Connect with us

Education

I wanted to defend the leftist school librarian but she didn’t deserve it

Published

on

Melania Trump National Read a Book Day

I have a confession to make. When I heard the story of the school librarian who rejected the gift of books from First Lady Melania Trump, I intended to read her open letter so I could defend her actions. I should have known better than to try to defend a far-left tool of indoctrination, but I originally misunderstood.

After reading her post, I realized I was wrong to even consider defending Liz Phipps Soeiro.

My initial perspective came from a quick scan of the “facts”:

  • Super-successful school with 9,000 books was picked by Melania Trump
  • Librarian sent them back because there were other schools that could use the books
  • She sprinkled in some politics into her letter

That’s how I understood the story based upon my scan of a mainstream media article. My only defense for her, had these actually been the facts, would have been that lost in all the controversy is the question of why more books were being given to schools that have plenty of books already?

All three points were proven to be incorrect. Here’s reality:

  • A program not created by the First Lady selected schools to honor for a day created by… wait for it… the Obama administration
  • Librarian sent them back because she wanted to make several political statements
  • She sprinkled a couple of alternative facts about education into a purely political letter intended to make herself feel good and receive kudos from other liberals

She went after Betsy DeVos in a way that would make you think the education system was wonderful until 9 months ago. She complained about teacher pay even while admitting they were paid well… just not enough to live close to the rich school. She invoked ‘white supremacy’ as an argument. No, really.

Perspectives

Classless Librarian With Overinflated Ego Rejects Melania’s Gift of Books to Schoolchildren

https://www.redstate.com/terichristoph/2017/09/28/classless-librarian-overinflated-ego-rejects-melanias-gift-books-schoolchildren/Unfortunately for Cambridgeport, they have an ungrateful librarian by the name of Liz Phipps Soeiro, who took it upon herself to reject the First Lady’s gift, then made things worse by writing a blog post in which she presumes to educate Mrs. Trump on public schools, with the obligatory leftist screed on Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, whilst also patting herself on the back for being so well educated.

Final Thoughts

Moral of the story: even if it seems like a leftist may be on the proper side of an argument, you should do your full research. I always do, and I’m glad that I did before sticking my foot in my mouth on this one. The First Lady did nothing wrong and deserved zero animosity from this librarian in her publicity stunt. My only question after reading her letter is to wonder what they teach librarians in college. She had two grammatical mistakes in her letter, including an atrocious run-on sentence. My eyes still hurt from reading it.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Education

Good Trump: Free speech on college campuses! Bad Trump: ‘Student loan debt, I’m going to work to fix it.’ Huh?

Published

on

Good Trump Free speech on college campuses Bad Trump Student loan debt Im going to work to fix it Hu

When I read the initial headlines, I was very pleased with President Trump. His push to prevent schools from quashing conservative voices on campus is a long-overdue move that gave me hope we might actually start seeing the stifling of free thought coming to an end.

Then I read the articles and had to scratch my head.

“Student loan debt, I’m going to work to fix it. Because it’s outrageous what’s happening. You’re not given that fair start. You’re too far down. It’s not right and we’re going to work very, very hard to get it fixed,” the President said.

If these exact words were spoken by a Democratic candidate for President, most Republicans and every true conservative would be up in arms talking about personal responsibility and the necessity for students to acknowledge the agreement they willfully entered into by going to a college they couldn’t afford. But since the words were spoken by President Trump, I’m hearing radio silence on social media.

Hundreds of conservatives have seen my Tweet, but few dare acknowledge it for fear of being seen as critical to the President.

But, that’s the minor part. As an optimist, I’m inclined to focus on the positive.

We absolutely need the government to stop funding institutions that refuse to allow freedom of thought on their campuses. It’s our lot in life that conservatism is spurned by educators and administrators in these progressive indoctrination centers, but that’s partially our fault. While conservatives were busy applying their knowledge to the real world, leftists filled the void to teach about it. It’s our long-running mistake that we allowed the halls of learning to become leftist reprogramming institutions. Now, our only recourse in the immediate future is to bring conservative perspectives in hopes of reaching those who haven’t had their logic and reason dismantled by university life.

