Connect with us

Opinions

Susan Rice leaked Russian Facebook ads to cover her own sins

Published

on

For days now, I’ve seen numerous headlines, especially from the Washington Post, on how Barack Obama advised Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg about, foreign infiltration of Facebook and disinformation campaigns. They claim that Obama was warning Zuckerberg about fake news when they met in Lima, Peru following the 2016 election. What a load of propaganda. So, all of a sudden Obama is the hero who rides in and rescues and warns Zuckerberg of the evils of Russia? I’m not buying it. Not even a little bit.

Background

This story is just full of fake news itself. The original tale related how Obama confronted Zuckerberg about Russia, but that was debunked. Both Fox News and Axios reported that was a lie. Obama didn’t even bring up Russia or fake news in general.

In reality, Facebook has seized this opportunity to crack down on what they call “fake news.” Utilizing the Russian fake news ads on Facebook as a strawman to crack down on conservative sites. Facebook’s logic seems to be that Russia is controlling politics and spreading fake news in union with conservative sites. Thus, Facebook’s elaborate excuse and convenient lie to censor conservative media.

But why all this now? The Washington Post is notorious for propaganda, but why this and Obama now?

Erick Erickson at The Resurgent has a source that tells him that Susan Rice accompanied Obama into that meeting with Zuckerberg. I read a lot of sources on the web, but one of the ones I trust the most and have never been disappointed by is Erick Erickson. In fact, he’s been right when I’ve been wrong a number of times, so this caught my attention.

Susan Rice and Samantha Power are both in the hot seat currently for unmasking hundreds of individuals having to do with the Trump campaign and Russian connections – which at the very least was unethical and could very well be illegal. What does a corrupt Marxist do when backed into a corner? Well, they throw someone under the bus. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if Susan Rice and Team Obama threw Zuckerberg under the bus to save their own hides.


Perspectives

Exclusive: Sources Say Susan Rice Leaked Against Facebook To Cover Her Own Russia Sins | Erick Erickson, The Resurgent

http://theresurgent.com/exclusive-sources-say-susan-rice-leaked-against-facebook-to-cover-her-own-russia-sins/Well a source tells me that when the conversation took place the person who accompanied Obama in this meeting was none other than Susan Rice.

The Obama Administration alums and Clinton campaign are obsessed with Russia and how they claim they stole the election and need to concoct theories for why Donald Trump is President besides the fact that they were rejected. The latest one is that it must’ve been $100,000 in Facebook ads that did it (a tiny fraction of the billion dollar Democrat ad machine). So Susan Rice and the Obama team point the finger at Zuckerberg to their friends in the Washington Post rather than come to terms with what really happened.

Wait-Susan Rice Leaked The Facebook/Russia Story To Give Obama Some Cover? – Matt Vespa

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/09/28/waitsusan-rice-leaked-the-facebookobama-story-n2387566Folks, there’s a reason why Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) called Susan Rice the “Typhoid Mary” of the Obama administration on foreign policy. Whenever something goes wrong; she’s there. She’s always there.

Axios reported that the paper updated its online version of the story with an editor’s note saying, “This story has been updated with an additional response from Facebook.”

It was updated so much that WaPo pulled the word “Russia” from the headline, changing it to, “Obama tried to give Zuckerberg a wake-up call over fake news on Facebook.”

Embarrassment as Washington Post corrects its ‘scoop’ about Obama, Facebook and Russia | Fox News

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/26/embarrassment-as-washington-post-corrects-its-scoop-about-obama-facebook-and-russia.html“When we updated the story with Facebook’s additional response, we also added the text ‘did not single out Russia specifically’ to foreshadow the Schrage statement, which appears further down in the story. When we added that clause we should have made the attribution clear and we’ve modified the line to do so. Here’s how it now appears: ‘although Facebook representatives say the president did not single out Russia specifically,’” a Washington Post spokeswoman told Fox News.


Analysis

This is old hat for Rice, who made a similar move on Benghazi when they blamed the terrorist attack on a video. That was another lie. I don’t think it’s in these people; to tell the truth. Since everyone is still obsessed with all things Russia and the Left keeps pointing the finger at Trump, they decided to use it to their advantage. Gee, they think just like communists because they are communists. Imagine that. And as I have said many times, there is far more collusion with Russia to be proven on the Left than the Right. That doesn’t mean Trump is clean by any means, but there’s no proof of collusion on his part. With Clinton, you had not only the uranium deal, you had Skolkovo, which should have also landed her in prison.

