Connect with us

Entertainment and Sports

Seven teams control their own destiny for the college football playoffs



Seven teams control their own destiny for the college football playoffs

By the middle of November, the field of potential playoff teams in college football is expected to still be wide. 2017 is turning out to be very tight with clear scenarios already looking solid. There are seven teams who absolutely control their own destiny with a handful of teams hoping for some upsets to move their way in.

Let’s look at the scenarios that will determine the field of four, but first let’s look at a projection of the top seven ahead of the release of the official rankings tonight.

  1. Alabama – No question here.
  2. Miami – Their impressive victory over Notre Dame should propel them way up, though the committee might put them at 3 and Oklahoma at 2.
  3. Oklahoma – TCU was their biggest win since Ohio State and Clemson looked mediocre. Iowa State losing again may be enough of a mark on the Sooners to let Miami leapfrog them.
  4. Clemson – They just keep winning, but the shine is wearing off a bit as they haven’t seemed as dominant lately as they were before their loss.
  5. Wisconsin – Perfect record. Then again, most teams in the top 10 would have a perfect record playing their schedule.
  6. Auburn – The committee may take their two early losses and push them down to 7 despite beating the #1 team last week.
  7. Georgia – They didn’t just get beat. They were embarrassed and exposed the challenges of being a one-dimensional offense in the modern era.

Now, let’s look at the scenarios of why these seven teams control their own destinies:

One offs: Oklahoma and Wisconsin

With a win over TCU and Iowa State’s loss to Oklahoma State, Oklahoma would have to lose both of their final games (including this week’s home game against 1-9 Kansas) to be out of the Big 12 Championship Game. They’ll move into the top four with today’s release of rankings after Georgia and Notre Dame lost, but to stay there they’ll need to win out. For a two-loss Big 12 team to get in, other two-loss teams would have to quickly become three-loss teams soon.

Wisconsin will not have beaten a team that ends the season in the top 25 unless they beat the Big 10 East champion. Fortunately for them, they’re #5 looking in and two of the four teams ahead of them play each other, so all they have to do is win out. Despite being undefeated, they’re also the most vulnerable. They haven’t been tested enough, so Michigan at home and Minnesota on the road aren’t slam dunks. Then, there’s the Big 10 Championship game. If the right Ohio State and J.T. Barrett show up, they’re probably a better team than Wisconsin.

Unlike the ACC and SEC, the champion in the Big 12 and Big 10 may not get in if it’s not Oklahoma and Wisconsin. TCU and Ohio State are their likely opponents and both teams would probably end up at #5 or #6 even if they win their championships.

ACC: Clemson and Miami

Assuming they both win out before playing each other, the ACC Championship will be an elimination game for the playoffs. For both to make it in would require a strange set of circumstances, but it’s not out of the question. This is, after all, college football. Anything can happen.

SEC: Alabama, Auburn, and Georgia

Whoever wins the SEC Championship will be in unless there are crazy losses leading up to it. Georgia has the East locked down. Alabama will be undefeated going into the Iron Bowl against the best 2-loss team in the nation with Auburn. The winner of that game plays Georgia. It’s possible for two SEC teams to be in the playoffs if either Georgia or Auburn beat Alabama, but that would require an upset or two, just like with the ACC.


Before anyone starts throwing out Notre Dame, Ohio State, USC, or any other teams with a chance, I’m not suggesting there’s no way anyone other than these seven can make it. Based upon the schedules and how the playoff picture currently sits, these seven teams are the ones who do not need help. For anyone else to make it in would require more losses than just the head-to-head matches in the ACC and SEC.

The race for the playoffs is tighter this year than the previous three. Things can shift quickly with upsets, but if four of the top seven win out, they’re in the playoffs. Teams on the outside have to hope for OU and/or Wisconsin to stumble or unfathomable losses leading into the ACC Championship Game. Otherwise, a combination of four of the top seven will be playing each other for the trophy.

Entertainment and Sports

Billy Graham and the emergence of Christian media.



From the start, Billy Graham was a media magnet and he knew how to use the power of media. Even most liberals and progressives (although there were exceptions like William Edelen and the Gaylor family/FFRF) could not shoot down this man who wore his faith on the sleeve and actually respected Graham.

