Connect with us

Opinions

Why a GOP comeback is merely a pipe dream

Published

on

Why a GOP comeback is merely a pipe dream

The ongoing GOP Exodus has ignited massive controversy among Republicans, who call defectors from the party everything from sore losers to communists and closet Hillary fans. In reality, ex-Republicans are loyal to America, rather than to a person or a party. The defectors’ objective is to save their country and they are intelligent enough to realize the GOP is no longer the vehicle through which to accomplish this goal.

The Republican Party was in trouble prior to the circus that led to the nomination of an incompetent, narcissistic bully. The GOP desperately needed to accomplish two things in 2016: grow their party and forever debunk the mainstream media’s accusations that Republicans are haters, chauvinists, racists, homophobics, out of touch with the “little guy,” and engaged in a “war on women.”

Contradicting this definition of a Republican is merely a pipe dream now, as the party’s standard bearer is currently a hateful, nasty, bigoted, chauvinistic, self-absorbed racist who is completely out of touch with the “little guy” and laughs about assaulting women. As for that other goal, it is dust in the wind. “Growing the party” is a topic not heard very often among Republicans these days and for good reason.

Pipe dreams and fancies

There is no recovery from this disaster and the GOP should feel free to turn off the light, because the Party’s over. However Trump’s angry mob of haters hotly deny that the GOP is in trouble and cling to the fantasy that all is well. Meanwhile, true conservatives are busy forming parties of which to be proud, rather than remaining with a party for which they must continuously make excuses, similar to the battered wife insisting her abusive spouse will “change.”

Republicans ignore the knock of opportunity

The GOP could have nominated a shining star in 2016, but through a perfect combination of corrupt action and apathetic inaction, the Party collectively refused to save itself and handed the nomination–and subsequently the presidency–to an unqualified, childish, self-absorbed bully.

Anti-Trumpers were outnumbered by those who fall into one of three categories: the apathetic, the corrupt, and the cowardly:

Apathy

Any Republican who could sit out the primaries, despite the threat of a Trump nomination and the irreversible damage it would cause, had little or no regard for the fate of the party or the country as a whole. Nevertheless, 85% of Republican voters sat out their states’ primaries.

Corruption and cowardice

Likewise, it was said there were far more anti-Trump delegates than Trump supporting delegates at the convention, yet most who opposed the Nazi-like narcissist folded like paper tigers when bullied by a corrupt rules committee. This leads to yet another question. Why does the GOP have corrupt leadership?

These are not minor issues, ladies and gentlemen, and they are not problems from which the Republican Party will recover.

Through apathy on the part of voters, cowardice on the part of certain delegates, and corruption at the top, the Republican Party is now saddled with a standard bearer who is a sickening disgrace. Trying to tell the world that “most of us” didn’t want him just doesn’t wash. True conservatives are those willing to begin again with a party that cares enough to hold the line and come to its own rescue if ever its life is at stake.

Advertisement
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Susan Hauck

    September 15, 2017 at 6:20 am

    Wow! Jesse, you’re a great writer! I love you articles! Keep writing. The GOP comeback IS merely a pipe dream. Anyone who doesn’t believe it has their head in the sand! You keep writing. I want to read more of your articles! Thanks for this great post. I love it! Rock on!

  2. Danny Lamar (@4liberty7777)

    September 15, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    Right on Jesse..you hit the nail on the head! Gop…done…over…fried…burned out…excuse filled…an empty shell with no life left in it with an unqualified leader that CANNOT lead by example unless the gop wants to go around groping women etc. Keep it coming Jesse and do not be discouraged for there are many that get it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment and Sports

Game of Thrones Final Season Episode 2 Review

Published

on

Game of Thrones Final Season Episode 2 Review

As with episode’s one’s review there is no promise of keeping free of spoilers. In fact there is nothing to spoil. Last week’s episode was gritty in a political thriller sort of way as the divided North became the main focus. Episode 2 takes place in the limbo period between the preparation episode and the battle itself. It served as a second preparation episode that was unnecessary filler between two important events. In practice, I like to keep these reviews free of shiny objects and focus on the more analytical aspects of the show, but those were few and far between.

