Support Ultra-MAGA Patriot Mike Lindell (and us!). Buy from MyPillow with promo code “JDR” at checkout or call 800-862-0382.
Harvey Weinstein, Hollywood’s latest de facto pervert, has been BUSTED! His unscrupulous, dishonorable, and sexually predatory modus operadi has been exposed. Mr. Weinstein has now gained the attention of several law enforcement agencies which are said to be diligently looking into the Hollywood director’s possible criminal acts: mainly sexual assaults.
But, what do we know of Harvey Weinstein’s gender identity?
As of now, we can only assume that dear, ol’ Harvey identifies as a male, in line with his biological sex. On the other hand, we only assume that Harvey is male solely based upon our own hateful, culturally induced, stereotypical thinking… or so we are routinely informed. Oh, Poor Harvey…
(Feel free to laugh out loud.)
Now, put on your thinking caps, because we are about to enter the hypothetical future: a future in which Mr. Weinstein is found guilty of sexual assault and subsequently imprisoned… only to later reveal to the world that his true gender identity is female.
In our new hypothetical future, one extremely important issue has just arisen: where will Harvyetta serve out her time, her sentence? Will she serve her time for sexually assaulting various women in the men’s prison facility or in the women’s prison facility? Yes, Harvyetta may have been convicted of sexual crimes against biological women, but shouldn’t our empathies lie with the perpetrator who has been forced to live as a man, to live a lie? Oh, and we surely wouldn’t wish to be perceived as “intolerant”!
Hmmmm. Decisions… Decisions….
Well, we don’t have to look to the future to find the answer to our hypothetical conundrum. In fact, just last year the Obama administration issued new guidelines on this very matter. As expounded upon at The Guardian, “The US Department of Justice released new guidelines Thursday prohibiting corrections agencies from placing transgender inmates into men’s or women’s units solely based on their anatomy at birth.” Lucky for us, President Trump’s Department of Justice has taken up the Obama-era torch of incarceration “equality.” In August of this year, “The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a brief Saturday defending current federal policies that allow transgender inmates to be housed in facilities that correspond with their gender identity.” Certainly, this provides us with a definitive answer to our hypothetical question regarding Harvey Weinstein in the case of future incarceration: Mr. Weinstein would undoubtedly be housed in a female only correctional facility, free to continue his perverted shenanigans, free to prey on imprisoned women who have no hope of escape from Harvey’s sexual predations. This ladies and gents, is “progress.”
(Feel free to cry out loud.)
Here in the present, more and more conflicts surrounding where to house “transgender” inmates are cropping up across the country. In St. Louis, “an investigation is underway at a southeast Missouri jail over a transgender inmate after complaints emerged about inappropriate contact.” The complaints come from fellow female inmates who have been involuntarily housed with biological males. In Texas, according to complaints and motions filed in the U.S. District Court’s Northern District, women inmates have launched a lawsuit claiming “they are living in a degrading and dangerous environment by being forced to share showers and bathrooms with the transgender inmates.”
There is ample reason for these female inmates to be concerned. One illustrative example comes out of the United Kingdom. In March of this year, a convicted rapist was moved from his all-male facility to an all-women’s facility after undergoing sex-change surgery. However, by September, the convicted rapist had to be moved into isolation after making unsolicited and inappropriate advances toward female inmates. I am sure nobody could’ve seen that coming…
Yet, here we are, America, knowing that Harvey Weinstein’s key to sexual bliss, on the occasion of a sexual assault conviction, may be easily found in one, simple utterance: I Identify as a woman.
Are you okay with that?
Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?
Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.
There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.
Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.
Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.
We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.
To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.
Thank you, and God Bless!
JD Rucker
