Connect with us

Culture and Religion

Martha Raddatz wants us to stand with Moore accusers but pay no attention to the Menendez trial

Published

on

Martha Raddatz Hypocrisy

Martha Raddatz, your bias is showing.  On one hand, you say you’re disgusted with the voters of Alabama that are willing to give Roy Moore the doubt.

ABC’s Raddatz Disgusted By Skeptics of Allegations Against Roy Moore

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2017/11/12/abcs-raddatz-disgusted-skeptics-allegations-against-roy-mooreLast week, The Washington Post reported that Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore allegedly pursued relationships with teenagers when he was in his 30s and that he allegedly molested a 14-year-old girl. It was the latest in the avalanche of recent sexual misconduct allegations sweeping the nation. And while many believed the claims, others took them with a grain of salt citing the timing as suspicious. On Sunday’s Good Morning America, ABC’s Martha Raddatz used her analysis to express her frustration and contempt for such people. “I don’t really know what those voters are waiting for,” she huffed.

Yet, you only talk about Senator Bob Menendez’s corruption trial for only 16 seconds.  Menendez is a Democrat from New Jersey.  Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain is what I say.

Raddatz Promises to Discuss Menendez Trial, Only Gives It 16 Seconds

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2017/11/12/raddatz-promises-discuss-menendez-trial-only-gives-it-16ABC’s Martha Raddatz was on a mission against Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore on Sunday. After decrying skeptical Alabama voters for just not getting the message, she grilled White House Adviser Kellyanne Conway during This Week on if Moore should step aside. But no matter how many times Conway explained that she felt he should if the allegations were true, Raddatz insisted Conway was defending him. Conway called Raddatz out and pointed to the media’s double standard on ethics and failing to adequately report the corruption trial of Democratic New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez. Raddatz promised a full discussion later in the show, but it never came.

In spite of a bad interview Moore did with Sean Hannity, this only should show you that as with Bill Clinton, the progressive pagans expect us to uphold and honor our values while they get to trash them as much as they want.  Funny thing is Alabama voters might just listen to Raddatz for once.   At least according to the following story published in Newsmax.

New Poll Shows Jones Ahead of Moore in Alabama Senate Race

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/doug-jones-roy-moore-alabama-senate-race/2017/11/12/id/825636/Democratic candidate for Senate Doug Jones has a slight lead over his Republican opponent Roy Moore in a public opinion poll recently released about the Alabama special election.

A poll of 500 voters conducted by JMC Polling and Analytics November 9 and 11 in cities across the state showed Jones ahead at 46 percent among likely voters who said they would support Jones if the election was held tomorrow. Moore drew a 42 percent response, with 9 percent saying they were undecided.

Steve Deace sums this up the best:

If the game is now anytime someone makes an accusation you’re guilty, and the credibility of the accuser who lacks explicit evidence is verboten, enjoy your star chamber.

The Left will kill us with that scam. Yet many on the so-called “Right” now seemingly want to play it.

Deace also comments about Bush 41:

This is now the third (or sixth, I lost count) different woman to come forward on George HW Bush. By rules of “conservative media” — many of whom are Bush alums — set forth this past week, his reputation is now ruined and forfeit.

Because it’s about the seriousness of the allegations, not their veracity. Oh, and you can’t question the credibility of the accusers who offer nothing but their own word, either. Those are the rules now. Mitt Romney taught me that.

The biggest danger with this kind of thinking is that it will trickle down if not already with women who have axes to grind, want to make quick money, or just get men into trouble.  I have been accused of these things myself by strange women who just did it me because they felt like it, or whatever.

It is a double standard with these people.  They want to express themselves as women, especially their sexual prowess (intentional or not) but they want to destroy certain men for noticing it.

Sadly there is and will always be a certain degree of sex appeal.  Not just in popular culture and music but in sports (Swimming would be my favorite), high culture (I am a sucker for classically trained female singers regardless if they are Soprano, Mezzo, or Contralto) etc.  What we have to do is not come across as someone who is a sexual predator either by the way we speak and/or just keeping our hands to ourselves.  I don’t have to remind you that the later was one thing that Taylor Swift did NOT “Shake Off.”  Talk about “Look at what you made me do.”

Someone who wants to be a voice for liberty and freedom. Telecom (Radio/TV) Pikes Peak Community College 1993-1998, BS Journalism, minor Political Science, Colorado State University-Pueblo 1999-2004

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

GOP plays pro-life card in an election year bluff for votes

Published

on

GOP plays pro-life card in an election year bluff for votes

With another year of failure behind them and a midterm election ahead, the GOP is busy doing as it always does under such circumstances, squeezing a boatload of bills through Congress designed to give the appearance that they’re keeping their word to the conservative base of the party.

