Connect with us

Guns and Crime

Pervert husband of former Hillary top aide gets slap on wrist for sexting crime

Published

on

We’re about to find out if a 21-month jail sentence is enough time to cure a bad weiner.

Anthony Weiner was sentenced to 21 months in federal prison for sexting a 15 year old girl, perhaps for now putting an end to a sordid and absolutely disgraceful chain of events which saw a one-time nationally prominent Democrat (and chief media defender of Obamacare) reveal an absolute lack of adult control and absence of a basic moral compass.

However, given the depth of Weiner’s predatory compulsions and depravity, the 21 month sentence could be viewed as quite lenient treatment of the former New York congressman and husband to Hillary Clinton top aide Huma Abedin.

Weiner’s brief sentence shows the advantages not only of plea bargaining, but also of a process known as fact bargaining.

The Background

Prior to 2016, Weiner was the tragic lead whose lack of basic adult control — and moral compass — sent him from national prominence as one of the chief Obamacare defenders in Washington, and a ranking House representative from the nation’s largest city, into the depths to which he now resides: Child molester. Pervert. Felon.

This man’s public downfall started in 2011 with an expose by the original Breitbart website. Weiner further humiliated himself, his wife and their followers when he sought the New York City mayoralty in 2013. That quest for higher office was soon derailed by new evidence of his predatory activities including his use of an arguably racist Latino alter ego “Carlos Danger” when preying on vulnerable young targets, further illustrating he had not learned the perils of his own ongoing lack of control.

Despite the sordid revelations, Weiner’s criminal exposure only really gained steam about one year ago when new text photos surfaced of the former Congressman’s apparent self-pleasuring, constituting a “sexualized image with a child in it,” referring to Weiner’s young son who was visible in the photos. Soon, a young accuser came forward with evidence. Apparently, there was too much for the federal authorities to ignore.

Analysis

Weiner’s brief sentence shows the advantages not only of plea bargaining, but also of a process known as fact bargaining.

Plea bargaining allows defendants to “accept responsibility” and gain the cooperation of the government prosecutors through their agreement to recommend leniency to the sentencing judge. In the federal judicial system, there are advisory sentencing guidelines (which use a points system for various crimes and what are called enhancing factors, and others called mitigating factors). The guideline calculations are made by defendants and prosecutors, and in plea deals the cooperation is key, because an agreement to plead to one crime allows a defendant to avoid the risk of conviction on other possible counts which could involve much more prison time if the defendant gets convicted. The judge, in all cases, has the final say on any sentence, regardless of the agreement between defendant and prosecutor.

This is where Weiner’s possible involvement with certain laptop computers, and access to classified data through his wife Huma’s job in the State Department, become critical factors. (One must wonder the value of Weiner’s silence, should Hillary Clinton seek a 2020 rematch or if still-wife Huma Abedin has plans of her own.)

The government did not have to offer a plea deal. The government could also have conditioned leniency on Weiner’s “cooperation” in other inquiries.

Instead, it offered a deal, allowing Weiner to admit to some facts, to some crimes.

But what’s critical is that the deal permits Weiner to avoid addressing many other things.

The Takeaway

Today’s sentencing assures Weiner avoids the embarrassment of a criminal trial, and in many ways it enables him — now an admitted, convicted predator — to control the narrative and conceal evidence of perhaps many, many other crimes, sexual or otherwise.

Finally, the 21-month sentence won’t be what it seems. While parole has been abolished in the federal system, defendants must serve at least 85 percent of their sentence. This means that good behavior should shave off about three months for Weiner. But there are other ways to lessen the prison stint.

There are ways to get credit for “rehab” and also the possibility of serving part of the sentence in a halfway house where Weiner could be “free” during the day. The result? Weiner could do less than one year, and I can even see a scenario where he is released in as little as six months.

Weiner has revealed far too much about himself. What’s critical, though, is what he and his enablers will now be allowed to conceal, indefinitely.

Conservative corporate lawyer, commentator, blockchain technology patent holder and entrepreneur. Headquartered in a red light district in the middle of a deep blue People's Republic.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

Video Double play: Busting the gun grabber’s musket myth.