Verdict: Episode 2 was a hollow turd.

Ser Jaime

Ser Jaime Lannister is the MVP of this episode, having the only interesting opportunities continuing throughout the script, but still failed to depict, accurately, Jaime’s character once more. Jaime opens up on “trial” before his former enemies. In truth, Jaime, blurring the lines between sarcastic and serious, regards slaying Mad King Areys II as his “finest deed.” He regrets little, but that which he regrets are the deeds of concealing his (past) love for Cersei, like throwing a child out of a tower, and [spoiler alert] lying to Tyrion about his first wife Tysha being a whore. The latter is an increasingly frustrating deviation that not only undermines Jaime’s character development but has paved the way for HBO to emasculate Tyrion Lannister, metaphorically speaking as opposed to the literal emasculating of Theon Greyjoy. In confronting Daenerys, Jaime was not as defiant enough to make an interesting confrontation better. Instead this was undermined by the power struggle between Daenerys and Sansa, denying a far richer scene where Jaime declares that he saved half a million people. During the drinking scene that resembled previous buildups before battles, Jaime’s character could have amended the Tysha deviation. This hope was unrealized; however, the episode’s best scene was the knighting of Brienne of Tarth, a misfit too ugly to be a lady but unable to be a knight. “Any knight can make a knight” is a well-known Westerosi saying.

Lack of Military Realism

The show goes out of its way to paint incompetent characters like Sansa and Daenerys as quality leaders. Last week, was the first time characters acknowledged how selfish Daenerys is. Sansa is the last person on the show you want as a “wartime president.” Very few remaining characters in Game of Thrones can play the game and command an army. Jon Snow is one. Tyrion is a second, but the show has made him irredeemably stupid. Jaime refused the game but technically has a winning record as a commanding officer. Bronze Yohn Royce was technically featured in the episode and can do both. Daenerys is probably better at military command than playing politics, but when you have dragons, it takes far less skill, Aegon the Conquerer proved as much. Last weeks episode delved into the logistics of war. That was virtually undone in this episode.

For instance Brienne of Tarth is given command of the left flank. Looking closely at the war maps, the left flank featured the knights of the Vale. Instead of having Lord Yohn Royce, a season military commander who fought in Robert’s Rebellion, the Greyjoy Rebellion, led the winning cavalry charge in the Battle of the Bastards, has the loyalty of his men as the most powerful lord in the Vale, the show has Brienne of Tarth command the Vale’s force. Brienne of Tarth has fought one battle, at most! She has never led an army and has no ties to the Vale. The only thing dumber than giving her command of the Vale would be giving her command of the Dothraki, who I believe are on the right flank, the place of honor in ancient Greek culture (perhaps relevant). It’s not that Brienne of Tarth is unworthy of any command, they simply chose the second least believable place for her to lead.

Prepubescent Sex Scene

This is not the poorest written sex scene in Game of Thrones, that still belongs to Sansa being married off to Ramsay Bolton, one of the worst plot deviations from the books. Arya having sex with Gendry was up there though. Arya is eleven when the show starts. A year has passed, no doubt, maybe two, but not anything beyond three which would barely put her at fourteen, at most. It’s not the combo, it’s the age. Arya is a child, not a sensual woman. The show has unrealistically aged these characters. Heck, why didn’t they recast Gilly’s [Mance’s] son? They’ve had over three Mountains, two Dario Naharises (both poorly casted), two Myrscella Baratheons, and I’m sure there are others.

Only Meaning

The only meaning in the episode that was of any worth was Bran revealing the motive of the White Walkers to erase the memory of mankind. There was no buildup and little foreshadow towards this reveal. Game of Thrones is all about placing mysteries on the backburner (who really killed Jon Arryn) but this was a little rushed.

Final Thoughts

This episode was less worthwhile than watching the first three episodes of Star Wars. You could have missed episode 2 and have gone straight to episode 3 and you would have missed nothing that wasn’t known already. I’m not saying this was the worst Game of Thrones episode ever but its down there.

