Connect with us

Culture and Religion

Political Christianity is not of God



First and foremost, I’m a Christian. Nothing is more important to me than my faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. It is the core of who I am.

At the same time, I have a passion for politics. I endeavor to know what political solutions are best for every circumstance. When I find solutions I believe are the best, I do so under a biblical worldview. I can’t help it. As a Christian, my belief of what is right and wrong is formed by my biblical worldview. I can’t divorce myself from my biblical worldview.

So do I believe that Christians should be involved in politics? Yes, I think it is important for Christians to know what is going on and vote based on their conscience and convictions. Make an informed decision and realize no matter what happens, God is sovereign, and He will ultimately work out His plan.

What I don’t think Christians should do is speak for God when He hasn’t spoken; like megachurch Pastor Robert Jeffress. In a recent statement, he stated:

“When it comes to how we should deal with evil doers, the Bible, in the book of Romans, is very clear: God has endowed rulers full power to use whatever means necessary — including war — to stop evil. In the case of North Korea, God has given Trump authority to take out Kim Jong-Un. I’m heartened to see that our president — contrary to what we’ve seen with past administrations who have taken, at best, a sheepish stance toward dictators and oppressors — will not tolerate any threat against the American people. When President Trump draws a red line, he will not erase it, move it, or back away from it. Thank God for a President who is serious about protecting our country.”

This form of political Christianity may be political, but it is not Christianity.

Yes, under Romans 13 and in the Old Testament the government has the power of the sword. The power of the sword isn’t an exclusive power reserved for the United States. The power granted to President Trump is the same power God has given to Kim Jong-Un. Think about that.

Also, the other issue I have with this statement is, that somehow the United States is righteous. Don’t get me wrong. I love this country. I’m an American. I believe America is the greatest country in the world. I love this country so much that I don’t like to be called a Greek-American because we know what ever comes after the hyphen is always diluted. I’m an American, and I happen to be of Greek descent. I believe in American Exceptionalism.

So don’t get me wrong. This isn’t me bashing America. It’s just me pointing out the biblical fact that all nations have abandoned God including the United States.

Therefore, this leads me to my third point. The truth is North Korea is probably the most wicked and evil country in existence. Does this mean that God is angrier with them? I don’t know. You know, what I do know, and what the Bible tells us, that God used the Assyrians to bring judgment upon Israel. The Assyrians were even more wicked and evil than Israel; though God used them because you know what God hates even more. He hates hypocrites.

Israel had the Scriptures and ignored them. They invoked themselves as righteous and above all nations because God had set them apart. We are God’s chosen people; we are superior. They invoked His name and did what was evil in the sight of the Lord.

That is why Jesus continually called the Pharisees hypocrites and blasted them as illustrated in Matthew 15. Jesus called them the blind leading the blind and both would fall into a pit. The Pharisees rejected Jesus because they believed they didn’t need him. We are children of Abraham. We obey the Law. We know God, and we speak for Him. Jesus continually rebuked them throughout his ministry because they neither knew him or his Father. They were first-class hypocrites that invoked the name of God for their own lustful and selfish ambitions.

You see, this is what political Christianity tries to do in this country all the time. They are like every politician, which always end speeches with, May God Bless America.

Let me tell you something. Most of the time this is an excellent example of taking the Lord’s name in vain. Nowadays, we don’t keep the “May” in there we just go to the demand of God Bless us.

You want God to bless us and at the same time completely disregard His Word? What kind of God do you think He is? He is not the false idol most American churches worship. The God of love and no holiness, righteousness, and worthy to judge. Live in your sin, that’s cool. I’m only in it for the blessing, don’t talk to me about dying to self and all that.

I don’t know Pastor Robert Jeffress. I have never met him. Don’t know much about his theology or ministry or even if he is truly a Christian. What I do know is that God isn’t an American. He isn’t a Republican, and He didn’t vote for Donald Trump.