The President’s actions are a great step towards making that happen. Just as funding Planned Parenthood is idiotic considering the political divide in which they operate (they donate millions to Democrats while receiving money from the government), it’s equally dysfunctional to pay schools while they work feverishly to subvert the very concepts that built this nation, including the Constitution, free speech, and the American exceptionalism that once relied on personal responsibility to hold account to our success as a nation.

Let’s hope nothing comes from the notion that schools are to blame for student debt. Instead, we’ll focus on schools being to blame for stifling conservatives and indoctrinating children. That’s the good news in all this.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Education

‘Academic’ journal editor Roberto Refinetti tries to explain why they published absurd hoax papers, fails miserably

Published

on

Academic journal editor Roberto Refinetti tries to explain why they published absurd hoax papers fai

An under-reported story last year revealed multiple “academic” journals, where only the highest levels of academic thought leadership is allowed to publish, put nonsense hoax articles in their publications simply because they perpetuated radical progressive thought. These peer-reviewed journals were willing to publish utter garbage as long as the garbage smelled like the hyper-leftist garbage they normally publish anyway.

Libertarian pundit John Stossel tried to interview the editors of these prestigious journals which were hoaxed, and was only able to find one willing to go on camera. Roberto Refinetti from the academic journal Sexuality and Culture came on air to discuss the hoax and the problems with academic journals. But even he was unable to come up with a valid response about why these journals were so easy to fool.

Stossel read some of the reviews from “experts” in the field that were used to determine whether or not the papers should be published. When Stossel noted that one of the reviewers was an idiot, Refinetti rushed to the defense by blaming the hoaxers and said, “They made up data that he or she [the reviewer] wished he had but he didn’t, so when he sees, ‘Wow, these people did this study that I wanted to do and they got the results that I thought should be there, this is great!'”

In other words, Refinetti came to the same conclusion as the hoaxers and Stossel: Some if not most of those who review these papers make their decision based on whether or not the conclusions fit their worldview, not whether or not the papers were actually correct.

This is just one of many examples of why leftist academia, which is the vast majority of all academia, operates with the sole goal of reinforcing their biases rather than informing students or giving the education system proper facts about the world.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Conservatism

Why free speech is so hated by college students

Published

on

Why free speech is so hated by college students

You’ve heard the stories. Free speech isn’t actually a thing on college campuses around the country. There seems to be certain types of protected speech, such as anything that embraces the leftist narrative of these progressive indoctrination centers, but any views that are considered to be too conservative for the delicate eyes or ears of college students are quickly stifled.

But it’s not just the administrators, professors, and other far-left employees of the colleges. The students themselves are opting out of free speech willingly. Sure, they’d probably complain if anyone intruded on their rights to espouse hyper-leftist ideologies or spew out progressive talking points, but that won’t happen. Why? Because those who may be opposed to their ideas are the same people who embrace limited government, free speech, and our rights as Americans. Therefore, the people who have an incentive to quash leftist notions are the very people who are against quashing anyone’s notions at all.

It’s a conundrum for conservatives because the same courtesy is not paid to them. Free speech (or any of our rights, for that matter) is neither appreciated nor sacred to leftists. So we’re stuck trying to protect our own rights to free speech while defending the left’s rights to the same. Meanwhile, they don’t have to defend their right to free speech because nobody’s trying to deny them of this right, but they’re busy trying to prevent any conservative ideas from seeping through to the collective conscious of their precious university environment.

This video by Campus Reform shows leftist students doing everything they can to prevent conservative ideas from being seen, let alone appreciated. This is important to them to stop ideas from being observed and potentially discussed, but they believe the reason they do it is to stop “hate speech.” The definition of “hate speech” on college campuses throughout America has become anything that’s contrary to their own progressive philosophy. Therein lies the real reason free speech is so hated.

We appreciate everything Campus Reform and their parent organization does. We strive to deliver strong conservative perspectives for college students as well, which is why we remain a crowdfunded publication powered by donations of our readers. The only way to stop the censorship of conservative ideas on college campuses is to continue to spread the word. We have reality on our side, so the more we push the message, the easier it will be to break through their indoctrinated defense shields.

The bottom line for college leftists is deep down, they realize their arguments are wrong. Their only defense against thoughtful conservative perspectives is to prevent as many people as possible from hearing them. Why? Because they have no defense against the truth.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report