Connect with us

Opinions

Muslim terrorism will never, never end…but I know what’s coming

Published

on

Sunday night (Monday morning, technically) I came home after watching the Houston Astros win Game 5 of the World Series. I live in a gated apartment complex and I pay extra to do so in order to keep riff-raff out. I have a 5 year old son half of the time, who I want protected, and the gates are my first line of defense. There is a strict policy of no tailgating. Each resident is supposed to open the gate on their own and drive through individually. Lately tailgating has become popular and I had had enough that night when a small white car tried to follow me in.

I stopped just inside the gate and waited for the gate to close. This guy (or girl for all I knew at this point) decided to follow close enough to keep the gate from closing. You can debate the merits of my next actions until you’re blue in the face but I got out of my truck and shouted for the other driver to back off and open the gate on their own.

It turned out to be a man in his early 20,s of Middle Eastern origin, with a thick accent; from his clothing and speech almost certainly a Muslim. Now, as anyone who has read my work for any length of time knows, I’m a veteran of Afghanistan, and in my position I have seen some of the most horrific things imaginable at the hands of Muslims, even ones that were supposedly our friends. This has caused me to suffer from PTSD so badly that it cost me jobs, my marriage, and other relationships.

Encountering Middle Eastern people is nothing new in my part of town. They’re at the grocery store in mobs practically, dressed as if they still live wherever they came from. It doesn’t always cause an anxiety attack, but occasionally it does, and when this young man became belligerent I immediately went from mildly annoyed to full-blown Red Alert.

The encounter ended without a physical confrontation as I decided to be the bigger man and retreat. I settled upon contacting management the next day. I spent the entire night awake and ended up not going to work the next day. On Tuesday when I did get to the office I was shaking so badly my boss sent me home after half a day.

Of course, just a few hours later our nation suffered the latest attack by an Islamic militant. And that, dear readers, is why even after all this time I sometimes go to Red Alert when I encounter them.

Question time

Now, is EVERY Muslim that is here a terrorist? No.

But riddle me this: how do you tell the good ones from the bad? It’s certainly not by assimilation. Too many still wear desert garb. We’re not in a desert here. You’re not in your homeland. You left for a reason. Why are you still acting like you are?

Now, let me address the various liberal bleeding heart (and I include here the ridiculous self-righteous libertarian and neocon) arguments right away.

1) Not all Muslims are terrorists.

A: So I’ve already said. But if I handed you 10 Reese’s Pieces and told you 1 was poisoned, how many would you eat?

2) What about the Las Vegas shooter?

A: What about him? We still don’t have a clear motive and ISIS has claimed repeatedly he worked for them. Plus, the idea that we have our own killers here, so we should also let foreign killers in is patently insane.

3) (Insert various racism/Islamophobia crap here because you have no cogent argument.)

A) (Insert something my editor would probably rather I not say.)

The common thread

The fact is: There are many violent attacks in this country that have a common thread. San Bernardino. Orlando. 9-11. Many others. One common thread: Islam.

No, I didn’t say “radical Islam.” I don’t use that phrase. “Radical Islam” is a politically correct phrase designed by liberals so as not to seem “bigoted.”

Here’s my take on any religion: You now tell how devout a member of a religion is by how closely its followers mimic the founder of the religion. Buddhists to Buddha, Christians to Jesus, Muslims to Mohammed.

As a Christian I struggle every day. I WISH most days I was half as much like Christ as ISIS is to Mohammed.

You read that right. ISIS are the ones who imitate Mohammed most closely. They rape. They murder those who aren’t not Muslim, or not Muslim enough. They commit pedophilia. They practice slavery. They conquer. They infiltrate other countries as harmless “refugees” looking for handouts and then gather strength until they can take over. All is in accordance with the practices of Mohammed.

I don’t say things like “believe me” or “let me be clear” or “don’t doubt me.” Do research, REALLY research Mohammed if I don’t believe me. For Christians I highly recommend a book from former PLO terrorist-turned-Christian Walid Shoebat called “God’s War on Terror.” When you read it, keep in mind it was written more than 10 years ago. You’ll be amazed how many predictions in it have already come true.