Facebook took over $100,000 in cash from Russia for political ads. The funny part about that was that Russia took stances on both the left and the right. They even placed ads for Black Lives Matter on Facebook. Their goal was chaos and to sow division. I said at the time of the election that Russia didn’t care who was elected, they had a contingency plan for both and it looks like I was right. Yay me. However, that amount is minuscule compared to what the billions, Democrats spent on ads. All this finger pointing by the left at Facebook is a distraction and deflection on a massive scale.

The reality of the situation is Obama, Clinton, Rice and the whole gang ignored our biggest threats for eight years. What I call the New Axis of Evil: Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. Obama tried to schmooze with Putin, who considered him a weak fool. Putin thought the same thing of Clinton, only she could be bought more easily. Remember the ludicrous ‘reset button,’ which was just embarrassing. Then you have Obama’s treasonous ‘more flexible’ comment to the Russians. They never said a peep about Russia trying to impact our elections during that time. But this isn’t a new thing for the Russians. They have been meddling in our elections for decades. The Cold War never ended; it shifted.

Obama and Rice were repeatedly warned about Russia, specifically in 2014. And they did nothing. Obama was too busy bowing to the Mullahs of Iran to notice. Even as bad as Obama’s national security team was, they had all this intelligence at their fingertips. They already knew the Russians had been probing us and our elections. But they were guilty of dereliction of duty. The Obamas were too busy on vacations and partying with celebrities to care about what the Russians were doing, and our enemies knew it. They did nothing but embolden our enemies, and they let them infiltrate vital areas in our government and across our nation. That’s communist infiltration, and we are living with it now.

Final Thoughts

So, Susan Rice and Barack Obama will blame others as they always do, when it was on their watch that the spies walked through the front door; a door they held open for them. Susan Rice is an enemy within and will do anything to save herself. The Russians are just a means of trying to do so. Meanwhile, the Russians are still at it, and no one is stopping them. The enemies from within and from without are having a field day at our expense.

Terresa Monroe-Hamilton owns and blogs at NoisyRoom.net. She is a Constitutional Conservative and NoisyRoom focuses on political, national and international issues of interest to the American public. Terresa is the editor at Trevor Loudon's site, New Zeal - trevorloudon.com and a writer and editor at Right Wing News. She also does research at KeyWiki.org. You can email Terresa here. NoisyRoom can be found on Facebook and on Twitter.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

Love is not exclusive: An open letter to Matt Walsh

Published

on

Dear Mr. Walsh,

I am a longtime follower of yours, but over the last few months it seems you are spending a lot of time calling out leaders of various faiths for not being Christian enough. Why would you want to alienate others who are also trying to do God’s work of spreading love the way they have interpreted it? The Bible leaves lots of room for interpretation. Was that unintentional? Perhaps there was a purpose for the parables instead of absolute answers.

No two people are going to believe the exact same thing nor hold the exact same approach of what is best to reach people to live an inspired life, even if those two people are reading from the exact same Bible. The important thing is getting others into the boat of doing good, loving all unconditionally, and bringing people together. What good does it do to divide us this way? Most of the time I applaud what you stand for, but I think this is wrong.

There are many different types of Christians with many different messages. But why focus on the differences? Jesus would surely want us to focus on the similarities… to love each other as brothers and sisters as we are, not push those who are slightly different outside of some line you have decided absolutely cannot be crossed.

I admit I know very little about all the different types of Christians that exist and the idiosyncrasies you insist on calling out. But I don’t need to because that’s not important. That line of thinking misses the greater message – that love is more important than our individual sects. We are all in this together. Christians from all walks are spreading their way of understanding the best they know how. They aren’t spreading evil. Anything outside the limits of your defined box doesn’t necessarily make it evil. As long as you are acting as a conduit of unconditional love, you have nothing to fear, ever.

The greatest of these is love. Not faith. That means your faith should never be more important than love

You have lost the purpose of following Christ in the first place. There are moments as a father when my daughter will give an extra piece of candy to her little sister just because she knows it will make her smile. But there are also moments when my daughter knows I’m watching and gives that candy to her sister only because she wants to be recognized as kind. See the difference?

