See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
It’s seven o’clock at night. Do you know that you’re daughters are reading? Well if they are reading Teen Vogue, you might want to swipe that from their grubby little hands, and/or if you were foolish enough to buy a subscription you might want to cancel it.
Why? Because one of its writers, Emily Lindin, has just admitted on her Twitter account before she got a lot of backlash that men who are not guilty of sexual harassment may need to be put in the line of fire for the “greater good.”
So you don’t care if men who are not guilty of sexual harassment are actually convicted and found guilty either by the court of public opinion? Or worse, in the court of law, just as long as the male patriarchy is dismantled and abolished. Based on Lindin’s decision to “protect” her tweets, she is not backing down from her stance to destroy men in order to create an egalitarian utopia even if she had to admit that a proper investigation had to be conducted before you can truly convict a man of sexual harassment.
I have experienced first hand this attitude in our culture when I worked for one of the big retail store chains in the country. I have known women that use confidentiality policies of the company in order to get certain men into trouble and out of a job, regardless if they are truly guilty or the women just down right hate them and want them out of “sight” so they out “out” of their puny minds.
Since Lindin has an “UnSlut Project,” let us understand what the definition “Slut” means.
According to Merriam-Webster “Slut” means; a lewd (crude and offensive in a sexual way), dissolute (lax in morals; licentious), or promiscuous (many transient sexual relationships) woman. So what are we to call women who are loose with their morals? Nothing negative that might bruise their ego? Just call them sexually liberated? Tell me please so I can be a better man and treat women the way they ought to be treated, because I don’t know how to anymore.
Don’t tell me that some women don’t care for sexual relations in spite of their claims that all sex with men is rape, including in the bonds of matrimony.
So thank you, Emily, for exposing what popular feminism really thinks about men. Sorry if you were wrongly accused of being a slut in your tweens, but what you’re doing now is not helping your cause.
Further Reading
Teen Vogue Columnist Claims She’s ‘Not Concerned’ If Men Are Falsely Accused Of Sexual Harassment
As a deluge of sexual harassment claims washes over Hollywood, the entertainment and media industries, the concern remains that innocent men will suffer as a result of false accusations of impropriety. The great tragedy of revealing an underground network of abusers is that all allegations will lose credibility if any actors, writers, or journalists are hit with false claims of sexual misbehavior.
But according to Teen Vogue columnist and “The UnSlut Project” founder, radical feminist Emily Lindin, a couple of falsely accused men who end up being harshly punished for harassment they didn’t commit is just a price that has to be paid in the service of dismantling the oppressive Patriarchy.
Liberal says it’s “OK” to Destroy Innocent Men to Accomplish Feminist Goals
The proclamation belongs to columnist Emily Lindin who jumped to her Twitter account on November 21 to reveal her “unpopular opinion” that she doesn’t mind false accusations against men, Daily Wire reported.
The upshot, here, is that Lindin believes that all men are rapists and oppressors who need to be destroyed — you know, even if they’ve never actually perpetrated any raping or oppressing.
Covid variant BA.5 is spreading. It appears milder but much more contagious and evades natural immunity. Best to boost your immune system with new Z-Dtox and Z-Stack nutraceuticals from our dear friend, the late Dr. Vladimir Zelenko.
Females like this woman and the other “Feminists” in popular culture are doing more damage to women than they know.
They are constantly reinforcing the stereotypes of women as “__itchy”, bossy, overly emotional, and generally unreasonable and inconsistent, needy, gold-digging clingy bosses or drama-queens throughout the workforce.
Way too many women have their jobs because of EEO and the over-sensitivity of women in the workplace in positions of un-earned authority and the laws passed by Democrats that favor minorities of all varieties over those with real merit, skills or experience.
The result is that the men that are NOT gay or sexual stalkers are being turned off by women in general and are unwilling to commit to living with one or to fidelity or to honoring their promises to the women that will not keep their words or be willing to show loyalty or fidelity to “their” men. The inevitable result is a growing number of aging women with no families, no relationships and few friends of an age to care for them in their old age and an equally growing number of males with growing assets that are unwilling to commit to a woman for family and unwilling to become responsible for or to care for the aging female population.
The Feminists bring this on themselves and on all women as they mistreat men in the workplace and the men tune out and turn away from the relationships that women need to raise the children that are the inevitable result of the promiscuous and love-less sex favored by the feminists.
…and that includes homosexuality. I have heard about men that turned to homosexuality, not because of natural instinct or whatever, but because its the only they can have a physical relationship.
I agree with you said Ed.