Boost This Post

Get this story in front of tens of thousands of patriots who need to see it. For every $30 you donate here, this story will be broadcast to an addition 7000 Americans or more. If you’d prefer to use PayPal, please email me at jdrucker@reagan.com and let me know which post you want boosted after you donate through PayPal.

Will you help revive the American Conservative Movement?

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Since leftist media won’t say it: Radical Islamic terrorists murdered hundreds of Christians

Published

on

Since leftist media wont say it Radical Islamic terrorists murdered hundreds of Christians

The dramatic shift in how mainstream media characterizes terrorist attacks over the years reached what I hope is the pinnacle of their obfuscation today. The terrorist attacks in Sri Lanka against Christian churches and areas where Christians were likely to gather were committed on Easter Sunday by Muslims in a city known for radicalization. This was a clear and unambiguous attack by radical Islamic terrorists specifically targeting Christians.

But you’ll have a hard time coming to that conclusion if all you’re reading or watching is leftist mainstream media.

The reporting today has been in stark contrast to the immediate labeling and narrative-building surrounding the terrorist attacks in New Zealand mosques last month. There was zero doubt based on media reporting that the attacks were targeting Muslims. But today, it’s hard to even find the word “Christian” in any of the posts or news reports. On top of that, there’s a stark difference when reading the Tweets of condolences from leftists who refuse to acknowledge this as an attack against Christianity despite the immediate and crystal clear labeling of the New Zealand mosque incidents as attacks targeting Muslims.

Some of this was noted by Brittany Pettibone:

OAN’s Jack Posobiec added that a new phrase has been coined by the media regarding the Notre-Dame fire:

Was this the same response they were giving following the Christchurch attacks? No. As Imam Mohamad Tawhidi noted, the differences were very clear.

Why do the media and leftist politicians do this? Why are they quick to label attacks against any other religious group exactly as they appear, but they’re so unwilling to call out any attacks against Christians as attacks against Christians?

This is the time we’re in, folks. The left has a narrative they want jammed into our heads and that narrative has no room for acknowledging violence and persecution is committed against Christians. The only stories that fit their narratives are stories that can blame Christians for wrongdoing. In those cases, the perpetrators’ status as Christians is broadcast loud and clear. But if Christians are victims, the left will go to extreme lengths to negate that fact from the record.

Of all the major news outlets, I was only able to find one that didn’t shy away from the truth. The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board stands alone in declaring the intended victims of this attack as who they are and why they were targeted.

WSJ Editorial Board

The intentional suppression of what happened, who committed it, and who was targeted is beyond insulting. The terrorist attacks in Sri Lanka are being framed by the media as some people did something.

Continue Reading

Democrats

How NOT to beat AOC: Run a big-dollar GOP candidate against her

Published

on

How NOT to beat AOC Run a big-dollar GOP candidate against her

There is some excitement coming out of the Bronx because of an alleged “big money donor” with connections who wants to defeat Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) so badly, he or she is willing to fork over tons of dollars and influence in a campaign to turn the deep blue district red. This won’t happen. It will be disastrous if they try.

The only thing that could possibly work for the GOP to upend the hyper-leftist radical progressive would be to find the ideal candidate and run a purely grassroots campaign against her. Otherwise, they’d only be playing to her strengths.

If the GOP is serious about beating her, they need to forget the money angle. That’s not to say they don’t need money, but it needs to be money from within the district comprised of small donors who are targeted starting as soon as possible. They don’t need to appeal to the few Republicans in the district. They need to go after the independents and Democrats.

Their message must be simple, something to the effect of “The only candidate from the Bronx who is actually interested in the Bronx.” They have plenty of ammunition available to demonstrate how Ocasio-Cortez has her sights very clearly set on the national arena in which social media and battles with other Democrats is making her a nationwide star. They need someone who attends city council meetings, community meetings, and is 100% focused on the issues that concern the people of the Bronx instead of the grand ideas of Green New Deals and Medicare-for-All.

Then, they need a PAC that hammers away at the detrimental effects losing the Amazon deal has had on the Bronx. This is a gimme.

If their plans to go after AOC with money is the strategy that plays out, she’ll destroy them. It won’t be close. Every dollar spent will literally have the opposite effect. They can’t beat her with money. They need to hit doorbells.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report