Connect with us

Opinions

If he were alive today, Emperor Nero probably would be a Republican

Published

on

If he were alive today Emperor Nero probably would be a Republican

I’m not sure, but I think if Nero were alive today, he probably would be a Republican.

According to a well-known expression, in 64 A.D., Roman Emperor Nero “fiddled while Rome burned” in a fire that destroyed most of the city and left over half its population homeless. The expression has a double meaning: Not only did Nero play music while his people suffered, but he was a worthless leader in a time of crisis.

Like Nero, Trump and the GOP have been fiddling while the party burns to the ground from a blaze they started with their lies and broken promises, leaving conservatives within the party homeless. Additionally, Republicans have proven themselves to be worthless leaders in America’s time of crisis.

While the fiddling part of the story is debatable, the Great Fire that nearly destroyed Rome really occurred while Nero hid out at his villa in Antium, far from the fire. Nero was so ruthless and cruel that many believed he ordered the fire started to make way for building his Golden Palace and surrounding pleasure gardens.

Likewise, the great fire started by the GOP’s political pyromaniacs destroyed the party while they hide behind recycled campaign promises made to their constituents back home. And as recent polls and midterm elections have shown, many believe Republicans started the fire to make way for building their palaces and pleasure gardens of political power.

After the fire was out and the damage had been done, Nero finally returned to Rome to offer relief from the tragedy, but his reputation of ruthlessness and cruelty kept the people from trusting him.

Trump and the GOP are offering relief from the tragedy they created, as well. They’re promising AGAIN to repeal Obamacare. They’re promising AGAIN to end late-term abortion and taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood. They’re promising AGAIN to fix the illegal immigration problem.

However, as it was with Nero, the GOP’s track record of ruthlessness, lies, and broken promises are keeping the voter from trusting them as well.

In a speech to the House of Commons, Winston Churchill paraphrased a quote by George Santayana when he said, “Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it.”

Will we learn from Nero and the Great Fire about how not to vote in November? Or will conservatives be left helplessly standing by as Trump and the GOP burn America to the ground while fiddling away any hope of dousing the flames?

I think you know how I would answer that question.

Originally posted on StridentConservative.com.

 


David Leach is the owner of The Strident Conservative. His daily radio commentary is distributed by the Salem Radio Network and is heard on stations across America.

Follow the Strident Conservative on Twitter and Facebook.

Subscribe to receive podcasts of radio commentaries: iTunes | Stitcher | Tune In | RSS

Advertisement
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. one pissed off patriot

    September 29, 2018 at 12:31 am

    its the ol timey republicans that burned the party to the ground.
    trump picked up the pieces that the repubs discarded,, you know, the middle class,blue collar peope,people with kids,peope who believe in god, aka most americans,,, he beat the rino repubs black and blue,and he pulled the republican coat and pants off of ol timey repub party,and found democrat underwear underneath
    dont try to blame trump for what the ol timey repubs built,A legacy of lies,broken promises, and constant caving to the dems ,
    trump dosen’t have a single fingerprint on ANY of that!
    its all on the backs of the lying rino repubs and their symbiotic twins the demos,,,, nafta, wto, mfn,tpp,davos,bilderbergers,trilateral commission, and all the job killing factory exporting trade deals are all on the demos and rino repubs
    try as you might you cant blame trump for any of the past deals.

    • David Leach

      September 30, 2018 at 4:30 am

      Sorry, but his fingerprints are all over the pen he used to sign the #MiniBusBetrayal. Try as you might, you can’t excuse Trump for that deal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Media

Liz Wheeler on the most disgusting part of the Jussie Smollett scandal

Published

on

Liz Wheeler on the most disgusting part of the Jussie Smollett scandal

There are plenty of things about the Jussie Smollett scandal that should disgust us. The instant reaction by celebrities, politicians, and the media is right there at the top, especially when we consider how many are now saying, “let’s wait for the facts.” The notion that a successful gay black man thought it appropriate to make himself seem like a victim is also up there.

As One America News Network’s Liz Wheeler points out, we should also be disgusted that Smollett chose this victim status over being a strong leader and role model for less privileged black and gay people who could have looked up to him for his strength instead of now being scornful of his weakness.

What does that say about America when the left tries so hard to build the narrative that everything is wrong, they’re unwilling to recognize the real problems that are plaguing America. Why? Because they’re the biggest part of the problem.