**Spoiler Alert: Don’t read further if you don’t want to know Mr. Shoebat’s conclusion**

How it ends

The End Times story in the Bible and in Islamic teaching is remarkably similar. Their hero, the 12th Imam or “Mahdi” appears in the Bible as well, just under a different name. We call him the Antichrist.

The Ayatollah is telling his people that the Mahdi is among us now, and he will reveal himself when enough death and destruction has been committed. It doesn’t matter whether or not you believe this to be true. THEY believe it to be true. And this is why Muslims will never, NEVER stop trying to kill us and create mayhem.

“Radical” Muslims try to kill others now. “Moderate” Muslims believe the time to kill Infidels has not yet come, according to Mr. Shoebat. The moderates simply lie and gain entry to our nations to prepare for the day they DO need to attack.

Sorry Mr. President, “extreme vetting” won’t do. Keep them out. I have no illusions that it will stop it forever. God’s ultimate will is unstoppable. But maybe give us some more time to prepare?

And no, liberals, I don’t care what names you call me. I know the truth. You will too some day. THAT you can take to the bank. My PTSD isn’t only POST traumatic stress, but PRE traumatic stress. I know what’s coming. The signs are all there for those wise enough to see it. I don’t fear the eventual outcome. God has that in control. But even Jesus wept on the eve of his pain and suffering, as do I.

Benjamin Wilhelm served as a commissioned officer in the United States military for 10 years, serving one combat tour in Afghanistan. He is a recipient of the Bronze Star and Combat Action Badge among other military awards. Ben has worked in a variety of private sector businesses both large and small. He is a former military and civilian firearms instructor and an advocate for veterans issues. Ben is a strict Constitutionalist who sees the Federal government as an out of control leviathan, and the federal debt as a burden that will break the country. Ben is a divorced father of two boys.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions

It isn’t Never-Trump or Always-Trump destroying conservatism, it’s Sometimes-Trump

Published

on

One of the craziest—or should I say laziest—accusations leveled against me by Trump’s die-hard loyalists whenever I dare to call him out for breaking a campaign promise, getting caught in a lie, or promoting unconstitutional non-conservative ideas, is that I’m a liberal. Sometimes, they go so far as to accuse me of working for George Soros.

As I’ve said many times in response, I don’t work for Mr. Soros, but since money’s been a little tight at the Strident Conservative lately, if anyone has his number, I’d appreciate it if you’d send it my way.

It’s a sad reality that these pathetic taunts are what passes for political discourse in the Age of Trump. Gone are the days when differences could be civilly discussed based on facts instead of emotion.

Another sad reality of this behavior is that it’s a sign that the end of conservatism is near, as Trump’s small army of loyal followers attempt to rebrand conservatism by spreading the lie that he is a conservative and, using binary logic, accusing anyone who opposes him of being a liberal.

This rebranding effort has had an impact. Last week, RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel warned Republican hopefuls that anyone who opposed Trump’s agenda would be “making a mistake.”

McDaniel’s threat was issued following the GOP primary defeat in South Carolina by conservative Mark Sanford after he was personally targeted by Trump himself. Sanford’s crime? Disloyalty to the NY Liberal.

Another source of damage to conservatism has come from evangelicals and the so-called conservative media. In the name of self-preservation, they choose to surrender their principles by promoting the lie that Trump is a conservative. Some of these voices have taken to labelling conservatives who oppose Trump as Never-Trump conservatives, or worse, branding them as liberals and/or Democrats, as was recently written in a piece at TheFederalist.com:

“Trump may be an unattractive and deeply flawed messenger for contemporary conservatism. But loathe though they might be to admit it, what’s left of the Never-Trump movement needs to come to grips with the fact that the only words that currently describe them are liberals and Democrats.”

Then there are those who have adopted a Sometimes-Trump attitude about the president, where everything Trump does is measured using a good Trump/bad Trump barometer. While it has become fashionable for Sometimes-Trump conservatives to stand on their soap boxes condemning both Never-Trump conservatives and Always-Trump faux conservatives, I believe that this politically bipolar approach to Trump is the greatest threat of all to Constitutional conservatism in America.

Sometimes-Trump conservatives have accepted the lie that it’s okay to do a little evil in exchange for a greater good. Though they may fly a conservative banner, their lukewarm attitude about Trump is much like the attitude we see in the Laodicean church mentioned in the Book of Revelations (3:15-16).