Did you know that without Billy Graham, Christian media as we know it today might not have taken off and flourished? In his time and prime there was a Federal Council of Churches that consisted of mostly mainline churches and basically fought to keep “evangelical voices” off the air on both radio and even TV when it was brand new (follow the attendance and the money). When Graham became president of Northwestern Bible College in 1948, he through the college applied for one of the construction permits that the Federal Communications Commission approved of in the 1940’s. Northwest Bible College got the green light from the FCC and a year later KTIS AM signed on in the Twin Cities. Today Northwestern Media owns 18 radio stations (9 FM, 9 AM) and in honor of what Graham did continues to be the media outreach of what is now called the University of Northwestern. You can read more about Graham and Northwestern Media here.

Soon after Northwestern Media and Graham’s inroads into mainstream media, others quickly followed. Most notably Percy Crawford who began his TV program “Youth on the March” on the fleeting ABC Network who also carried Graham’s “Hour of Decision” on their radio network. In 1958 Crawford started his namesake radio company to buy up radio stations and carry full-time Christian formatted programming. Percy Crawford would pass away in October 1960, but his son Don and later grandson Don Jr. would carry on his legacy to this day. While Moody Bible Institute was in radio since 1925, their respected radio network did not talk off until 1958. The same year that the Crawford Broadcasting Company started.

Another important Christian broadcaster Dick Bott grew up in a Christian home and while no stranger to Christian evangelism choose a different path. After marrying his wife, Bott got involved in her father’s radio station selling ads that would air on the respected station. He would later buy and operate a secular station in Salinas/Monterey, California which Bott would eventually sell off. Bott was compelled to build a radio station on consistent Christian programming but with integrity and accountability. Bott bought a country music station in the Kansas City metropolitan area and quickly changed the format and call letters. The station that was KANS-AM became KCCV 760 AM “Kansas City’s Christian Voice” in 1962. It and its FM simulcast sister with the same call letters are still the flagship stations of the now “Bott Radio Network” which consists of now 118 stations that it owns. In 1966 Warren Bolthouse stated Family Life Broadcasting (aka Family Life Radio or FLR) which today owns 43 stations and is now based on Tucson, Arizona.

In the late 1960’s and early 1970’s Lester Sumrall made his inroads into Christian media stating with WHME-FM in South Bend, Indiana and later into TV with the acquisition of WHMB-TV in Indianapolis and later the sign on of WHME-TV in South Bend. These three stations laid the groundwork for LeSea Broadcasting. Paul and Jan Crouch started their own TV programming with would become known as the Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) in 1973. The Bible Broadcasting Network signed on in 1971 with a single station in Norfolk, Virginia growing to 49 full power stations.

An FM rock station in Orange County, California KYMS 106.3 which could not compete with the more powerful rock signals of KMET (now KTWV) and KLOS in the greater Los Angeles area found its niche with the emerging Jesus people in 1975. In addition to Christian teaching and talk programs, KYMS also played the fleeting “Jesus Music” that was popular with that respected audience and while KYMS was not the very first Contemporary Christian Music station (that honor went to a station in Lincoln, Nebraska), it was the first one that was successful. KYMS’s run as a Contemporary Christian station would last for 20 years. WHME-FM would jump on this music and eventually spinning it off on a station of its own in the 1990’s. Northwestern Media’s FM stations and FLR would also adopt a CCM format in due time.

Radio broadcaster Bob Anthony also caught on to this emerging genre and would be one of the founders of Educational Media Foundation which signed on a single FM station in Santa Rosa, California in 1982 playing Contemporary Christian music. Today EMF owns and operates over 245 radio stations with its Christian music services K-Love and Air1. Another radio company devoted to Christian programming also was started up around this time. This for-profit company was founded by Stuart Epperson and Edward G. Atsinger III and they still head up this company we know today as Salem Media Group. In the late 1980’s Bob and Felice Augsburg started up what would become know as WayMedia and it’s Way-Fm brand which originally targeted Christian youth with Christian Music that appealed to that respected audience.

The list is almost endless with so many other Christian broadcasters over the years and many not as big as the ones I listed. For better and for worse the Christian media we take for granted, even in the new media likely would not have happened had it not been for Billy Graham.

Continue Reading

Entertainment and Sports

History repeats itself: Once again the National media praises a Socialist Dictatorship.




Being like-minded is the only reasonable explanation for this behaviour.

The occasion was the Olympic games with the national media falling all over itself to heap praise upon the a leadership of a socialist regime. But instead of a murderous socialist regime in North Korea, it was a murderous socialist regime in Germany just before WWII:

“Foreigners who know Germany only from what they have seen during this pleasant fortnight can carry home only one impression: it is that this is a nation happy and prosperous beyond belief, that Hitler is one of the greatest, if not the greatest, political leaders in the world today, and the Germans themselves are a much-maligned, hospitable, holy, peaceful people who deserve the best the world can give them.” New York Times, editorial August 16, 1936

Presumably this was before the nonsensical ‘Godwin’s law’ made the mentioning of Socialist monsters of the past verboten. Curiously enough, this is primarily used by Leftists in trying to suppress discussions of their blood soaked history. ‘Never forget’ is extremely difficult when one can ‘Never Mention’ the murderous past and present of the collectivist ideology.

Back then the New York Times had a bit more balance in it’s coverage with these headlines:

100,000 Hail Hitler; U.S. Athletes Avoid Nazi Salute To Him;

U.S. Welcome Is Mixed, Whistling Interpreted as ‘Bronx Cheer’ Is Heard as Team Gives Its Own Salute.

So why are we witness to a somewhat similar display from the national media reporting on the representatives from another Socialist nation, one that hails from North Korea instead of Germany?

Could it be they are merely ignorant that they are helping that authoritarian regime and do not understand it’s true nature? A government that starves, tortures imprisons and publicly executes it’s own people?
Was it as some have suggested in these cases, cheering for the rebel or the underdog?
Perhaps it is their way somehow going after the Trump administration?

Or could it just be that they are of the same ideological mindset?

We can dispense with giving them the benefit of the doubt. These are people of allegedly high intelligence, as is most of the Socialist-Left – Just ask them. With few exceptions – namely Buzzfeed of all places – it is hard to believe they do not understand the role they are playing with the woman who heads the ‘Propaganda and Agitation Department of the Workers’ Party of Korea. Nor can they be excused of not knowing the horrors taking place in what is essentially an open air concentration camp. Again, these are people who fashion themselves as the intellectual elite of the nation, the crème de la crème of the Left, standing up for the downtrodden everywhere, except North Korea.

It’s also hard to believe that the National media is really cheering for the underdog, given that description hardly extends a Germany under the iron fist of the Nationalsozialistische deutsche Arbeiter-Partei or the Soyuz Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik. It should also be clear that the national media has a history of this kind of advocacy that existed long before Trump ascended the public stage.

So, the obvious conclusions is that they are of the same collectivist mindset. No doubt if pressed, they would offer the same excuses for the starvation, oppression and mass murder used for other collectivist nations as ‘not really socialism.’ Or that the Socialism they advocate (were they truly honest about who they are) would be ‘done correctly’ in their case.

No, these were merely people cheering for their ideological brethren, and we’ll just leave it at that.


Continue Reading

Entertainment and Sports

Don’t mock us for what we believe



Dont mock us for what we believe

What if, during the Grammy awards ceremony, celebrities used their spotlight to mock someone because she was a woman? What if actors stood on the stage and made jokes about someone specifically because he was black? And on top of that, the audience laughed and laughed because he’s black and they’re not! Or homosexual? Or Jewish? Make no mistake, that’s exactly what happens when they stand on stage and mock conservatives.

It is no different to trash someone who believes differently than to trash someone for what they look like. Why is it okay to mock someone for their beliefs, but not okay to mock someone for what they are? Isn’t what you believe more a part of who you are than what you look like? For example: If I tell a joke in which I mock a man for being Hispanic, is that worse than if I tell a joke in which I mock that same man for believing in God, for believing that cows are sacred, or believing he should eat only vegetables?

If anything, it should be more offensive to mock someone for their beliefs, as it’s more of a reflection of who they are than their looks. Isn’t that what MLK tried to teach us? We don’t have streets named after him because he cared what people look like. His message was, it’s the content beneath the skin that matters most. Look at who a person is, not what he is. Mocking someone for believing in conservatism is mocking who he is. In my opinion that’s worse than mocking what he is.

Detractors might say that you can’t change what you are (although Rachel Dolezal and Caitlyn Jenner might disagree). But if you believe in your gut, through and through, that abortion is wrong, for example, then that’s not something you can change either. If you believe in Christianity, then you base your life around it. It’s who you are and as unchangeable as what you are.

One more thing, if the Grammy awards are going to allow celebrities to bash right wingers, they should allow celebrities to bash left wingers too. We’re all about equality, right? So let’s have equal bashing time for both sides. James Woods and Tim Allen can stand up there and do their thing, then Alec Baldwin and Sarah Silverman can do theirs. Or, as an act of true tolerance and inclusion, they could allow neither, and show respect for beliefs of all kinds.

Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily






Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.