The cyclic nature of climate means the hysteria can only be exploited for a limited time, and it’s running short.
When it comes to creating deceptive labels the national socialist Left is par excellence, despite failing at everything else. Their self labeling as ‘Liberals’ while having a collectivist ideology has to be one of the best examples. However, nothing shows their true genius for mendacity than their use of the of the term ‘Climate Change’ instead of the phrases ‘Global Warming’ or ‘Global Cooling’.
This is one of those vague terms with a ‘Heads we win, Tails we win’ sort of quality that works in any environment. It’s a plain fact of reality that the climate always changes, so they can claim prescience no matter happens. It’s use also gives them one of the greatest strawman arguments of all time, the ever deceitful pejorative ‘Climate Change denier’. No one actually denies that the climate changes, but this doesn’t stop them from tarring their opponents with this scurrilous accusation at every turn.
Global Cooling then Global Warming then Climate Change and then back to Global Cooling.
The past few decades happened to be in the upward part of a never-ending cycle of change that has taken place as long as the planet has existed. This let the climate cult cast the increasing temperatures as ‘Global Warming’. When this decelerated the infamous phrase ‘Climate change’ became popular with talk about what to make of the ‘pause’ in global warming. Soon enough people began to notice that globe wasn’t really getting warmer, and islands that were supposed to sink beneath rising sea levels defied conventional wisdom and began growing in size.
Only a bit of fancy footwork with the language helped ‘hide the decline’ in the fortunes of global warming.. pardon.. Climate change. Normal weather events were recast as being extreme, while lack of major hurricanes over long time periods ignored until they returned once again. Instead of mere winter storms that have occurred for millennia, they were labeled with hurricane style names and said to be bombs or explosive. People are going to begin questioning why are we making sacrifices to the carbon gods when the planet really isn’t burning up?
Scientists are predicting ‘mini ice age’.
Still further, the bad news for the climate cult is that soon enough the cycle turn to a downward trend showing it to be just hysteria over something that is naturally recurring.
From Sky News: Scientists predict ‘mini ice age’ could hit UK by 2030
A mathematical model of the Sun’s magnetic activity suggests temperatures could start dropping here from 2021, with the potential for winter skating on the River Thames by 2030. A team led by maths professor Valentina Zharkova at Northumbria University built on work from Moscow to predict the movements of two magnetic waves produced by the Sun. It predicts rapidly decreasing magnetic waves for three solar cycles beginning in 2021 and lasting 33 years. Very low magnetic activity on the Sun correspond with historically documented cold periods on Earth.
This reality will not sit well with the climate cult, they’ve made a living over carbon indulgences the past few decades while using their hysteria to try to control every aspect of our lives. It has met some ‘resistance’, apparently we’re supposed to believe that the main driver of climate – The SUN – has a less of an influence effect than an ancillary effect of the sun, and not from the main green house gas to boot.
From the Washington Post: No, Earth is not heading toward a ‘mini ice age’
It’s a dramatic idea, but it isn’t being embraced by many climate scientists, who argue that anthropogenic global warming — brought on by a human outpouring of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere — will far outweigh any climate effects that might be caused by the sun. As far as the solar variations go, “The effect is a drop in the bucket, a barely detectable blip, on the overall warming trajectory we can expect over the next several decades from greenhouse warming,” said Michael Mann, distinguished professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University, in an e-mail to The Washington Post.
Worse yet, there are actual reports from the periodical Scientific American that state in essence, “pollution is helping to cool the climate, masking some of the global warming that’s occurred so far.” Cleaning Up Air Pollution May Strengthen Global Warming.
For now, the Climate Cult is showing their best perversion of the scientific method attacking any who dare to utter words that challenge their orthodoxy. They may only have once choice, going back to flogging the cause of Global Cooling or wait until the cycle begins again, hoping no one will remember this hysteria, time will only tell.
Video Double play: Busting the gun grabber’s musket myth.
Two videos that eviscerate the Liberty Grabbers ‘One shot’ musket myth.