Being a good Christian isn’t the end goal. Being Christian is supposed to be a means to a life of good, love, and worth. Don’t do good just because it keeps you within the Christian box and therefore gets you to Heaven. That is a selfish motivation. Do good for a better reason: Because you have love in your heart. Do good because you love unconditionally, and you truly want to help others be happy. It is the only thing that matters in our time here, and it’s how we grow in spirit. By learning in every action how we can perform that action in a loving way, we challenge ourselves spiritually in every choice we make.

When you are on your deathbed you won’t be thinking of how much money you made or how many people you excluded for being inadequately holy. You will be thinking of the way you treated others, and the litmus test for that judgment is unconditional love. If you are acting in accordance with love for your neighbor, you will be proud of your actions as you lay there reflecting on your life. But if instead you are acting out of fear, those will be the actions that haunt you in your last days.

Love

Love is the means and it is also the ends. It is the lesson and the reward. It is the guide and the destination. We are meant to spread that love where ever and whenever we can, without restrictions. Only then are we truly walking in the light of God.

First Corinthians 13:13 is certainly very cliché, especially at weddings, but it holds an insight that many of us often overlook.

“And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.”

The greatest of these is love. Not faith. That means your faith should never be more important than love… Unconditional love, not just love for your family and friends. Love for all. And not with conditions like, only if he is a Christian, or only if she acts the way I think she should. Unconditionally means as they are. Love him because he is. For if we only love those who love us back, what kind of love is that?

Dan Alexander

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Let’s Just say it: The Left Hates the Culture of Liberty. Part II

Published

on

By

While it hides behind the false label of Liberal, the nation’s Socialist Left continues to expand its assault on Liberty culture.

In Part I we began this discussion on how the Left is coming out of the authoritarian closet displaying their abject revulsion to the Culture of Liberty. In Part II we will detail the major aspects of their assaults on freedom. While it may sound shocking to many, deep down everyone should realise that the Left is becoming increasingly adverse to Liberty. Aside from wanting the freedom to wage the violence of abortion, they have little use for the concept in any other form.

Down through history Leftists have used and then disposed of democratic institutions to obtain power. The Bolsheviks and Nationalsozialistische deutsche Arbeiter-Partei being good examples from the storied past. At present, their favourite tactic involves the use of negatively termed alternative phrases to attack basic Liberties. They use these phrases to suppress these freedoms while maintaining the fiction of being ‘Liberal’.

“Hate Speech” used to attack Free-speech.

Here we see the first of many negatively charged phrases the Left uses to attack freedom of speech. As in most cases the term is undefined, allowing them to expand it to encompass whatever they wish to suppress. As in the other cases, this let’s them pretend to advocate free-speech while working against the concept.

Their recent expansion of assaults against the basic human Liberty of self-preservation has seen them us this convenient expedient to arbitrarily censor speech with regard to this fundamental natural right. Of course, they like to use the excuse that they are private entities unencumbered by 1st amendment issues. But this is a discussion on the Culture of Liberty and as Matt Christiansen pointed out, quite often the cultural value that is changed first, followed by restrictions from the government.

“Fake News” used to attack Freedom of the Press.

This is a new term in the pantheon of Leftist phrases, but once again it’s an undefined term used to go after those they deem to be unworthy of the vaunted title of ‘Journalist’. The national Socialist Media has always been disdainful of those who are not part of their elite cadres. At one point they labelled those outside the industrial media complex as being pajama clad, now they just brand them as being “Fake News”. Certain ‘social media’ sites have begun using this excuse to censor what can be stated on them. To be clear, the issue isn’t the veracity of the content, but it’s political point of view.

“Military Style” used to attack the Commonsense human Right of Self-Defence.

This was one of the first instances where the national Socialist Left developed the idea of assaulting a basic human Liberty an alternative phrase while still pretending to support it. This began with the undefined phrase “Assault Weapon” transitioning into even more nebulous terms such as “Military Style”. As with the other terms these have a twofold purpose – convey a negative feeling over a fundamental right while feigning it’s support.

Having once set the precedent that certain means of self-defence are verboten, it then becomes a simple matter of expanding the reach of these terms to include all firearms. This while Leftists parrot the fiction that they “believe in the 2nd amendment”.

“Background Checks” [ Intergalactic, Enhanced, Universal ] used to also attack Private Property Rights.