“I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.”

Trump is a double-minded man unstable in all his ways (James 1:8). When lukewarm Sometimes-Trump conservatives choose to overlook this reality, they end up watering-down conservatism to the point that it has no value or power to change America’s course.

As lukewarm Sometimes-Trump conservatives point to the Always-Trump and Never-Trump factions as the reason for today’s conservative divide, remember that it’s the unenthusiastic, noncommittal, indifferent, half-hearted, apathetic, uninterested, unconcerned, lackadaisical, passionless, laid back, couldn’t-care-less conservative imposters in the middle who are really responsible.

Originally posted on The Strident Conservative.

 


David Leach is the owner of The Strident Conservative. His daily radio commentary is distributed by the Salem Radio Network and is heard on stations across America.

Follow the Strident Conservative on Twitter and FacebookSubscribe to receive podcasts of radio commentaries: iTunes | Stitcher | Tune In | RSS

Continue Reading

Opinions

Conservative Picks for the Nevada Primary

Published

on

Nevada is full of competition. There are no shortage of quality candidates in Nevada, only quality politicians. Nevada isn’t a strong blue state or red state. It usually sides with the winner in a presidential election. In fact, given Trump’s upset, it was surprising Nevada wasn’t one of the states where polling was wholly inaccurate. Nevada is home of Las Vegas, the country’s fastest growing metropolitan area. So the future political leanings of the state are up in the air. This primary features vacancies which offer a nice opportunity to grow conservative ideals among the population.

Best Picks: Danny Tarkanian, Joel Beck
Worst Picks: Mark Amodei, Cresent Hardy
Best Race: District 3
Worst Race: District 4

US Senate

Dean Heller is an incumbent Republican and in all likelihood will keep his nomination. Heller is running on a rather unimpressive Senate record showing that he is part of the problem, not the solution. There are four challengers but only a few are worth talking about. The first is Sarah Gazala. She is somewhat running as a conservative, but her emphasis on education shows that she isn’t the right fit for the Senate. A local office would be a better calling. Then there’s Vic Harrell. The only discernible fact about Harrell is his devotion to Trump. This zeal isn’t wrong but it doesn’t make him a good candidate. The strongest challenger is Tom Heck. Heck ran and lost in 2016 in a tight race. It’s very possible Heck could maintain the seat, and probable that he would do a superior job.

Conservative Pick: Tom Heck

District 1

Two challengers seek to red pill this district. The first, Joyce Bentley, has a decent platform and is like to side with Trump on several key issues. The issue is whether she will deviate when necessary. The second is Freddy Horne. He is likely the more viable candidate here having a history of running a campaign, but its a moot point in this district.

Conservative Pick: Joyce Bentley

District 2

Mark Amodei has held the seat for a while and is a RINO. He faces three challengers. Sharron Angel is the first. She was a failed Senate candidate in 2016 losing to Heck. She seems as though a strong Conservative. But she may be a weak candidate. Joel Beck is a veteran running on a solid small government platform. He has a more thorough understanding of veterans issues and immigration than most. Beck would be an outstanding defender of the Constitution.

Conservative Pick: Joel Beck

District 3

This vacated seat has caused a feeding frenzy of an election. but this race is between Scott Hammond and Danny Tarkanian. Hammond is a State Senator with a decent record and the backing of the NRA. But from this article which he promoted, he doesn’t seem to be a strong defender of liberty, though its hard to get a clear picture with the bias writing. In a rare instance of strategic planning by the Trump administration with regards to the 2018 race, Team Trump convinced Tarkanian to seek the House as opposed to the Senate. Danny Tarkanian, being a team player, obliged. Nothing wrong with that. Playing along earned him a Trump endorsement. And while Heller gets by with one less challenger from the right, Tarkanian has a better chance at reducing government spending as he campaigns heavily on. Overall, Tarkanian may be a sycophant, but Hammond is more likely a RINO climbing the ladder.

Conservative Pick: Danny Tarkanian

District 4

Congressman Ruben Kihuen will not seek reelection as the result of a sexual harassment scandal. This presents a golden opportunity to flip this blue seat. Many Republicans have entered but there is no clear frontrunner. First up is Jeff Miller. He’s running to prevent Nevada from becoming East California. With all the candidates, the Las Vegas Review-Journal made this one easy. The former Congressman refused to answer. If Cresent Hardy believes he’s too big to answer yes or no questions, he probably thinks he’s too good to talk to his constituents. The only thing that is concerning is the question on DACA recipients.