It is a bedrock principle (if they have any) of the Liberty grabber Left that back during the ratification of the US Constitution the only weapons in existence were flintlock musket that took 5 minute to reload. Thus there wasn’t any school violence because it would have taken too long for the perpetrator to kill anyone.
As it typical of the lore of the national socialist Left, this is a lie of the first order. A previous video celebrated the “Assault Weapon” tricentennial, which was bit of the tongue in cheek variety since there were other repeating “Military Style” weapons in existence before this time period. These will be detailed in future articles. Meanwhile we present two videos that also bust the ‘Musket Myth’, one a short presentation from the Royal Armouries on the Jover and Belton “Flintlock breech-loading superimposed military musket”
Published on Aug 30, 2017
Curator of Firearms, Jonathan Ferguson, gives us a peek at the Flintlock breech-loading superimposed military musket, by Jover and Belton (1786)
This is a very relevant piece since the inventor Joseph Belton corresponded with the Continental Congress in 1777:
May it Please your Honours,
I would just informe this Honourable Assembly, that I have discover’d an improvement, in the use of Small Armes, wherein a common small arm, may be maid to discharge eight balls one after another, in eight, five or three seconds of time, & each one to do execution five & twenty, or thirty yards, and after so discharg’d, to be loaded and fire’d with cartridge as usual.
“It was demonstrated before noted scientists and military officers (including well known scientist David Rittenhouse and General Horatio Gates)”
This destroys the mythology that the founders had no knowledge of this type of repeating firearm technology that existed already.
The second is a humours dissertation on the subject from video raconteur Steven Crowder https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/
from a few years ago that also eviscerates this bit of Leftist mythology.
Published on Feb 10, 2015
People have been telling us for years that the 2nd amendment was written in a time of Muskets, and that it doesn’t apply to the evolved weapons of today. Is it true?
So why is this important?
Two primary reasons. One that these factual examples demonstrate that the founding fathers knew of these technological advances. Therefore, they destroy any Leftist pretences that the 2nd amendment be confined to muskets. Second that, school violence is something other than an issue of guns.
Video: Celebrate the “Assault Weapon*” Tricentennial!
How time flies, it’s been 3 Centuries [1718 – 2018] since the invention of the Puckle gun – one of the many early “Assault Weapons*”
Image Credit: littlegun.be
When they aren’t spouting nonsensical lines such as “30 magazine clip in ½ a second”, Liberty grabber Leftists love to parrot the lie that back before the ratification of the Constitution, (1788) they only had one shot muskets that took 5 minutes to reload. The reality is that repeating and other early versions of ‘automatic weapons‘ were in existence long before this time period. Imagine that, the national Socialist Left lying about an important historical fact that furthers their agenda?
This is a full video exposition of this historic gun from Forgotten Weapons
The Puckle Gun, or Defense Gun as it was also known, was invented and patented in 1718 by the London lawyer James Puckle.
This was an early ‘automatic weapon’ was capable of firing 63 shots in 7 minutes in 1721.
It utilised a revolving cylinder to bring a projectile and powder charge to the breach of the gun. In essence, it was a manual revolver, but it was in existence 70 years BEFORE the Constitution was ratified. So much for the ‘One shot musket Lie’. One could have several of these revolving cylinders loaded and ready to be placed on the gun – making them something akin to the first “High capacity magazines*”.
*Yes, we’re playing it a bit fast and loose with these terms, but since they have no set definition, that doesn’t matter. In point of fact, that term (and others) were made up by the Liberty grabbers as a way of destroying the basic human Right of self-defense while maintaining the fiction supporting it. The tactic is to use a term such as this so it’s an easy progression to destroy any civil or natural right. In the case of the Liberty of self-defense, the definition is simply expanded to include just about every gun in existence.
PragerU Video: What’s a Greater Leap of Faith: God or the Multiverse?
Image Credit: PictureQuotes.me
What’s a greater leap of faith: God or the Multiverse? What’s the multiverse? Brian Keating, Professor of Physics at the University of California, San Diego, explains in this video.
Published: Apr 23, 2018