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Democrats

Leftist media pushes back on Green New Deal criticism

Published

on

Leftist media pushes back on Green New Deal criticism

It’s been an up-and-down couple of weeks for proponents of the Green New Deal. Before details were released, it was already being heralded as the greatest thing since President Obama’s election. Then, the details came out and even many on the left were taken aback by the ambitious and incoherent provisions of the deal as detailed in a FAQ section on Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s government web page.

But that was just a draft. They took it down. At least that was the story.

Unfortunately for proponents, they were caught a little flat-footed as questions started pouring in about, well, all of it. Even if we dismiss the less-draconian concepts such as eliminating air travel or the less-sane ideas like taking care of those who are unwilling to work, the left is still stuck with a proposal that the most frugal estimates put at costing around $7 trillion while other’s consider the decade-long cost to be in the HUNDREDS of trillions of dollars.

This is, of course, ludicrous. There’s not enough money in the entire world to pay for the proposal if its cost is somewhere between the lowest and highest estimates, but that hasn’t stopped leftist media from regrouping. Now that the dust has settled a little bit, they’re doing everything they can to recommit to this concept. It’s not that they suddenly believe in this fairy tale. It’s that they don’t want this to be the issue Republicans attack in the 2020 elections.

One article in particular that I read from CNN (yes, sometimes I need to see what the other side is thinking) really struck me for its honesty about the situation. Though I stopped reading it in paragraph two when it referred to “non-partisan” PolitiFact, I went back to it just now to digest the awfulness fully (see the sacrifices I make for our readers!).

To be clear, much of what this article says is correct. It asserts the GOP will take the tenets of the Green New Deal and use it to scare voters into thinking it’s even worse than Obamacare. From 2010 through 2016, Republicans attacked Obamacare incessantly and it worked, giving them the House in 2010, the Senate in 2014, and the White House in 2016. Unfortunately, they stopped there and didn’t actually go after Obamacare with the same fervor they held in their campaign rhetoric and now the Democrats have turned the issue on its head.

But here’s the thing. Obamacare may have been bad, but the Green New Deal truly is worse. It’s not even close. Even if we take at face value the notion that the Green New Deal is simply an ambitious framework around which real legislation can be forged, we have to look at the core issues entailed in order to see the true damage it can do. This is a socialist document. It’s a call for the same levels of insanity that drive the Medicare-for-All movement. Within its frivolous attempts to change perceptions of air travel, cows, and job creation is a deep-rooted desire to convert Americans to needing more government.

NOQ Report needs your support.

The Green New Deal represents the far-left’s desire to make more American dependent on government. At the same time, it aims to increase the levels of dependency for those who are already in need of assistance. It wants Democrats to latch their wagons on the notion that if we become a militantly environmentalist nation, that will serve the dual purpose of giving us fulfillment while saving the planet.

I believe most leftist journalists understand this, but they see in the ridiculous framework a path through which Republicans can be defeated wholesale in 2020 as long as the left can control the narrative surrounding the Green New Deal. They fear another Obamacare counterinsurgency that would wipe out the anti-Trump gains they made in 2018, so they’ve adopted a stance that the Green New Deal isn’t as bad as Fox News says it is. Meanwhile, they’re doing everything they can to say, “look over here and not at the Green New Deal.”

The politics behind what the Green New Deal represents is more in play than the tenets of the proposal itself, at least in the eyes of leftist media. It’s not that they want to promote the concept. They simply don’t want the concept to derail their party in the next election.

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Louis Farrakhan refers to Ilhan Omar as ‘sweetheart,’ prompting zero outrage

Published

on

Louis Farrakhan refers to Ilhan Omar as sweetheart prompting zero outrage

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan referred to Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) as “Sweetheart” as he addressed her during a speaking engagement on Sunday. He apparently caught his faux pas and immediately justified the remark, but at that point the moniker which many consider to be sexist or misogynistic had already been noted.

Nevertheless, it didn’t cause the stir one might expect. As a far-left progressive, Omar is known for being a feminist icon on Capitol Hill even though she hasn’t been in office for a full two months yet. As our EIC noted, the lack of a rebuke was because of the source, not because she now feels it’s okay to refer to her as “sweetheart.”

The statement came as Farrakhan was telling Omar she shouldn’t be sorry for the statements she made last week about Israel, AIPAC, and Jewish influence in Washington DC, particularly over Republicans.

In a world where consistency was still considered a virtue, followers of Omar would be wondering why she’s not expressing outrage over the belittling reference from a powerful man. But the world isn’t consistent and Farrakhan always gets a pass.

 


NOQ Report Needs Your Help

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 NOQ Report