Conservative Pick: Jeff Miller

Continue Reading

Opinions

Conservative Picks in the South Carolina Primary

Published

on

South Carolina is one of the nation strongest overall states for Conservatism. Out of nine representatives, eight of which Republican, only two are complete RINOs (Joe Wilson and Lindsey Graham). Conservatism is strong in South Carolina just as it is in North Carolina. This primary presents a good opportunity to maintain and grow. Trey Gowdy is exiting, presenting a good chance for an upgrade at the position. Since the GOP took the Whitehouse, Gowdy stopped being fiscally Conservative, and is an unfortunate voice of support for the expensive Mueller investigation.

Best Pick: Mark Sanford
Worst Pick: Katie Arrington
Best Race: District 4
Worst Race: District 7

District 1

After five years, Mark Sanford has been a solid Conservative. He is being challenged. His main opponent is Katie Arrington. Arrington is a full blown Trumpist. If she had a shred of Conservatism in her she would be satisfied with the performance of Sanford. But instead she is challenging him because he, like most decent Conservatives, has been reasonably critical of Trump. Arrington’s fanaticism is not worth the risk of losing Sanford.

Conservative Pick: Mark Sanford

District 2

Joe Wilson is an unchallenged product of the swamp. He is running to complete his second decade.

District 3

Jeff Duncan is a steadfast Conservative who didn’t compromise under Obama and has remained strong under Trump. He is unchallenged.

District 4

There are numerous candidates seeking to fill Trey Gowdy’s shoes. The first of which was written about back in February, Mark Burns. I had a lot to say about Trump’s top pastor:

I remain optimistic about Mark Burns joining the ranks of Congress. Previously, Burns announced he was praying about challenging Lindsey Graham, a notorious warmongering RINO. But it appears either prayer or opportunism has landed him in a different race. Due to his political amateurism, not many of his positions are clear. Oddly enough, he has suggested Federal takeover of public school security. Though his heart seems in the right place, his position shows a lack of localism which small government believes in. It’s safe to speculate that Mark Burns isn’t all that fiscal conservative which isn’t unfamiliar.

On social issues, however, Pastor Mark Burns could be a strong tool for conservatives, so long as he can graduate from being a Trump surrogate. Burns has a more unifying persona than a lot of Republicans adding the possibility of broadening the base. On the issues of race and abortion, Pastor Mark Burns is a powerful voice. Though a strong personality does not make one the best candidate, Burn has tremendous potential to make a difference in DC.

Another formidable candidate is Lee Bright. He has the backing of Steve King (IA) and Thomas Massie (KY). Massie is a strong Conservative so this endorsement means something. Bright’s political career was put on hold when he got primaried in 2016. To be frank, he got voted out probably for being a nutjob. This guy is all rhetoric and no substance. He will maybe vote the right way, but he is not a leader on Conservative legislation. Furthermore he is a weaker candidate due to his propensity to act a fool. Bright isn’t likable but he at the end of the day, he wouldn’t be a RINO.

Then there’s William Timmons. He has the endorsement of Marco Rubio which indicate that he is the RINO in this race. Timmons campaigns on fiscal responsibility but champions Trump for it who has not been fiscally responsible this year. Either he’s pandering or misinformed. Either way, it’s an indication he will e a big spender. His attack ads on Dan Hamilton are baseless, though he is likely correct that Hamilton is not that Conservative. But Timmons record isn’t Conservative either.

Conservative Pick: Mark Burns

District 5

Ralph Norman is unopposed. He’s actually been solid in his brief tenure.

District 6

Gerhard Gressmann is the only Republican running.

District 7

Tom Rice has been a halfway decent Congressman but not without fault. He is being challenged by Larry Guy Hammond. Hammond is running from the right but not with a level head. Tom Rice isn’t fantastic, but populism won’t do the job better. And Hammond is more populist than Conservative. His website offers no real solutions. It merely trashes the state and asks for money.

Conservative Pick: Tom Rice

Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily

Advertisement

Facebook

Twitter

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.