Pastor, if you are called to the ministry, then preach the gospel and make disciples of all nations. Fulfill the Great Commission and get off the airwaves. You want to proclaim what God has spoken. Then open your Bible and preach the only place He has spoken, and that is the Bible.

I don’t know what will transpire between North Korea and the US, but I will be praying for peace and not stoking the fires of war.

One thing I’m certain of is that I am not foolish enough to invoke God’s name and speak when He hasn’t spoken. You know, I’m kind of big on not misrepresenting God and invoking His wrath. Call me crazy but this political Christianity that has been around for decades is what needs to go away and just die.

Mr. Roditis a candidate for California State Controller. He is an entrepreneur and owns several companies. He graduated from UCSD with a B.A. in Political Science/International Relations. He's a former City Commissioner with the City of Anaheim, CA. He's a Conservative Constitutional Federalist. Follow him on Twitter @KonRoditis

Continue Reading


  1. David L. Mays

    August 10, 2017 at 9:56 am

    AMEN!!!! Much wisdom in this, and I am much in agreement!

  2. April

    August 11, 2017 at 6:24 pm

    I find the safest way to seek wisdom about Politics is by going to the Word of God, the Bible. Our Bible is our road map, it teaches about correct responses when it come to love, life, relationship, authority, evil and our enemies. Scripture can be applied to ALL things. Even leading a NATION! God can envoke even a ROCK, OR A donkey if he has to. If you believe that God is sovereign and that He is IN CONTROL, then you have to believe that HE RAISES up whom HE WANTS to be a leader, good or bad. Many examples of that truth all throughout the Bible. God is still on the throne, he knows the end, and there is Nothing New Under the Sun!

  3. Tajdeen Ozimede

    August 11, 2017 at 11:00 pm

    Politics will always be part of religion, because it the only way religious teachings on equity,accountability and service to humanity can be fully practiced. What is wrong in political religion is ‘we are the chosen people’syndrome.

  4. Konstantinos Roditis

    August 12, 2017 at 8:27 am

    Thanks, David. April, I couldn’t have agreed with you more. Thanks for reading my article and supporting The New Americana.

  5. J

    August 14, 2017 at 9:05 am


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

When have the Enemies of Liberty on the Left ever compromised on the 2nd amendment?




The history of freedom always has been one of it’s enemies slowly ratcheting it down with restraints in the name of equality or security.

Everyone knows the drill by now, a ‘Serious Crisis’ takes place, the Left immediately demands the surrender of more human rights forcing the innocent to pay for the sins of the guilty. Meanwhile, those who dare defend those rights are pilloried with almost every pejorative in the book.

The history of Liberty Control has always been one of unending incremental infringements on our rights. The enemies of Liberty on the Left always follow the same progression. They begin with spurious claims over the ‘easy access to guns’, getting whatever they can, after which they reset the sequence for the next go around.

The Left’s idea of ‘progress’ is always one direction, with demands that the pro-liberty side give up as yet more of their freedom. Each time around it’s the same story, with only ever worsening regularity. But why is this the case? When have the Liberty controllers on the left ever compromised on the common sense human right of self-defence, or any other liberties for that matter?

Liberty Control down through the ages.

The dirty little secret of Liberty control is that it has it’s roots in racism, epitomised in the infamous United States Supreme Court case DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD, (1856):

It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went.

Please note that it specifically mentions “the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went.”, as the partial rationale for the decision.

Further on, the past century has saw an inexorable sequence of infringements with the examples ranging from the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968 to the Brady act of 1993.

In some rare cases, the Republican party spearheaded some partial relief of earlier infringements, but these were always accompanied with other restrictions. The overall trend has always been ever intensifying restrictions on the rights that are supposed to be free from infringement.

The Left’s idea of ‘compromise.’

