Connect with us

Media

Christine Blasey Ford’s Rate My Professors conveniently blank

Published

on

Christine Blasey Fords Rate My Professors conveniently blank

As soon as Christine Blasey Ford went on the record, it became known that she was a professor in the field of psychology at the Palo Alto University who also taught at Stanford University. Recent reports circulated on Twitter and Facebook of how students brutalized Professor Ford in their reviews. However what garnered an equal amount of attention was the censorship of this article. And perhaps Rate My Professors is also guilty of censorship.

The article in question was published on TheFederalistPapers.org by the site’s ringleader, Steve Straub. However Miguelifornia was unknowingly tweeting fakenews. It’s understandable how someone who believes is QAnon would so willingly overlook critical details, mainly that this isn’t the Christine Ford that is accusing Brett Kavanaugh.

She’s currently a professor in the Social Work Department at California State University – Fullerton.

Christine Blasey Ford does not teach at Fullerton. Meaning, this article is connecting the wrong person to the Kavanaugh accuser. This is a case of shoddy journalism. Now the issue of Twitter censorship is real. It also appears Twitter does not like Mr. Straub’s site.

What do the reviews actually say?

Christine Ford has been a professor so having taught students, its more than likely she has true reviews that can actually be found. Except she doesn’t. The two pages on Rate My Professors, the gold standard website for professor reviews are both void of reviews.

Palo Alto University page

Stanford University page

No reviews could be found on lesser competitors or indirect competitors. Stephanie Dube Dwilson of Heavy noted:

It’s not known if they never had reviews or if reviews were removed, but there are no reviews on her two pages.

Key Questions

So how do reviews just not exist for a professor. It’s understandable how the Stanford page may be blank, but the Palo Alto page should, in theory have some reviews. So this invites speculation as to whether Rate My Professors wiped her page clean after she went public and before the internet could vet her page for curiosity. If she had a 4.5 would her review still be up there? If they were worried about spam posts to smear Ford, why not simply lock her page. It does a disservice to students who are deciding to take her to censor information that could be used in a class scheduling decision. Why does Rate My Professors even care to intervene on Christine Ford’s behalf? It’s completely understandable to lock the page, like Wikipedia often does on controversial topics.

Final Thoughts

It is unlikely any student ratings would have been germane to Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Brett Kavanaugh. However, they could have undermined her character. Suppose more than one student rated her and their reviews said that she was a liar. Or what if a review said that she sexually harassed a student. This information could have undermined her accusations against the Supreme nominee, as opposed to her being a tough grader or even a poor educator. However the issue here has less to do with how the reviews impact the situation at-hand and more about how Rate My Professors likely wiped reviews in an effort to minimize scrutiny in regards to Ford.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Pingback: 'Nox & Friends

  2. Anonymous

    September 20, 2018 at 2:53 am

    I can answer this, as I was lucky to click a link to her ratings the day her name was announced. They did in fact quietly remove the reviews.

    There were maybe 6 or 7 reviews and they were polarized. About 3 good and 3 bad from what I remember. The bad ones said she was an annoying grader, made her seem like a bitch, and one said something along the lines of being unhinged. The others were your typical positive reviews. If I remember correctly, the latest reviews were posted in 2014. The earliest, 2011?

    • DBS

      September 27, 2018 at 4:45 pm

      I saw one from 2016 and one from 2017. They are now gone.

  3. Water Bear

    September 20, 2018 at 1:07 pm

    The score on her reviews (or lack thereof) prompted me to make a face similar to them.
    0.0

  4. Sabre22

    September 20, 2018 at 3:15 pm

    Last time I looked the god reviews were there and there were no bad ones (NO surprise there)

  5. meThree

    September 20, 2018 at 9:16 pm

    It does not really matter, does it?…. Giving the fact that we all know that she lies and that she is an extreme Leftist who associates with Hillary’s lawyer and other “great” people.

  6. M

    September 28, 2018 at 12:13 pm

    She’s a total liar. Wonder how much she was paid for this bs?

  7. Ronald

    September 30, 2018 at 10:24 am

    Another interesting thing is that the wayback machine (internet archive) only shows archives saved twice, starting on Sept. 16, 2018 and ending Sept.20, 2018. This is referring to the California State University, Fullerton entry, which is now being claimed as a “different” Christine Ford, but I am not buying it. They also scrubbed the bad reviews from that page as well.

