recently passed a resolution containing “person first” language guidelines that all agencies and departments are urged to used.

For example, an offender will now be called a “formerly incarcerated person”, “justice-involved person”, or “returning resident.”

A juvenile delinquent will go by “young person with justice system involvement” or a “young person impacted by the juvenile justice system.”

How did San Francisco leaders find time to address this non-issue when homelessness has reached crisis-levels and their city is literally covered in human feces? Have voters become so engulfed in tribal allegiance that they can’t see the absurdity in front of their faces?

Cain’s reaction was short and perfect.

In George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the nation of Oceania had adopted the official language of Newspeak, “a controlled language of restricted grammar and limited vocabulary, meant to limit the freedom of thought.” It’s both a partial precursor to and a necessity of socialism because freedom of thought allows deviations from authoritarian control. Whether the leaders of San Francisco know it or not, they’re building a version of Oceania right now.

As long as Americans stand by and elect leaders who are more interested in not offending criminals than solving the massive problems faced by law abiding American citizens, this lunacy will continue. San Francisco is dying.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Democrats

Bernie’s betting high on Green New Deal to save his campaign

Published

on

Bernies betting high on Green New Deal to save his campaign

Around four months ago, Senator Bernie Sanders was on top of most 2020 election polls. Meanwhile, Senator Elizabeth Warren was polling at single-digits, former Vice President Joe Biden hadn’t entered the race, Senator Kamala Harris was still relatively unknown and nobody knew how to pronounce Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s name. That was then. Today, he has slipped to third in many polls and has less of an upside than 4th-place Harris or 5th-place Buttigieg.

Much of this can be attributed to Warren’s two strong debate performances as well as her willingness to throw radical proposals against the wall every week. Sanders has been relying heavily on his old shtick; even some leftist media sources noted that Sanders 2020 sounded exactly like Sanders 2016. His campaign until this week had been heavily reliant on promoting socialist redistribution schemes and vouching for Medicare-for-All, neither of which give him any daylight between Warren and himself. In fact, you can quote one about socialism or healthcare, attribute it to the other, and their supporters couldn’t tell the difference.

But Warren’s climate change plan fell flat with the leftest of the leftists. At a “modest” $2 trillion, it was seen as a band-aid for a sliced jugular in the eyes of many climate change activists. This was it. This was Bernie’s opportunity to pounce, and pounce he did. His recently unveiled $16.3 trillion Green New Deal package is a massive amount of pouncing.

How massive? Let’s start from the year 1 AD and write a check every day to pay for it. How much would that check need to be?

Sanders has been receiving praise from some of the most radical progressive groups out there since unveiling his plan. It is much more “woke” than Warren’s and may serve Sanders in his quest to lead the hyper-leftist wing of the party once again in the primaries. Currently, Warren holds that mantle. Will the Green New Deal be enough?

If it isn’t, Sanders is done. This is his only differentiating factor against Warren, which is why his Twitter account and campaign mailers have been in overdrive trying to make the Green New Deal the talking point for progressives. He needs them to look at his plan and Warren’s and believe Bernie is the most radical of the radicals.

It could backfire. This may be a way for Warren to appear more mainstream than Sanders. She has already conspicuously declined to take on the label of being a Democratic Socialist and has gone so far as to speak like a capitalist even if her policies are socialistic. Sanders doesn’t share her embarrassment for labels. He’s a socialist and never try to deny him of this “honor.”

Sanders is throwing up a hail mary even though the Democratic primary match is still in the first quarter. He recognizes this race could slip away from him quickly if he doesn’t do something different. He hopes the Green New Deal is his Warren-buster.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

American Conservative Movement

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending