Connect with us

Democrats

Why I trust the FBI as they investigate Kavanaugh even if Democrats do not

Published

on

Why I trust the FBI as they investigate Kavanaugh even if Democrats do not

Leftists, Democrats, and mainstream media have to put on their anti-FBI makeup for the time being. When the investigation into Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual assault allegations yield no actionable fruit for the Senate or Justice Department, they law enforcement agency will be hit hard by Democrats as being pawns held back by the White House.

Their investigation will almost certainly result in a very thin report. Democrats will blame time constraints and a limited scope set by the White House as reasons for this. They won’t acknowledge the reality that a 3-decade-old accusation without the benefit of date, location, or physical evidence can only come down to a series of interviews, all of which can be easily handled quickly by the FBI.

If it took longer than a week to reach all the people loosely involved with the case, I’d be crying foul.

But let’s momentarily set aside the irregularity of the case, one that no law enforcement agency in the nation would willingly investigate without direct prompting from a higher power. Let’s say there’s something the FBI is able to find. Would they? Absolutely.

This goes beyond doing their jobs. The high profile of this case has a nation holding its breath. The last thing any FBI agent wants to do is miss something, even the slightest detail. Their individual reputations and the reputation of the bureau itself is on the line because anything they miss will certainly be uncovered by one or more of the hundreds of journalists currently doing their own investigating.

Whatever the FBI misses, mainstream media will find. When they do, they’ll use it as evidence that the FBI is either incompetent or doing the bidding of the President.

If anyone should be skeptical of the FBI, it’s Republicans in general and President Trump in particular. Getting an investigation on any of the Clintons has been impossible, yet the Peter Strzoks of the bureau seem to be running an anti-Republican agenda from FBI headquarters. Democrats have it easy when it comes to the FBI.

Nevertheless, I have full confidence in the bureau on this issue. If you think the FBI will be going through the motions, then you don’t understand the pride of the men and women in America’s most prestigious law enforcement agency (Strzok aside). They’ll put forth their best efforts. If there’s a smoking gun or bombshell witness, the FBI will find them.

When all is said and done, the FBI will have a full understanding of “boofing.”

Democrats already KNOW Kavanaugh is guilty so they expect the FBI to pull a rabbit out of a beer can. When no rabbit appears, Democrats will blame the bureau and their “handlers” at the White House.

Democrats

Andrew Gillum concedes to Ron DeSantis in Florida gubernatorial race

Published

on

Andrew Gillum concedes to Ron DeSantis in Florida gubernatorial race

It was arguably the most watched gubernatorial race in the nation this past midterm election season and it didn’t disappoint. It took a recount and multiple lawsuits to finish, but in the end Republican Ron DeSantis defeated Democrat Andrew Gillum.

The mayor of Jacksonville finally conceded for the second time today, nearly two weeks after election day. He already conceded once on election fight.

Andrew Gillum concedes in Florida governor’s race for second time

https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/11/17/andrew-gillum-concedes-florida-governors-race-second-time/2041301002/In a four-minute video posted live on Facebook, Mayor Gillum stood with his wife R. Jai, a Tallahassee park in the background and both dressed in Florida A&M University orange and green. Gillum first thanked his supporters. Then, he officially acknowledged Republican Ron DeSantis as the winner.

“R. Jai and I wanted to take a moment to congratulate Mr. DeSantis on becoming the next governor of the great state of Florida,” Gillum said in the video posted at about 5 p.m.

DeSantis Tweeted acknowledgement of the concession.

Florida is a bellwether for the 2020 presidential election. The closeness of the race and the apparent corruption in the state means both parties have a lot of work to do. The state needs to get their act together before then as well.

Continue Reading

Democrats

Stacey Abrams doesn’t concede in her non-concession speech

Published

on

Stacey Abrams doesn't concede in her non-concession speech

Republican Brian Kemp will be the next governor of Georgia. He defeated Democrat Stacey Abrams by receiving 50.2% of the vote, negating the possibility of a runoff election.

Abrams isn’t happy about it. She said today she’s unwilling to concede but acknowledged that Kemp would be certified as the winner. In a strange political doublespeak way, she fought back against a system that prevented her from rightfully winning.

Or something.

Bottom line: She lost. She, President Obama, and Oprah Winfrey failed to get her enough voters to win the election. Whether she actually concedes or not is irrelevant.

Continue Reading

Democrats

Kamala Harris pushes fraudulent ‘petition’ to build her 2020 fundraising spam list

Published

on

The worlds of marketing and political campaigning have many things in common. Their intention is to persuade people. They’re both selling something. They employ tested colors, designs, and buzzwords to get people excited. One of the keys to their success is something called “list-building.”

With ballots from the 2018 elections still being counted, Senator Kamala Harris is wasting no time building her 2020 list. To do it, she’s employing a deceptive technique, promoting an online “petition” that’s really nothing more than a way to get people to willingly give her campaign their contact information. These people will be targeted with campaign fundraisers later.

No official announcement has been made about her 2020 presidential run, but it’s hard to believe she’s not running after purchasing 1,100 Facebook ads to promote these “petitions.” A Facebook ad doesn’t have a set cost, but we can assume big money is being put into these list-building ads because of the sheer volume. To put it into perspective, Beto O’Rourke spent around $5 million on Facebook ads for his Senate campaign. Presidential campaigns can easily spend 25 times as much as an expensive Senate campaign.

Unlike a valid petition people often sign to get a candidate or proposition on a ballot, these list-building petitions don’t actually do anything. People are told they’re demanding this action or that, but in the end they’re just giving over information. Some go so far as to ask for everything, including name, address, phone numbers, email, and occasionally even income. These lists grow much more slowly because of the depth of the information requested.

A more common technique is to ask for minimal data to encourage people to fill it out. At the end of the day, all a campaign really needs is an email address they can later use in fundraising campaigns. Here’s an example of an ad Senator Harris’ campaign recently put out:

Kamala Harris Petition

The meta data reveals the page was titled, “Acquisition: 180822 Mueller FB.”

“FB” means it was a Facebook campaign. “Mueller” was the topic. “180822” is the tracking number for A/B testing. “Acquisition” is the goal. Anyone who signed this “petition” has just had their contact information acquired. Mission accomplished. They will soon be receiving emails asking them to donate to the Kamala Harris 2020 presidential election fund.

As for the results of the “petition,” they will go nowhere. There won’t be a Congressional action that is enabled by the thousands of people who “signed” it. You won’t see Kamala Harris standing in front of the White House reading off the names of the people who participated in the “petition.” She couldn’t do that even if she wanted to because the “petition” only asks for a first name. Are there really people out there who believe signing a petition only requires a first name?

Senator Harris is promoting fraudulent petitions with the sole purpose if building her 2020 fundraising spam list. Anyone who “signs” it believing they’re demanding protection for Robert Mueller is a sucker. That’s exactly who she wants to target.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement Donate to NOQ Report

Facebook

Twitter

Trending

Copyright © 2018 NOQ Report