Published

on

By

Gun confiscation bingo

Two videos that eviscerate the Liberty Grabbers ‘One shot’ musket myth.

It is a bedrock principle (if they have any) of the Liberty grabber Left that back during the ratification of the US Constitution the only weapons in existence were flintlock musket that took 5 minute to reload. Thus there wasn’t any school violence because it would have taken too long for the perpetrator to kill anyone.

As it typical of the lore of the national socialist Left, this is a lie of the first order. A previous video celebrated the “Assault Weapon” tricentennial, which was bit of the tongue in cheek variety since there were other repeating “Military Style” weapons in existence before this time period. These will be detailed in future articles. Meanwhile we present two videos that also bust the ‘Musket Myth’, one a short presentation from the Royal Armouries on the Jover and Belton “Flintlock breech-loading superimposed military musket”

Royal Armouries
Published on Aug 30, 2017
Curator of Firearms, Jonathan Ferguson, gives us a peek at the Flintlock breech-loading superimposed military musket, by Jover and Belton (1786)

This is a very relevant piece since the inventor Joseph Belton corresponded with the Continental Congress in 1777:

May it Please your Honours,
I would just informe this Honourable Assembly, that I have discover’d an improvement, in the use of Small Armes, wherein a common small arm, may be maid to discharge eight balls one after another, in eight, five or three seconds of time, & each one to do execution five & twenty, or thirty yards, and after so discharg’d, to be loaded and fire’d with cartridge as usual.

“It was demonstrated before noted scientists and military officers (including well known scientist David Rittenhouse and General Horatio Gates)”

This destroys the mythology that the founders had no knowledge of this type of repeating firearm technology that existed already.

The second is a humours dissertation on the subject from video raconteur Steven Crowder https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/

from a few years ago that also eviscerates this bit of Leftist mythology.

Published on Feb 10, 2015
People have been telling us for years that the 2nd amendment was written in a time of Muskets, and that it doesn’t apply to the evolved weapons of today. Is it true?

So why is this important?

Two primary reasons. One that these factual examples demonstrate that the founding fathers knew of these technological advances. Therefore, they destroy any Leftist pretences that the 2nd amendment be confined to muskets. Second that, school violence is something other than an issue of guns.

Continue Reading

Guns and Crime

Final pieces of the puzzle voiding the Second Amendment are ready to put in place

Published

on

It’s no mystery to the majority of liberty-loving Americans that politicians of every political stripe have been working feverishly to find new ways to restrict or eliminate our constitutionally protected God-given rights. And there has been perhaps no greater effort in their politically correct but unconstitutional agenda than their attempts to void in word and/or deed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

While attempts to restrict gun ownership have existed throughout American history, the current movement got its footing from the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). This law, a response to gangland crime during Prohibition, established a framework for the federal government to regulate specific types of firearms and accessories, and it imposed a tax on the manufacture and transfer of firearms defined by the Act.

Though amended by the Gun Control Act of 1968 to address a flaw that nearly voided the NFA, the law has been used to curtail, if not prohibit, transactions involving firearms identified in the 1934 law. Since 1968, the Firearms Protection Act of 1986, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, and the NICS Improvement act of 2008—which “improved” background checks required under the Brady Law—have also been added to the NFA.

As you can see in this very brief timeline, the old “slippery slope” adage is true. And in the aftermath of recent shooting events at public schools, the final pieces of the puzzle to void the Second Amendment are ready to put in place.

For example, the omnibus spending bill passed by the GOP-controlled Congress and signed into law by Donald Trump in March included the Fix NICS Act, a bill introduced by Republican Sen. John Cornyn. This so-called “improvement” to NICS gave the government power to deny gun rights to individuals for something as minor as a traffic ticket, and it laid the groundwork for the establishment of a FBI database of all gun owners.

With Fix NICS in the books, and with Republicans and Democrats in one accord on gun control, Washington is ready to take the next logical step toward voiding the Second Amendment—a Nazi Germany-style gun registry. If successfully made into law, these proposals will give the federal government complete control over every gun and gun owner in America, thus giving our Big Brother overlords the power they need to eliminate private gun ownership entirely.

Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) has introduced the Crime Gun Tracing Modernization Act, a bill that will require the federal government to establish a “searchable, computerized database” of all records pertaining to the sale, importation, production, or shipment of firearms. Though he hasn’t advocated a database system “yet”, Nelson’s GOP opponent, Gov. Rick Scott is equally as dangerous following his strong anti-gun position since the Parkland, FL high school shooting.

In the House of Representatives, Democrats have introduced the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act. If passed, it would prohibit gun ownership without a license and would require a valid firearms license to transfer and receive a gun. The bill would also require the US attorney general to maintain a “federal record of sale” system to track every gun purchase made in America.

From laws denying gun rights to adults under 21 years of age to the growing acceptance—even in Washington—of using Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO) to seize firearms from individuals who haven’t broken any laws, many Americans have already lost their Second Amendment rights.

If anti-gun politicians in Washington have their way—and with no Constitutional conservative coalition to stop them, they might—all of America will soon know the reality of living in a country without a Second Amendment . . . and without liberty.

Originally posted on The Strident Conservative.

 


David Leach is the owner of The Strident Conservative. His daily radio commentary is distributed by the Salem Radio Network and is heard on stations across America.

Follow the Strident Conservative on Twitter and FacebookSubscribe to receive podcasts of radio commentaries: iTunes | Stitcher | Tune In | RSSSubscribe to receive podcasts of radio commentaries: iTunes | Stitcher | Tune In | RSS

Continue Reading

Guns and Crime

Gov. Andrew Cuomo takes ERPO laws up a notch; will use teachers to seize guns

Published

on

The anti-Second Amendment hysteria by left-wing extremists and the media—but I repeat myself—has reached a fever pitch following recent incidents of gun violence at public schools as it breathes new life into a punch list of Constitutionally questionable laws designed to completely disarm America.

One such law gaining momentum is the Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO). By taking one part “big government knows best” and adding a heaping cup of “for the children” with just a dash of “mental health crisis” for seasoning, progressives in both parties have created the perfect recipe to satisfy their appetite for killing the Second Amendment and denying us our God-given right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

An ERPO empowers family members and the police to seize guns from anyone they feel poses a danger to themselves or others simply by obtaining a judge’s order—an order that doesn’t require testimony from the “accused” which is a violation of our Constitutional rights. No warrant. No charges. No arrests.

After the Parkland, FL high school shooting earlier this year, Gov. Rick Scott—currently the GOP candidate for US Senate—joined forces with Republicans who had already joined forces with Democrats to pass a host of anti-gun laws, including ERPOs. In the months that followed, GOP governors in Vermont and Maryland also passed ERPO laws.

Earlier this year I wrote in an article about how mental illness is being used to deny gun rights, and I shared a story about an ERPO being used by police in Seattle, WA to forcefully confiscate the guns of a man because his neighbors didn’t like that he “stared” at them while legally wearing a holstered firearm.

Besides the fact that ERPOs are becoming one of the greatest threats to our Constitutional rights, they are also serving as the grease for the slippery slope we are taking toward tyranny, as we see in the recent proposal by NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Cuomo plans to introduce a proposal to the state legislature for a law that will allow teachers to petition a judge to remove guns from the homes of “troubled students.” Under his expansion plan for ERPO, teachers and school administrators would be granted legal standing to petition a court to remove firearms from the homes of students considered a threat to themselves or others. The teacher’s union loves this idea.

If it becomes law, the next time a child acts up in a NY school SWAT teams could be knocking down the door where they live to disarm the parents. And with the way ERPO laws are gaining acceptance—including in Washington DC—it could happen where you live too.

Originally posted on The Strident Conservative.

 


David Leach is the owner of The Strident Conservative. His daily radio commentary is distributed by the Salem Radio Network and is heard on stations across America.

Follow the Strident Conservative on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to receive podcasts of radio commentaries: iTunes | Stitcher | Tune In | RSS

Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily

Advertisement

Facebook

Twitter

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.