First of all, background checks have been in existence for almost 25 years, but one would not know it by the oft repeated talking points of the Left. Their well seasoned unfamiliarity with the facts will see them demand that which already exists. As is the case in other realms, they use their inability to base arguments on facts to their advantage. So when they repeat this demand, people get the impression that background checks are desperately needed.

Or they will use the ever popular tactic of moving the goal posts, demanding that these be even more intrusive in our private lives seizing control of our private property.

The basic premise for these “Intergalactic Background Checks” is that the government somehow has the ‘right’ to control certain items of one’s private property because they are dangerous. Well, there are three glaring issues with this false premise.

  • One is that private property is a foundational element of Liberty, one does not ‘own’ something if they cannot control it, such as in the purchasing or selling of said property. Leftists would love to negate this fundamental freedom with some sort of societal ownership regime as part of their collectivist ideology. “Intergalactic Background Checks” would impose a government edict over everyone’s property that would be greater than one’s ownership of those possessions.
  • Two, since restraint over the government is the fundamental purpose of the 2nd amendment and the Constitution in general, IBC’s would place control of these restraints in the hands of the government. In essence removing any limitations on the government. History is replete with examples of why this is a very bad idea.
  • Third, “Intergalactic Background Checks” would be the first and very critical step towards registration and the inevitable confiscation of guns. For once the government has purview over one’s private possessions, it can easily transition to tracking them in this control regime. History is also replete with the tale of the registration leading to confiscation. Meanwhile the national Socialist Left has made it quite clear this is their ultimate goal.

The Takeaway.

In many ways the Parkland Kids have done everyone a great service in exposing once and for all the Left’s disdain for freedom. Instead the slow creep of the collectivist mindset overtaking the country until it’s too late for anything that can be done, we have been forewarned of the danger. The Parkland Kids and the rest of the Authoritarian Socialist Left will have to be honest for once about their true intentions.

Were they to do so, they would drop the mask and stop hiding behind the Liberal label. They could then try to sell everyone their true socialist national agenda of égalité minus the Liberté or even fraternité.

At least then the people would know what they are getting instead of the farcical Utopian fantasies that have been part and parcel of the Leftist propaganda for centuries now. Were they to win on the basis of said honesty, they would have a mandate to rule over Liberty as they have promised, freedom be damned.

But the past has shown that people never willingly vote for this type of draconian rule. Instead they have to be enticed into enslaving themselves with the false promises of “Free Healthcare”, “Free college” as well as marginal safety from harm for the low-low price of sacrificing their Liberty.

Which is why the Left’s deceit and deception will continue, no matter how it’s been exposed in the past. They will still try to keep up the false pretence of being ‘Liberal’ or in favour of ‘Progress’ and if everyone is informed enough, they will end up on the ash heap of history as is rightfully the fate of all tyrants.

 

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

How do you spend your time?

Published

on

How often do we do things just because we are supposed to? Or go through the same routine over and over again without pausing and asking ourselves if we really enjoy what we are doing. There’s another way.

Do only things that bring you genuine joy. Don’t lie to yourself about this. Be brutal with your honesty here. This is about your own happiness, therefore the only one who can determine if the thing you’re doing is really something you enjoy is you. Maybe you tried surfing or skiing and everyone else raves about how awesome it is, but to you… meh, it didn’t really click that way. You don’t have to pretend. You get to choose what you do or don’t do.

What is genuine joy?

It’s when time flies by and all you felt was pure, never contrived, emotion. You began doing that thing and it’s like you became it. Your hands on the handlebars melded to them. You were in the movie or painting or music, feeling it. Your fingers on the instrument were the instrument. You didn’t spend a second thinking of being elsewhere; you were completely immersed in it. As if your actions were not even done with conscious thought. You’re smiling ear to ear then, and for hours to come. This is fulfillment. This isn’t faux happiness for a Facebook post.

If you’re doing something voluntary, and you don’t really enjoy it (and deep down you really do know) STOP. You don’t have to. Do what you really love. The moment you recognize whatever it is you’re doing isn’t really making you happy, put a stop to it. Stand up and walk away. Do something else and do it for you. No need for Facebook posts, just that legitimate smile and that feeling on the inside.

You have to purge the negatives in your life. No one else knows you like you. So if you don’t fight for your own happiness, who else will?

Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily

Advertisement

Facebook

Twitter

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.