It should be obvious by now that the enemies of Liberty on the Left do not want anyone to have the basic human right of self-preservation. They have made that clear in many articles, editorials and videos on the subject of repealing the 2nd amendment or outright gun confiscation.  Consequently, it can be presumed that anything short of that immediate goal is a ‘compromise’ to them.
The win-win eventuality for them is that their ‘compromise’ positions sets up for their ultimate goal none the less. Asserting government control over everyone’s private property with ‘Intergalactic’ Background Checks followed on with the governmental permission requirements in gun registration that will eventually lead to gun confiscation. They would also like to control free-speech with the expedient of ‘Political correctness’ or entirely undefined ‘Hate speech’. But for now they merely want to get people used to these restrictions on Liberty.

The Takeaway

The Left’s increasing stridency towards Liberty has intensified as of late, which is quite odd given that they supposedly support the concept with the self-labeling as “Liberals”. The Left has become single-minded in their pursuit of gun confiscation(and it’s precursors), to the point of rejecting measures that would actually serve to protect the children. As is typical of the nation’s Left, they self-label their obsession with taking guns away from the innocent as being ‘reasonable’. Meanwhile, they vehemently oppose workable solutions to the problems they caused in the first place.

Their latest tactic is to exploit the victims of mass murder in a bid to shut down debate and impose their unworkable ‘solutions’ to the exclusion of anything else. Do they even sound ‘reasonable’ or ‘Liberal’ for that matter? They incessantly complain that the proponents of Liberty won’t surrender their principles and once again yield to their demands, but when will they ever compromise and defend liberty?



Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

An open letter to Sen. Lamar Alexander, US Senate on the nomination of Chai Feldblum



The Honorable Lamar Alexander

Chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions committee

United States Senate

CC United States Senators

March 17, 2018


Dear Senator Alexander,

It has come to my attention that President Trump has re-nominated Chai Feldblum to her position as commissioner of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This news has brought me grave concern.

On behalf of the American people, it is up to you and the rest of the Senate to remedy this unfortunate situation.

As you are aware, the EEOC deals with cases of workplace discrimination; having the power to enforce federal laws, investigate discrimination complaints, regulate and pursue legal charges against private businesses, and influence public opinion. It is imperative that any federal agency entrusted with such powers be steered by the conscientious counsel of unbiased leadership.

A former college basketball coach once said, “Offense is not equal opportunity.” However, since her appointment by former President Obama in 2010, Ms. Feldblum has exploited her position at the EEOC to offensively further her own fanatical advocacy goals at the expense of religiously-oriented American citizens, the Bill of Rights be damned.

Religious liberty, inviolable and protected from governmental infringement by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, is richly ingrained in our country’s values, having been secured by the blood of our ancestors. In fact, religious liberty, often referred to by the Founders as freedom of conscience, was considered by early Americans to be so precious that, even in the midst of America’s fight for independence, conscience objections were considered sacrosanct.

Consider the words of America’s first President, George Washington, in a letter to Benedict Arnold during America’s Revolutionary War:

“While we are contending for our own liberty, we should be very cautious not to violate the conscience of others, ever considering that God alone is the judge of the hearts of men, and to Him only in this case are they answerable.”

For Chai Feldblum, however, religious freedom must be subjugated with the full force of the government’s ugly fist.

She is, in a word, tyrannical.

Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary defines tyranny as “a rigorous [strict] condition imposed by some outside agency or force,” as imposed by a tyrant.

A tyrant is defined as “one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power.”

Ms. Feldblum has made several deeply troubling statements that betray her tyrannical intentions, wholly at odds with America’s founding principles:

  • “I’m having a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win… Sexual liberty should win in most cases. There can be a conflict between religious liberty and sexual liberty, but in almost all cases the sexual liberty should win because that’s the only way that the dignity of gay people can be affirmed in any realistic manner (emphasis mine).”
  • “I believe granting liberty to gay people advances a compelling government interest, that such an interest cannot be adequately advanced if ‘pockets of resistance’ to a societal statement of equality are permitted to flourish, and hence that a law that permits no individual exceptions based on religious beliefs will be the least restrictive means of achieving the goal of liberty for gay people (emphasis mine).”

Ms. Feldblum’s seditious statements are in dramatic contrast to what Benjamin Franklin wrote in 1774, in Emblematic Representations:

“The ordaining of laws in favor of one part of the nation, to the prejudice and oppression of another, is certainly the most erroneous and mistaken policy. An equal dispensation of protection, rights, privileges, and advantages, is what every part is entitled to, and ought to enjoy (emphasis mine)”

In addition, Ms. Feldblum’s thesis on the proper role of government is unequivocally incompatible with the words spoken by President Thomas Jefferson during his first inaugural address, 1801:

“A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned – this is the sum of good government.”

Chai Feldblum’s offensive advocacy through the EEOC is so extreme and outside of Constitutional bounds that, in 2012, the usually divided Supreme Court of the United States ruled unanimously against Feldblum’s EEOC attempt to void the “Ministerial Exemption,” which allows leeway for religious organizations to carry out routine, religiously-related matters of hiring and terminating employees.

While Ms. Feldblum claims to represent the LGBTQ+ community, she speaks only for a small, yet loud portion of the demographic; one comprised almost entirely of radical LGBTQ+ activists.

In truth, Ms. Feldblum’s fanatical, extremist, ideologically-driven agenda only serves to marginalize a significant portion of sexual minorities, in addition to women and countless Americans of religious orthodoxy.

Ignoring the conservative, sexual minorities who disapprove of the forced subjugation of religious Americans, Ms. Feldblum propagates stereotypes of the various people she claims to represent, and actively encourages neighbors to go to war with neighbors.

Feldblum insists on a “zero-sum” game, where religious Americans and members of the LGBTQ+ community are incapable of living peaceably side-by-side. As the architect of former President Obama’s Transgender executive order, Feldblum further victimizes traumatized women and children, insisting they must tolerate an unsafe existence, as grown men are ushered into their locker rooms and bathrooms in the name of “progress.” Feldblum insists on subjugating religious, yet same-sex attracted business owners in the private market, drastically hindering their pursuit of happiness through economic independence. Feldblum insists that all LGBTQ+ Americans think as she does.

Ms. Feldblum is a tyrant; wholly unworthy of another five years at the helm of the EEOC.

Speaking on the sacredness of religious liberty in America, Samuel Adams stated, August 1, 1776:

“Driven from every other corner of the earth freedom of thought and the right of private judgment in matters of conscience direct their course to this happy country as their last asylum.”

The responsibility, Senator Alexander, now rests with you and the Senate to protect religious liberty as vigorously and as confidently as our Founding Fathers.

If you fail to perform this duty, this great test of your legacy as one of the leaders of the free world, may the words of Samuel Adams haunt you for the remainder of your days:

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”


Most sincerely,


Paige Rogers, Tennessee

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Video: The Racist roots of Liberty control – Who doesn’t like certain people getting rights?




In honour of #NationalWalkoutDay let’s look at those who really don’t like certain people getting rights – specifically the common sense human right of self-preservation.

This is NationalWalkoutDay [Who would have thought that kids would want to skip school?] With one of the most important human rights in the spotlight, it would be a good idea to examine the reasons why this has been suppressed in the past. To begin, consider Hillary Clinton’s statement smearing most of the country:

So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward, and his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. “You don’t like black people getting rights, you don’t like women getting jobs, you don’t want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are, whatever your problem is, I’m going to solve it.”

So who really is opposed to the certain people getting their common sense human rights? The following video from Colion Noir details that Liberty (gun) control has it’s roots in racism:

Gun Control’s Racist History

Interestingly enough, the same people who claim to care about ‘the children’ but whole heartily support Planned Parenthood are the same folks who want to deprive the people of their basic human rights. Who would have thought that was the case?


Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily






Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.