An ace-in-the-hole often played by the Gang Of Phonies when they are desperate for our cash and our votes is the pro-life card, which explains their plan to hold a show vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Act (BAASA) later this week.

If passed, BAASA would allegedly protect infants delivered alive after a failed abortion which begs the question, if a failed abortion delivers a live baby and a successful abortion delivers a dead baby, isn’t abortion the very definition of premeditated murder?

Premeditated Murder: The term that is used to describe a murder that was planned in advance and was carried out willfully. – Black’s Law Dictionary

In 2002–strangely enough, another midterm election year–George W. Bush signed a similar bill called the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA). While the bill claimed to provide legal protection for an infant born alive after a failed abortion, BAIPA failed to provide penalties or enforcement mechanisms to punish violators.

Without those provisions, the law was meaningless and made it possible for a baby killer like Kermit Gosnell–who routinely murdered babies by severing their spinal cords with scissors through the back of the neck or drowning them in toilets after being born alive–to become a millionaire.

While it can be argued that BAASA might do some good, this is simply an election year ploy that falls woefully short of doing what’s necessary to end the abortion holocaust.

For example, there has been no advance of the “most pro-life platform in GOP history,” which included commitments to defund Planned Parenthood, ban dismemberment abortions, and pass a Human Rights Amendment to the Constitution. In fact, Trump and the GOP actually supported the abortion industry by passing three spending bills in 2017 that fully funded Planned Parenthood.

As a supporter of the Federalist Party and the Convention of States project, I see this charade as more proof that conservatives need to leave the GOP and join these movements. Only by reigning in the federal government and returning power to the states will we bring an end to this holocaust.

What difference could it make? Well, Indiana State Rep. Curt Nisly just introduced a bill that would completely ban abortion in the state. In Roe v. Wade America, his chances of success are somewhere between slim and none. But in Constitutional America, where “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” NIsly’s bill would likely succeed.

BAASA may or may not become law, but it’s nothing more than a lame attempt by RINOs to save their jobs. The lives of the unborn deserve better than this.

Originally posted on The Strident Conservative.

 

David Leach is the owner of The Strident Conservative. His daily radio commentary is nationally syndicated with Salem Radio Network and can be heard on stations across America.

Follow the Strident Conservative on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to receive podcasts of radio commentaries: iTunes | Stitcher | Tune In | RSS

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

The 10 most genocidal leaders in history

Published

on

The 10 most genocidal leaders in history

Here is another list article from John Hawkins Grumpy Sloth website. This piece was written by Deena Lyon, and continues to warn those who love socialism siren song that it shall raise humanity up, and take care of humanity for a very long time.

Trouble is when you take the place of God himself and fear that people will turn on you, what can you do? You must shackle them in fear, up to threating and even carrying out the death sentence. You think big government will take care of the people, but more often than not, it becomes a weapon against the innocent and has murdered millions if not billions and trillions and googols of them. We as humans just never learn that we can’t better than or without God Almighty.

Most of the men listed here (sorry ladies, no devil women here) were leaders from the 20th Century. Only one man listed that took power in the late 19th Century.

Reference

The 10 Most Genocidal Leaders In World History

https://grumpysloth.com/10-genocidal-leaders-world-history/There must be a special place in Hell for the dictators on this list. The majority of them found Communism and/or Socialism to be the ultimate tool in committing mass murder. If you ever wonder how one person can kill millions just remember that government can be the most dangerous instrument known to mankind.

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Personalized Artificial Intelligence: Project Pai hopes to let you do things for yourself without you

Published

on

Personalized Artificial Intelligence Project Pai hopes to let you do things for yourself without you

Imagine having a digital “avatar” that could do things for you. It could interact how you interact, do things on your behalf, and possibly even replace you in certain situations. Sound impossible? It may not be for long.

Project PAI, which stands for Personalized Artificial Intelligence, hopes to build these avatars based upon your online interactions. It utilizes blockchain protocols to power the creation of a “virtual you” that you can unleash on the web and eventually through other venues.

Let’s fast-forward a bit with speculation. Could this ever be used to create an avatar that is so much like you, it replaces you completely? Could it be used to help grieving friends and family once you die? Could it sit in for you in meetings? The potential here is incredible, but it can also be scary. There was an episode of Dark Mirror that took it to the extreme, taking similar concepts and applying them to a synthetic body that replaced  a deceased husband.

Others, as you can watch in the video above, are even more skeptical about the potential this brings.

Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily

Advertisement

Facebook

Twitter

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.