  8. Ganon

    September 30, 2018 at 7:38 pm

    ask the anons on 8chan. they screen shot it before it was scrubbed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Media

Anthony Derlunas, who yelled ‘Heil Hitler, Heil Trump,’ is a Trump-hating leftist

Published

on

Anthony Derlunas who yelled Heil Hitler Heil Trump is a Trump-hating leftist

Mainstream media went to great extremes to make people believe Anthony Derlunas is a Trump supporter who was spreading his antisemitic message because he’s a Republican voter. When it was revealed he yelled. “Heil Hitler, Heil Trump,” during a performance of Fiddler on the Roof because he was triggered and actually hated Trump, mainstream media suddenly went silent on the story.

That’s what happens when a leftist narrative is broken. It gets buried, distorted, or outright lied about by the press. They love their narratives. They hate anything that proves their narratives wrong.

Moonbattery The MSM’s Anthony Derlunas Hate Hoax

https://moonbattery.com/the-msms-anthony-derlunas-hate-hoax/The hyperpartisan “mainstream” media has never been more dishonest than since the horrific shootings at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, as it attempts incongruously yet determinedly to tie anti-Semitism around Donald Trump’s neck. Flawed reporting reached hate hoax levels in light of a moonbat named Anthony Derlunas screaming “Heil Hitler! Heil Trump!” at a Baltimore performance of Fiddler on the Roof. Since it is hard to find anything but moonbattery elsewhere, we turn to One America for the story.

Continue Reading

Media

President Trump reacts to Jim Acosta’s press pass decision: ‘Not a big deal’

Published

on

President Trump reacts to Jim Acostas press pass decision Not a big deal

He’s right. This isn’t a big deal. CNN’s Jim Acosta should never have had his hard pass revoked in the first place, either. That made it a bigger deal than it really ought to be. But it happened and now a temporary order has been placed by a judge.

What does this mean for future press conferences? A lot. What does it mean for the 1st Amendment? Not so much. It’s a blow to the President and a win for the free press, but this won’t be an issue that will ever come up again.

It shouldn’t have come up in the first place.

Some are asking why the White House needs to publish rules of decorum for the press when they weren’t needed before. That’s just it. They weren’t needed before. This is a different President, but it’s also a different press.

Continue Reading

Guns and Crime

Luis Cobos-Cenobio, the star of the Arkansas dashcam shootout, is an illegal immigrant

Published

on

Luis Cobos-Cenobio the star of the Arkansas dash cam shootout is an illegal immigrant

It’s an odd headline. The lede in this story should the shocking dashcam footage showing suspect Luis Cobos-Cenobio firing on police who were trying to pull him over. Unfortunately, immigration status is either buried or ignored altogether by mainstream media, so we thought it was necessary to point out up front that the man who allegedly tried to shoot and kill police officers is an illegal immigrant.

You can read the details at Fox News, one of the only outlets I’ve found so far that mentions his immigration status:

Dashcam video shows moment illegal immigrant suspect opens fire on Arkansas police officer

https://www.foxnews.com/us/dashcam-video-shows-moment-illegal-immigrant-suspect-opens-fire-on-arkansas-police-officerCobos-Cenobio has been jailed on $500,000 bond, and has had a detainer placed on him by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, an agency spokesperson confirmed to Fox News.

Cobos-Cenobio has been charged with four counts of attempted capital murder, committing a terroristic act, fleeing, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, according to police.

If he is convicted on any or all of these charges, he’s going to jail for a long time. There’s no way to know at this point how many Americans he’s harmed in the past. Sadly, as a criminal illegal immigrant, there’s no reason for him to be here in the first place.

Mainstream media doesn’t want you to know that part of the story, though. Some went so far as to avoid the topic altogether.

For example, this article from ABC News is nearly 400-words in length and never even hints at his immigration status. Many stories simply noted as deep into the article as possible that he had a “federal hold” or “detainer request” without indicating that almost certainly means he’s here illegally.

Mainstream media is desperate to bury or cover up anything that pertains to illegal immigrants. This story, with its amazing and terrifying video, was too “good” for them to pass up. That didn’t stop them from hiding his immigration status.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement Donate to NOQ Report

Facebook

Twitter

Trending

Copyright © 2018 NOQ Report